Connect with us

Missouri

New Missouri law protects doctors who prescribe off-label drugs ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine

Published

on

New Missouri law protects doctors who prescribe off-label drugs ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine


JEFFERSON CITY — A brand new legislation in Missouri prohibits pharmacists from questioning docs who prescribe the controversial off-label medication ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for sufferers.

The measure, which fits into impact in August, was signed Tuesday by Gov. Mike Parson after it was permitted by the Legislature in Might.

Below the legislation, state medical licensing boards could be prohibited from punishing or taking away the medical licenses of docs who “lawfully” prescribe the 2 medication, which grew to become unproven alternate options to treating COVID-19 amongst individuals who opposed vaccinations.

The legislation additionally bars pharmacists from contacting a health care provider or affected person “to dispute the efficacy of ivermectin tablets or hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablets for human use” until the physician or affected person asks concerning the medication’ effectiveness.

Advertisement

Persons are additionally studying…

  • All the time wild at Wrigley: Marmol ejected, Goldschmidt’s streak ends, Cubs win, and that is solely Recreation 1
  • BenFred: Matt Carpenter is constructing a compelling comeback try with Yankees
  • St. Louis aldermanic president, two allies indicted on federal bribery costs
  • Shooter who killed Sweetie Pie’s actuality TV star pleads responsible, implicates others
  • Donovan delivers: Rookie’s Tenth-inning hit wins Recreation 2, splits doubleheader on lengthy, bizarre Wrigley day
  • McClellan: A lesson discovered on the imply streets of Webster Groves: ‘Watch out on the market.’
  • A St. Louis County couple constructed a ‘world-class’ backyard. They are saying their metropolis is ruining it.
  • BenFred: If non-Pujols free agent additions do not enhance, Cardinals will want commerce deadline do-over
  • Pujols rescues Cardinals in Tenth for 3-2 win as Goldschmidt, Wainwright shine
  • St. Louis space Catholic faculties face massive instructor scarcity as closures loom
  • Renegade priest at St. Stanislaus goes again to Poland
  • Hudson, Arenado finish frustrations in 5-2 Cardinals win over San Diego
  • Deadly capturing of canine in St. Charles County sparks nationwide consideration, investigation
  • Machado wonders when opposing groups will fete Cardinals greats Pujols, Molina with ‘farewell tour’
  • Gordo: Booming minor-league bats are creating looming big-league selections

Ivermectin is often used to deal with parasitic worms in horses. The drug is permitted for people to deal with infections brought on by parasitic worms, head lice and pores and skin circumstances like rosacea, however not COVID-19.

“You aren’t a horse. You aren’t a cow. Significantly, y’all. Cease it,” the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration tweeted in August 2021.

Advertisement

In September 2021, Dr. Steven Brown of Chesterfield instructed KMOV (Channel 4) that instances of ivermectin toxicity had occurred at Mercy hospitals throughout the state. Brown is a digital care doctor for Mercy.

“People who find themselves relying upon ivermectin and remaining unvaccinated are beneath an amazing false sense of safety,” Brown stated. “I’ve seen folks with ivermectin toxicity within the emergency room from taking the animal formulation. I’ve seen individuals who relied on ivermectin to stop themselves from getting COVID who’re on ventilators and who’ve died.”

Hydroxychloroquine was developed to deal with malaria brought on by mosquito bites.

The FDA in July 2020 stated hydroxychloroquine confirmed no profit for reducing the probability of loss of life or rushing restoration from the coronavirus.

The company additionally obtained a number of studies of people that have been hospitalized after taking ivermectin supposed for livestock, in response to its web site.

Advertisement

The Missouri Pharmacy Affiliation opposed the laws.

“We weren’t pleased with the entire dialogue. I feel we acquired the language the place it’s tolerable for pharmacists,” government director Ron Fitzwater stated Tuesday. “It’s an instance of one thing that while you let exterior components get entangled in coverage. It’s very unlucky.”

The laws, which was added as an modification to a package deal of adjustments to medical licensing laws, was added by Sen. Rick Brattin, R-Harrisonville.

He stated he had heard considerations from docs about potential repercussions in the event that they prescribed the 2 medication.

“They had been in concern of probably dropping their licenses in the event that they had been turned in,” Brattin stated Tuesday. “They needed one thing performed about it.”

Advertisement

He stated the 2 medication had turn out to be “politicized” through the pandemic.

“Sure pharmacists needed to start performing like physicians and denying the filling of the prescriptions. This reestablishes the skilled equilibrium between docs and pharmacists,” Brattin stated.

Rep. Patty Lewis, D-Kansas Metropolis, earlier instructed the Kansas Metropolis Star that Democrats agreed to the language within the invoice to fulfill a bunch of hard-right conservatives within the Senate.

Brattin, who’s aligned with the Senate’s “Conservative Caucus,” is operating to signify Missouri’s 4th District in Congress.

The laws is Home Invoice 2149.

Advertisement

Bill protects Missouri doctors who prescribe off-label drugs ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine



Source link

Advertisement

Missouri

No, Missouri’s abortion rights referendum will not block malpractice lawsuits, retired judge says

Published

on

No, Missouri’s abortion rights referendum will not block malpractice lawsuits, retired judge says


JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (KFVS) – As Missouri voters are likely on track to vote on a constitutional amendment to enshrine the right to abortion, the state’s leading anti-abortion organization, Missouri Right to Life, has made claims about the resolution’s impact which legal experts refute as “untrue.”

The referendum would re-establish an individual’s right to receive abortion care up to a certain point. It also, ”require[s] the government not to discriminate, in government programs, funding, and other activities, against persons providing or obtaining reproductive health care.”

This part of the amendment, Missouri Right to Life President Susan Klein said, would effectively block any lawsuit against an abortion provider for malpractice or negligence.

“It basically takes away the right to sue an abortionist, the right to sue a human trafficker, the right to sue the perpetrator of incest,” Klein said.

Advertisement

Former Missouri Supreme Court chief judge Mike Wolff said these claims are all based on extremely loose, and wildly exaggerated legal opinions with no basis in actual law.

“It would have no effect whatsoever,” Wolff said. “We would essentially be back to where we were with Roe versus Wade. If there was a malpractice committed in the course of giving medical care of any kind, Roe versus Wade did not protect the doctor or the hospital or anybody else from liability in a malpractice action.”

As for Klein’s claims about human trafficking and incest, Wolff said there’s absolutely nothing in the amendment that would affect how those crimes are prosecuted in the state of Missouri.

“There’s nothing in here that makes what is criminal behavior, rape, incest, that kind of thing, to be protected in any way,” Wolff said. “There’s nothing in here about that.”

A key section of the referendum says that any restrictions on abortion will be “presumed invalid” unless a court can prove they are medically necessary for safety.

Advertisement

“This is like turning the presumption of innocence in criminal cases into a presumption of guilt until proven innocent,” Missouri Right to Life attorney James Coles said in a legal analysis. “It represents another new barrier to defending the validity of abortion statutes in the courts.”

On this one, Wolff agrees, given that’s precisely the point of the initiative: to establish that abortion is not a crime and that it should be the state’s burden to prove the necessity of a restriction.

“So, if the legislature tries to impose additional restraints on this, [it would] have to show that they’re necessary to protect a person’s safety and some of the examples that you can come up with would just be absurdly unrelated to patient safety.”

The Missouri Secretary of State’s office has until August 13 to determine whether enough valid signatures were collected to put this, and other questions, on the November 5 ballot.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri City police still investigating why man was in back of patrol cruiser at time of deadly crash | Houston Public Media

Published

on

Missouri City police still investigating why man was in back of patrol cruiser at time of deadly crash | Houston Public Media


Pictured is a Missouri City Police Department vehicle.

A detective for the Missouri City Police Department said Wednesday it continues to investigate why a man was in the back seat of a patrol vehicle when a now-terminated officer responded to a robbery call last month and got into a wreck that killed a woman and her teenage son.

The 53-year-old man in the back seat of the patrol cruiser driven by Officer Blademir Viveros was found hours after the June 20 crash and transported to a hospital with serious injuries, according to the Texas Department of Public Safety, which is investigating the crash. Missouri City Police Chief Brandon Harris said during a news conference last week that department policy prohibits officers from responding to calls when people are in the back of their vehicles.

“As far as if he was under arrest or in custody, I do not know,” Det. Michael Medina said Wednesday. “That’s part of our internal investigation.”

Medina said Viveros, 27, was terminated last week. Whether Viveros will face any criminal charges has yet to be determined, according to DPS, which said it will present its findings to the Fort Bend County District Attorney’s Office for potential prosecution.

Advertisement

Medina said the man in the back of the patrol vehicle has not been charged with any crimes since the night of the crash.

DPS said in a news release that Viveros was driving over the posted speed limit and did not have his emergency lights activated when he crashed into a 2005 Toyota Corolla driven by 16-year-old Mason Stewart at about 8:45 p.m. June 20 on Cartwright Road in Missouri City. Both Stewart and his mother, 53-year-old Angela Stewart, were pronounced dead at the scene.

Mason Stewart was pulling out of a private drive and failed to yield the right-of-way to Viveros, DPS said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Top Missouri bills awaiting action from Governor Parson – Missourinet

Published

on

Top Missouri bills awaiting action from Governor Parson – Missourinet


(Jefferson City, MO) – Gov. Mike Parson has less than two weeks to take action on the rest of the bills Missouri lawmakers passed this year. Here’s a list of some key bills awaiting a decision from the governor:

Crime package
Senate Bill 754, sponsored by Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer, R-Parkville, includes “Blair’s Law,” which would create a criminal offense for firing gunshots in the air to celebrate. Another provision, called Max’s Law, would increase the punishment for harming or killing law enforcement animals.

The plan would increase the minimum age from 12 to 14 years old for a minor to be charged as an adult for any felony. It would also create the offense of aggravated fleeing a stop or detention of a vehicle if a person flees at high speed, knowing that a law enforcement officer is attempting to detain the person.

Fix to senior citizen property tax relief bill
Another major bill awaiting action is a fix to a senior citizen property tax relief bill passed in 2023. Current state law allows Missouri counties to stop property tax increases for homeowner taxpayers who are eligible for Social Security benefits.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 756, sponsored by Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer, R-Parkville, would clarify that eligible homeowners must be 62 or older to qualify.

The reason for the proposed change is because questions have been raised about whether certain seniors are excluded, including Missouri teachers and firefighters, who participate in a state pension plan instead of Social Security.

Military-friendly bill
Senate Bill 912, sponsored by Sen. Ben Brown, R-Washington, would allow a full state tax deduction for military and National Guard enlistment and re-enlistment bonuses; make it easier for veterans to get a handicap placard for their vehicle; cover the cost of military specialty license plates for veterans; require the Missouri Veterans Commission to work with the Department of Mental Health to find ways to fight veteran suicide, and award National Guard members and veterans who served on active duty from 2001 to 2021.

340B program
The Missouri Legislature has given its blessing to a proposal that aims to increase access to discounted drugs for uninsured and low-income patients. Senate Bill 751 would put a stop to pharmaceutical companies restricting 340B drug discount contracts between Missouri hospitals, healthcare centers, and local pharmacies. Sen. Justin Brown, R-Rolla, is the bill sponsor. Rep. Tara Peters, R-Rolla, carried the bill in the House.

Ban on local governments delaying evictions
House Bill 2062 would prevent Missouri cities and counties from enforcing eviction delays unless authorized by state law. A main provision would crack down on people illegally occupying homes and other residential properties.

Advertisement

The bill is sponsored by Rep. Chris Brown, R-Kansas City. His bill was inspired by a federal eviction freeze imposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. The federal move resulted in financial hardships for property owners. But after the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the federal move, St. Louis and St. Louis County implemented local eviction moratoriums.

Parson has until July 14th to sign bills into law or veto them. Any left unsigned will automatically become law.

All new laws in Missouri take effect August 28th unless otherwise mandated.

Copyright © 2024 · Missourinet




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending