Connect with us

Minneapolis, MN

Colder Temps, Chances For Snow Ahead: MN Weather

Published

on

Colder Temps, Chances For Snow Ahead: MN Weather


TWIN CITIES, MN — Temperatures typical of a more normal Minnesota winter are in the forecast, along with chances for light snow.

Here’s the specific NWS forecast from the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport:

Tuesday: Cloudy, with a high near 33. West northwest wind 10 to 15 mph.

Tuesday Night: A chance of flurries before midnight. Cloudy, with a low around 25. West northwest wind around 10 mph.

Advertisement

Wednesday: Partly sunny, with a high near 28. North northwest wind 10 to 15 mph.

Wednesday Night: Mostly clear, with a low around 15. North northwest wind 5 to 10 mph becoming light north after midnight.

Thursday: Mostly sunny, with a high near 29. North northwest wind 5 to 10 mph becoming south in the morning.

Thursday Night: Partly cloudy, with a steady temperature around 24. South southwest wind around 10 mph.

Friday: Mostly cloudy, with a high near 32. Southwest wind 5 to 10 mph.

Advertisement

Friday Night: A 20 percent chance of snow. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 24. South southeast wind around 5 mph.

Saturday: Partly sunny, with a high near 33. Southeast wind 5 to 10 mph.

Saturday Night: A 20 percent chance of snow. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 25. East southeast wind around 10 mph.

Sunday: A 30 percent chance of snow. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 33. East southeast wind around 10 mph becoming west in the afternoon.

Sunday Night: A 30 percent chance of snow. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 22. Northeast wind 5 to 10 mph.

Advertisement

Monday: A 30 percent chance of snow. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 31. Northeast wind 5 to 10 mph.



Source link

Minneapolis, MN

Column: Minneapolis killings expose government lies, brutality

Published

on

Column: Minneapolis killings expose government lies, brutality


We relearned something from the killings of two law-abiding citizens by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis: There’s a limit to how many government lies the public will tolerate.

When government officials arrogantly persist in blatantly lying, the public just might turn angrily against the prevaricators.

Or maybe they’re not lying technically. They simply might not care whether they’re telling the truth, or what it is. Their only intent is to spew a tale that fits a political agenda. Regardless, the citizenry can stomach only so much.

Another thing we relearned is that when a government keeps acting against the public’s wishes, the public tends to rise up and smack its leader, altering the leader’s direction.

Advertisement

That’s the sign of a functional democracy when enough people get riled up and elbow their way into leading the government themselves.

In the process, they’re very likely to prod various other governments — state and local — into acting on their behalf.

We’ve been seeing this play out in the aftermath of the Minneapolis killings.

But, in fact, the public rebellion has been building during a yearlong nightmare of unjustified, inhumane, un-American violence by federal immigration agents. Their targets have been people with brown skin suspected of living in the country illegally. Never mind that many not only are documented, they’re U.S. citizens.

Such has been the slipshod and authoritarian way President Trump’s promised mass deportation program has been carried out.

Advertisement

Polls have consistently shown that voters strongly support the president’s goals of protecting the border and also deporting the “worst of the worst” undocumented criminals. But people have increasingly objected to his roughhouse methods, including masked federal agents slapping around and pepper-spraying legal protesters.

It’s not clear whether the two Minnesota citizens victimized by quick-draw federal agents were protesting. You can’t believe the Trump administration.

And that’s the danger in habitually lying: People can become so cynical that most disregard whatever they’re told by their so-called leaders. And that cripples what’s necessary for an ongoing healthy democracy: a cooperative relationship based on trust between citizens and those they’ve chosen to govern.

Some things we do know about the slain Minnesota citizens.

Alex Pretti, 37, was an intensive care nurse in a VA hospital. He was shooting video with his cellphone of agents and protesters when he was pepper-sprayed and wrestled to the ground by several agents as his legally carried handgun was removed. Then he was shot in the back several times.

Advertisement

He was not a “domestic terrorist” and “assassin” who wanted to “massacre law enforcement,” as Trump sycophants immediately lied on TV before backing off, after most of America saw videos of the killing and the president got nervous.

Renee Good, 37, was a mother and poet who appeared merely to be trying to drive through protest chaos when an agent shot her three times through the windshield. She did not try to run down the agent, as the administration claimed.

Good was not “obviously a professional agitator” who “violently, willfully and viciously ran over the ICE officer,” as Trump wrote on social media.

Public outrage at the lying and the brutish immigration enforcement has pressured elected officials into action all around the country.

Sure, you can call it political grandstanding and, of course, much of it is. But good politics and sound democracy involve listening to the public and acting on its desires.

Advertisement

In Sacramento, the state Senate held an emotional two-hour debate over a bill aimed at permitting people to sue federal law enforcement when their constitutional rights are violated. Rights such as the ability to peacefully protest and to be protected against excessive force. Lawsuits already are allowed against state and local officers. But federal agents are practically untouchable.

Senate Bill 747 by Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) passed on a 30-10 party-line vote — Democrats for and Republicans against. The measure moved to the Assembly.

The vote was yet another sorry sign of today’s unhealthy political polarization. Not one Republican could break out of the Trump web and vote to hold illegally operating federal agents accountable in civil courts. But neither could one Democrat detect enough fault in the bill to vote against it.

Some law enforcement groups oppose the legislation because they fear it would spur additional suing against local cops. Look for an amendment in the Assembly.

The heated Senate debate reflected Democratic lawmakers’ frustration with Trump — and many of their constituents’ fears.

Advertisement

“The level of anxiety and anger is higher than I’ve ever seen in my 13 years in the Legislature,” Sen. Tom Umberg (D-Santa Ana) told me.

“People are coming into our offices fearful for relatives or friends who are hiding out, afraid to go to doctors’ appointments and their kids are staying away from schools.”

During the debate, several senators mentioned two young protesters who were each permanently blinded in one eye by rubber bullets shot by Homeland Security officers in Santa Ana. Lawmakers also railed against “kidnappings” off the street of people simply because of their skin colors, accents and dress.

“California is not going to let these thugs get away with it,” Wiener vowed.

“There’s a lot of hyperbole on this floor,” Sen. Tony Strickland (R-Huntington Beach) asserted. He called for repeal of California’s “sanctuary” laws that greatly restrict cooperation by state and local officers with federal immigration agents.

Advertisement

Easing those laws is probably a good idea. But more important, we’ve got to restrain undisciplined federal agents from shooting unarmed people in the back.

Sen. Shannon Grove (R-Bakersfield), who revealed that she has been packing a firearm for 30 years, said that Pretti should never have brought his gun to a protest even if it was legal — which it isn’t in California.

And she’s right. But he never brandished the weapon and shouldn’t have paid with his life.

Neither should Pretti have been immediately attacked as a bad guy by lying federal officials. They’re now paying a political price.

What else you should be reading

The must-read: Planned Parenthood, reproductive healthcare could receive $90 million in new state funding
The TK: Healthcare experts warn “people will die” unless state steps up amid federal cuts
The L.A. Times Special: Meet the un-Gavin. Kentucky’s governor sees a different way to the White House

Advertisement

Until next week,
George Skelton


Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Detroit vigil honors Minneapolis nurse killed during immigration protest

Published

on

Detroit vigil honors Minneapolis nurse killed during immigration protest


Detroit — Members of the nation’s largest federal government employee union, elected officials, religious leaders and others held a vigil Sunday to honor an intensive care nurse who was killed by federal immigration agents during a Jan. 24 protest in Minneapolis.

About 50 people gathered for the vigil outside the John D. Dingell Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center on John R. Similar events were held at VA hospitals across the country to honor Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old member of the American Federation of Government Employees union who worked for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

In an incident that is the subject of a U.S. Department of Justice civil rights investigation, Pretti was shot multiple times by federal agents during a protest in Minneapolis against President Donald Trump’s illegal immigration deportation surge and the tactics used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

According to witnesses and video of the incident, Pretti was recording the agents with his phone and directing traffic before intervening in a woman’s arrest. After he approached agents who were struggling with a woman they were taking into custody, Pretti was pepper-sprayed and tackled before an agent removed a handgun from his waistband. Someone yelled “Gun, gun” before at least two agents fired shots at Pretti, killing him.

Advertisement

Trump administration officials have accused Pretti, who had a concealed pistol license, of unlawfully interfering with an arrest, while critics of the shooting said Pretti was exercising his constitutional right to protest. Pretti was filmed during a Jan. 13 demonstration spitting at agents and kicking the taillight off a federal law enforcement vehicle. In that incident, federal agents tackled Pretti and scuffled with him, although he was not arrested.

Pretti’s death followed the Jan. 7 fatal shooting of Rene Good, who was fatally shot after driving her vehicle toward an ICE agent. Good’s death is not being investigated by the Department of Justice.

Members of the AFGE union, U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, and Pastor Charles Williams II of the National Action Network Michigan Chapter and the Historic King Solomon Baptist Church in Detroit were among those who attended Sunday’s vigil.

“It’s very encouraging to see so many people felt a connection to Alex and wanted to honor him this way,” Tlaib said. “Alex’s parents have asked (people) to please stop spreading lies about (their) son. He liked helping people, and he did that until his last breath.”

Advertisement

ICE officials did not respond to an email seeking comment Sunday.

Pastor Maurice Rudds of Greater Mount Tabor Church told the gathering: “You are at the right place at the right time. I am grateful to be with people who are making things happen.

“We are going to win,” Rudds said. “It may take a lot of time, but we are on the right side of justice and we are going to win. I was taught as a boy to recite the Pledge of Allegiance … but this is not the America I love.”Christine Kozicki, a retired teacher from White Lake, said she doesn’t like the direction of the country.“I see fascism, coming,” said the retired teacher from White Lake Township. “My grandparents came to this country from Poland in 1905, and I’ve been to Poland and have seen the concentration camps. I hear that same drumbeat here in the United States right now.”Roachal Ford, member of the union Local 933, said ICE is taking money from other federal agencies.“ICE needs to be defunded,” Ford said. “They’re killing people.”Bryanaa Wilkiams, also a member of Local 933, added: “This is affecting my generation. America is no longer free.”The AFGE is the nation’s largest federal employee union, representing more than 820,000 workers.

ghunter@detroitnews.com

(313) 222-2134

Advertisement

@GeorgeHunter_DN



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Some U.S. Olympians are speaking out after Minneapolis killings

Published

on

Some U.S. Olympians are speaking out after Minneapolis killings


The fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal authorities in Minneapolis last month have drawn condemnation from politicians, influencers and celebrities — and increasingly from athletes who will soon be representing the U.S. at the Olympics.

Emotions have been running high in Minnesota, where the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown has permeated nearly every aspect of daily life amid weeks of protest and confrontations with federal authorities, and they were on display last Sunday during a Professional Women’s Hockey League game in St. Paul as fans chanted “ICE out now.”

At a postgame press conference, Minnesota Frost stars Kelly Pannek and Taylor Heise, both members of the U.S. Olympic squad, said it was important to acknowledge what was happening in their own community.

“It’s obviously really heavy,” said Pannek, who appeared to be overcome with emotion. “I think people have been asking a lot of us what it’s like to represent our state and our country. I think what I’m most proud to represent is the thousands — tens of thousands — of people who show up on some of the coldest days of the year to stand and fight for what they believe in.”

Advertisement

Heise added that the team has done a good job of making everyone feel welcome and safe during its games, “even though you can’t feel safe, I feel like, in this time and place here in Minnesota.”

Cross-country skier Jessie Diggins also acknowledged the situation last week after her final competition before the 2026 Winter Olympics. Diggins, who won gold in 2018, wrote in an Instagram post that she hoped she was able to bring some joy to people watching and honor all those back home protecting their neighbors.

“Honestly, this week was mentally and emotionally stressful for me for many different reasons, all of which were outside of sport,” Diggins wrote on Jan. 25, the day after Pretti’s killing. “Primarily, it’s been devastating following the news of what has been happening in Minnesota right now and it’s really hard feeling like I can do nothing about it.”

Diggins, Pannek and Heise are three of the 24 athletes from Minnesota who will represent the U.S. at the Milan Cortina Games. But they are not the only Olympians who have spoken out.

Figure skater Alysa Liu, who is from California, has been sharing posts to her Instagram Stories this week about the deaths of Pretti and Good. She also shared a post on Thursday urging people to call their representatives in Congress to oppose the current funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that oversees immigration enforcement.

Advertisement

It’s unclear whether more Olympians will speak out on the world stage in the coming weeks, especially following news that the U.S. will send Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to Italy to assist with security.

In a video that’s been viewed more than 500,000 times on TikTok and another 60,000 on Instagram, Coach Jackie J, a popular content creator who focuses on sports, urged athletes to use their platform at the Olympics to “speak up” against a government “going after its own people,” describing it as not only an opportunity but a “responsibility.”

“Let everyone know that you’re not representing this government, you’re not representing what it’s doing, you’re representing the people,” she said.

The International Olympic Committee noted that all athletes have the ability to express their views but that there are restrictions in place to maintain the neutrality of the Games overall.

Athletes can’t make political statements during competition or official events, such as a medal ceremony or the opening or closing ceremonies. They are also not allowed to speak out inside the Olympic village. The IOC said these rules have been in place since the Tokyo Games and were made in consultation with the IOC Athletes’ Commission.

Advertisement

The Olympics have been a venue for political expression for more than a century, with the first modern podium protest taking place in 1906 by Irish track athlete Peter O’Connor. After winning the silver medal in the long jump, O’Connor scaled the flagpole to replace a British flag with an Irish nationalist banner in protest of having to compete as a British athlete before Ireland gained its independence.

The 1906 Intercalated Games were considered Olympic Games by the International Olympic Committee at the time, but the IOC no longer recognizes the event or its medals.

One of the most well-known protests to Americans happened at the 1968 Summer Olympics, when Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists and bowed their heads in a Black Power salute to protest racial discrimination. Smith and Carlos, U.S. track stars, had just won first and third place in the 200-meter race.

Extending gloved hands skyward in racial protest, U.S. athletes Tommie Smith, center, and John Carlos stare downward during the playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner” after Smith received the gold and Carlos the bronze medal in the 200-meter run at the Summer Olympics in Mexico City on Oct. 16, 1968.AP file

Amy Bass, a professor of sports studies at Manhattanville University in Purchase, New York, said that at first the big news was that Smith had broken a world record, but the protest made headlines only after the U.S. Olympic Committee removed their Olympic credentials following pressure from the International Olympic Committee.

“Doing that sort of created a bigger spectacle than had already happened,” Bass said. “And so they kept their medals and they were sent home.”

Advertisement

Their protest was part of a larger movement by a collective of Black athletes, the Olympic Project for Human Rights, who had threatened to boycott the Olympic Games if a set of civil rights demands were not met, according to Bass. But the group failed to find consensus, which led Smith and Carlos to the now famous moment in Mexico City.

Athletes don’t leave their lived experiences or belief systems behind the moment they step into a competition, Bass said, and the platforms they’ve worked hard to build are theirs to use as they see fit.

“The Olympics are inherently political, because one enters the Olympics under a flag which represents some form of nation state,” Bass said. “So there’s nothing apolitical about the Olympic Games, and there never has been. There’s nothing apolitical about sport, and there never has been.”

The 1968 protest led to Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter banning demonstrations at the podium and during specific events.

There are big and small ways athletes can signal their own views.

Advertisement

Bass noted that just before the 2018 Winter Olympics, skier Lindsey Vonn told CNN that she would not visit the White House if she won a gold medal, in a statement against President Donald Trump. At the Tokyo Games a few years later, the U.S. women’s national soccer team took a knee before they took the field, a protest against racial injustice.

It’s up to individual athletes to decide what role they want to play in a larger collective action, something that is a lot to consider, Bass added.

“The ancient Greeks created the Olympics for this reason — to put down swords and see what peace felt like, so that if we ever achieve it, we’ll know when it arrives,” Bass said. “But the world doesn’t stop being the world just because they’re skiers on the hill.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending