Connect with us

Indiana

Michigan loss to Indiana calls Sherrone Moore’s game management into question

Published

on

Michigan loss to Indiana calls Sherrone Moore’s game management into question


BLOOMINGTON, Ind. — Michigan’s five losses have come in different flavors, from deflating to shocking to maddeningly predictable.

Saturday’s 20-15 loss to No. 8 Indiana was a new twist. Michigan’s defense played inspired football and held one of the most explosive offenses in the country to 18 yards in the second half. The Wolverines offense missed numerous opportunities, but that’s nothing new. There was another issue, one that’s been in the background all season but became harder to ignore after a game that came down to the final minute.

Sherrone Moore’s game management was not good. If he’s going to succeed as a head coach, it will have to get a lot better.

Moore wasted a timeout challenging an obvious fumble. He gave his leading rusher one carry in the first half. He took a delay-of-game penalty instead of going for fourth-and-3 at Indiana’s 42-yard line. Gifted an interception at Indiana’s 7, Michigan ran the ball three times and kicked a field goal. And then the kicker: With three timeouts and a theoretical chance to get the ball back, Moore let nearly 30 precious seconds tick away before stopping the clock.

Advertisement

GO DEEPER

Indiana’s Cinderella run reaches 10-0 for first time after rare win against Michigan

Those mistakes didn’t cost Michigan the game, but they’re symptomatic of a program that isn’t doing the little things well. Michigan needed to do everything right to have a shot at beating Indiana, which is a sentence that has not been typed many times in the history of college football.

Entering Saturday, Michigan had lost twice in its previous 44 games against the Hoosiers, and one of those was the Twilight Zone season of 2020. But this is a different Indiana team, one that has captured the hearts of football fans everywhere during its 10-0 start. It’s also a different Michigan team, not that Michigan fans need the reminder.

Michigan was the first team all season to put the Hoosiers on the ropes. After falling behind 17-3 in the first half, the Wolverines smothered Indiana’s offense and gave themselves a chance to win. A game that looked like a rout turned into high-stakes drama, with Indiana’s College Football Playoff hopes hanging in the balance.

Advertisement

In a game like this, every decision is magnified. A lot of Moore’s decisions didn’t end up looking great, and his explanations weren’t much better.

On the decision to challenge Alex Orji’s fumble: “We got the word buzzing down that it was possible the knee would have been down. I wanted to challenge and fight for my kids.”

On kicking a field goal at the 3-yard line, down 17-3: “It really was the momentum of moving the football. We wanted to get points. It was later in the game, so we had time to go back down there and try to score.”

On giving carries to redshirt freshman Benjamin Hall instead of leading rusher Kalel Mullings in the first half: “We just wanted to get Ben some carries. He’s been throughout the whole year doing a really good job, and we just felt like it was time for him to get some work as well.”

On waiting to call a timeout when Michigan still had a shot to get the ball back: “It was just talking about conversations of what the play call was going to be, what we were going to do. That’s where it all came from.”

Advertisement

The full context is helpful here. After Michigan came up less than a yard short on fourth down, Indiana took over near midfield with 1:35 on the clock. The Hoosiers gained 8 yards on first down, and Moore seemed caught between calling a quick timeout or conceding the first down. Indiana got the first down on the next play, so the lost time didn’t matter. But the criticism on the CBS broadcast, coupled with a shot of Moore hanging his head, didn’t paint a pretty picture.

Moore is a first-time head coach, and rookie mistakes are to be expected. Lots of coaches struggle with game management early in their careers and get better with time. And it’s worth remembering that Moore filled in for Jim Harbaugh last season and pushed a lot of the right buttons to keep Michigan’s undefeated season alive.

The puzzling part is that Moore seems to be getting away from things that were supposed to be his strengths. Moore went for it three times on fourth down against Ohio State last season, and Michigan converted all three. Those were great, gutsy calls. Against Indiana, the Wolverines went for a fourth-and-goal in the fourth quarter — they really didn’t have a choice — and scored on a 1-yard touchdown run from Mullings, but other times they played it safe.

The sequence that hurt the most came after Zeke Berry intercepted a pass at Indiana’s 7. Michigan called three unimaginative runs and kicked a 22-yard field goal to pull within 17-6. That’s the difference between a tie game and a five-point loss.

“We’ve got to be able to punch that ball in, no question about it,” quarterback Davis Warren said. “The opportunity was there for us. We’re definitely going to think about those a lot. It stinks. It hurts. We knew that we were good enough to win this football game.”

When Michigan had players like Blake Corum and J.J. McCarthy, going for it on fourth down was an easy call. It’s not as easy this year. Michigan’s offensive struggles make it tempting to take points when they’re available, but the lack of explosiveness also means the Wolverines need to score touchdowns when they have the chance. As a result, a lot of Michigan’s decision-making has felt haphazard and inconsistent.

Advertisement

Despite their offensive limitations, the Wolverines had every opportunity to win this game and spoil Indiana’s Cinderella season. For the good of college football and the enjoyment of all, perhaps it’s better that they didn’t. A 10-0 Indiana team on its way to the College Football Playoff is a much better story than a 5-5 Michigan team trying to make the Pinstripe Bowl.

This is not Michigan’s year, but the Wolverines don’t plan to be irrelevant for long. Their goal is to be playing meaningful games again, preferably as soon as next season. When that happens, Michigan will need to know that Moore can push the right buttons. Saturday was a clear indication that he needs to get better in that area.

This game was there for the taking. When time was running out, Michigan let it get away.

(Photo: Joe Robbins / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)





Source link

Advertisement

Indiana

What Tom Izzo said after Michigan State’s win over Indiana

Published

on

What Tom Izzo said after Michigan State’s win over Indiana


Michigan State basketball went into Assembly Hall on Sunday afternoon and controlled the Hoosiers from start to finish, earning a 77-64 victory. The win goes a long way in almost virtually confirming that the Spartans will have a triple-bye in the Big Ten Tournament, while also bolstering the Spartans case to get a No. 2 seed in the NCAA Tournament.

For the second straight outing in the state of Indiana, MSU head coach Tom Izzo came away pleased with his group, and expressed that to the media:

  • “Well, to be honest with you, for once, we got off to a good start. We haven’t been doing that. We decided to try to go inside, Kohler (had) been struggling, we thought we’d try to get him going. We get that 10-point lead and it kind of stayed that way.
  • “We did not do a great job of building on it, it’s because they’re a good team. Everybody asks me, ‘Are they good enough to be in the tournament?’ Read my lips: hell yes. It’s just that somebody’s got to lose some of these games. The league is so good.”
  • “I’m proud of my guys, because coming back from that Thursday-Sunday deal, both on the road, I thought they showed a lot of character. I’m proud of my staff, those preps are not easy at this time of year. Kur came off the bench and really sparked us after making more than a few mistakes.”
  • “What I appreciated about the game is I thought Jeremy took over. Everything we asked him to run early, to go into Jaxon, he did a great job of. I thought Kur, who’s a sophomore now, took a big step forward after not playing very well the 5 minutes he was in there early and falling down and giving up 3s, and then he bounced back. That’s kind of what you’ve gotta do.”
  • “We did it a little different way. We said this will be kind of like the NCAA Tournament where you’ve got a one- or two-day prep, one-day prep, so I think it was good for us. I’m really proud of them, but I don’t want to be proud of them until I’m done playing.”
  • “All in all, guys, we’re in spring break, which means you can practice like 100 times, and nobody arrests you or anything. But our guys deserve some time off and we’ll get some things done tomorrow. “

Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes and opinion. You can also follow Cory Linsner on X @Rex_Linzy





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Coast Guard investigates death of mariner working barge in Jeffersonville

Published

on

Coast Guard investigates death of mariner working barge in Jeffersonville


play

U.S. Coast Guard officials are investigating March 1 after a mariner died while working on a barge in Jeffersonville, Indiana.

An incident involving the mariner occurred the afternoon of Feb. 27 at mile marker 597 of the Ohio River, said Lt. Cmdr. Steve Leighty, public affairs officer for the U.S. Coast Guard Ohio Valley Sector. Leighty declined to provide further details about the mariner and the circumstances of their death, citing the ongoing investigation.

Advertisement

Officials with the Clark County Sheriff’s Office are also investigating the incident, Leighty said.

Reach reporter Leo Bertucci at lbertucci@usatodayco.com or @leober2chee on X, formerly known as Twitter



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana Pacers Must Manage Two-Way Contract Player Availability Down Stretch

Published

on

Indiana Pacers Must Manage Two-Way Contract Player Availability Down Stretch


WASHINGTON – The Indiana Pacers have a player availability puzzle to put together down the stretch of the 2025-26 season, and it involves all three of their players on two-way contracts.

Currently, the Pacers have Jalen Slawson, Ethan Thompson, and Taelon Peter signed to two-way deals. Thompson and Peter have been helpful at different points this season, and all three players are healthy right now. They each project to have a bigger role in the Pacers’ final outings of the season.

But they can’t all play in every game thanks to two-way contract rules, and the Pacers will have to juggle the availability of each player. Indiana has already played multiple games since the All-Star break with just one or two or their two-way contract signees available to play.

Advertisement

That’s because two-way agreements come with a limit – players on such contracts can only be active in 50 games per season (or a proportionate ratio of 50/82 games at the time of signing based on the number of days left in the season). The Pacers couldn’t get by without their two-way contract players at various moments this season due to injuries, with Peter being active for 23 of the team’s first 25 games and Thompson during every game from December 1 through January 17.

During those stretches, Indiana needed their two-way players to field a team or a rotation that actually made sense. It wasn’t a poor use of their active days. But that two-way usage early in the season now requires the Pacers to be strategic down the stretch of 2025-26. They have 22 more games this season but won’t be able to use their two-way talents in all of them.

Peter, a rookie selected in the second round of last June’s NBA Draft, had a rush of games to open the campaign, and he’s allowed to suit up 14 more times this league year. “He’s figuring out what being a professional basketball player is about,” Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle said of Peter and his in-season growth earlier this month. “It’s about being who you are all the time, regardless of make or miss. Just keep playing, just keep staying aggressive.”

Thompson was signed on November 30, which permitted him to appear in 39 games this season. He’s only got 10 left – Thompson was effective right away with the Pacers and played often after his signing. He was named to the NBA G League Next Up game, effectively the G League All-Star game, for his performances this campaign.

Slawson signed his contract earlier today and is eligible for 13 appearances the rest of the way for the Pacers. So, with 22 games remaining, none of the team’s two-way contract players can be active for each remaining game. The team will have to figure out the best strategy when it comes to managing two-way player availability during the final months of the season.

Another consideration for the franchise is that two-way players, by virtue of their contract, can be transferred down to the G League at any time. Peter, Slawson, and Thomspon have combined for 64 appearances with Indiana’s G League affiliate team, the Noblesville Boom, this season. Once the Boom’s season ends – their final scheduled game is March 26 but the team currently holds a playoff spot – then the G League is not an option for two-way players.

So the Pacers have to figure out the best way to deploy, and evaluate, their two-way contract signees during March and April. It’s a lot to manage.

“We’re trying to save games for him,” Carlisle said of the Pacers decision to keep Quenton Jackson, who was previously on a two-way contract, inactive for a game earlier this month. “We want to conserve those games as much as possible.”

Jackson had his contract converted from a two-way deal to a standard deal earlier today, and Slawson filled his two-way slot. It was sharp business for the Pacers, but they lost some available two-way days as a result – Jackson had more than 13 games remaining, but Slawson gets fewer because of the day he signed his contract.

Advertisement

“Two-way guys, your life is a lot of unpredictability of where you’re going to be from day to day,” Pacers general manager Chad Buchanan shared in February.

If the Pacers want to keep their two-way talents around the NBA club as much as possible, their best course of action could be to keep two of the three active in every game and occasionally just have one of the three available. If the team can get to a spot in which they have 15 games left on the schedule and all of their two-way talents have 10+ games left in which they could be active, two of the three could play every night during the final 15 outings. Using all three at once could be difficult, though Indiana may choose to deploy each of Thompson, Peter, and Slawson on the second night of back-to-backs as they manage injuries down the stretch. Putting any of the trio in the G League for a few days is an option, too, but comes with injury risks.

Slawson has not appeared in a game for the Pacers yet this season. Peter is averaging 3.3 points per game while shooting 35.8% from the field while Thompson is posting 4.9 points per contest and knocking down 36.7% of his shots. The Pacers are 15-45 with three back-to-backs remaining and three games left against teams near them in the inverse standings.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending