Iowa
Iowa Senate Republicans have the better eminent-domain bill | Opinion
Better protection for property rights is a worthy goal. But legislators shouldn’t do it at the expense of telling businesses they’ll always have to be wary of Iowa pulling the rug from under them.
New New battle lines are being drawn at the Iowa Statehouse in the debate over eminent domain for a carbon dioxide pipeline. For opponents of the permit Summit Carbon Solutions received to seize land if necessary, competing pieces of legislation imply a question that could split their unlikely alliances: Is the goal merely to ensure that no property owner has their land taken involuntarily, or is it to sink Summit’s project entirely?
Iowans have numerous reasons to be skeptical about the long-term effects of a Summit pipeline. But singling out the company and its precise vision is unfair. The eminent-domain bills moving through both chambers of the Legislature have flaws, but lawmakers and the governor should settle on something closer to Senate Republicans’ proposal.
Ag groups say killing the pipeline means a farm crisis
The main argument for the pipeline, reiterated by farm groups and lawmakers on Jan. 21, is that a pipeline that carries and buries waste from biofuel production will improve sustainability measurements for Iowa corn. Without that tool, advocates say, Iowa farmers won’t be able to find markets and a new “farm crisis” looms.
The talk about sustainable aviation fuel, carbon capture tax credits and emerging markets is, unfortunately, almost all about dollars. Missing from five years of carbon-pipeline debate has been compelling evidence that the environmental benefits from the pipeline can help justify the harms to water and health that Iowa’s corn-ethanol obsession has helped to perpetuate. Carbon capture proponents have not inspired confidence that the carbon intensity scores they seek to change for ethanol plants are much more than a number.
Nevertheless, in 2024 the Iowa Utilities Board ruled that Summit’s pipeline proposal would “promote the public convenience and necessity,” granting it the right to seize land from property owners to bury the pipeline in places where the company and landowners could not reach a voluntary agreement. Whether that right of eminent domain is appropriate has been the center of years of debate at the Statehouse. Groups that opposed carbon pipelines on environmental grounds found bedfellows in the property rights advocates. But every legislative attempt to thwart Summit has failed, including when Gov. Kim Reynolds vetoed bipartisan eminent-domain restrictions in 2025.
The House and Senate are advancing starkly different eminent proposals early in 2026. House File 2104 simply disallows eminent domain in connection with carbon pipelines. Senate File 2067 allows companies to change their planned routes to seek more voluntary easements, and Senate File 2069 would tax pipelines, with the proceeds going to Iowa’s Taxpayer Relief Fund.
Summit says the House bill, which lawmakers approved 64-28 on Jan. 21, would kill their project. The Senate bills are not as far along. Supporters of the House bill point out that the Senate measures do not, in the end, restrict Summit or other companies from eventually invoking eminent domain to proceed.
Pulling out the rug at this point would be too damaging
That’s the stage for the conflict over three general paths:
- Let the pipeline proceed as state regulators approved, with the ability to seize land.
- Stop the project in its tracks.
- Split the difference by letting the pipeline be built, but with less room for seizures.
The second option might have more appeal if policymakers were working against a blank slate. But it’s a serious matter to change the rules retroactively in a way that ruins a company’s Iowa investment. It’s more than fair for landowners to grumble that they futilely asked for eminent-domain protections for years before Summit received a regulatory thumbs-up. Still, the fact is that the company succeeded in arguing for that approval. Allowing the pipeline might be the wrong move – and if Summit ultimately manages to proceed without land seizures, at least some environmental groups would see that as a failure and not a win-win. But it would be even worse to demonstrate to prospective entrepreneurs that state leaders are willing to blow up economic development after years and hundreds of millions of dollars of preliminary investment.
Leaving things alone would permanently discard the argument that Summit’s situation differs significantly from what happens when land is needed for conventional infrastructure such as roads, electrical transmission or sewers. The “public convenience and necessity” resulting a carbon pipeline, such as benefits for the agriculture sector, is less direct and more speculative. The fervor to reject Summit’s condemnation rights is plain.
Something like the Senate bills is the best path forward. The legislation’s chief insight is that Summit’s profit potential from lucrative federal carbon tax credits should afford it the ability to spend considerably more money jumping through Iowa hoops and paying Iowa taxes. It’s also true that the distinction between banning eminent domain and merely providing alternatives to eminent domain is important. Whatever lawmakers ultimately pass should impose more obstacles before the company could seek to condemn land; the original Senate Bill 2067 doesn’t go far enough.
Lawmakers also have to consider Reynolds, who was an early supporter of carbon capture. It’s at best unclear whether any bill legislators pass could reach the two-thirds support in both chambers necessary to override any veto from the governor. Her veto message in 2025 hinted that she could support more narrowly tailored eminent-domain legislation; she has said little this year about her expectations.
Better protection for property rights is a worthy goal for the Legislature. But legislators shouldn’t do it at the expense of telling businesses that they’ll always have to be wary of Iowa pulling the rug out from under them.
Lucas Grundmeier, on behalf of the Register’s editorial board
This editorial is the opinion of the Des Moines Register’s editorial board: Rachel Stassen-Berger, executive editor; Lucas Grundmeier, opinion editor; and Richard Doak and Rox Laird, editorial board members.
The late boxing great George Foreman lies buried in a cemetery in the northwestern corner of Iowa – a place he has no connection to outside of a lone visit to the region nearly 40 years ago.
Foreman died March 21, 2025, at the age of 76 in Houston and was buried in Logan Park Cemetery at Sioux City, Iowa, a month later, city officials confirmed. Foreman’s family returned Thursday to his burial site, holding a news conference with Sioux City Mayor Bob Scott to reveal Foreman’s burial place, marked by a large monument that bears an image of him as a teen following his Olympic gold medal boxing win.
The family explained in a statement released by Sioux City officials that he had visited the Iowa city in 1988, and often recalled the sense of peace he experienced there.
After traveling to the city on April 17 last year to bury Foreman, his family said they immediately understood the region’s appeal.
“Our father lived a life of purpose, faith and gratitude,” the family said in a statement released by Sioux City officials. “To see him laid to rest in a place that brought him peace means everything to us.”
Scott joined the family at Foreman’s monument that lies just a few miles north of the Missouri River in an upper Midwest city of nearly 87,000 people. The cemetery overlooks the scenic Loess Hills, created by windblown silt deposits that reach up to 200 feet high (about 61 meters) and line the river along the Iowa border for 200 miles (322 kilometers).
“Their story is a reminder of how one place can stay with someone for a lifetime,” Scott said.
A native Texan, Foreman rose to fame when he made the 1968 U.S. Olympic boxing team, winning gold in Mexico City. He became the heavyweight champion of the world in 1973 by defeating the great Joe Frazier, only to lose the title a year later to Muhammad Ali in the famous “Rumble in the Jungle.”
A full 20 years later in 1994, Foreman became the oldest man to win the heavyweight championship at 45, defeating Michael Moorer in an epic upset.
Foreman retired in 1997 with a 76-5 career record.
He then moved on to the next chapter in his life as a businessman, pitchman and occasional actor, becoming known to a new generation as the face of the George Foreman Grill. The simple cooking machine sold more than 100 million units and brought him more wealth than boxing.
A biographical movie based on Foreman’s life was released in 2023.
Copyright © 2026 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
DUBUQUE, Iowa (KCRG) — About 50 Iowans braved the threat of severe storms to hear from Republican candidate for governor Zach Lahn at his town hall in Dubuque Friday night.
Lahn, a farmer and businessman, said his campaign is about solving the long-term systemic issues facing Iowans.
One priority is addressing what Lahn calls a cancer crisis in Iowa, as the state has the second-highest cancer rate in the country. Solving the crisis means ensuring Iowans have access to clean, nitrate-free drinking water, working with farmers to reduce agricultural runoff.
“Iowans are just ready for something that they should be able to count on, like clean drinking water,” Lahn said. “We have ways to clean up the drinking water in Iowa that isn’t on the backs of farmers, but is working alongside with them because they’re drinking the water too, and they want to do what’s right.”
