Connect with us

Minnesota

Sven Sundgaard: Minnesota summers are getting hotter and longer

Published

on

Sven Sundgaard: Minnesota summers are getting hotter and longer


Already nearing the midway level of meteorological summer season and shocker: It’s a sizzling one. Once more. For the third consecutive yr, we’re more likely to register one of many 15 hottest summers in Twin Cities historical past. 

Final summer season was the most well liked recorded for the Twin Cities, beating 1988 and any summer season within the ‘Mud Bowl’ decade. If the pc fashions are appropriate, we might be headed towards one of many ten hottest Julys on file. This comes after the eleventh hottest June, which adopted the 2021 June that was the second hottest on file. 

With regards to local weather change, June and September are our quickest warming months within the heat season. July and August, the height of our summer season warmth, are warming extra slowly and subtly. Principally, summers are getting longer quite than extra excessive in Minnesota. It will get sizzling faster and earlier, and the warmth lasts longer into September. That’s why among the most dramatic adjustments we’re noticing are in early summer season and extended, heat autumns. 

Advertisement

That is PRECISELY what you’d anticipate in a Greenhouse Impact world. Elevated fossil gas emissions lead to our environment trapping extra warmth, not essentially magnifying it or creating extra of it. This is the reason you’d anticipate summers to get longer, winters shorter, and nights to be hotter. That is additionally the rationale why the Arctic is warming quickest in winter regardless of being nearly completely in the dead of night.

Under is a tough illustration of what’s taking place:

Understanding the uneven warming of summer season months helps put into context summer season extremes, just like the Twin Cities hitting 101 levels on June 20. One-hundred levels isn’t extraordinary in Minnesota, however it’s rare. What’s way more fascinating is that it occurred in June. On the uncommon event we hit 100 levels (on common about as soon as each 5 years), 71% of the time it’s in July. 

June common temperatures have warmed about 1.5 levels F, which can not sound like lots, however that’s half of a regular deviation (a measure of the conventional vary from common). That warming is sufficient to improve the likelihood of hitting 101+ levels in June by 3 to 4 occasions the historic common. I’ve mentioned earlier than how shifting the common makes extremes exponentially extra (or much less on the chilly aspect) doubtless. Right here’s a graphic reminder:

What about scorching warmth through the Mud Bowl?

A eager climate fanatic is aware of that the Mud Bowl summers of the Nineteen Thirties noticed many 100-degree days – greater than in every other decade. The Nineteen Thirties nevertheless are an anomaly that we have to separate from the century and a half file (in truth once we apply pattern strains they normally disappear). 

Advertisement

There are research now that present fingerprints of human-caused local weather change we beforehand didn’t anticipate. Look ahead to an upcoming article on among the fascinating science on the Nineteen Thirties and the way it compares to the current decade.

The fundamental takeaway is that regardless of all the intense sizzling days within the Nineteen Thirties, the current decade is hotter than the Nineteen Thirties. Actually, if we take a look at the 15 hottest summers, No. 1 was final summer season. Sure, 2021 beat the entire Nineteen Thirties summers. Three of the 15 hottest summers are from the Nineteen Thirties (1933, 1936, 1937). Three of the most well liked are from the previous ten years: 2021, 2012, 2020. Even the common of the three most up-to-date summers is hotter than the three hottest Nineteen Thirties summers.

The positive signal that our sizzling summers now ARE a results of human-caused local weather change is that the warmth is constant and chronic. Positive, July 1936 hit 108 – the most well liked recorded temperature in Twin Cities historical past – and lots of 100+ days, however June of that yr was chilly and August that summer season was simply regular.

Whereas July 1936 was highly regarded, the general summer season local weather behaved extra like regular, with ups and downs. Final summer season was hotter general by being constantly sizzling, similar to this summer season to date. The cool breaks, in the event that they occur, aren’t as cool as they was once. 

If we take out the anomaly of the Nineteen Thirties (once more this will likely be mentioned in a future submit) and take a look at the primary 50 years of our 149 years record-keeping in comparison with the latest 50 years, you see a VERY clear pattern: There are 2.5 occasions extra 100+ days in the latest 5 many years than the primary 5, and 4 occasions extra 101+ days. Even simply wanting on the hottest day of every summer season and plotting a graph, the pattern is upward, even in case you embrace the Nineteen Thirties.

Advertisement

Probably the most related measure to point out our warming summers is common temperature, and the common now’s completely, undeniably a lot hotter than ever earlier than.

One of many massive shifts in our common temperatures are a results of very heat summer season nights, even separate from the city warmth island impact we see within the Twin Cities.

Statewide, nights are getting hotter (summer season and winter). Whereas the 101-degree day of June has particular local weather change fingerprints, it’s not as giant because the fingerprints on the 2 heat nights that surrounded that scorcher. We had three in a single day lows in a row within the 70s; the low on the June 20 was nearly 80 levels. The local weather shift index from Local weather Central illustrates this impression effectively.

The local weather shift index statistically extracts the part of human-caused local weather change from the information to provide a measure of local weather change’s impression on a particular temperature studying for a area.

For instance, the 101-degree day had a local weather change impression, however to a lesser diploma:

With nonetheless the vast majority of July to get via, all of the fashions mixed with the information already within the books, the Twin Cities has a 93% probability of being hotter than regular. As I discussed at first, the mannequin knowledge suggests this might even be one of many ten hottest Julys of all time. 

In case you’re on the lookout for a break in August, good luck. 

If the long-range forecasts for the rest of July and August are realized, this might be a VERY sizzling summer season once more. It could doubtless make it the fifth-hottest summer season, hotter than 1936 or 1937 however simply behind 2012 and 1933. There’s nonetheless a bit of greater than half of summer season left and Mom Nature could produce other plans, however it’s troublesome to see how we reverse the hotter-than-average pattern any time quickly.

Utilizing July 12 for instance

To grasp statistics as they apply to temperatures (normalized knowledge, customary deviation, averages, and many others.), let’s take a look at July 12. We are able to plot each excessive temperature at MSP Airport on July 12 from 1873 via 2021.

Advertisement

The Greek letter after every quantity on the very backside is ‘sigma.’ It equates to at least one customary deviation, or how far the temperature deviates from the common. 

If knowledge is normalized (i.e. the median and the common are the identical), it can observe a bell curve. The extra knowledge you could have, the higher probability of this taking place. This is the reason we are able to’t inform a lot from 5 years of knowledge, however ten, 30 and even 100 years tells us lots. On this explicit case, we now have excessive temperatures for each July 12 for 149 years. The info strains up properly in a “regular” approach.

We are able to calculate the common (imply) and the usual deviation (sigma) from the information. 

On this case, the common excessive temperature is 84. The usual deviation is 6.6 levels F. The realm below the curve represents chances. So we are able to say that the common excessive is 84 and your +/- 1 customary deviation vary is 77 to 91 levels F. This represents the darkest blue a part of the bell curve within the heart. It equates to 68%, or 68% of the time the excessive temperature on July 12 will likely be between 77 and 91.

If we need to additional develop our vary to 2 customary deviations (2 sigma), we take the 6.6 levels F and double it +/- from the common. The 2 customary deviation vary, which represents the darkest, and middle-darkest blue areas, is about +/- 13 levels F, or a variety of 71 to 97. That equates to 95%, or 95% of the time the temperature falling between 71 and 97 on July 12. Something outdoors of this vary (a day within the 100s, or a day within the 60s) is fairly uncommon.

To present an instance of how a seemingly small shift can have an effect on every part, I’ve put the likelihood of every vary being hotter or colder than every customary deviation worth.

Advertisement

Let’s say the common for July 12 had been to heat 3 levels F, or about half of a regular deviation (0.5 sigma). The typical would now be 87 as an alternative of 84, not a seemingly massive shift. However the excessive finish of 104 levels F would change. As of now, 104 levels F on July 12 is sort of unattainable (0.2% probability): a 1 in 500 yr prevalence. 

But when we shift this knowledge 3F as Minnesota’s common temperature warms, a median temperature of 87 would make the probabilities of hitting 104F more likely. 

At a median of 84F, hitting 104F would symbolize 3 customary deviations. However at 87F it turns into 2.5 customary deviations. The likelihood of hitting that temperature goes from simply 0.2% to 1.3%. 104F would nonetheless be rare, however it’s now six occasions extra more likely to occur: 1 in 77 years versus as soon as in half of a millennium.

On the cool aspect of issues, let’s say we take the two sigma worth of 71 levels F, which has a 2.3% probability. Properly, now it has solely a 1.3% probability, which means it has develop into nearly twice as unlikely because it was once. 

BMTN Notice: Climate occasions in isolation cannot at all times be pinned on local weather change, however the broader pattern of more and more extreme climate and record-breaking extremes seen in Minnesota and throughout the globe might be attributed on to the quickly warming local weather brought on by human exercise. The IPCC has warned that Earth is “firmly on monitor towards an unlivable world,” and says greenhouse fuel emissions have to be halved by 2030 so as to restrict warming to 1.5C, which might forestall probably the most catastrophic results on humankind. You’ll be able to learn extra right here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Minnesota

Trial will be

Published

on

Trial will be


It’s a high-stakes trial that could ultimately give Republicans and Democrats a 50-50 split in the Minnesota Senate.

“It has such political ramifications,” said Twin Cities attorney Mike Bryant. “I think a lot of people will be watching what happens.” 

Advertisement

It was April 2024, when the criminal complaint said Minnesota Sen. Nicole Mitchell‘s stepmother’s called 911 to report a burglary at her Detroit Lakes home. Mitchell allegedly told police she entered the home to retrieve personal items connected to her recently deceased father, because her stepmother had cut off contact.

In a social media post, Mitchell denied all allegations. Mitchell said she had gone to check on a family member with Alzheimer’s disease.

Bryant said he feels Mitchell will have to testify.

“Unless the state has a really super weak case that they can’t prove anything, I think it’s going to be one of those situations where the jury’s going to want to hear from her,” said Bryant. 

“I think it’s going to be very difficult to win,” said Minneapolis criminal defense attorney Joe Tamburino. “Let’s face it, according to what’s in the complaint and what we imagine the prosecutor will prove at trial, is that she was found in the house at the very early morning hours, she was dressed in black and she was discovered by her stepmother and then supposedly she ran down to the basement, and then when the police got there, she made a number of incriminating statements.”

Advertisement

Tamburino said Mitchell’s defense team will be calling on character witnesses.

“Those are witnesses who would say ‘look, the defendant is someone who’s honest, trustworthy, a good person,’” said Tamburino.

They will also try for something called jury nullification.

“Meaning you’re just telling the jury you never had the intent to do this, you’re a good person, so please find me not guilty,” said Tamburino. “Will there be witnesses, like factual witnesses, to say things that ‘well some of this property really was belonging to the defendant Ms. Mitchell’ or ‘some of this property was meant to go to her.’”

Bryant said he expects the longest part of the trial to be jury selection. If a jury can be picked in time, he expects the trial should wrap by the end of the week.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minnesota

Remer, the ‘Home of Bigfoot,’ draws thousands of believers and curiosity-seekers to festival

Published

on

Remer, the ‘Home of Bigfoot,’ draws thousands of believers and curiosity-seekers to festival


“We’re very self-disciplined [and] keep the facts straight,” he said.

In 2009, Tim Kedrowski’s trail camera on his family’s hunting land in Remer captured a blurry image of a towering, dark figure with long arms. The image made headlines worldwide.

Some thought it was a hoax, but Kedrowski contacted the MN.B.R.T. to confirm it was a bigfoot.

Kedrowski, who died last year, wasn’t a bigfoot believer, said son Casey Kedrowski of Rice, Minn. But without the trail camera image, he said, Remer couldn’t lay claim to bigfoot like the way it does today.

Advertisement

Ruyak trademarked Remer as the Home of Bigfoot, a designation he said was solidified after the reputed 2009 sighting. He has studied local reports of alleged bigfoot sightings dating back to the early 1900s, when town founder William P. Remer discovered massive footprints.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Dokken: Walleyes might be prized in Minnesota and North Dakota, but not in this Idaho lake

Published

on

Dokken: Walleyes might be prized in Minnesota and North Dakota, but not in this Idaho lake


Now here’s something you’ll never see in Minnesota or North Dakota.

I came across a story from the Idaho Statesman newspaper the other day about a walleye “invasion” in Lake Lowell, a southwestern Idaho lake known for its largemouth bass fishing.

Brad Dokken
Advertisement

As a result of the unwanted influx, Idaho’s Fish and Game department is asking anglers to have at it with the walleyes, the Idaho Statesman reported. No limits; instead, anglers should “catch, kill and keep” every walleye they catch.

The fish apparently were illegally introduced by a fisherman in 2022, the Statesman reported, and may “be competing and taking food from largemouth bass.” The population has “advanced quickly” since 2022, fisheries biologist Art Butts told the newspaper.

“Idaho and walleye just aren’t a good match in most places,” the newspaper said, citing a news release from Idaho Fish and Game.

“Just because there’s places in the Midwest that do really good with walleye, and they haven’t impacted largemouth bass … that doesn’t mean that they’re not going to have an impact here,” Butts told the Statesman.

Given the mindset of many anglers in Minnesota and North Dakota, where “if it’s not a walleye, it’s not a fish” is a common perception, it might be hard to grasp the concept of walleyes being an undesirable species.

Advertisement

But just like any invasive species, walleyes can have a big-time impact on the ecology of lakes and rivers where they don’t belong. And once the genie’s out of the bottle, so to speak, reversing the impact is difficult, if not impossible.

That’s no different than any other invasive species, whether it’s zebra mussels or jumping carp.

As the Statesman reported, Idaho’s Fish and Game is encouraging anglers to target walleyes, even though it probably won’t fix the problem.

As the old saying goes: When life gives you lemons, make lemonade.

“We know that angling by itself is probably not going to do much for the population,” Butts says in the article. “Walleye are considered one of the best-eating fish in freshwater, and so while we’ve got this problem, let’s get the word out to folks that might be interested in fishing for them.

Advertisement

“Here’s a place where you … have a good opportunity to do that.”

This isn’t the first time fisheries managers have raised the alarm about walleyes, of course. The Columbia River has long had a population of unwanted walleyes, to the detriment of native salmon species, and now has a reputation as a trophy walleye fishery. As with Lake Lowell in Idaho, there’s no size or bag limit on walleyes in the Columbia River.

There have been other instances of unwanted game fish species, as well, and not just walleyes. According to the National Park Service, non-native lake trout were discovered in Wyoming’s Yellowstone Lake in 1994. Since then, millions of lake trout have been removed from Yellowstone Lake through gillnetting, in an effort to lower the population and lessen the negative impact on native cutthroat trout. Other techniques, such as spreading plant-based pellets over lake trout spawning sites to suffocate the eggs,

also are being explored, the NPS said.

Lake trout are probably my favorite fish to catch, and walleyes are right up there. Just goes to show, I guess – one angler’s prize is another angler’s problem.

Advertisement

I’ve said it before, and I’ll probably say it again:

There’s something about watching a bobber that just never gets old.

I thought about that again last weekend, when I got the chance to spend a few hours walleye fishing on Devils Lake.

My fishing partners had been over there a few days already and had done well dunking leeches below slip bobbers in about 15 feet of water, give or take, the previous two mornings. Eater-size fish, mostly, with their biggest stretching the tape at 19½ inches.

That fish went back in the lake to hopefully make more anglers’ bobbers sink sometime down the road.

Advertisement

Expecting a spot to produce walleyes three days in a row might be a stretch, especially in a location as small as this particular area, but we decided to give it a few hours anyway.

Boat traffic certainly wouldn’t be a problem. Even though it was a holiday weekend, I was struck by how quiet the lake was – at least in the area where we were fishing. We didn’t see more than a handful of boats the whole time.

Not that I’m complaining, mind you.

The action was considerably slower than what my fishing partners had experienced the previous two days – just my luck – but we still managed to put three eaters in the box during our short time on the water.

I had the pleasure of watching my bobber sink to a 17-inch walleye.

Advertisement

I’ll take fish like that any day of the week. And if getting to watch a bobber sink is part of the deal, all the better.

Brad Dokken
Brad Dokken joined the Herald company in November 1985 as a copy editor for Agweek magazine and has been the Grand Forks Herald’s outdoors editor since 1998.

Besides his role as an outdoors writer, Dokken has an extensive background in northwest Minnesota and Canadian border issues and provides occasional coverage on those topics.

Reach him at bdokken@gfherald.com, by phone at (701) 780-1148 or on X (formerly Twitter) at @gfhoutdoor.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending