Connect with us

Indiana

New York Liberty decimate Indiana Fever, win 104-68

Published

on

New York Liberty decimate Indiana Fever, win 104-68


The Indiana Fever have not had it easy to start the season. Sunday night’s matchup with the New York Liberty marked their 11th game in 20 days, the previous ten giving them a 2-8 record and a whole, whole lot of scrutiny and media attention, much of it directed toward a player you may have heard of: Caitlin Clark.

Sunday night even marked a back-to-back for the Fever, 24 hours after securing their second win of the season, a game that was overshadowed by the reaction to a hard foul by Chennedy Carter on Clark.

Everything about their season — injuries, their subpar pay, the media circus around Clark and its inability to prevent itself from turning into said circus — has been exhausting.

But before they could enjoy four precious off days before their next game on Friday evening, they had to face the Libs at the Barclays Center. And the WNBA is not a league that prizes sympathy.

New York took the lead four seconds into the game after Jonquel Jones directed the opening tip-off to Breanna Stewart in the front-court, igniting a one-woman fast-break. That was it. With 39 minutes and 56 seconds of game to play, the Liberty scored the game-winning bucket, refusing to let the score approach even.

Sandy Brondello’s team had taken early double-digit leads in their last two victories as well, but unlike those games, the Libs didn’t take their foot off the gas pedal in quarters 2 and 3. Indiana’s Kelsey Mitchell and NaLyssa Smith, whose respective seasons have been choppy thus far, combined for 38 points and made some nice plays to cut their deficit from 21 points to 14, but their efforts were ultimately a speed-bump.

The Liberty were completely locked in on defense, and held Caitlin Clark to just three points, five assists, and three turnovers on 1-of-10 shooting. They switched pick-and-rolls, trapped them, hedged them, and everything in between for 40 minutes, with Jones executing whatever was asked of her…

Advertisement

Jones posted a monster 18/13/4/2/1 stat-line, but was merely the centerpiece of a defense that got contributions from everybody wearing sea foam. Betnijah Laney-Hamilton took the Clark assignment and aced it, while getting help from a flurry of limbs every time the ball entered the paint…

“I think it’s our job to help B out,” explained Jones. “She has a tough responsibility every night to guard the best perimeter players, and she does a great job of that. Teams are definitely going to try to do what they can to get her away from those players, to make the game a little bit easier for them … as much as she’s doing a great job, we have to make sure that we’re backing her up.”

New York recorded more blocks and steals than Indiana, but the turnovers were even at 13 apiece, and there was hardly a difference in transition offense. But Indiana just couldn’t get clean looks in the half-court while the Liberty stumbled into them by accident, ending the game shooting 57.6% from the floor to Indiana’s 37%,

Advertisement

Laney-Hamilton led the way with 20 points on a hyper-efficient 7-of-9 performance, while Sabrina Ionescu added 16/6/6 (though her turnover problems continued with four) and Stewart contributed a calm 13/6/5 on 5-of-11 shooting. The only starter who didn’t crack double-digits was Courtney Vandersloot, who returned after a one-game absence with back tightness, and she still put up nine points and seven assists on 4-of-4 shooting.

Nobody had more than 11 shot attempts, and yet, the Liberty recorded 30 assists on their 38 made baskets, passing up good looks at the rim for great ones…

Brondello described the team’s offensive philosophy after the game: “How do we get the best looks every single time? When we’re sharing it and playing selfless like that, that’s beautiful basketball. It’s fun to watch, it’s fun to play. But then, just making sure we have good inside-outside attack. I think that’s critical for us. We established B, we established JJ early in the game and that kind of opens up the outside.”

Their domination on Sunday wasn’t about any one player, and even the bench turned in their best performance of the season to date. They combined for 28 points — a season-high — despite Nyara Sabally’s absence with a back injury.

“I thought we had great production from the bench,” said Brondello. “We created for each other, I thought we played poised and we got two feet in the paint, we got some open looks near the end, too. It was fun to watch them play that way, and we’re getting there.”

Advertisement

Without Sabally to rely on, the Libs turned to Kennedy Burke in an extended role, and she delivered: ten points on 2-of-2 from three, in addition to three steals and three blocks.

“I felt like today, I had I had more time on the court, so I was able to get in the flow of everything,” said Burke of her performance.”

Along with Leonie Fiebich and Kayla Thornton, she was part of a trio of wings off the bench that kept the Liberty’s 5-out spacing principles flowing while bringing the length and defensive versatility the team envisioned in the preseason.

Burke credited the group’s success to “the trust that we have with each other. There were some lapses where it was a miscommunication, but I feel like throughout the season, it’s gonna get better, it’s gonna get stronger. We just got to keep building off each other and trusting each other.”

No, the Fever were not the most fearsome opponent, especially not on the second half of a back-to-back. But if the Liberty can keep building off this type of performance and indeed get stronger, as Burke predicts, the whole league has to watch out.

Advertisement

After two grind-it-out wins that had the Liberty talking about winning ugly, their Sunday night beatdown of the Fever was a two-hour celebration in front of a sold-out Barclays Center that opened up the entire second deck for Clark’s second trip to NYC.

And, if nothing else, it was a reminder to the 17,401 fans in attendance that New York can still put teams in the dirt.

Final score: New York Liberty 104, Indiana Fever 68

Commissioner’s Cup begins with a bang

Sunday marked the first day of Commissioner’s Cup play for the Liberty, who now sit in a tie with the still-undefeated Connecticut Sun in the Eastern Conference Cup standings.

As a reminder, each team will play the other five teams in its conference once. The team in each conference with the best record in those five games (with point differential as a tie-break) will advance to the championship game on June 25.

Advertisement

New York is the defending Cup champion after their win over the Las Vegas Aces last season, in which they took home the $500,000 prize pool. This season, they will be playing for Women Creating Change, an organization that would receive more money from the W based on how well the Libs do.

Next Up

Advertisement

Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images

The New York Liberty begin a three-game road trip on Tuesday, seeking revenge against the Chicago Sky, who handed them their first loss of the season on May 23. Tip-off is scheduled for 8:00 p.m. ET from the Windy City.





Source link

Advertisement

Indiana

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.

Published

on

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.


(CHALKBEAT INDIANA) — When Pete Hinnefeld and his wife started looking for a preschool for their daughter, they hoped to send her to the same school her brother attended, which was just down the road from their house and offered Spanish-language immersion.

To do this for Lydia, then age 3, they were prepared to pay the $600 monthly cost.

But after voters approved a property tax referendum to fund early learning for children living within the Monroe County Community School Corporation, the family’s preschool bill was cut by more than half. Nearby preschool cut down time spent commuting to their parents’ house for babysitting, and helped Lydia build social skills.

The family are one of hundreds now benefitting from the 2023 referendum, which has more than doubled the number of children attending 3- and 4-year-old preschools in the district.

Advertisement

“For us, this is why you pay taxes,” Hinnefeld said. “It’s important for young kids to have access to school and if parents need to work, it’s an opportunity to let them work.”

The referendum put forward by the district, located in Bloomington, is a first in the state, offering all families tuition support on a sliding scale based on income, no matter whether children attend a district preschool or a partner provider.

It represents a local solution to problems with accessing and affording early learning that have left thousands of Indiana families waiting for help. Indiana in December 2024 froze its Child Care and Development Fund, or CCDF, and On My Way Pre-K dollars, which provide funding for early learning for income-eligible households.

A $200 million funding increase for CCDF approved by the State Budget Committee this week will allow Indiana to begin issuing vouchers againin May to around 14,000 more children, for a total enrollment of around 57,000. Those funds will last around one year.

Still, around 20,000 children will remain on the waitlist, and families may have fewer options for where to use their vouchers as hundreds of providers have closed since the freeze was announced, according to early learning advocates in the state. In a recent survey of early childhood educators in Indiana — which includes those working in a variety of settings — 90% of respondents said families are struggling to pay tuition.

Advertisement

A statewide universal preschool program is unlikely, Republican leaders have said. Instead, a legislative proposal this year would have let cities and counties — not just school districts — ask voters to fund preschool seats. It failed to get traction, but its advocates expect it to return.

The political climate isn’t especially promising for local tax increases: A new Indiana law has placed caps on property tax revenue that are already affecting local budgets. Lawmakers also recently restricted when schools can place referendums on the ballot.

Still, a new local revenue stream could be a boon in some Indiana communities, such as those with high demand for preschool, existing programs, and high social cohesion, said Sam Snideman, vice president of government relations for United Way of Central Indiana.

“There are going to be communities where this makes a ton of sense,” Snideman said. “The increasing challenge for an entity that goes before the public for a referendum is making a very clear value case. What is the common good and what is in the community interest is very important.”

School district’s pre-K enrollment doubles after referendum

Before Monroe schools brought the referendum request to voters, the district conducted a study that showed there were not enough early learning seats to serve children in the community, said Timothy Dowling, director of early learning and enrollment at Monroe schools. And families couldn’t always afford the seats that were available.

Advertisement

But the district also knew that research links quality early learning improved later academic outcomes, Dowling said.

