Connect with us

Missouri

Missouri barred 6 nonprofits so far from federal child nutrition program

Published

on

Missouri barred 6 nonprofits so far from federal child nutrition program


JEFFERSON CITY — Missouri Division of Well being and Senior Companies officers have blacklisted six nonprofits from a federal baby diet program that paid them for distributing meals.

The biggest current claimant in Missouri’s Summer time Meals Service Program, Connie Bobo’s New Heights Group Useful resource Heart, acquired greater than $20.6 million in federal reimbursement from pandemic meal distributions and acquired a $975,000 home and a $2 million business constructing earlier than being barred from this system.

New Heights was added to the U.S. Division of Agriculture-maintained Nationwide Disqualified Checklist, which bars participation within the Little one and Grownup Care Meals Program and is utilized by state regulators weighing purposes to take part within the Summer time Meals Service Program. New Heights additionally was referred to the Missouri Legal professional Common’s Workplace and the USDA Workplace of Inspector Common.

Persons are additionally studying…

Advertisement

DHSS officers additionally had been in a position to doc sufficient issues at 5 different organizations so as to add them to the Nationwide Disqualified Checklist and finish their participation in this system. Two had been referred to federal investigators.

The Nationwide Disqualified Checklist is barely accessible to state regulators and organizations licensed to take part within the baby diet packages. A USDA spokesperson wouldn’t determine organizations which were referred to the record, citing federal privateness guidelines. However a DHSS spokeswoman offered the Put up-Dispatch with the names of organizations the state referred:

Advertisement

• Sisters of Lavender Rose, based in 2017 by Cymone McClellan, who listed a Florissant deal with on the time. It was paid greater than $2.8 million in claims from the SFSP and CACFP since 2020. Officers stated they disallowed practically $400,000 in claims from the group and referred it to USDA investigators. McClellan, who additionally lists her title as Cymone O’Donnell, didn’t reply to requests for remark. Nor did she return a name left for her on the restaurant she began in Berkeley this summer time, 314 Kitchen.

Us Serving to Us, purportedly began by an Elliot Dixon of Harrisonville. The group, which claimed some $380,000 in meal reimbursements by way of the packages, additionally listed a New York deal with and somebody named Kizzy Murphy. Nobody may very well be reached for remark and it’s unclear if any of the individuals on its registration paperwork really existed. DHSS officers say there’s no “particular proof” the group really distributed any meals. State officers blocked $17,188 in claims. Us Serving to Us has been referred to federal investigators.

• Sisters of Annitrya, a St. Louis nonprofit based by JoAnn Davis in 2019 that appeared to function a summer time camp. It claimed $1.4 million in meals reimbursement since 2020. The state blocked nearly $150,000 in reimbursements to the group. The nonprofit dissolved this yr. Davis and the group couldn’t be reached for remark.

Dream It Massive Inc., a California nonprofit included in Missouri in October 2020. It lists Margraretha Wells as president and Danielle Carr, with a St. Louis deal with on Dryden Avenue, as secretary. The group was paid $900,000 since 2020 for the meals it claimed to distribute. The state flagged a minimum of $61,000 in claims submitted by the group. It has since been dissolved and its organizers couldn’t be reached.

• Karah Academy of Dance and Performing Arts, a Florissant dance studio based by Chantaya King, claimed $1.6 million because the begin of 2020 The state barred rather less than $74,000 in claims to the group.

Advertisement

King, who additionally operates Chantaya King Ministries, stated Karah had been concerned with the USDA packages for near 9 years and gives meals to youngsters in her dance studio. King stated she was unfairly swept up within the state’s elevated scrutiny of this system.

“We weren’t a fly-by-night pop-up,” King stated.

She stated some paperwork wasn’t out there for state inspectors after they confirmed up for an unannounced assessment round Easter and that Karah’s previous clear audits weren’t taken into consideration.

“All of our audits have been wonderful, so how unexpectedly are our audits not good?” King stated. “We did our greatest with what coaching that they had given us.”

The six organizations barred from participation symbolize a tiny fraction of the roughly 900 teams that had been permitted to take part in a minimum of one of many two USDA packages.

Advertisement

The state’s administrative actions got here underneath the CACFP, which requires extra documentation that youngsters acquired the meals than the summer time meals program.

The 2 packages pay as a lot as $4.56 per meal that collaborating nonprofits declare to distribute. In the course of the pandemic, guidelines requiring youngsters to eat meals on web site had been waived and drive-thru-style distributions had been allowed, typically with little to no documentation that meals went to youngsters or out in any respect. On-site monitoring by regulators was extraordinarily restricted throughout the peak of COVID-19.

Earlier than the pandemic allowed nonprofits to supply grab-and-go meals, the state’s largest faculty districts had been the most important summer time sponsors, although they by no means billed greater than $1 million yearly. Pre-pandemic, solely a handful of enormous organizations billed greater than $1 million yearly for the CACFP.

Whereas some teams argue the waivers received meals into the neighborhood rapidly whereas youngsters had been residence from faculty, federal prosecutors have stated it left the packages susceptible to fraud. Well being division officers stated they’d discovered greater than $5 million in claims tied on to the non-congregate waivers issued throughout the pandemic.

“Sadly, the waivers have offered some sponsors with the right discussion board to compromise program integrity and mismanage the packages,” DHSS officers stated in an announcement.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Missouri

Kehoe in fundraising lead in Missouri GOP governor’s race

Published

on

Kehoe in fundraising lead in Missouri GOP governor’s race


MISSOURI – FOX 2 is following the money pouring into one of the top races in Missouri: the Republican primary for governor.

Campaign finance records with the Missouri Ethics Commission reveal Lt. Mike Kehoe taking a massive lead in fundraising.

Political consultants say it’s fueling his rise in polls, with the money almost as important as the message.

Kehoe had trailed the front-runner, Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, by 15%, 20%, or more in polls over the past year.

Advertisement

Our Missouri Nexstar, The Hill, and Emerson College Poll this month shows Kehoe pulling within 3% of Ashcroft, which is within the margin of error.  

Ashcroft is touting an endorsement from former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee this month.

Third-place candidate in our poll, Missouri State Senator Bill Eigel of St. Charles County, just debuted his first TV ad Tuesday. 

However, Kehoe continues to win big in the fundraising derby.

Records show his “Citizens for Kehoe” campaign committee had $1.74 million on hand for the quarter ending in March, compared to $656,000 for Ashcroft’s campaign committee and $727,000 for Eigel’s committee.

Advertisement

Ashcroft has a huge edge in name recognition from his father, John Ashcroft, the former Missouri Governor, U.S. Senator, and U.S. Attorney General. 

Still, we’ve found fundraising gap is even more dramatic when it comes to the political action committees (PACs) supporting the three candidates.

The Committee for Liberty PAC, which supports Ashcroft, had $1.9 million on hand at the end of the quarter, taking in less than $61,000 so far in June. Its top donors in 2024 are California real estate developer Steven Craig, August Busch III, and Ashcroft’s mother, Janet.

Believe in Life and Liberty (BILL) PAC, which supports Eigel, had a little more than $1 million on hand at the end of the quarter but has raised $445,000 this month. Its top donors this year are St. Louis pro-life activist Joan Langenberg, Trial Lawyers for Justice of Montana and the Edelman-Thompson Law Firm of Kansas City.

American Dream PAC, which supports Kehoe, dwarfs the others, with $4.5 million on hand at the end of last quarter and more than $2 million raised so far this month.

Advertisement

St. Louis Political Financier Rex Sinquefield has donated $1.25 million to the PAC this year.   Herzog Rail and Highway Construction of St. Joseph, Mo., has donated $1 million, and Waycrosse Inc. of Minnesota, the investment arm of agribusiness giant Cargill, has kicked in $500,000. 

Kehoe contends that his lead among small donors tells the real story.

“The fact of the matter is we’ve outraised all seven other opponents in the Republican field by three to one with Missouri dollar donors, small dollar donors (under $2,825), people who say, ‘We like Mike’s message; we think his leadership skill fits what Missouri needs right now,’” he said.

Early absentee voting, with an excuse, began Tuesday. The August 6 primary is now six weeks away.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri attorney general candidates discuss IVF, fighting crime, education, defending senators – Missourinet

Published

on

Missouri attorney general candidates discuss IVF, fighting crime, education, defending senators – Missourinet


Two candidates running for Missouri attorney general discussed a variety of topics during a forum Monday. The event was hosted by the Federalist Society.

Republican Will Scharf and Democrat Elad Gross participated in the forum; Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey did not participate.

Scharf, who is on Donald Trump’s legal team, said Missouri is failing on fighting crime. He said the state should be prosecuting more violent crime – not less.

“We have underfunded, undermanned police departments,” said Scharf. “On the prosecution front, you have far too many cases being lost, far too many cases that are never even being brought certainly the way that they should be. Plea deals are out of control and rampant. And lastly, we’re a deep red state with deep blue courts. Our bail laws are far too weak. We need much tougher rules on pretrial detention.”

Advertisement

Gross, who is a civil rights attorney, said reinvesting in the community will get better results, such as stable housing, and boosting job opportunities and education. They both criticized Bailey about his direction on fighting crime.

U.S. Congress is debating whether to protect invitro fertilization access to help women have children. Gross said the state and federal governments should pass these protections for reproductive rights.

“But there’s questions right now about the language to the point where we’ve got Republicans and Democrats in our state legislature talking about passing a law to protect IVF. That’s how extreme we’ve gotten in Missouri,” said Gross.

Scharf said Missouri law does not endanger IVF.

Scharf said the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education should be investigated. He said the state’s educational system should focus on parental rights and student achievement.

Advertisement

“I think we need to understand how this completely unaccountable bureaucracy is so comprehensively failing our students and our families all over the state, and why it’s done so for so long. We have a real problem with government accountability in Jefferson City,” said Scharf. “Deep state bureaucrats, you can call them, a lot of my supporters would, run this state in a way that has left our core governmental functions like education.”

Gross said parental rights belong to parents when it comes to education.

Louisiana has adopted a law which requires public schools there to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Gross said the law is unconstitutional.

“It’s a waste of the taxpayers in Louisiana’s money,” said Gross. “It’s going to be a waste of our money if it comes here. And if you want to spend that money somewhere, just because you want to put it somewhere, put it into civic education, put it into our classrooms, put it on issues that actually matter.”

Missouri Attorney General candidate Will Scharf said putting up a Ten Commandments display in classrooms is constitutional and Missouri should follow Louisiana.

Advertisement

The Missouri Attorney General’s Office is defending three state senators in defamation lawsuits for misidentifying a Kansas City Super Bowl parade shooter. Sens. Rick Brattin, R-Harrisonville, Denny Hoskins, R-Warrensburg, and Nick Schroer, R-Wentzville, posted a photo of a Kansas man on social media, incorrectly stating that he is an undocumented immigrant and the mass shooter. Now, Denton Loudermill of Kansas is suing the ultra conservatives in a Kansas federal court.

Scharf disagrees on the lawsuits in more ways than one.

“The lawsuit itself is garbage. The statements in question weren’t defamatory. They don’t meet the standard for defamation under the law,” said Scharf. “That having been said, I don’t think the AGs office has any role here, and I think that the AGs office should not have intervened. The legal arguments that they’ve made for why they needed to intervene, about protecting Missouri jurisdiction or something like that, are absolute bunk.”

The Missouri Attorney General’s office argue that the senators are protected by legislative immunity because they were acting in their official capacity when they posted their comments.

Gross said state taxpayers should not pay for the legal bills in these cases.

Advertisement

More than 20 people were shot at the celebration and one woman was killed.

Copyright © 2024, Missourinet




Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Federal judges in Kansas, Missouri stop student loan relief plan

Published

on

Federal judges in Kansas, Missouri stop student loan relief plan


WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – The next phase of the Biden administration’s student loan debt relief plan has been put on ice.

U.S. District Judge Daniel Crabtree in Kansas and U.S. District Judge John Ross in Missouri both issued rulings in cases brought by the state attorneys general.

In Kansas, Judge Crabtree allowed some but not all of the proposed relief to go through. Students who borrowed $12,000 or less will have the rest of their loans forgiven if they make 10 years’ worth of payments, instead of the standard 25. But students who had larger loans cannot have their monthly payments lowered and their required payment period reduced from 25 years to 20 years.

In Missouri, Judge Ross’ order says that the U.S. Department of Education cannot forgive loan balances going forward but could lower monthly payments.

Advertisement

The rulings are seen as wins for Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach.

“Only Congress has the power of the purse, not the President,” Bailey said in a statement.

In a statement, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the Biden administration “will never stop fighting for students and borrowers — no matter how many roadblocks Republican elected officials and special interests put in our way.”

It is still possible that borrowers see changes in their payments, however this injunction will prevent the intended number of borrowers affected.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending