Connect with us

Iowa

After Iowa abortion ruling, should voters boot Justice David May? Rekha Basu weighs in.

Published

on

After Iowa abortion ruling, should voters boot Justice David May? Rekha Basu weighs in.



Opponents of same-sex marriage waged ideological warfare against the courts in 2010. This time, Kim Reynolds, lawmakers and justices are responsible for the ideological warfare.

play

  • Rekha Basu is a longtime syndicated columnist, editorial writer, reporter and author of the book, “Finding Your Voice.”
  • She retired in 2022 as a Des Moines Register columnist.

Fifteen years ago, a group of evangelical political activists, furious over the Iowa Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling for same-sex marriage, plotted revenge. Led by Bob Vander Plaats of the The Family Leader, they formed the ironically named “Iowans for Freedom.”

Funded partly by out-of-state money, it campaigned against three of the Supreme Court justices who happened to be up for retention elections in 2010. And it succeeded in unseating three fine ones: Chief Justice Marsha Ternus and Justices Michael Streit and David Baker.

Fast forward to this year, when a reconstituted Iowa Supreme Court, a majority hand-picked by Iowa’s anti-abortion Gov. Kim Reynolds, turns back the clock 50 years with a 4-3 ruling effectively outlawing abortions after six weeks into a pregnancy. In doing so, the justices overturned precedent that had withstood previous Supreme Court challenges, deciding that abortion laws should not be assessed under the strict-scrutiny standard previously invoked.

And now, in response, some women are taking a cue from what Iowans for Freedom accomplished in 2010. They’re encouraging others to turn the page on the November ballot — literally — to the side where judicial retention votes are, and vote against Justice David May. He’s the only one who voted for the six-week ban who’s up this year.

Advertisement

So, how could anyone who opposed the 2010 campaign support the same tactic? Comparisons between the two efforts get complicated. Retention elections used to be mostly pro forma shows of support for sitting judges appointed on a nonpartisan basis, who were doing their jobs properly. In 2010, same-sex marriage opponents couldn’t accept that their religious-based agenda had lost in a court of law bound by the Iowa Constitution. So it used the elections to wage ideological warfare. 

This time the ideological warfare has been waged by the governor, state lawmakers and the court’s new majority, by tampering with the once nonpartisan, constitutionally based process. Reynolds, an outspoken abortion opponent, called a special one-day session of the Legislature last summer to vote on the ban. Six weeks is before most women even know if they’re pregnant. Iowa’s Republican-led Legislature complied by passing it, though a nearly identical 2018 law had been permanently blocked. Reynolds had over the years appointed four new justices, including May, who could reliably be predicted to vote as they did.

More: Kim Reynolds picked this Legislature, and it steamrolled an extreme path for Iowa

The victims now will be untold numbers of pregnant women and girls, and children born to people ill-equipped to care for them.

Advertisement

“The ideological bias of this court does not reflect the will of most Iowans, and I’m not sure how far it follows the constitution,” said Des Moines’ Lea DeLong, the reproductive rights advocate who penned a letter making the case for opposing May’s retention. “My reading of the constitution is that it is intended to expand the rights and liberties of people.”

Her letter is being widely circulated by email. It points out that, as Reynolds’ appointee, May helped give Iowa “one of the most restrictive rulings in the nation against the rights of women.” It goes on to say, “It is an unfortunate development in our society that these kinds of actions against judges must happen, but I’m afraid we have had to learn some sad lessons from those who deny the rights of women. It is well known that most Iowans do not support these draconian restrictions on women’s lives and decisions.”

That’s true: 61% of Iowans polled support abortion rights in all or most cases. Still, the governor saw fit to impose her personal beliefs over the will of the majority.

DeLong is co-founder with Charlotte Hubbell of a group of some 15 women known as Iowans for Reproductive Freedom (one word but light years away from the group that waged the 2010 ballot battle). Formed in November, 2022, it has placed billboards defending reproductive rights on display around Des Moines.

They carry such captions as:

Advertisement
  •  Reproductive Freedom Is KEY to a Strong Family.
  •  Keep Government OUT of Women’s Health Care.
  • If Men Got Pregnant, We Wouldn’t Be Discussing This.

Though individual members support the ballot idea and are circulating DeLong’s letter, the organization isn’t officially involved in the effort. DeLong herself doesn’t doubt May is a good person. And she’s mindful that Reynolds would likely replace him with another justice of the same ideological bent. But she wants this to be a wake-up call. “It sends a message,” she said. “Maybe it will encourage people to think very seriously about what this court is doing to women.”

Unlike Vander Plaats’ well financed and heavily publicized initiative, she says, “We’re not trying to organize a campaign. We will do what women have always done before: Spread information to our friends.”  

More importantly, the goal this time is protecting rights, not undermining them.

“Much as I don’t like the fundamental concept of doing this,” DeLong said, “I think so many destructive lines have been crossed.”

And she’s right. They have been.

Advertisement

Rekha Basu is a longtime syndicated columnist, editorial writer, reporter and author of the book, “Finding Your Voice.” She retired in 2022 as a Des Moines Register columnist. Her column, “Rekha Shouts and Whispers,” is available at basurekha.substack.com.



Source link

Iowa

Panel boots Libertarians from Iowa ballot for governor, US House

Published

on

Panel boots Libertarians from Iowa ballot for governor, US House


play

  • A state panel ruled Libertarian candidates for governor, lieutenant governor and the 3rd Congressional District failed to qualify for Iowa’s general election ballot.
  • Lieutenant governor candidate Jules Cutler failed to file an affidavit of candidacy, invalidating the party’s gubernatorial ticket.
  • The State Objection Panel ruled 3rd District candidate Marco Battaglia can’t appear on the ballot since he failed to run under his legal name, Mark T. Andersen.

A state panel voted to remove Libertarian candidates for governor and Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District from the Nov. 3 general election ballot — and the candidates are vowing to appeal the decision in court.

Republican voters, strategists and activists challenged the candidacies of gubernatorial candidate Nicholas Gluba, 2nd Congressional District candidate Rick Stewart and 3rd Congressional District Marco Battaglia.

Advertisement

The three-member State Objection Panel heard the challenges Monday, June 15.

The panel said Gluba and his lieutenant governor candidate, Jules Cutler, failed to qualify for the ballot because Cutler did not submit an affidavit of candidacy by the June 2 deadline.

And the panel said 3rd District candidate Marco Battaglia could not appear on the ballot because his affidavit of candidacy and nominating papers do not match his legal name, Mark T. Andersen — even though he run as a candidate previously on election ballots as Marco Battaglia.

Gluba, Cutler and Battaglia say they will appeal the panel’s ruling to district court.

“We have over 8,000 petitions signed,” Cutler said. “I think not appealing it would be doing a disservice to the people who actually signed those petitions.”

Advertisement

The panel found Stewart qualified for the general election ballot, unanimously voting to dismiss a complaint against him.

Republicans are expected to face competitive elections this fall as they seek to retain the governor’s office and their full control of Iowa’s congressional delegation. Having Libertarian candidates on the ballot could potentially pull away votes from Republicans they need to win.

Election analysts at the Cook Political Report rate Iowa’s governor’s race, and the 3rd District as “toss-ups.” The 2nd District is considered “likely Republican.”

Advertisement

Libertarian lieutenant governor candidate failed to submit affidavit of candidacy

The challenge against Gluba and Cutler’s candidacies from Waukee Republican Keven Arrowsmith revolved around Cutler’s failure to provide a signed affidavit of candidacy to the Iowa Secretary of State’s office.

Cutler said an employee in the office, Dani Phillips, told her she did not need to submit a separate affidavit of candidacy and that Phillips would not accept Cutler’s affidavit when she tried to submit it.

Gluba turned in his own affidavit of candidacy, as well as more than 8,000 signatures of Iowans who support placing the proposed gubernatorial ticket on the ballot, exceeding the 3,500-signature threshold.

Phillips, however, testified to the panel that Cutler did not provide an affidavit of candidacy or ask if she was required to provide one.

“I think there’s a factual issue that appears to be very much in dispute,” said Attorney General Brenna Bird, who sits on the panel. “Ms. Phillips says that the affidavit of lieutenant governor was never offered as part of the petitions. Ms. Cutler and others say that the objection was offered, and it was rejected as not necessary by Ms. Phillips.”

Advertisement

The panel, comprised of Bird, Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate and Secretary of Agriculture Mike Naig, all Republicans, ruled unanimously in favor of the challenge against Gluba and Cutler, removing the gubernatorial ticket from the ballot.

“I tend to side with the election worker, because I don’t think she has a reason not to follow the law,” Bird said. “That hasn’t been seen here, and as she described it, I think that that affidavit for whatever reason may not have been filed.”

State Auditor Rob Sand, a Democrat, recused himself from hearing the challenge because he is running for governor.

With Gluba off the ballot, Sand and Republican Zach Lahn will be the only gubernatorial candidates on Iowa’s ballot.

Advertisement

At the hearing, Gluba and Cutler’s attorney, Jake Heard, questioned Phillips’ memory of the day that Gluba and Cutler submitted their nominating papers.

Cutler said she believes Phillips made a mistake and doesn’t remember Cutler trying to offer an affidavit of candidacy.

“It is natural for her to make a mistake, and I’m willing to give that to her,” Cutler said. “What I would really appreciate the objection panel to look at is her memory.”

After the hearing, Cutler criticized the panel’s proceedings.

“That is the most disappointing, frustrating and disheartening experience I’ve had in 30-plus years since I immigrated as a 16-year-old girl from the Soviet Union,” Cutler said.

Advertisement

Marco Battaglia removed from 3rd District ballot for not using legal name

A split panel voted to remove Battaglia from the ballot because he did not run under his legal name of Mark Andersen.

Alan Ostergren, an attorney for challengers Annie Kuhle and Wes Enos, said allowing someone to run for office under a different name would confuse voters.

“What would stop a candidate next cycle from saying, ‘My name’s Chuck Grassley, I’m running for the Senate,’” Ostergren said.

However, Battaglia ran for governor as a Libertarian in 2018, losing the primary and then running as the party’s nominee for attorney general that year. Battaglia also was the Libertarian nominee for lieutenant governor in 2022.

“Mr. Battaglia has appeared on the ballot in three general elections as Marco Battaglia,” said Stephanie Berlin, chair of the Libertarian Party of Iowa. “He is known professionally as Marco Battaglia in his band. Everybody knows who he is as Marco Battaglia.”

Advertisement

He also ran for Congress in the 3rd District in 2024 but was removed from the ballot for a different reason and ran as a write-in candidate.

Sand asked Berlin about Battaglia’s previous runs for office under the name Marco Battaglia.

“Wouldn’t an objection at this point when he’s already done it be in some way unfair?” he said.

Berlin agreed.

Advertisement

Bird said she believes Iowa law is clear that candidates have to run under their own name.

“I don’t think Iowa law allows someone to run for office under a fictitious name that’s not their name,” Bird said.

The panel voted 2-1 to uphold the challenge against Battaglia, with Bird and Pate in favor and Sand opposed.

With Battaglia off the ballot, Republican U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn and Democratic state Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott will be the only candidates on the ballot in the 3rd District, which includes the Des Moines metro.

Battaglia says he faces pressure from Republicans to drop out of the race.

Advertisement

He said Republican U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn and Kuhle, who is a Republican strategist and adviser to Nunn, visited his home and asked him to drop out. Battaglia said he also received a call from U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Officials with Nunn’s campaign said they believe Battaglia submitted petition signatures they suspect were gathered by an outside group, which could constitute an illegal in-kind contribution to Battaglia’s campaign under federal law.

After meeting with Nunn and Kuhle, Battaglia told them in a text that he would consider ending his candidacy “if you would be willing to introduce impeachment of the President for Treason, Bribery and other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Kuhle refused.

Advertisement

“To be clear, this is not a negotiation; Zach will not be making any promises about official policy actions in exchange for your removal from the ballot,” she wrote in a text to Battaglia.

After the hearing, Berlin criticized what she called threats against Battaglia, saying Nunn and Kennedy offered Battaglia time in the White House and visits to Trump administration officials if he dropped out.

“We are not the Republican JV team,” she said. “We are not backing down.”

Kuhle disputed that characterization in a statement, saying, “no offer, inducement or thing of value was ever proposed or provided in exchange for withdrawing the nomination petitions.”

Rick Stewart will appear on ballot in 2nd District

Stewart will appear on the general election ballot in Iowa’s 2nd District after the panel voted unanimously to dismiss the objection against him.

Advertisement

Bernie Hayes, chair of the Linn County Republicans, argued Stewart should be disqualified because he identifies himself as Rick Stewart on his affidavit of candidacy but turned in nominating petitions identifying himself as Richard Stewart.

Ostergren, who represented Hayes, said he did not know whether he would appeal the panel’s ruling.

Stewart will join Republican Joe Mitchell, Democrat Lindsay James and no party candidate Dave Bushaw on the ballot in the northeast Iowa district.

Stephen Gruber-Miller is the Capitol bureau chief for the Des Moines Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@registermedia.com, by phone at 515-284-8169 or on X at @sgrubermiller.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa DNR flags 8 beaches for high bacteria levels

Published

on

Iowa DNR flags 8 beaches for high bacteria levels


PALO, Iowa (KCRG) – The Iowa Department of Natural Resources says eight beaches are not recommended for swimming.

Beaches in eastern Iowa include Pleasant Creek in Palo, Backbone in Dundee and Lake Darling in Brighton.

Other beaches include Black Hawk in Sac County, Clear Lake in Cerro Gordo County, Crandalls Beach and Emerson Bay in Dickinson County, and North Twin Lake West in Calhoun County.

Testing shows the waters are showing high levels of E. coli, which is an indicator of other potentially harmful bacteria in the water.

Advertisement

Swimming in contaminated water could lead to illnesses and infections.

Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Staffing new Iowa prisons may be “impossible,” union president warns

Published

on

Staffing new Iowa prisons may be “impossible,” union president warns


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa — The number of inmates at Iowa’s prisons are expected a surge in the coming years, but prison workers don’t don’t they’re ready for the challenge.

Gov. Kim Reynolds signed Iowa’s habitual offender law June 2, a measure expected to cause the number of inmates in Iowa prisons to surge.

Under the new law, a person is considered a habitual offender once they are convicted of their third felony. Their mandatory minimum sentence would be doubled, as well as increasing their maximum sentence.

To counter the expected increase, the state is planning to build three new prisons.

Advertisement

Todd Copley, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the union that represents Iowa’s prison workers, said the state cannot staff the facilities it already has.

“The Department of Corrections can’t staff the prisons that we have, let alone build three more where it would be impossible to staff those,” Copley said.

The nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency predicts the number of inmates behind bars at Iowa prisons will surge by nearly 50 percent in three years.

“t’s, I don’t think words comprehend what the staff is facing in the future,” Copley said.

The LSA says Iowa’s prison system has more than 230 vacant positions, more than half of those being for correctional officers. Iowa prisons are already over capacity by 27 percent across the state.

Advertisement

Staffing issues are at the center of a lawsuit against the Iowa Department of Corrections after a guard and nurse were murdered by inmates at the Anamosa State Penitentiary in 2021. The suit says poor staffing contributed to their deaths.

“I talk frequently with a lot of the correctional officers and, you know, what happened with the murders at Anamosa is devastating. It’s so unfortunate,” Copley said.

Copley said the staffing shortage is dangerous for both staff and inmates.

“Believe it or not, somebody has loved ones somewhere in the prison system in Iowa. We have to look after those individuals as well,” he said.

Copley said the state has to do more to help those doing dangerous work.

Advertisement

“You can work at McDonald’s for $20 an hour and not worry about getting stabbed, beaten or having urine thrown on you for that matter,” he said.

The LSA estimates it will cost nearly $2 billion to build the new prisons.

Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending