Connect with us

Indiana

Inconsistent Play Driving Poor Start For Indiana Pacers

Published

on

Inconsistent Play Driving Poor Start For Indiana Pacers


CHICAGO — The Indiana Pacers took on the Chicago Bulls last Friday, and the Pacers mood as a group was largely positive before the game. Players were focused on their upcoming task at hand after a lengthy morning shootaround session. They took a hard look at their offense, spacing, and movement in an attempt to figure out what they needed to do to recapture their offensive potency. Players were light and jovial about one hour before tipoff.

That night, the Pacers scored 132 points and earned their first win without clutch time all season. They made 18 three-point shots and kept the Bulls away. It was the team’s third-highest scoring game this season, and Indiana earned a much-needed win on the same day that they focused on re-establishing their offensive identity.

Advertisement

Two days later, that same Pacers team was at home hosting the lowly and banged-up Charlotte Hornets. Head coach Rick Carlisle shared before the game that his team went through all of their offensive keys again before the action, just like they did in Chicago. Indiana had a chance to win two-straight games before having four days off to practice, and the group had a similar pregame vibe.

Yet the results were different that night. The Pacers scored just 109 points in a loss against the shorthanded Hornets, dropping the team’s record to 10-15. They weren’t able to keep rolling offensively, and that inconsistency had defined this Pacers campaign.

“We’re struggling in the margins of the game,” Carlisle said after his team lost in Charlotte. “Put two hands on the ball. Avoiding avoidable turnovers. Simple things within our defensive system that we control, we’re not doing a good enough job on those. We’ve got to, probably, communicate a lot better.”

Why have the Indiana Pacers been inconsistent?

Indiana has been all over the place. In a way, they are similar to last year — their best level is extremely high, yet their lowest performances look like one of the worst teams in the league. The Pacers have beaten Boston, Dallas, New York, Miami, and Orlando this season. That’s three of the Eastern Conference’s top-four teams, missing only a Cleveland group that the Pacers haven’t played yet. The Mavericks were in the NBA Finals last season. At their best, the blue and gold can hang with, and beat, contenders.

Advertisement

At their worst, they can’t beat anyone. Charlotte (twice), New Orleans, Philadelphia, Toronto (twice), and Brooklyn have already taken down the Pacers this season. Picking up those games was supposed to be Indiana’s way of improving from last year. Instead, they are inconsistent and have a lower ceiling. They have rarely strung together good play, even within one game.

“We’re human. When bad things happen, people are gonna hold their head down. Energy shifts. When we’re cooking, when we’re up, when we’re making shots. Of course our vibe is gonna be there,” Pacers forward Jarace Walker said the night his team lost to Charlotte in Indy. “We’ve just got to figure out how to keep that even keel, that level head when things do go south. So I feel like that’s where we’re struggling right now, and we’ll figure it out eventually.”

Two days ago, after several days off and multiple practices, the Pacers went to Philly and stomped the 76ers. It was another reminder of the team’s highest level — at their best they look like a postseason threat. The ball moved well, and Indiana’s defense found success all night. Games like that make their low points so confusing. They can have a night where they appear to one of the worst teams in the league right in the middle of stronger outings.

Indiana’s results display this information well, but so do their per-possession numbers. Per pbpstats, the Pacers are 14th in offensive efficiency at about 1.14 points per possession this season. Yet they have finished a game with an offensive rating over 120 eight times (7-1 in those games) and concluded action with an offensive rating under 110 nine times (0-9). 17 of the team’s 26 games fit into either extreme. They’ve been all over the place — last year, Indiana only had 14 games the entire season with a points per 100 possessions figure below 110. They’re on pace for 28 this season. The Pacers reached the 120 mark 45 times in 2023-24, yet they’re only tracking to hit 25 this season.

That’s a lot of numbers that all point to the same thing — the blue and gold have been inconsistent this season, and it’s largely due to their offense. On defense, the team is similarly poor compared to last season. In general, they have been slightly better on the less glamorous end of the floor. But with the rock, the Pacers were a machine last year. They hit a high peak in over half of their games. This year, they’ve fallen flat just as often as they had an easy night when it comes to scoring.

“It’s a good question. I feel like just focusing on the little things, really. Getting guys healthy, obviously not an excuse,” guard T.J. McConnell said of the team’s inconsistencies. He’s been one of the team’s steadiest performers. “But I think just focusing on the small details, especially on a defensive end. We just have to be better.”

The Pacers need to play better, as McConnell said. That’s obvious, reaching their peak more often would lead to more wins. But they may get equal, if not more, value by reducing the frequency of their poor outings. In general, that is what has felt different about the team this year compared to the most recent full campaign — they have far more outings where they look like they have no scoring capability, even against weak opponents.

What does it take to shake that kind of issue? It’s hard to say. If the Pacers knew why they were inconsistent, they would address it and not have these problems in the first place.

Advertisement

Some of it comes down to their many injuries, including a few that are likely season ending. Their pace hasn’t been as breathtaking compared to the rest of the NBA like it was last season. Tyrese Haliburton, the team’s star player, has been up and down — just like the team as a collective.

It’s hard to predict what version of the Pacers will show up, but less frequent peaks and more visible lows has the team at 11-15 with a tough stretch of opponents coming up. Some would argue that inconsistent is synonymous with bad when it comes to the quality of an NBA team, and that may be true in some cases. Indiana will hope they can prove that to be false and get back to the season they hoped to have.



Source link

Indiana

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.

Published

on

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.


(CHALKBEAT INDIANA) — When Pete Hinnefeld and his wife started looking for a preschool for their daughter, they hoped to send her to the same school her brother attended, which was just down the road from their house and offered Spanish-language immersion.

To do this for Lydia, then age 3, they were prepared to pay the $600 monthly cost.

But after voters approved a property tax referendum to fund early learning for children living within the Monroe County Community School Corporation, the family’s preschool bill was cut by more than half. Nearby preschool cut down time spent commuting to their parents’ house for babysitting, and helped Lydia build social skills.

The family are one of hundreds now benefitting from the 2023 referendum, which has more than doubled the number of children attending 3- and 4-year-old preschools in the district.

Advertisement

“For us, this is why you pay taxes,” Hinnefeld said. “It’s important for young kids to have access to school and if parents need to work, it’s an opportunity to let them work.”

The referendum put forward by the district, located in Bloomington, is a first in the state, offering all families tuition support on a sliding scale based on income, no matter whether children attend a district preschool or a partner provider.

It represents a local solution to problems with accessing and affording early learning that have left thousands of Indiana families waiting for help. Indiana in December 2024 froze its Child Care and Development Fund, or CCDF, and On My Way Pre-K dollars, which provide funding for early learning for income-eligible households.

A $200 million funding increase for CCDF approved by the State Budget Committee this week will allow Indiana to begin issuing vouchers againin May to around 14,000 more children, for a total enrollment of around 57,000. Those funds will last around one year.

Still, around 20,000 children will remain on the waitlist, and families may have fewer options for where to use their vouchers as hundreds of providers have closed since the freeze was announced, according to early learning advocates in the state. In a recent survey of early childhood educators in Indiana — which includes those working in a variety of settings — 90% of respondents said families are struggling to pay tuition.

Advertisement

A statewide universal preschool program is unlikely, Republican leaders have said. Instead, a legislative proposal this year would have let cities and counties — not just school districts — ask voters to fund preschool seats. It failed to get traction, but its advocates expect it to return.

The political climate isn’t especially promising for local tax increases: A new Indiana law has placed caps on property tax revenue that are already affecting local budgets. Lawmakers also recently restricted when schools can place referendums on the ballot.

Still, a new local revenue stream could be a boon in some Indiana communities, such as those with high demand for preschool, existing programs, and high social cohesion, said Sam Snideman, vice president of government relations for United Way of Central Indiana.

“There are going to be communities where this makes a ton of sense,” Snideman said. “The increasing challenge for an entity that goes before the public for a referendum is making a very clear value case. What is the common good and what is in the community interest is very important.”

School district’s pre-K enrollment doubles after referendum

Before Monroe schools brought the referendum request to voters, the district conducted a study that showed there were not enough early learning seats to serve children in the community, said Timothy Dowling, director of early learning and enrollment at Monroe schools. And families couldn’t always afford the seats that were available.

Advertisement

But the district also knew that research links quality early learning improved later academic outcomes, Dowling said.

“We wanted to do everything we can to help our students get the benefit of early learning, because we know it pays off in huge dividends,” Dowling said.

The referendum equated to around a $50 increase yearly for a home with an assessed value of $250,000, according to the district website, and also paid for instructional supplies for K-12 students. It passed with 55% of the vote; Dowling said the community study and transparency about how the referendum funds would be used were key to its success.

As a result of the successful referendum, all families in the district qualify for at least $4,000 in tuition assistance for preschool for 4-year-olds, whether their children attend a district school or at one of seven community providers.

Around 76% students in the district’s program attend for free based on their family’s income, Dowling said. Families in the lowest income tier who send their children to community providers receive $8,000 in tuition assistance.

Advertisement

The program also offers tuition assistance for 3-year-old preschool based on income and where the student attends school. For families making 225% or less of the federal poverty level, preschool is free at district programs. Often those families struggled the most to afford child care, even when state child care vouchers were available, Dowling said.

In 2024-25, the year after the referendum passed, the number of 4-year-olds attending preschool doubled from 184 to 378, with 64 of those children attending preschool at outside centers. This year, the district expanded preschool for 3-year-olds, based on the timeline laid out in the referendum. Enrollment jumped from 78 to 123, with another 33 students attending community child care centers, Dowling said.

With multiple types of providers, families have options, said Kelly Sipes, the executive director for Penny Lane Childcare Centers, which is a partner provider with the district. Those who need transportation might choose a district-run preschool, she said, but those who need year-round care during school holidays can choose a center like Penny Lane instead.

Her centers are usually at capacity, Sipes said, and child care needs in the community persist. When CCDF funding was cut, some of her families turned to the funding from the district instead.

“It’s awesome for the families,” Sipes said. “We should be all in this together as a community.”

Advertisement

Pitching child care: ‘We live in a society’

Replicating referendum-funded preschool might work well in communities where school-based providers already exist, and where there’s a sufficient tax base and steady demand for child care, Snideman said. It would also be an incentive to attract working families.

But it could be a harder sell in rural districts, where there are fewer families and less demand.

Generally, school referendums pass in districts that are wealthier, and in areas with less farmland, said Larry DeBoer, a Purdue University professor emeritus of agricultural economics, who has studied school referendums in depth.One of the biggest predictors of success is whether a school district has tried to pass a referendum before — even if they’ve failed, a second referendum is more likely to pass, DeBoer said.

Monroe schools had previously passed an operating referendum the year before its 2023 preschool referendum. As a county, Monroe has a slightly lower per-person income than Indiana as a whole, and has more students than the small and medium-sized districts most likely to propose successful ballot measures. It’s home to Indiana University, and tends to vote Democratic in a largely conservative state.

A legislative proposal this year, HB 1430, would have given the power to levy preschool referendums to counties and cities, potentially casting a wider net for both family demand and child care providers.

Advertisement

The bill did not receive a hearing, in part because Indiana legislative leaders are usually reluctant to consider bills with a fiscal impact in even-numbered years where they don’t pass a state budget. And the most recent state budget passed in 2025 was tight, with cuts to spending and programs due to a revenue shortfall.

The bill’s author, Rep. Blake Johnson, a Democrat, said that conversations about the bill have been fruitful, and that he expects the idea to return in a future session.

Given budget concerns, a locally funded solution that communities can tailor to their own needs may be more successful than a statewide one, said Patrick McAlister, who leads the Preschool Choice Alliance, a statewide group.

“This is an economic development need. Here’s the tool and the option to exercise it or not,” Johnson said.

A successful referendum would be a boon to working parents who struggle to afford the cost of early learning, said McAlister, who used to be the director of the Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation. But even for non-parents, a preschool referendum could have a positive impact on property values and in other ways, McAlister said.

Advertisement

Ultimately, it would be one part of an “all and above strategy” addressing care for children from birth to age 2.

“We live in a society,” McAlister said. “There are certain things we hold true and caring for children is a value many people share.”

Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl

Published

on

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl





© Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Ty Simpson was a guest on the “Downs 2 Business” podcast with Caleb Downs and Josh Downs, and he discussed why he believed Indiana beat Alabama in the Rose Bowl.

The Crimson Tide’s offense was unable to score a touchdown against the Hoosiers in the 38-3 loss. Simpson shone a light on why he felt Indiana had so much success against Alabama on X.

“From my point of view, I was like they don’t much,” Simpson said. “I was like they do the same thing every down and so when I get the ball, I knew exactly what was going to happen. They just didn’t mess up, bro. They were in the exact same spot they were supposed to be, and they were so well coached. It was so much different than the SEC. In the SEC, they’ll play man, they’ll do these unorthodox coverages because kind of how it is. That game was crazy to me. Of course, I got hurt; that was a bummer. But I just knew what they were going to do, but we couldn’t really run the ball. We didn’t really throw it. It was so crazy to me how it happened.”

Advertisement

Indiana went on to beat Oregon in the semifinals of the College Football Playoff, and the Hoosiers defeated Miami in the National Championship after defeating the Crimson Tide.

Simpson and Caleb Downs are now both gearing up to be drafted this month.







Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance

Published

on

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance


Indiana may be one of the most decorated programs in college basketball history, but a brand name no longer has the recruiting pull it used to. In the past, the Hoosiers had a foolproof sell: it’s Indiana. Nowadays, in the NIL era, the playing field has been leveled. 

To win in the transfer portal and recruiting as a whole, a program like Indiana needs a premier recruiter – and it has one in Darian DeVries.

Heading into his second season as the Hoosiers head man, DeVries is on an absolute heater, as he just landed his sixth transfer (Villanova guard Bryce Lindsay) on Wednesday night. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far:

Advertisement

Indiana Hoosiers head coach Darian Devries reacts in the first half of the NCAA game at Value City Arena on Saturday, March 7, 2026 in Columbus, Ohio. | Samantha Madar/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

Indiana won’t have a talent problem in 2026-27

On one hand, the expectations are high in Bloomington – especially after the turnaround Curt Cignetti engineered in just two quick years on the gridiron. And an NCAA Tournament appearance isn’t exactly the Herculean task a College Football Playoff berth, let alone a national title, is. 

Then again, DeVries didn’t have much time to craft his 2025-26 roster, and the end result wound up being less-than ideal from a talent perspective. All things considered, DeVries didn’t do a poor job given the roster he had. But it was also his roster. 

Advertisement

Coaching is a balance of roster-building, X’s and O’s and culture. It’s up to DeVries to tailor a roster fit to his coaching strengths. Here in the 2026 offseason, he’s sent a message: recruiting will not be a problem. As a result, talent won’t be a weakness – it’ll be a strength. 

The question now: can DeVries take advantage of an uber-skilled crew? Can he mesh the pieces and, ideally, create a product better than the sum of its parts? If the 2025-26 season was any sign, the answer is yes – which means a Big Dance appearance should be the bare minimum next year. 

Advertisement

How will the backcourt depth chart shake out?

Notre Dame guard Markus Burton celebrates during a NCAA men’s basketball game against Missouri at Purcell Pavilion on Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2025, in South Bend. | MICHAEL CLUBB/SOUTH BEND TRIBUNE / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Hoosiers are going to have a loaded guard rotation, and DeVries has a variety of options in terms of a starting backcourt.

Advertisement

Markus Burton is a surefire starter at lead guard, but then DeVries can choose between Bryce Lindsay and Jaeden Mustaf at the two, or, potentially, he could run both together at shooting guard and small forward.

What about Duke transfer Darren Harris, though? He’s more of a wing, but it’s not exactly clear how he’ll fit in the fold. And incoming combo guard Prince-Alexander Moody can also compete for minutes. 

Fortunately, DeVries can’t exactly go wrong. A Burton-Lindsay starting backcourt would be undersized but loaded, chock-full of shooting and playmaking, while a Burton-Mustaf combo would be a slashing nightmare for opponents, strong defensively and tough on the boards. 

And if Moody shocks the college hoops world and manages to sneak in over both Lindsay and Mustaf, that means the Hoosiers have a bona fide star on their hands. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far.

Advertisement

The Hoosiers should be much better on the glass

Indiana could have been a lot better on the boards a year ago. The Hoosiers were No. 296 in offensive rebounding rate and No. 122 in defensive rebounding rate, per Bart Torvik. As a squad, Indiana was often undersized – and sometimes by a huge margin. Naturally, the glass suffered, affecting both sides of the floor. 

Advertisement

Mar 20, 2026; Tampa, FL, USA; Alabama Crimson Tide forward Aiden Sherrell (22) shoots against Hofstra Pride forward Victory Onuetu (6) in the second half during a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Benchmark International Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images | Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

In 2026-27, the Hoosiers should flip the script in that department. With incoming big men Aiden Sherrell (Alabama) and Samet Yigitoglu (SMU) combining for 14.1 total rebounds per outing despite neither playing more than 30 minutes per game in this past campaign, Indiana should have a dominant glass-cleaning unit in the frontcourt in 2026-27.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending