Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa’s top leaders need to quit treating reporters as obstacles

Published

on

Iowa’s top leaders need to quit treating reporters as obstacles



Majority Republicans took what should have been an unremarkable bookkeeping matter and made it another example of them dismissing the merit of independent reporting on the people’s business.

An insightful journalist covering Iowa state government won a capitulation from the Legislature on Wednesday. After rather transparently giving Laura Belin of the Bleeding Heartland website the runaround for much of the past five years, the Iowa House gave Belin a press credential.

The rules for credentialing had for years been moving goalposts that always managed to exclude Belin, who writes and edits her site from a progressive viewpoint and is often critical of Republicans who control state government. Belin sued House Chief Clerk Meghan Nelson in federal court on Jan. 19 — and a few days later she had her credential.

Advertisement

The sequence of events reinforces the conclusion that there was never any neutral principle about journalism or workspace at issue here. (The lawsuit head-shakingly recounts evolving excuses: that passes were not available “to the public” or to “nontraditional/independent” media, that they were available only to “press, radio and television” and then to “bona fide correspondents of repute” and so on.) Iowa’s judicial branch and state university athletic departments seem to have no difficulties in giving members of the news media the same access without splitting hairs over the mechanism or content of their work.  

Instead, majority Republicans (who presumably endorse the work of the chief clerk they hire) took what should have been an unremarkable bookkeeping matter and made it another example of them dismissing the merit of independent reporting on the people’s business.

It’s possible to produce incisive reporting on the Legislature without special press access, as Belin has done for over a decade. Many lawmakers actively respond to messages, and both the House and the Senate to their credit have greatly improved the public’s access to all stages of the legislative process through video streaming. But the pass lets journalists work in dedicated space on the House floor, hear debate more clearly, and touch base with legislators both purposefully and spontaneously.

“I hope this victory for press freedom will make any public official reluctant to deny access to reporters, either as retaliation for tough coverage or because of political bias,” Belin said in a prepared statement. 

Advertisement

This resolution does not mean all is well, however. Unlike her predecessors, Gov. Kim Reynolds does not hold regular news conferences that include time for reporter questions.

The Iowa Senate shows no sign it will ever allow journalists to return to their floor seating in that chamber, last made available to the press in 2020. Two years ago, a spokesman bemoaned, “As non-traditional media outlets proliferate, it creates an increasingly difficult scenario for the Senate, as a governmental entity, to define the criteria of a media outlet.” To repeat, among state agencies, it’s seemingly only the Legislature that’s having this difficulty.

“The doors of each house shall be open,” the Iowa Constitution reads. Lawmakers going back to Iowa’s territorial days have recognized their responsibility to allow journalists to report their deliberations to the rest of the public. Today’s lawmakers should have nothing to fear from journalists working near their desks. In fact, having a forum for impromptu chats should mean a better chance for a lawmaker’s nuanced thoughts to get published, which serves everybody’s interest, including the 3 million Iowans who won’t set foot in the Statehouse during the session.

As a final point, top officials in the executive and legislative branches set an example, for good or ill, in following the letter and spirit of the First Amendment and Iowa’s open meetings and open records laws. Lately, it’s more often been a bad example. Just a few months ago, Belin and others won a separate lawsuit against Reynolds’ office over its failure to provide public records, as required by law. By waiting to act until there’s formal litigation, these leaders imply that the rules are obstacles to evade, rather than principles to uphold.

Advertisement

There’s much room for improvement by top state officials in respecting First Amendment rights, but they could start by bringing reporters — including Belin — back to the Iowa Senate floor.

Lucas Grundmeier, on behalf of the Register’s editorial board

This editorial is the opinion of the Des Moines Register’s editorial board: Carol Hunter, executive editor; Lucas Grundmeier, opinion editor; and Richard Doak and Rox Laird, editorial board members.

Want more opinions? Read other perspectives with our free newsletter, follow us on Facebook or visit us at DesMoinesRegister.com/opinion. Respond to any opinion by submitting a Letter to the Editor at DesMoinesRegister.com/letters.

Advertisement



Source link

Iowa

Iowa Supreme court affirms eviction order for Short’s Burger & Shine

Published

on

Iowa Supreme court affirms eviction order for Short’s Burger & Shine


Following a years-long legal saga, the Iowa Supreme Court recently upheld a decision to evict Short’s Burger and Shine from its South Clinton Street building.

The May 22 decision, delivered by Chief Justice Susan Christensen, agreed with the Johnson County District Court’s decision to evict the downtown burger restaurant after finding that it did not notify the building’s owner — a trust operated by Midwest One Bank — of its intent to extend the lease.

The decision concludes one part of the Short’s legal saga. The now-closed restaurant is also in litigation for a discrimination and retaliation lawsuit Short’s owner, Kevin Perez filed in 2024 against Midwest One Bank, the trust of late building owner Haywood Belle, Belle’s widow, a bank employee, and the City of Iowa City

Advertisement

Iowa City’s Short’s Burgers and Shine closed in 2024

Short’s closed in early 2024 after the court determined Perez hadn’t renewed the business’s lease on time.

Short’s opened at 18 S. Clinton Street in 2008 with the goal of honoring the legacy and story of former building owner H.D. Short, who shined shoes for 50 years, beginning in 1920. The original ownership group included Perez, Dan Ouverson, and former Hawkeye and NFL player Nate Kaeding, who now runs the Gold Cap Hospitality ownership group.

Eviction proceedings started when Short’s temporarily closed in April 2022 “to fix poor building conditions” without notifying Midwest One Bank, the executor of Belle’s trust.

The closure breached a part of the lease agreement that said the restaurant would default on its lease if it “failed to engage” in normal business for more than 15 consecutive business days, the court found. The renovations also violated a provision that forbade structural changes or improvements without prior written approval.

Advertisement

Midwest One Bank sent notice on May 10, 2022, that Short’s would default on its lease if it did not reopen for regular business and cease renovations within 10 days, according to court documents. Shorts responded, claiming it could not reopen for business until renovations were complete because the gas could not be turned back on until repairs were finished.

Midwest One Bank “terminated” the lease and started eviction proceedings in May 2022. Shorts was allowed to continue operating and occupying the building while the case was litigated.

Midwest One Bank filed two eviction claims and delivered notice that Short’s needed to vacate the building by the end of the lease on April 30. Short’s did not vacate, and Midwest One Bank pursued a third eviction claim, accusing the owners of failing to provide notice of renewal.

Advertisement

Short’s argued that because they continued renovations, disputed eviction, and secured insurance, it was evidence of their intent to renew.

The restaurant owners also argued that pending eviction proceedings prevented them from renewal. The court argued that Short’s simply did not declare intent to renew for “whatever reason.”

“Mere forgetfulness does not entitle a party to equitable relief,” the decision reads.

Liam Halawith covers Johnson County local government and public safety for the Press-Citizen. Reach him by email at lhalawith@registermedia.com. Follow him on X at @liam_halawith.   

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Fired Iowa nurse aide wins jobless benefits after numerous resident-care complaints

Published

on

Fired Iowa nurse aide wins jobless benefits after numerous resident-care complaints


WEST DES MOINES, Iowa (IOWA CAPITAL DISPATCH) – An Iowa nursing home worker fired after being accused of repeatedly neglecting residents’ needs is entitled to unemployment benefits, a judge has ruled.

State records indicate certified nurse aide Abigail Kromah worked for Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Care Center in West Des Moines from May 2024 through December 2025, when she was fired. She subsequently applied for unemployment benefits, which led to a recent hearing before an administrative law judge.

The hearing records indicate Kromah testified that when she was fired on Dec. 19, 2025, the employer informed her that the discharge was due to “numerous resident complaints” regarding the care she had been providing.

According to the judge’s findings in the case, Kromah had received multiple disciplinary warnings related to resident care. In August 2024, she allegedly received verbal and written warnings for failing to answer residents’ call-lights in a timely manner, failing to properly assist residents with their personal care, and for complaining about the residents in common areas of the workplace.

Advertisement

Her employer testified Kromah was also given warnings for refusing work instructions from the nursing staff, and for telling a resident who needed to be toileted to go the bathroom in their briefs.

In August 2025, it was alleged that Kromah failed to check on a resident throughout the entire night. During that shift, a nurse had neglected to unclamp a feeding tube, which caused the tube to leak. When another nurse checked on the resident at 5 a.m., the resident was “drenched in feeding solution from head to toe,” according to the judge’s findings.

‘I can’t live this way… She’s horrible.’

Days later, the home alleged, a resident of the facility entered the hallway in his wheelchair at about 6 a.m., loudly complaining, “I can’t do this anymore,” and, “I can’t live this way.” The man allegedly refused to go back to his room, explaining that Kromah was there and “she’s horrible.”

The man reportedly stated had had switched on his call-light to have his urinal emptied, but Kromah never came to assist him, which meant the urinal overflowed and spilled on him. When Kromah eventually came to the room, the man allegedly said, she changed him into dry clothing but did not clean him.

The home alleged Kromah was given additional warnings in October 2025 for reportedly failing to answer residents’ call lights and failing to complete her rounds every two hours. One resident of the home had allegedly became so frustrated by the lack of response to his call-light that he contacted the police on one occasion, according to the judge’s findings.

Advertisement

State inspection reports indicate Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Care Center was cited for insufficient staff in January 2026, with one resident complaining the issue with call-lights had been a longstanding problem. According to the inspectors, the man said that on one occasion, he couldn’t get help to clear his airway and was afraid he was going to die unless he managed to clear it himself, which he did.

In ruling that Kromah was entitled to jobless benefits, Administrative Law Judge Michael Lunn noted that while she had clearly been warned about deficiencies in resident care, she appeared to have been fired for a separate issue — attendance — for which she had received no such warnings.

A discharge for misconduct cannot be based on past acts such as the resident-care issues, Lunn ruled, but must instead be based on a current act. With no current act of disqualifying misconduct, Lunn stated, Kromah was entitled to collect unemployment benefits.

Iowa Capital Dispatch was unable to locate Kromah to seek comment for this article.

Copyright 2026 IOWA CAPITAL DISPATCH. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa begins its summer meal programs

Published

on

Iowa begins its summer meal programs


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – With some schools already on summer break, programs are helping make sure Iowa kids don’t go hungry.

The state’s Seamless Summer Option program provides free meals to children and teens 18 and younger during summer break.

Those meals are served at schools, parks and community centers. Children are served on first come, first served basis.

You can find a full list of those on the USDA’s Summer Meal Finder.

Advertisement

This year, the state has returned to the federal SUN Bucks program.

Eligible families can get up to $120 per child. That is then divided up to $40 a month to help pay for healthy food purchases.

The Des Moines Area Religious Council told KCRG after the state announced its return to the program that area businesses, as well as those in need, would benefit.

“Those dollars are going to go back into local grocery stores. It’s an investment in our community. When we look at feeding programs like SNAP, we know that it has that multiplier effect every time a dollar is spent, you’re getting more out of it,” said Blake Wiladsen, the council’s communication manager.

The state will regulate the program similarly to the state’s SNAP program. Things like candy, soda, vitamins, minerals, pre-made foods, and juice made with less than 50% fruit or vegetables cannot be purchased with Iowa SUN Bucks.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending