Connect with us

North Dakota

North Dakota lawmakers question bill draft eyeing their property ownership

Published

on

North Dakota lawmakers question bill draft eyeing their property ownership


A number of North Dakota lawmakers have disputed a invoice proposal that will require disclosure of what property they personal and would ban them from voting on funding for state entities leasing house from them.

The Legislature’s interim Authorities Administration Committee took no motion on the invoice draft Monday.

The draft laws would require candidates and appointees to reveal “the placement of actual property during which the person making the assertion, and the person’s partner, have a monetary curiosity, together with actual property owned by a enterprise during which the person making the assertion, and the person’s partner, have a monetary curiosity.”

The invoice draft additionally would ban state lawmakers from voting on funding measures for state entities that lease property during which the legislator has a monetary curiosity.

Advertisement

The proposal additionally would ban state entities from leasing property during which an elected or appointed state official with authority over the entity has a monetary curiosity.

Individuals are additionally studying…

Advertisement

The draft additionally would require state leases and rental agreements to incorporate a listing of all homeowners of the leased property, together with folks with an possession curiosity in a enterprise proudly owning the property.

Lawmakers questioned the idea and scope of the invoice draft, which has no penalty provision.

Rep. Rick Becker, R-Bismarck, introduced the examine proposal final 12 months for lawmakers to overview state-leased property and take into account whether or not any restrictions or prohibitions must be imposed regarding state-leased property owned by statewide elected or appointed officers or lawmakers.






Advertisement

Roers Jones



Advertisement








Dan Ruby

Ruby



Advertisement


Rep. Shannon Roers Jones, R-Fargo, throughout dialogue Monday stated “the aim for the invoice is sensible.” 

“The invoice draft appears cheap to me in the truth that if we’re as a state spending our taxpayer sources to lease property from non-public entities, we must always know if any of the homeowners of these entities are those who’re voting to approve the leases,” she stated.

Rep. Dan Ruby, R-Minot, stated the proposal would single out sure folks, “which I feel is fallacious.” 

“Give me a little bit extra time, I will poke extra holes in it, however I do not suppose that is wanted, and I am not going to help it,” he stated.

Rep. Dan Ruby, R-Minot, opposes a invoice draft proscribing state lawmakers who’re lessors to state entities.

Advertisement






Klemin

Advertisement

Klemin










Burckhard

Advertisement

Burckhard




Rep. Larry Klemin, R-Bismarck, questioned about being required to reveal non-public houses and farm land and stated the invoice draft “goes a bit too far in it isn’t precisely germane to the priority.”

Lawmakers identified their legislative guidelines for members to declare potential conflicts of curiosity so their chamber can decide whether or not they can vote on a invoice.

Advertisement

Committee chairman Sen. Randy Burckhard, R-Minot, quipped, “It would not sound like there’s going to be plenty of help for this invoice draft.” 

The proposal may resurface in a future assembly of the panel, which requested the invoice draft final fall as a part of the examine, however the draft would nonetheless need to undergo the Legislature subsequent 12 months.

The panel additionally reviewed a listing of state company house wants and leases, together with lessors, although “sure LLCs and different companies both didn’t present or outright refused to supply the names of their homeowners,” Legislative Council Senior Fiscal Analyst Alex Cronquist advised the committee.

The checklist contains no less than two state lawmakers who’re lessors to state companies. 

Attain Jack Dura at 701-250-8225 or jack.dura@bismarcktribune.com.

Advertisement



Source link

North Dakota

North Dakota Badlands national monument proposed with tribes’ support

Published

on

North Dakota Badlands national monument proposed with tribes’ support


A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The U.S. Forest Service would manage the proposed monument. The National Park Service oversees many national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Trump’s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

Advertisement

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Port: Make families great again

Published

on

Port: Make families great again


MINOT — Gov.-elect Kelly Armstrong is roaring into office with some political capital to spend. I have some ideas for how to spend it during next year’s legislative session.

It’s a three-pronged plan focused on children. I’m calling it “Make Families Great Again.” I’m no marketing genius, but I have been a dad for 24 years. There are some things the state could do to help.

The first is school lunches. The state should pay for them. The Legislature had a rollicking debate about this during the 2023 session. The opponents, who liken this to a handout, largely won the debate. Armstrong could put some muscle behind a new initiative to have the state take over payments. The social media gadflies might not like it, but it would prove deeply popular with the general public, especially if we neutralize the “handout” argument by reframing the debate.

North Dakota families are obligated to send their children to school. The kids have to eat. The lunch bills add up. I have two kids in public school. In the 2023-2024 school year, I paid $1,501.65 for lunches. That’s more than I pay in income taxes.

Advertisement

How much would it cost? In the 2023 session,

House Bill 1491

would have appropriated $89.5 million to cover the cost. The price tag would likely be similar now, but don’t consider it an expense so much as putting nearly $90 million back in the pockets of families with school-age children. A demographic that, thanks to inflation and other factors, could use some help.

Speaking of helping, the second plank of this plan is child care. This burgeoning cost is not just a millstone around young families’ necks but also hurts our state’s economy. We have a chronic workforce shortage, yet many North Dakotans are held out of the workforce because they either cannot find child care or because the care available is prohibitively expensive.

State leaders haven’t exactly been sitting on their hands. During the 2023 session, Gov. Doug Burgum signed

Advertisement

a $66 million child care package

focusing on assistance and incentives. We should do something bolder.

Maybe a direct tax credit to cover at least some of the expenses?

The last plank is getting vaccination rates back on track.

According to data from the state Department of Health,

Advertisement

the kindergarten-age vaccination rate for chicken pox declined 3.76% from the 2019-2020 school year. The rate for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is down 3.72%, polio vaccines 3.54%, hepatitis B vaccines 2.27%, and the vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis 3.91%.

Meanwhile, personal and religious exemptions for kindergarten students have risen by nearly 69%.

This may be politically risky for Armstrong. Anti-vaxx crankery is on the rise among Republicans, but, again, Armstrong has some political capital to spend. This would be a helpful place for it. A campaign to turn vaccine rates around would help protect the kids from diseases that haven’t been a concern in generations. It would help address workforce needs as well.

When a sick kid can’t go to school or day care, parents can’t go to work.

These ideas are practical and bold and would do a great deal to help North Dakota families.

Advertisement
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN

Published

on

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN


LOS ANGELES — — Treysen Eaglestaff had 23 points in North Dakota’s 77-73 win over Loyola Marymount on Friday night.

Eaglestaff also contributed five rebounds for the Fightin’ Hawks (3-2). Mier Panoam scored 16 points and added seven rebounds. Dariyus Woodson had 12 points.

The Lions (1-3) were led in scoring by Caleb Stone-Carrawell with 17 points. Alex Merkviladze added 16 points, eight rebounds, four assists and two steals. Will Johnston had 15 points and four assists.

North Dakota went into the half ahead of Loyola Marymount 36-32. Eaglestaff led North Dakota with 12 second-half points.

Advertisement

——

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending