Nebraska
Isaac Gifford returns to Nebraska with a ‘purpose’ to motivate and to win
LINCOLN, Neb. — Isaac Gifford is big on action. No amount of talk replaces work or preparation.
But he’s also a believer in using his voice to impact change.
“You speak it into existence,” Gifford said of Nebraska’s defensive focus on creating more turnovers in 2024.
Gifford is a senior safety who recorded a team-high 86 tackles last year for a defense that ranked seventh nationally in yards allowed per play. He has started 22 games the past two seasons and chose to return in 2024 for a bonus fifth year of eligibility because he felt, deep within himself, his job in Lincoln was not finished.
Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.
Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.
Sign Up
He enters this season as a model for teammates young and old.
“He’s someone I want to be as a leader,” linebacker MJ Sherman said. “He’s someone I admire, his work ethic, how he plays, how he talks, how he thinks.”
Nebraska returns several leaders who could have left to make a run at the NFL — offensive linemen Ben Scott and Bryce Benhart, cornerback Tommi Hill, defensive linemen Ty Robinson and Nash Hutmacher.
Isaac Gifford (No. 2) had 86 tackles last year. (Dylan Widger / USA Today)
Gifford stands out among even that elite group as the one player on the roster driven most strongly by motivational forces unique to Nebraska.
“Giff motivates me,” safety DeShon Singleton said. “He plays like everything is on the line for him. He literally bleeds red and white right now. He’s a Husker through and through.”
Late this summer after the Huskers completed a grueling session of stadium stairs, strength coach Corey Campbell called on Gifford to address the team.
Cameras captured the moment for Nebraska’s documentary series, “Chasing 3.” It’s featured in the episode that premiered at the start of preseason practice last month.
Campbell said he and Gifford talked previously about purpose. “I just want you to tell the group about your purpose,” Campbell told Gifford, “why you’re here.”
Gifford reminded the Huskers that his brother, Tennessee Titans linebacker Luke Gifford, played at Nebraska. Isaac grew up watching Luke, whose senior season in 2018 coincided with the first year for former coach Scott Frost.
A group of players on that team “created a foundation,” Gifford said, as Nebraska shrugged off a slow start under Frost and won four of its final six amid tight defeats against Iowa and Ohio State. With Luke and the other foundational leaders gone a year later, the Huskers lost big against those same Buckeyes as part of five defeats in six midseason games.
The bad stretch sunk Nebraska’s season. Frost’s program never recovered.
Last year, Gifford said, a core group of veteran players built a similar foundation in coach Matt Rhule’s first season. When Gifford faced a choice about his future, he picked the option that Luke didn’t have — to come back.
Gifford had watched Nebraska in 2019, his senior season at Lincoln Southeast High School, and he saw the leadership structure crumble.
“I wasn’t doing that,” Gifford told the team. “I see a foundation, and I knew that if we got this s— right, we’re gonna f—ing win. So I didn’t come back to f—ing lose. At all. That is not my mindset. I don’t care how many times I puke on the goddamn stairs, I’ll do it again, cause I’m not losing this year. And I’m not going to watch it go to s—.
“So that’s my purpose, and that’s why I’m here.”
In the middle of this summer, Gifford and the Nebraska defensive backs learned that Evan Cooper, the secondary coach who directed them last season and recruited more than half of the players who play at a young position group, was leaving.
The timing stunk. News broke July 5 of Cooper’s exit and one day later that Rhule was set to hire John Butler, a successful assistant who left the Buffalo Bills as secondary coach this year.
Gifford and some of the older defensive backs got together and talked about their situation.
“You’ve just gotta go on,” he said. “There’s a lot of young guys recruited by coach Cooper. But they’ve stuck with us. They’re putting their heads down and grinding.”
Butler showed up later in July, his attitude toward football on display from the start. Butler said this week that he’s yet to acquire a car or a house in Lincoln.
“I’m not worried about the car,” he said. “I’m not worried about where I’m going to live.”
He’s worried about getting to know his players. And not just their strengths on the field. He can see that from game and practice film. Butler wanted to learn about the people with whom he was set to work during the next several months in tense times. He gravitated to Gifford.
Butler coached as a graduate assistant at Texas with the 1998 team that snapped the Huskers’ 47-game home winning streak. The coach came to Lincoln and lost as the Penn State linebackers coach in 2012.
He had a picture in his mind of the ideal Nebraska player.
“Giff basically fits that mold,” Butler said. “That’s the expectation when you walk in the door. And then you get it, and you’re like, ‘This dude’s a Cornhusker.’”
In his players, Butler said he’s looking for leaders who do more than make themselves better.
“Leaders by example are good,” the coach said. “But leaders that have the DNA inside of them to really bring people with them (that’s when you’ve got something).”
