Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa Senate votes to require businesses use E-Verify to avoid hiring undocumented workers

Published

on

Iowa Senate votes to require businesses use E-Verify to avoid hiring undocumented workers


Iowa businesses would be required to use the federal E-Verify system to determine whether their employees are legally in the country under a bill that passed the Iowa Senate Wednesday.

The Senate voted 30-17 Wednesday afternoon to pass Senate File 108, sending it to the Iowa House for consideration. All but one of the Republicans present voted in favor of the bill. Sen. Dan Zumbach, R-Ryan, voted with every Democrat to oppose it.

The Senate has passed a version of the bill in past years, but it has never been taken up by the Iowa House.

This year, the Senate’s vote comes as immigration is shaping up to be a major issue in the 2024 presidential race and in Congress.

Advertisement

The U.S. Senate earlier this month failed to pass a bill that would have created a new mechanism to shut down the border if illegal crossings reached a certain threshold. And Congressional Republicans have indicated new border measures are a top priority for them.

Iowa lawmakers are considering several bills this year that proponents say would help deter illegal immigration but critics have described as anti-immigrant.

More: Migrant workers ask Iowa lawmakers to reject slate of immigration bills

Sen. Julian Garrett, R-Indianola, said the border is “probably the number one issue” he hears about.

Advertisement

“There’s not a lot we can do here in Iowa at the state level, but this is something we can do,” he said. “And I think it will make a difference.”

Sen. Janice Weiner, D-Iowa City, said if Iowa lawmakers are concerned about the border they should contact their federal representatives and senators.

“Ask them to pass the bipartisan law on immigration reform and the border that was agreed to in Washington,” she said. “That’s the solution. It’s a federal issue.”

What would the Iowa E-Verify bill do?

It is already illegal under federal law to knowingly hire someone who is in the country illegally.

The Iowa bill would allow a county attorney, local law enforcement official or member of the public to file a complaint with Iowa Workforce Development if they suspect a company has violated the law.

Advertisement

If a company is found to have violated the law by hiring an undocumented immigrant, the company would be required to terminate the employee and would be placed on a three-year probationary period during which it would be required to file quarterly reports with the state listing every new employee hired during that period.

A second offense would cause the company’s business license to be permanently revoked.

More: Iowa doesn’t require US citizenship for in-state tuition. A Republican bill would end that.

The Iowa Secretary of State’s office would be required to maintain a database of companies found to violate the law.

Employers could defend themselves in court by arguing that they did not knowingly employ an undocumented immigrant in violation of the law.

Advertisement

Garrett said passing the bill would help level the playing field for businesses that already diligently check to ensure their employees are in the country legally.

“It’s very unfair to law-abiding legitimate businesses and employees to have to compete with people that are coming across the border, and you know they’re pouring across right now,” he said. “The Biden administration doesn’t seem inclined to do a thing about it.”

Business groups oppose the Iowa bill

Many of Iowa’s largest business groups are opposed to the law, including the Iowa Association of Business and Industry, Iowa Chamber Alliance, National Federation of Independent Businesses, Quad Cities Chamber of Commerce, Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance, Master Builders of Iowa, Iowa Grocery Industry Association, Heavy Highway Contractors Association, and Agribusiness Association of Iowa.

Sen. Tony Bisignano, D-Des Moines, read off a list of business groups who oppose the bill during debate.

“Everybody opposes this,” he said. “And it’s not because they want to circumvent the law and use undocumented workers. It’s because in their professional operation, it doesn’t work.”

Advertisement

Bisignano said the program would also harm potential employees who are wrongly flagged.

“What about the employee?” he said. “What about the applicant who they got his middle initial wrong or a letter in his name or a number on the Social Security and it’s red flagged? And how long are they unable to be employed?”

Garrett said thousands of Iowa businesses already use the E-Verify program voluntarily. Several other states require businesses to use the program.

“Right now more than 5,000 businesses in Iowa use E-Verify,” he said. “They don’t have to. It’s not required. Why would they do that if this is such a horrible program?”

Stephen Gruber-Miller covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@registermedia.com or by phone at 515-284-8169. Follow him on Twitter at @sgrubermiller.

Advertisement





Source link

Iowa

Iowa Supreme court affirms eviction order for Short’s Burger & Shine

Published

on

Iowa Supreme court affirms eviction order for Short’s Burger & Shine


Following a years-long legal saga, the Iowa Supreme Court recently upheld a decision to evict Short’s Burger and Shine from its South Clinton Street building.

The May 22 decision, delivered by Chief Justice Susan Christensen, agreed with the Johnson County District Court’s decision to evict the downtown burger restaurant after finding that it did not notify the building’s owner — a trust operated by Midwest One Bank — of its intent to extend the lease.

The decision concludes one part of the Short’s legal saga. The now-closed restaurant is also in litigation for a discrimination and retaliation lawsuit Short’s owner, Kevin Perez filed in 2024 against Midwest One Bank, the trust of late building owner Haywood Belle, Belle’s widow, a bank employee, and the City of Iowa City

Advertisement

Iowa City’s Short’s Burgers and Shine closed in 2024

Short’s closed in early 2024 after the court determined Perez hadn’t renewed the business’s lease on time.

Short’s opened at 18 S. Clinton Street in 2008 with the goal of honoring the legacy and story of former building owner H.D. Short, who shined shoes for 50 years, beginning in 1920. The original ownership group included Perez, Dan Ouverson, and former Hawkeye and NFL player Nate Kaeding, who now runs the Gold Cap Hospitality ownership group.

Eviction proceedings started when Short’s temporarily closed in April 2022 “to fix poor building conditions” without notifying Midwest One Bank, the executor of Belle’s trust.

The closure breached a part of the lease agreement that said the restaurant would default on its lease if it “failed to engage” in normal business for more than 15 consecutive business days, the court found. The renovations also violated a provision that forbade structural changes or improvements without prior written approval.

Advertisement

Midwest One Bank sent notice on May 10, 2022, that Short’s would default on its lease if it did not reopen for regular business and cease renovations within 10 days, according to court documents. Shorts responded, claiming it could not reopen for business until renovations were complete because the gas could not be turned back on until repairs were finished.

Midwest One Bank “terminated” the lease and started eviction proceedings in May 2022. Shorts was allowed to continue operating and occupying the building while the case was litigated.

Midwest One Bank filed two eviction claims and delivered notice that Short’s needed to vacate the building by the end of the lease on April 30. Short’s did not vacate, and Midwest One Bank pursued a third eviction claim, accusing the owners of failing to provide notice of renewal.

Advertisement

Short’s argued that because they continued renovations, disputed eviction, and secured insurance, it was evidence of their intent to renew.

The restaurant owners also argued that pending eviction proceedings prevented them from renewal. The court argued that Short’s simply did not declare intent to renew for “whatever reason.”

“Mere forgetfulness does not entitle a party to equitable relief,” the decision reads.

Liam Halawith covers Johnson County local government and public safety for the Press-Citizen. Reach him by email at lhalawith@registermedia.com. Follow him on X at @liam_halawith.   

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Fired Iowa nurse aide wins jobless benefits after numerous resident-care complaints

Published

on

Fired Iowa nurse aide wins jobless benefits after numerous resident-care complaints


WEST DES MOINES, Iowa (IOWA CAPITAL DISPATCH) – An Iowa nursing home worker fired after being accused of repeatedly neglecting residents’ needs is entitled to unemployment benefits, a judge has ruled.

State records indicate certified nurse aide Abigail Kromah worked for Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Care Center in West Des Moines from May 2024 through December 2025, when she was fired. She subsequently applied for unemployment benefits, which led to a recent hearing before an administrative law judge.

The hearing records indicate Kromah testified that when she was fired on Dec. 19, 2025, the employer informed her that the discharge was due to “numerous resident complaints” regarding the care she had been providing.

According to the judge’s findings in the case, Kromah had received multiple disciplinary warnings related to resident care. In August 2024, she allegedly received verbal and written warnings for failing to answer residents’ call-lights in a timely manner, failing to properly assist residents with their personal care, and for complaining about the residents in common areas of the workplace.

Advertisement

Her employer testified Kromah was also given warnings for refusing work instructions from the nursing staff, and for telling a resident who needed to be toileted to go the bathroom in their briefs.

In August 2025, it was alleged that Kromah failed to check on a resident throughout the entire night. During that shift, a nurse had neglected to unclamp a feeding tube, which caused the tube to leak. When another nurse checked on the resident at 5 a.m., the resident was “drenched in feeding solution from head to toe,” according to the judge’s findings.

‘I can’t live this way… She’s horrible.’

Days later, the home alleged, a resident of the facility entered the hallway in his wheelchair at about 6 a.m., loudly complaining, “I can’t do this anymore,” and, “I can’t live this way.” The man allegedly refused to go back to his room, explaining that Kromah was there and “she’s horrible.”

The man reportedly stated had had switched on his call-light to have his urinal emptied, but Kromah never came to assist him, which meant the urinal overflowed and spilled on him. When Kromah eventually came to the room, the man allegedly said, she changed him into dry clothing but did not clean him.

The home alleged Kromah was given additional warnings in October 2025 for reportedly failing to answer residents’ call lights and failing to complete her rounds every two hours. One resident of the home had allegedly became so frustrated by the lack of response to his call-light that he contacted the police on one occasion, according to the judge’s findings.

Advertisement

State inspection reports indicate Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Care Center was cited for insufficient staff in January 2026, with one resident complaining the issue with call-lights had been a longstanding problem. According to the inspectors, the man said that on one occasion, he couldn’t get help to clear his airway and was afraid he was going to die unless he managed to clear it himself, which he did.

In ruling that Kromah was entitled to jobless benefits, Administrative Law Judge Michael Lunn noted that while she had clearly been warned about deficiencies in resident care, she appeared to have been fired for a separate issue — attendance — for which she had received no such warnings.

A discharge for misconduct cannot be based on past acts such as the resident-care issues, Lunn ruled, but must instead be based on a current act. With no current act of disqualifying misconduct, Lunn stated, Kromah was entitled to collect unemployment benefits.

Iowa Capital Dispatch was unable to locate Kromah to seek comment for this article.

Copyright 2026 IOWA CAPITAL DISPATCH. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa begins its summer meal programs

Published

on

Iowa begins its summer meal programs


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – With some schools already on summer break, programs are helping make sure Iowa kids don’t go hungry.

The state’s Seamless Summer Option program provides free meals to children and teens 18 and younger during summer break.

Those meals are served at schools, parks and community centers. Children are served on first come, first served basis.

You can find a full list of those on the USDA’s Summer Meal Finder.

Advertisement

This year, the state has returned to the federal SUN Bucks program.

Eligible families can get up to $120 per child. That is then divided up to $40 a month to help pay for healthy food purchases.

The Des Moines Area Religious Council told KCRG after the state announced its return to the program that area businesses, as well as those in need, would benefit.

“Those dollars are going to go back into local grocery stores. It’s an investment in our community. When we look at feeding programs like SNAP, we know that it has that multiplier effect every time a dollar is spent, you’re getting more out of it,” said Blake Wiladsen, the council’s communication manager.

The state will regulate the program similarly to the state’s SNAP program. Things like candy, soda, vitamins, minerals, pre-made foods, and juice made with less than 50% fruit or vegetables cannot be purchased with Iowa SUN Bucks.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending