Kansas

The North Kansas City stadium site might just be the best one

Published

on


A lot has happened since John Sherman, principal owner of the Kansas City Royals franchise, first floated the idea of a new stadium in November of 2021. The road since then has been winding and frustrating, and four years and one failed vote later and we don’t know where the stadium is going or what it will look like.

But there is a light at the end of the tunnel. The Royals’ lease with the Truman Sports Complex ends after the 2030 season, which means they have to start on construction relatively soon to be ready by the 2031 season. Missouri and Kansas have both passed state-level funding. And the Royals had planned on announcing their final plan earlier this year, which implies they are close to an answer themselves.

Lately, there has been a lot of smoke surrounding the North Kansas City option. The office of NKC mayor Jesse Smith put out a press release on October 16 stating that:

The City of North Kansas City continues to have conversations with the Kansas City Royals regarding the possibility of a stadium and related development in North Kansas City. These discussions are substantial and will ultimately involve collaboration among the State of Missouri, Clay County, and the City in any final framework.

Additionally, the Missouri legislature had previously passed a bill that allows Clay County to create a sports complex authority that would govern the stadium. And we can’t forget that North Kansas City was one of two initial proposed sites by the Royals back in August 2023.

Advertisement

Like many folks, my reaction to the proposed Clay County site was one of skepticism. What was the point? To just leave a suburban area to go to another suburban area? Why not just stay in Kauffman Stadium?

I have since come around, and not because I am being paid off by the Royals. I have no idea what they’re doing and they have declined to comment on media requests about the stadium for a while now. No; I genuinely think that the North Kansas City site is the best one outside the East Village site, which seems dead. Let’s dig into why.

The Royals’ new stadium goals

So much has happened that it’s worth re-visiting the first real piece of official communication the Royals put into the world: an open letter from Sherman about what the Royals wanted to accomplish.

There are two things that stand out as clear benchmarks for what the Royals wanted the stadium to be from the very start of this project. First, though downtown was the primary goal, the Royals were cognizant that there were other sites that could work. They were pursuing sites “both in downtown Kansas City and close to it.”

Advertisement

Second, and most importantly, the Royals wanted to build a ballpark district, with “residential, commercial, and community components.” As Sherman wrote, their version was to construct “a new ballpark district and all that comes with it – one that is woven into the fabric of our city, can host events and concerts, and boosts our local economy.”

Why North Kansas City works

Kauffman Stadium is a beautiful park that exists within an ugly car dystopia that sucks the life out of the entire area. It’s surrounded by acres and acres of useless concrete. It’s cut off from goods, services, housing, and lodging. It is an unwalkable island wasteland.

Contrast that with walkable areas, where you don’t have to drive a car to get to where you want to go. More importantly, there are people already there. People live in walkable areas in multiunit apartments and condos, and walkable areas have narrower streets, more public transit, and a significantly higher density of resources and services than car-centric areas.

Downtowns are usually the only areas in American cities that have walkability and density. But suburbs can be walkable, too. Consider the area around Johnson Drive and Lamar in Mission, Kansas, versus the area around 119th Street and Strang Line Road in Olathe. Both Kansas City suburbs, but one is significantly prettier, more lively, and livable than the other.

Advertisement

North Kansas City is one of the only areas in the metro that has the ingredients for significant walkability. Indeed, the Armour Road area is already walkable and bikeable.

The above screenshot of Google Maps shows roughly where the Royals have proposed their site: bordered by Armour Road on the north and 16th Avenue on the south, and from Erie Street on the west to Howell Street on the east. North of Armour Road, there are rows and rows of houses, a public library, North Kansas City High School, and multiple new apartment complexes.

Add the streetcar into the equation, and the area quickly becomes an opportunity to transform into the type of urban neighborhood that is a destination. RideKC has already created an extensive and recent study of what an extension would look like up to North Kansas City, and their plan is to extend the line over the Heart of America Bridge and then up Swift Street.

And though walkability is key, car access is still easy. I-35 is immediately to the east, and there’s access to I-29, I-635, and Highway 169—along with access to downtown and I-70 via Highway 9.

So why wasn’t NKC the first choice?

Advertisement

No site is perfect, which I’m sure the Royals have grappled with significantly.

At the same time, there are some pretty big reasons why downtown is a better option than North Kansas City. One is population; the downtown KC population is about 32,000 people, compared to under 5,000 people in NKC as of the 2020 census. Furthermore, Jackson County has over two and a half times as many residents as Clay County, which is a significant difference when it comes to tax revenue and the inevitable “public” part of the “public-private partnership” that the Royals want.

And, of course, that streetcar thing? It’s already downtown.

But at this point in the juncture, North Kansas City is also the only place that fulfills all of the Royals’ initial desires for the project. The Washington Square Park site downtown is tiny and there is not space for a “ballpark village.” No site in Johnson County or Wyandotte County makes much sense for that, either, and a Legends site would end up as Kauffman Stadium West (derogatory).

If the Royals aren’t going to pull the trigger on the East Village site—which has always been the best choice—for whatever reason, North Kansas City provides a way to catalyze some public transit investment and transform the area into something the Royals can be proud of.

Advertisement

At least, if the public isn’t on the hook for too much money. But that, as they say, is a whole different ball game.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Exit mobile version