Gifford took note immediately of Butler’s style.
“We’re going to get along just fine,” Gifford said.
GO DEEPER
Projecting Nebraska’s 120-player roster: WRs improve, O-line lacks depth
For Gifford, the countdown to this final season in Lincoln began long before Luke put on a Nebraska jersey in 2014.
Gifford, 23, came of age as a Nebraska fan around the time Lavonte David recorded a program-record 152 tackles in 2010 and earned first-team All-America honors in 2011. Gifford studied David before he got to Lincoln Southeast, the high school program that produced Barrett Ruud, the Huskers’ all-time leading tackler and former linebackers coach.
Frank Solich coached at Southeast. Its athletic hall of fame is something of a shrine to the Huskers. Gifford can add to his legacy among the greats by driving a turnaround at Nebraska after seven consecutive losing seasons.
“The only way I can say it is, Giff’s impact on the defense is major,” Sherman said. “He’s the guy who’s always right on time with things. He knows his assignment. He knows how to execute. And that’s the standard.”
Gifford did plenty for the Blackshirts last year. His eight pass breakups ranked second on the team to Hill’s. Gifford’s 6.5 tackles for loss established a career high.
His aim? To do more this year. Nebraska generated just 14 turnovers on defense in 2023 to rank 106th nationally.
Whatever is needed to elevate that figure in this second season under defensive coordinator Tony White — if Gifford has to talk change into existence — he said he’s ready.
“My main goal since I’ve been here is to get Nebraska back to the place where everybody respected them,” he said. “That’s ultimately my goal. That’s what we’re going to get done.”
(Top photo: Michael Reaves / Getty Images)
Nebraska
Nebraska’s governor doesn’t carry a state-issued phone. Critics call it an abuse of state disclosure laws. – Flatwater Free Press
For more than two years, Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen did not make or take a single call on his cellphone while on the clock as the state’s chief executive — at least none that there is any record of, according to his office’s top attorney.
After the Flatwater Free Press filed a public records request for call logs from Pillen’s cellphone dating back to September 2023, the governor’s general counsel said no such records exist.
“Governor Pillen does not have a state-issued mobile phone,” the lawyer, Michael J. Donley, said in an email earlier this month — more than four months after Flatwater filed the request.
The revelation marks Pillen’s latest step to shield his communications from public view. He broke with more than 30 years of gubernatorial practice by not releasing a public schedule in March 2023, just two months into his first term. And in August of that year, his office refused to release four of his emails in response to a public records request, citing “executive privilege” — a justification that does not exist in Nebraska’s public records laws.
“I don’t email, I don’t text,” the first-term Republican governor said in response to criticism from Democratic lawmakers over his refusal to release the emails. “Texting when it’s for anything other than logistics, I don’t do.”
His decision not to carry a state-owned cellphone makes him the first governor in at least 20 years not to do so — and, advocates say, amounts to an attempt to circumvent state law.
“It’s absurd to think that simply moving his business to a private cellphone means that none of those records are available to the public,” said Gavin Geis, the director of Common Cause Nebraska, a transparency-in-government watchdog group. “That’s just an abuse of the whole public records process.”
Flatwater sought the records after the online news outlet the Nebraska Examiner reported in January that Pillen had steered the Nebraska Department of Economic Development to award a $2.5 million no-bid emergency contract to a lobbyist who had joined Pillen on state trips to South Korea and Japan.
Flatwater also requested emails between Pillen’s chief of staff, Dave Lopez, and former state economic development officials, including one who told the Examiner that Lopez had provided input on the state’s contract with Julie Bushell, the lobbyist. That portion of Flatwater’s request, which covered an 11-day period last July, also yielded no records, according to the Governor’s Office.
Under Nebraska law, “all records and documents, regardless of physical form, of or belonging to this state” or local governments are a matter of public record — meaning Nebraskans have the right to examine them, with exceptions allowed for investigative police records, personal information, trade secrets and a host of other sensitive documents. The law does not explicitly say whether records from public officials’ personal devices or private email accounts are subject to the law, but prior attorneys general have held for decades that they are.
Pillen’s office repeatedly claimed that Flatwater’s request sought “a record which does not exist” but declined to elaborate. Laura Strimple, a spokeswoman for the governor, said Pillen’s office “is transparent, follows the law, and has diligently responded to the countless public records requests we receive, including several from your outlet.”
“If you choose to publish this non-story, your outlet will have demonstrated once again that it is more interested in political hits and sensationalism than news that matters to hardworking Nebraskans,” Strimple said in an email.
She did not respond to follow-up questions about whether the governor has ever used his phone for state business and whether his office would consider those calls a matter of public record.
Full statement from Gov. Pillen’s spokesperson
After Pillen’s general counsel said records of the governor’s cellphone calls don’t exist, Flatwater sought to understand whether Pillen’s office believes that records of public business stored on private devices are not a matter of public record, an interpretation breaking with decades of precedence. The attorney, Michael J. Donley, said his initial claim “was more limited than how (Flatwater) characterized it,” but did not respond to follow-up questions seeking clarification.
In response to more emails seeking clarity, Pillen’s spokeswoman, Laura Strimple, said:
“If you want a response beyond what we have already told you, then you’ll print in full that:
- Governor Pillen’s administration is transparent, follows the law, and has diligently responded to the countless public records requests we receive, including several from your outlet.
- As we have repeatedly informed you, your public records request asked for a record which does not exist. We have fulfilled the parameters of your request with that answer.
- If you choose to publish this non-story, your outlet will have demonstrated once again that it is more interested in political hits and sensationalism than news that matters to hardworking Nebraskans.”
State law also requires Pillen’s office to maintain a file of all letters it sends denying records requests, and for that file to be made available to any person on request. Donley did not respond to multiple Flatwater requests to review the file, in conflict with the law.
Reporters often use the state’s public records law to find out who government officials are communicating with via phone, email and text.
In 2013, the Omaha World-Herald used call logs obtained under the law to reveal Nebraska’s then-lieutenant governor, Rick Sheehy, had made 2,300 phone calls on his state-issued phone to four women other than his wife, one of whom told the paper she had a four-year affair with Sheehy. He resigned a day after The World-Herald contacted him about its findings.
Such probes have historically not been limited to communications stored on state-owned devices.
In 1997, then-Attorney General Don Stenberg issued an opinion declaring that “public records need not be in the physical possession of an agency to be subject to disclosure under state records acts.”
Lawyers in then-Attorney General Jon Bruning’s office cited Stenberg’s opinion in 2012 when the office determined that members of the Gage County Board of Supervisors were obliged to turn over emails from their private accounts in response to a request from the Beatrice Daily Sun, which sought emails between the board and the county’s medical director, who had resigned.
In 2015, lawyers in then-Attorney General Doug Peterson’s office directed Omaha Mayor Jean Stothert, a Republican, to turn over texts she had sent on her personal phone to City Council members. “It seems to us that the records at issue here are those pertaining solely to the City’s business,” Peterson’s office wrote. “There is no right of privacy for matters that are not private.”
The Nebraska Association of County Officials, a nonprofit that serves and lobbies for all 93 of the state’s counties, tells its members the same. A presentation from the organization’s 2025 annual conference warned that text messages dealing with the public’s business “will be considered a public record.”
A spokeswoman for Mike Hilgers, Nebraska’s current attorney general, declined to say how he advises state agencies on public records stored on private devices. Neither Bruning nor Peterson, both Republicans, returned phone calls seeking comment.
Max Kautsch, a Kansas-based First Amendment rights and open government attorney who also practices law in Nebraska, said Pillen “is gambling that there will be no political consequence from narrowly construing the law.”
“In Nebraska, there is a collective hunch that public officials cannot conduct the public’s business on private devices,” he said. “But the governor wants to push back on what the consensus is on the law. The Legislature should make his obligation clear.”
Courts and attorneys general in other states have largely agreed. A 2014 study from Oklahoma State University found that courts and attorneys general in 18 states had addressed access to public records on private devices. In 15 of those states, authorities held that such records were open to public inspection.
That interpretation isn’t universal. Kentucky’s Supreme Court recently zagged, ruling 4-2 in April that public officials don’t have to disclose records of government business conducted on their private phones.
David Cuillier, director of the Joseph L. Brechner Freedom of Information Project at the University of Florida, called the Kentucky case “an outlier,” not the start of a trend. “At least I hope not — because it’s ludicrous to say that government employees and officials can do government business secretly just by using their own laptop or cellphone or Gmail or Yahoo account,” he said. “That defeats the whole purpose of public records laws.”
In Nebraska, Pillen’s decision to eschew a state-issued phone marks a break with at least two decades of precedent.
Former Republican Govs. Pete Ricketts, who preceded Pillen, and Dave Heineman, who served from 2005 to 2015, confirmed to Flatwater that they had state-owned mobile phones that they used for state business. Heineman, who served as lieutenant governor under Gov. Mike Johanns, said he believed Johanns had one, too.
Johanns, who was governor from 1999 until 2005, did not return emails seeking confirmation. Nor did former Gov. Kay Orr, who served one term as governor starting in 1987.
Former Gov. Ben Nelson said he may have been Nebraska’s first governor to carry a mobile phone after his election in 1990. The technology was in its infancy, and mobile phones were so big that a state trooper carried it for him, he recalled.
The Democrat couldn’t remember ever receiving a public records request for his call logs, he said. He took more heat from reporters over his public appearance schedule — something for which Pillen was criticized in 2023 for not making available to the press, breaking with more than three decades of practice.
Nelson faced a different kind of criticism, he said. He recalled a reporter asking about the frequent weekend hunting trips detailed on his calendar.
“The people of Nebraska — they’re telling me they want less government, so I’ve been trying to give it to them,” Nelson recalled saying.
The room filled with laughter, and the reporter who had asked about the trips looked sheepish, Nelson said.
“But the point is,” he said, “she knew my whereabouts.”
Nebraska
Nebraska Dept. of Agriculture proposes ban on food and beverages containing any amount of THC
LINCOLN, Neb. — A public hearing Thursday drew strong opposition to proposed rules that would label food adulterated and illegal if it contains any amount of THC and its derivatives, potentially decimating Nebraska’s hemp and CBD industry.
The regulations would affect products like gummies, beverages and oral tinctures. Over 490 people wrote in opposition to the new regulations, while only three supported them.
The rule changes stem from an executive order issued by Gov. Jim Pillen in January requiring state agencies to review laws regarding the use of synthetic THC in food and beverages. The order was made to align with federal law coming in November 2026, which bans synthetic THC products and limits total THC concentrations in hemp products to not exceed 0.4 milligrams per container.
The proposed Nebraska rule goes beyond that federal standard.
“I would say it’d be similar other than it does say no THC. It is zero THC,” said Andrew Bish, chief operating officer of Bish Enterprises. “It’s not we are deferring to the federal government standard and aligning with the federal government standard. It is, in fact, a different standard.”
Fifteen speakers testified during the hearing, with many calling for the Department of Agriculture to regulate the industry rather than enforce outright bans.
“I respectfully urge the department to pursue a balanced science-based approach that protects public safety, targets specific problems, strengths and standards where necessary and holds bad actors accountable without unnecessarily eliminating access to products that may Nebraskans find valuable and beneficial,” said Dr. Andrea Holmes, a professor of chemistry at Doane University.
Many who testified were shop owners who said the regulations would result in major business losses and reduced state revenue.
“In 2025, we pay over $1 million in sales tax. We expect to be over $1.3 million in 2026,” one speaker from The Cannabis Factory said. “We’re not opposed to regulation, or oversight, or even additional taxation.”
The Department of Agriculture will review comments and decide if any changes need to be made. If not, the regulations go to the attorney general and the governor for approval.
The regulations include a carve out for the medical cannabis acts, meaning people with medical cannabis cards could get prescriptions that would not be affected by this proposed regulation change.
Click here to subscribe to our 10/11 NOW daily digest and breaking news alerts delivered straight to your email inbox.
Copyright 2026 KOLN. All rights reserved.
Nebraska
Disaster declaration sought for May storm damage in Nebraska
Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen said Thursday that he has asked President Donald Trump to issue a major disaster declaration for damage caused by storms that hit the state May 15-18.
The storms spawned tornadoes and flash flooding across Buffalo, Fillmore, Gage, Howard, Jefferson, Nemaha, Thayer and Thurston counties. There were numerous downed power poles and lines as well as extensive damage to schools, building and roadways. Damage just to public infrastructure is estimated at nearly $5 million.
In addition to the disaster declaration request, Pillen said he also has requested access to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which provides funding to governments to allow them to rebuild in ways that will reduce or mitigate future disaster losses. Approval would allow the state to apply for such grants.
Thursday’s disaster declaration request is the second in two months. Back in May, Pillen requested one for historic wildfires in March that impacted Arthur, Garden, Grant, Lincoln and Morill counties. At the time of the request, it was estimated there was at least $9.7 million in damage from the fires, which were the worst in Nebraska’s history.
-
Austin, TX1 minute agoJuneteenth celebrations in Austin include parade and fun run
-
Alabama4 minutes agoGov. Kay Ivey sets execution date for Jeremy Williams
-
Alaska9 minutes ago8 Prettiest Downtown Strips In Alaska
-
Arizona16 minutes agoFounding Fathers-themed ice cream parlor makes Arizona debut
-
Arkansas19 minutes agoOne dead in Lepanto drowning incident
-
California24 minutes agoIs California’s ‘Big One’ coming soon? Maps show growing danger.
-
Colorado31 minutes agoColorado summer travel ideas, from glamping and hot air balloons to swimming and fishing
-
Connecticut34 minutes agoJoe Deko Appointed to State Legislature’s Group Studying Prepaid Funeral Contracts to Protect Consumers