“We wanted to do everything we can to help our students get the benefit of early learning, because we know it pays off in huge dividends,” Dowling said.

The referendum equated to around a $50 increase yearly for a home with an assessed value of $250,000, according to the district website, and also paid for instructional supplies for K-12 students. It passed with 55% of the vote; Dowling said the community study and transparency about how the referendum funds would be used were key to its success.

As a result of the successful referendum, all families in the district qualify for at least $4,000 in tuition assistance for preschool for 4-year-olds, whether their children attend a district school or at one of seven community providers.

Around 76% students in the district’s program attend for free based on their family’s income, Dowling said. Families in the lowest income tier who send their children to community providers receive $8,000 in tuition assistance.

Advertisement

The program also offers tuition assistance for 3-year-old preschool based on income and where the student attends school. For families making 225% or less of the federal poverty level, preschool is free at district programs. Often those families struggled the most to afford child care, even when state child care vouchers were available, Dowling said.

In 2024-25, the year after the referendum passed, the number of 4-year-olds attending preschool doubled from 184 to 378, with 64 of those children attending preschool at outside centers. This year, the district expanded preschool for 3-year-olds, based on the timeline laid out in the referendum. Enrollment jumped from 78 to 123, with another 33 students attending community child care centers, Dowling said.

With multiple types of providers, families have options, said Kelly Sipes, the executive director for Penny Lane Childcare Centers, which is a partner provider with the district. Those who need transportation might choose a district-run preschool, she said, but those who need year-round care during school holidays can choose a center like Penny Lane instead.

Her centers are usually at capacity, Sipes said, and child care needs in the community persist. When CCDF funding was cut, some of her families turned to the funding from the district instead.

“It’s awesome for the families,” Sipes said. “We should be all in this together as a community.”

Advertisement

Pitching child care: ‘We live in a society’

Replicating referendum-funded preschool might work well in communities where school-based providers already exist, and where there’s a sufficient tax base and steady demand for child care, Snideman said. It would also be an incentive to attract working families.

But it could be a harder sell in rural districts, where there are fewer families and less demand.

Generally, school referendums pass in districts that are wealthier, and in areas with less farmland, said Larry DeBoer, a Purdue University professor emeritus of agricultural economics, who has studied school referendums in depth.One of the biggest predictors of success is whether a school district has tried to pass a referendum before — even if they’ve failed, a second referendum is more likely to pass, DeBoer said.

Monroe schools had previously passed an operating referendum the year before its 2023 preschool referendum. As a county, Monroe has a slightly lower per-person income than Indiana as a whole, and has more students than the small and medium-sized districts most likely to propose successful ballot measures. It’s home to Indiana University, and tends to vote Democratic in a largely conservative state.

A legislative proposal this year, HB 1430, would have given the power to levy preschool referendums to counties and cities, potentially casting a wider net for both family demand and child care providers.

Advertisement

The bill did not receive a hearing, in part because Indiana legislative leaders are usually reluctant to consider bills with a fiscal impact in even-numbered years where they don’t pass a state budget. And the most recent state budget passed in 2025 was tight, with cuts to spending and programs due to a revenue shortfall.

The bill’s author, Rep. Blake Johnson, a Democrat, said that conversations about the bill have been fruitful, and that he expects the idea to return in a future session.

Given budget concerns, a locally funded solution that communities can tailor to their own needs may be more successful than a statewide one, said Patrick McAlister, who leads the Preschool Choice Alliance, a statewide group.

“This is an economic development need. Here’s the tool and the option to exercise it or not,” Johnson said.

A successful referendum would be a boon to working parents who struggle to afford the cost of early learning, said McAlister, who used to be the director of the Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation. But even for non-parents, a preschool referendum could have a positive impact on property values and in other ways, McAlister said.

Advertisement

Ultimately, it would be one part of an “all and above strategy” addressing care for children from birth to age 2.

“We live in a society,” McAlister said. “There are certain things we hold true and caring for children is a value many people share.”

Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl

Published

on

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl





© Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Ty Simpson was a guest on the “Downs 2 Business” podcast with Caleb Downs and Josh Downs, and he discussed why he believed Indiana beat Alabama in the Rose Bowl.

The Crimson Tide’s offense was unable to score a touchdown against the Hoosiers in the 38-3 loss. Simpson shone a light on why he felt Indiana had so much success against Alabama on X.

“From my point of view, I was like they don’t much,” Simpson said. “I was like they do the same thing every down and so when I get the ball, I knew exactly what was going to happen. They just didn’t mess up, bro. They were in the exact same spot they were supposed to be, and they were so well coached. It was so much different than the SEC. In the SEC, they’ll play man, they’ll do these unorthodox coverages because kind of how it is. That game was crazy to me. Of course, I got hurt; that was a bummer. But I just knew what they were going to do, but we couldn’t really run the ball. We didn’t really throw it. It was so crazy to me how it happened.”

Advertisement

Indiana went on to beat Oregon in the semifinals of the College Football Playoff, and the Hoosiers defeated Miami in the National Championship after defeating the Crimson Tide.

Simpson and Caleb Downs are now both gearing up to be drafted this month.







Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance

Published

on

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance


Indiana may be one of the most decorated programs in college basketball history, but a brand name no longer has the recruiting pull it used to. In the past, the Hoosiers had a foolproof sell: it’s Indiana. Nowadays, in the NIL era, the playing field has been leveled. 

To win in the transfer portal and recruiting as a whole, a program like Indiana needs a premier recruiter – and it has one in Darian DeVries.

Heading into his second season as the Hoosiers head man, DeVries is on an absolute heater, as he just landed his sixth transfer (Villanova guard Bryce Lindsay) on Wednesday night. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far:

Advertisement

Indiana Hoosiers head coach Darian Devries reacts in the first half of the NCAA game at Value City Arena on Saturday, March 7, 2026 in Columbus, Ohio. | Samantha Madar/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

Indiana won’t have a talent problem in 2026-27

On one hand, the expectations are high in Bloomington – especially after the turnaround Curt Cignetti engineered in just two quick years on the gridiron. And an NCAA Tournament appearance isn’t exactly the Herculean task a College Football Playoff berth, let alone a national title, is. 

Then again, DeVries didn’t have much time to craft his 2025-26 roster, and the end result wound up being less-than ideal from a talent perspective. All things considered, DeVries didn’t do a poor job given the roster he had. But it was also his roster. 

Advertisement

Coaching is a balance of roster-building, X’s and O’s and culture. It’s up to DeVries to tailor a roster fit to his coaching strengths. Here in the 2026 offseason, he’s sent a message: recruiting will not be a problem. As a result, talent won’t be a weakness – it’ll be a strength. 

The question now: can DeVries take advantage of an uber-skilled crew? Can he mesh the pieces and, ideally, create a product better than the sum of its parts? If the 2025-26 season was any sign, the answer is yes – which means a Big Dance appearance should be the bare minimum next year. 

Advertisement

How will the backcourt depth chart shake out?

Notre Dame guard Markus Burton celebrates during a NCAA men’s basketball game against Missouri at Purcell Pavilion on Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2025, in South Bend. | MICHAEL CLUBB/SOUTH BEND TRIBUNE / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Hoosiers are going to have a loaded guard rotation, and DeVries has a variety of options in terms of a starting backcourt.

Advertisement

Markus Burton is a surefire starter at lead guard, but then DeVries can choose between Bryce Lindsay and Jaeden Mustaf at the two, or, potentially, he could run both together at shooting guard and small forward.

What about Duke transfer Darren Harris, though? He’s more of a wing, but it’s not exactly clear how he’ll fit in the fold. And incoming combo guard Prince-Alexander Moody can also compete for minutes. 

Fortunately, DeVries can’t exactly go wrong. A Burton-Lindsay starting backcourt would be undersized but loaded, chock-full of shooting and playmaking, while a Burton-Mustaf combo would be a slashing nightmare for opponents, strong defensively and tough on the boards. 

And if Moody shocks the college hoops world and manages to sneak in over both Lindsay and Mustaf, that means the Hoosiers have a bona fide star on their hands. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far.

Advertisement

The Hoosiers should be much better on the glass

Indiana could have been a lot better on the boards a year ago. The Hoosiers were No. 296 in offensive rebounding rate and No. 122 in defensive rebounding rate, per Bart Torvik. As a squad, Indiana was often undersized – and sometimes by a huge margin. Naturally, the glass suffered, affecting both sides of the floor. 

Advertisement

Mar 20, 2026; Tampa, FL, USA; Alabama Crimson Tide forward Aiden Sherrell (22) shoots against Hofstra Pride forward Victory Onuetu (6) in the second half during a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Benchmark International Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images | Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

In 2026-27, the Hoosiers should flip the script in that department. With incoming big men Aiden Sherrell (Alabama) and Samet Yigitoglu (SMU) combining for 14.1 total rebounds per outing despite neither playing more than 30 minutes per game in this past campaign, Indiana should have a dominant glass-cleaning unit in the frontcourt in 2026-27.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending