Kansas
Kansas Republicans may have veto-proof majorities to end mail ballot grace period
What is the Kansas Supermajority? How leaders react to 2024 election
The 2025 Legislative Session begins Jan. 12 with Republicans controlling the House and Senate under Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
Kansas Republican lawmakers are getting close to repealing the three-day grace period for mail ballots, a law that was broadly popular when it was enacted eight years ago.
The Republican-led Legislature has passed Senate Bill 4, sending it to Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly’s desk. While the bill faces a likely veto, the GOP supermajorities appear to have the votes for an override.
Under Kansas election law, voters are allowed to advance vote by mail. As long as they are postmarked by Election Day, the ballots can be counted if they are delivered within three days.
That three-day grace period would be repealed by SB 4, meaning all mail ballots would have to arrive by 7 p.m. Election Day in order to be counted. The proposed change would take effect in 2026.
What lawmakers say about repealing grace period
That law was enacted in 2017 with bipartisan support in a near-unanimous Legislature. It had the backing of then-Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who said the motivation behind the law was concern about mail delays.
“Our opposition to this bill is simple: it’s wrong for the government to throw out votes for no good reason,” said Davis Hammett, president of Loud Light Civic Action, in a statement. “That is the only thing this bill would do if passed into law — throw out Kansans’ valid ballots because of slow mail. Mail delays are a government failure — a failure that this same legislature, with near unanimous support, voted to help fix in 2017 when they added additional mail processing days for ballots cast on election day to arrive.”
Senate Minority Leader Dinah Sykes, D-Lenexa, said during floor debate last month that mail processing problems “have honestly only gotten worse” since 2017.
But Republicans have largely flipped their view after mail voting was politicized following President Donald Trump’s claims of fraud in the 2020 election.
Sen. Bill Clifford, R-Garden City, said that he believes Kansas has secure elections. But after previously supporting the three-day grace period, he said he changed his mind out of concerned that the perception of fraud will dampen voter turnout.
“Being a party chair in western Kansas of the Republican Party, I certainly have to deal with individuals who still think there’s fraud in Kansas elections,” Clifford said. “Although I would disagree with that, that perception is the reality for many voters.”
Sen. Mike Thompson, R-Shawnee, is the chair of the Senate Federal and State Affairs Committee. He cited a federal appeals court ruling from a different circuit than Kansas where the judges found that grace periods for mail ballots are unconstitutional. The ruling doesn’t apply to Kansas.
“That gives us additional justification for eliminating this three-day grace period,” Thompson said.
Sen. Brenda Dietrich, R-Topeka, was the only Senate Republican to vote against the bill.
“I voted no on that,” Dietrich said while speaking to Greater Topeka Partnership officials last month. “I have 22 nursing homes, and that’s too important to them.”
Rep. Pat Proctor, R-Leavenworth, is the chair of the House Elections Committee.
“Voter confidence that the results of our elections reflect their will, that every vote is counted, lies at the very heart of our form of government and our way of life,” Proctor said in a statement. “According to the Secretary of State, the three-day grace period disenfranchised as many as a thousand voters last year. Joining the 32 states that have decided that Election Day should be Election Day is a positive step toward restoring voter confidence and ensuring every vote is counted in Kansas.”
Rep. Alexis Simmons, D-Topeka, is a member of the House Elections Committee.
“Election misinformation is the true cause of any issue with voter confidence,” Simmons said in a statement. “This bill was passed through a campaign of election misinformation, in part because of the chairman’s continued peddling of fake data. The Secretary of State’s Office has shared the data they collected about the issues Rep. Proctor raised during this debate and there is no evidence to back up his claims.
“In fact, the data shows the opposite of what Rep. Proctor is saying. Very clearly, the 3-day mail processing period protects Kansans who rely on mail voting from being disenfranchised due to slow mail. I am particularly concerned about this due to the recent news that Elon Musk’s absurd DOGE efforts will soon be focused on slicing and dicing the USPS.”
How many mail ballots benefit from 3-day grace period?
Eliminating the three-day grace period could mean that thousands of votes are not counted in future elections.
Secretary of State Scott Schwab’s office provided lawmakers with data from the 2024 general election in Kansas.
There were 163,405 mail ballots sent out, of which 147,359 were returned by the voter.
Of that, 2,110 ballots were received during the three-day grace period after Election Day. Those ballots were counted.
There were 603 ballots received after the grace period. Those ballots weren’t counted. Neither were 104 ballots received after Election Day that didn’t have a postmark.
The Secretary of State’s Office remained neutral on SB 4, but provided lawmakers with a summary of arguments for and against. It also lobbied to keep ballot drop boxes as an option for voters.
Ann Mah, a former Topeka lawmaker and former member of the Kansas State Board of Education, testified about statistics she got from the Shawnee County Election Office. In the 2020 election, there were 217 mail ballots received during the three-day grace period. In the 2022 election, there were 291 ballots.
“If passed, this bill would likely disenfranchise thousands of voters across the state of Kansas,” Mah said.
Republicans likely have veto-proof majorities for expected veto
While the governor is expected to veto the bill, Republicans likely have the votes for an override.
The Senate passed SB 4 on Thursday with a 30-10 vote, which is three above the supermajority needed for an override. One Republican sided with the Democrats.
A week before, the House passed the bill 80-39. While the House was four votes shy of a veto-proof supermajority, there were four Republicans absent that day — all four of whom previously voted to repeal the three-day grace period in 2023. There were four Republicans who sided with Democrats.
In 2023, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 209 to repeal the three-day grace period, but failed to override Kelly’s veto. The governor raised concerns for voters in the military.
In her veto message, Kelly said it would “likely result in too many rural Kansans not having their votes counted in important elections. That is unacceptable. We should be doing everything we can to make it easier — not harder — for Kansans to make their voices heard at the ballot box.”
The Senate mustered 25 votes for an override, two short of a supermajority. While the override attempt did not make it to the House for a vote, that chamber had 76 votes to pass the bill, which would have been eight short of the number needed to override a veto.
Republicans tried again in 2024, but the Senate GOP sank their own three-day grace period repeal bill by anchoring down the already controversial proposal with even more controversial proposals. The additions made it a sweeping bill to ban ballot drop boxes and ban electronic voting machines, among other provisions. The bill failed to pass because several Republicans sided with Democrats.
Jason Alatidd is a Statehouse reporter for The Topeka Capital-Journal. He can be reached by email at jalatidd@gannett.com. Follow him on X @Jason_Alatidd.
Kansas
This Chiefs-Bears trade would land Kansas City it’s long-term Travis Kelce replacement
Bullet point summary by AI
- The Chiefs are exploring long-term solutions at tight end beyond Travis Kelce’s expected 2026 retirement.
- One potential move involves targeting a veteran player from a team transitioning to a new starter at the position.
- The deal’s structure hinges on future playoff performance, creating a high-stakes incentive for both franchises.
While the 2026 draft is just in the books, it’s never too early to start thinking about the 2027 season — and if there’s one team that’s already looking that far ahead, it’s the Kansas City Chiefs.
Star tight end Travis Kelce is almost certainly retiring after the 2026 campaign despite an inflated new deal, and looking at the Chiefs’ depth chart, backup Noah Gray is not starting-caliber material. You could argue the team can scout for star talent in next year’s draft, but that would come with significant risk and opportunity cost if a prospect isn’t immediately NFL-ready.
Instead, there’s a potential solution general manager Brett Veach can utilize by acquiring an excess asset from another team.
This Chiefs-Bears trade solves Kansas City’s Travis Kelce problem
The Chicago Bears are clearly moving forward with 2025 first-round pick Colston Loveland as their TE1, in addition to taking blocking specialist Sam Roush out of Stanford in this year’s draft. All of which leaves backup — and previous starter — Cole Kmet on the outside looking in. The 27-year-old still has a lot of high-quality football left to play, and he’d certainly sign off on the opportunity to get starting snaps for a team with a championship window still wide open.
The problem is going to be convincing Chicago to pick up the phone in the first place. Kmet signed a restructured deal in April which disincentivizes the Bears from moving him until next year. A pre-June 1 deal would cost Chicago $4.1 million against the salary cap, while any swap after that date only saves the team $1.4 million.
So, with the present season not really an option, these two teams would need to be negotiating with next year in mind as Kmet is projected to cost the Bears $15.4 million against the cap in 2027. That’s the incentive Chicago needs to move him.
At the moment, Kmet is worth a conditional 2027 fifth-round pick — which may sound cheap, but the devil is in the details. Chicago will certainly dictate that an escalator be attached to the pick: For example, if Kansas City misses the playoffs in 2027, then it remains a fifth-rounder but may be deferred until 2028. If they qualify for the postseason then it could stay in 2027. A championship could push it up a round or two (though that would be a tough sell for the Chiefs).
Kmet has topped 500 receiving yards in three of his six seasons in Chicago, so there’s a good reason for Kansas City to inquire about his availability. The Bears, in turn, used a third-round pick to select Stanford’s Sam Roush – signaling they too are preparing for Kmet’s eventual departure.
Follow
Kansas
Kansas court sides with Stormont Vail in Medicaid payment dispute
Stormont Vail Healthcare is in a legal battle with the state government, alleging the Medicaid program was wrong to refuse payment for the hospitalization of a pregnant patient with complications.
At issue is a disagreement between the Topeka hospital and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment over whether inpatient health care services were medically necessary for the Medicaid patient’s last two weeks of pregnancy.
The Kansas Court of Appeals did not resolve that dispute, but it did side with Stormont Vail in a May 8 decision. The unanimous three-judge panel reversed a decision by Shawnee County District Court Judge Thomas Luedke and vacated an order from KDHE’s State Appeals Committee. The matter now goes back to the appeals committee for reconsideration.
The appellate panel was comprised of Judges Jacy Hurst, Thomas Malone and Stephen Hill, which heard oral arguments on Aug. 5. Hurst wrote the court’s opinion.
The lawsuit stems from a 2018 case of a pregnant patient, who is not named in appellate court documents. She was 28 years old at the time and had an intellectual disability among other complications, including rapid weight loss caused by hyperemesis gravidarum.
The woman was originally admitted at Newman Regional Health in Emporia before she was transferred to Stormont Vail. Part of the hospitalization during her third trimester was covered.
But the final two weeks were not because Sunflower Health Plan, one of the managed care organizations in the state’s privatized Medicaid program known as KanCare, refused to reimburse for the patient’s continued hospitalization through the day the child was born via cesarean section.
“We are here because the Kansas Medicaid program has wrongfully refused to pay for some of an inpatient hospitalization while a Medicaid beneficiary was at Stormont Vail,” said Amanda Wilwert, an attorney for the hospital, during oral arguments. “Stormont believes the inpatient care was medically necessary as defined by the Kansas Medicaid regulations.”
Court records and oral arguments show the state expected Stormont Vail to look into having a home health agency care for the patient in Emporia instead of continued hospitalization — even though home health generally does not take care of pregnant patients and her doctors believed the expectant mother was not stable enough to discharge.
“The way it’s supposed to work,” said Darren Sharp, an attorney representing KDHE, “is the managed care organization, in this case Sunflower Health, on behalf of KDHE reviews the medical records, asks about the appropriate level of care and whether there’s any other interventions that would be more cost effective or appropriate depending on the level of or depending on the patient’s records and the patient’s status.”
Sharp argued medical records showed the patients was getting better because of total parenteral nutrition, or TPN.
“This is when a tube, a PICC, is inserted and your minerals and your electrolytes and all of your nutrition is then intravenously provided,” Sharp said.
He said the treatment “was eliminating her vomiting, her diarrhea, she had no fever, her glucose levels were stabilized.”
In their ruling, the judges indicated the KDHE appeals committee primarily cared about the cost saving of using home health versus hospitalization while disregarding the treating physician for insufficient reasons and ignoring evidence on potential benefits or harms to the patient.
But the judges declined to resolve the dispute. Rather, unless the decision is appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court, the matter goes back to the KDHE administrative process.
There, the agency’s appeals committee must reconsider the case consistent with the Court of Appeal’s ruling. The published decision sets new precedent interpreting state laws and regulations on the Medicaid program.
“While this court provides no opinion on whether the disputed inpatient healthcare services met the definition of medical necessity,” Hurst wrote, “the record shows that some of the (appeals committee’s) factual findings were not supported by the record as a whole and that the (appeals committee) inaccurately applied the law when it failed to consider (the patient’s) individual characteristics and assess the harms and benefits of the healthcare intervention.
“In making a medical necessity determination, the reviewing agency must make an individualized determination based on the record as a whole.”
Jason Alatidd is a Statehouse reporter for The Topeka Capital-Journal. He can be reached by email at jalatidd@usatodayco.com. Follow him on X @Jason_Alatidd.
Kansas
Kansas Lottery Pick 3, 2 By 2 winning numbers for May 7, 2026
The Kansas Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at May 7, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 7 drawing
Midday: 6-2-2
Evening: 0-5-9
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning 2 By 2 numbers from May 7 drawing
Red Balls: 07-15, White Balls: 02-16
Check 2 By 2 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 7 drawing
05-08-21-44-48, Bonus: 01
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
All Kansas Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $599. For prizes over $599, winners can submit winning tickets through the mail or in person at select Kansas Lottery offices.
By mail, send a winner claim form and your signed lottery ticket to:
Kansas Lottery Headquarters
128 N Kansas Avenue
Topeka, KS 66603-3638
(785) 296-5700
To submit in person, sign the back of your ticket, fill out a claim form, and deliver the form along with your signed lottery ticket to Kansas Lottery headquarters. 128 N Kansas Avenue, Topeka, KS 66603-3638, (785) 296-5700. Hours: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes of any amount.
Check previous winning numbers and payouts at Kansas Lottery.
When are the Kansas Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT Tuesday and Friday.
- Pick 3 Midday/Evening: 1:10 p.m. and 9:10 p.m. CT daily.
- 2 By 2: 9:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
- Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Super Kansas Cash: 9:10 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Kansas editor. You can send feedback using this form.
-
Science12 seconds agoPentagon Releases Files on U.F.O.s
-
Health6 minutes agoGuava for Weight Loss Is a Real Thing—Here’s the Juicy Truth
-
Culture18 minutes agoWhy Is Everyone Obsessed With Bogs?
-
Lifestyle24 minutes agoHow ‘Mile End Kicks’ Nailed the Indie Sleaze Look
-
Technology36 minutes agoThese great digital gifts will arrive just in time for Mother’s Day
-
World42 minutes agoNorth Korea updates constitution to require automatic nuclear strike if Kim Jong Un is assassinated: report
-
Politics48 minutes agoHarris accuses Trump allies of trying to ‘rig’ 2026 midterms after Virginia court tosses redistricting measure
-
Health54 minutes agoSingle workout cuts cravings, offering new hope for smokers trying to quit