Lahn also wants to stop Iowa’s “brain drain,” as more of Iowa’s college graduates left the state for opportunities elsewhere.
“Don’t leave! Give me some time! I’m going to fight to keep you here,” Lahn said. “I was one of these kids. I thought I had to leave the state to find something better. We have to prioritize Iowa’s incentive dollars to make sure they’re going to grow Iowa businesses that are going to be here for the long haul, so our kids have places to work.”
Running a distinct campaign feels challenging this election, as Lahn is one of five GOP candidates who want to be Iowa’s next governor, facing U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra, former Department of Administrative Services Director Adam Steen, state Rep. Eddie Andrews and former state Rep. Brad Sherman.
Iowa Auditor Rob Sand is the only Democrat running for the state’s top office.
Lahn said he stands out by promising Iowa will be for Iowans, pledging to ban the use of eminent domain for private gain and tax out-of-state landowners and data centers at higher rates to lower property taxes.
“It always goes back to follow the money, so when it comes to not being a weak-kneed Republican today, I believe the paramount piece of that is answering only to the citizens of Iowa, not to special interests to pad their bottom line, but what’s best for the people of Iowa,” Lahn said.
Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.
Iowa State announced Thursday the addition of women’s wrestling as its 18th varsity sport, with the program scheduled to begin competition during the 2027-28 academic year. The team is the first varsity sport added at the university since soccer in 1996. Iowa State will be the 12th school in the state of Iowa to have an NCAA women’s wrestling program.
The Cyclones will be only the second Power Four institution to feature a varsity women’s wrestling program, joining the University of Iowa.
Advertisement
The university appointed Alli St. John, a two-time World Wrestling Championships silver medalist, as the program’s first head coach. St. John, who has spent the last three years with the Cyclone Regional Training Center, was a two-time women’s college national champion at King University.
“I am incredibly honored and grateful for the opportunity to be the first head coach of women’s wrestling at Iowa State University,” St. John said. “This is a historic moment not only for Iowa State University, but for the sport of wrestling, too. Iowa State has a rich wrestling tradition, and I’m excited to expand that legacy on the women’s side as we work to build a premier program in Ames that produces not only NCAA champions, but World and Olympic champions as well.”
The program will support a roster of 30 student-athletes with 10 scholarship equivalents, matching the scholarship limit of the men’s team. Official competitions will be held in Hilton Coliseum, with practice facilities in Beyer Hall.
The university also announced a major restructuring of its wrestling leadership, naming long-time men’s head coach Kevin Dresser as the Director of Wrestling. In this new capacity, Dresser will oversee both programs, assisting with fundraising and mentoring the coaching staff, which includes newly promoted men’s head coach Brent Metcalf.
Advertisement
“The addition of women’s wrestling is an exciting opportunity for Iowa State Athletics,” Dresser said. “The fact that it is one of the fastest growing sports at the high school level coupled with the overall love of wrestling in the state of Iowa makes this a very good decision. I can envision the Iowa Corn Cy-Hawk dual already and the excitement it will bring to the sport. I am excited to roll up my sleeves and help start another wrestling program.”
-
Michigan4 minutes agoQ&A: Jocelyn Benson on her tenure as Michigan’s secretary of state
-
Massachusetts10 minutes agoPolice shoot and kill man armed with knife in Lexington, DA says
-
Minnesota16 minutes agoBoldy, Eriksson Ek help Wild cruise past Stars in Game 1 of Western 1st Round | NHL.com
-
Mississippi23 minutes agoGeorge County High School senior killed in Highway 26 crash, MHP says
-
Missouri29 minutes ago
Missouri Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 winning numbers for April 18, 2026
-
Montana35 minutes ago
Montana Lottery Powerball, Lotto America results for April 18, 2026
-
Nebraska40 minutes agoGallery: Huskers Run-Rule No. 12 USC to Take Series
-
Nevada47 minutes agoIN RESPONSE: Cortez Masto lands bill would keep the proceeds in Nevada