Summit Carbon Solutions touts pipeline easement milestone in Iowa

AMES, Iowa — Summit Carbon Options says it has reached a significant milestone because it pushes forward on its carbon seize pipeline mission.

The Iowa-based firm says it has labored with 800 Iowa landowners to signal 1,400 easement agreements totaling almost 350 miles. The corporate says it has agreements for greater than half of the proposed route within the state.

Summit says it stays on monitor to start building on the two,000 mile, five-state pipeline within the third quarter of 2023.

The corporate is partnering with 32 ethanol crops throughout the Midwest, together with 12 in Iowa, to develop a pipeline that may retailer carbon underground in western North Dakota.

The greenhouse gasoline captured from the ethanol crops will assist the crops thrive by opening up entry to markets with low carbon gasoline requirements, similar to California and Canada.

Summit says about 40% of all of the corn grown in america and stays a key driver of commodity costs and land values.

“From the outset of our mission, Summit Carbon Options has been dedicated to partnering with landowners to open new financial alternatives for ethanol producers and strengthen the agricultural market for farmers,” Summit Carbon Options CEO Lee Clean mentioned in a information launch. “Securing easement agreements for greater than 50% of the proposed route in Iowa clearly demonstrates the momentum behind our mission and the rising recognition that carbon seize, transportation and storage tasks will improve our economic system, enhance environmental outcomes, and generate new sources of income for native communities.”

Summit says the Midwest Carbon Specific pipeline is a $4.5 billion mission, with a $1 billion funding in Iowa alone. Different states on the route are Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota and North Dakota.

Thus far, Summit has filed for permits in Iowa and South Dakota.

The carbon seize mission is also being met with some resistance from landowners within the path of the proposed pipeline.

Jessica Mazour of the Sierra Membership in Iowa has been serving to manage landowner resistance.

“Summit can tout no matter false look of assist that they need, however they’ve proven us time and time once more that we can not consider something they are saying,” Mazour mentioned in an electronic mail. “The reality is that 80% of the counties on the Summit route have objected to the pipeline mission and over 95% of the filings within the Iowa Utilities Board docket are objections. Till they’re achieved submitting their eminent area record, we must always not consider any of their uncited propaganda.”

Some landowners even refusing to even let survey crews from the pipeline firm onto their land.

Court docket data in North Dakota point out SCS Carbon Transport has sued 23 property homeowners in North Dakota.

Some county governments even have taken motion in opposition to the pipeline and the potential use of eminent area to safe easements, together with

altering allow necessities in Emmons County, North Dakota.

Summits says it can assist the ag economic system and cites a examine by accounting agency Ernst & Younger that exhibits Summit Carbon Options pays a mean of $1.2 million in new property taxes yearly to each Iowa county the place the mission is situated.

Summit Carbon Options says it has signed easement agreements with extra landowners over the previous 4 weeks than every other comparable timeframe for the reason that mission was introduced in 2021. It lists O’Brien, Pottawattamie, Floyd, Crawford, Chickasaw, Greene, and Boone counties the place greater than 70% of the proposed route has been secured. Summit says it has distributed greater than $80 million in easement funds to Iowa landowners.

“Summit Carbon Options is extremely inspired by the variety of landowners who’ve signed easement agreements to assist advance our carbon seize, transportation, and storage mission,” Clean mentioned in a information launch. “We sit up for persevering with to fulfill straight with Iowans to debate this crucial funding, reply their questions, and work collectively to advance the ethanol and agricultural industries which can be so crucial to our state and area.”