Connect with us

Indiana

Beating Cleveland Cavaliers Has Indiana Pacers Thinking Big With Goals

Published

on

Beating Cleveland Cavaliers Has Indiana Pacers Thinking Big With Goals


CLEVELAND – It wasn’t long ago that the Indiana Pacers were simply happy to be in this position.

Last May – May 19, 2024, specifically – the Pacers beat the New York Knicks in Game 7 to advance to the 2024 Eastern Conference Finals. It was, and is, a big deal that Indiana won that game. Any trip to the final conference round is significant. But the Pacers had more of a happy-to-be-there vibe last season, and in hindsight they’ll admit it.

Advertisement

“Last year was more new for us. So we were all kind of just excited, and maybe too complacent, to be here,” Pacers guard Andrew Nembhard said of that 2024 run on Tuesday. Then, he looked forward. “I think now we want to push the limit and see what we can do.”

The now that Nembhard is referring to is the upcoming challenge for the Pacers. They are headed to the Eastern Conference Finals again – they dispatched the Cleveland Cavaliers in a five-game series that ended on Tuesday, and they’ll play either the Knicks or Boston Celtics next. Those are two formidable foes, but Indiana is far more experienced than they were at this time last season.

“I think last year, we were just satisfied with being in the playoffs. Everything from there was kind of playing with house money, to be honest with you,” Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton said in April. “This year, I think we have real expectations to do something special as a group. And when I say something special, I mean a championship.”

About one month passed between Haliburton and Nembhard saying essentially the same thing. Indiana has trumpeted the same message top-to-bottom since the regular season ended – they feel like they can make a run this season, and their dismantling of the Cavaliers shows that they could be right.

Cleveland won 64 games in the regular season. Most analysts picked them to win the series. The Cavs swept the Miami Heat in the first round with wonderful offense and appeared to be riding a high heading into the Eastern Conference Semifinals.

Advertisement

That’s where they met the Pacers, a 50-win team that combines physicality and pace in a way that few others can. The Cavs knew, and stated, that preparing for that style is difficult. It can’t be simulated in a practice setting. But the East’s top-seeded squad still carried around confidence that they could beat the Pacers in a seven-game set. After winning 64 times out of 82, then four in a row to open the postseason, their attitude was justifiable.

But they weren’t ready for Indiana. The Pacers physicality became a story early in the series, something Cavs head coach Kenny Atkinson addressed on multiple occasions. Meanwhile, Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle, meanwhile, smiled that his team was described as physical by an opponent. It hasn’t always been what the blue and gold are known for, but they are gaining a reputation.

In Game 1, the Pacers did what they do best and generated wide-open jump shots. They made a ton of them in a key win, setting the tone for the best-of-seven set. The Cavs needed to respond, but they weren’t able to in Game 2 as Haliburton pulled off perhaps the best sequence of his playoff career.

It was clear by that point that a gap between the Pacers and Cavs didn’t really exist. If there was one, it favored Indiana. Cleveland was dealing with some injuries and missing jumpers, but the fourth-seeded Pacers were forcing them into tougher-than-usual shots and playing a demanding style to perfection. The East’s top team was often the group responding and making tweaks.

That isn’t how a second-round series is supposed to go. The Pacers aren’t the typical 50-32 team – they are 42-16 since January 1 (playoffs included) – but 64-win rosters almost never get eliminated before the Conference Finals. There’s a reason few experts picked Indiana to win despite their strong run of form in 2025: the Cavaliers had been excellent.

Advertisement

In fact, prior to this year’s NBA playoffs, only three teams that won 64+ games in a season didn’t make it to the conference finals at all – the 2021-22 Phoenix Suns, the 2015-16 San Antonio Spurs, and the 2006-07 Dallas Mavericks. It’s possible that the Oklahoma City Thunder join this group on Sunday, but it’s still a small collection.

Yet the Pacers won the series. And it wasn’t close. They rolled right through the Cavaliers in five games, taking the series 4-1 to advance to their second-consecutive Eastern Conference Finals. Game 3 was a struggle for the Pacers, but they met the needed level in the quartet of other outings.

“We’re a close team. Every time everybody doubts us, we just clash together and just figure out a way,” Pacers center Thomas Bryant said. “You’ve got to show real love around here and this team has real love between each other.”

Why do the Pacers have so much belief they can make a run?

It wasn’t just that Indiana beat Cleveland, it’s also the ease at which they did it. Game 3 was rough for the Pacers, as was the first quarter of Game 5 and the third quarter of Game 1. Basically every other moment in the series tipped toward the Pacers. The tempo and strategies all favored the blue and gold, and they never let up.

That’s why Indiana’s offense was so effective for the second-straight series. Their style is tough to deal with. The blue and gold have the best postseason offensive rating of the team’s still alive in the playoffs and scored with ease against the Cavs after doing the same to the Milwaukee Bucks in the first round.

That’s why the best-of-seven set ended in five games, and the road team came away with the series victory. The previous three teams that were eliminated before the conference finals despite winning at least 64 games lasted until at least Game 6 in their final series. The Cavs couldn’t even get that far against the Pacers.

The combination of great results and added experience has the Pacers buzzing about their chances going forward. They have over a week off before their next series begins, and they’re confident they can win it. After beating the Cavs in Game 5, the team was amped in the locker room. They could be heard celebrating from far down the hallway in Rocket Arena. Later, music blasted as they smiled through their one night of celebration before getting ready for the next round.

Fittingly, though, one of the songs played in the locker room was “On to the Next One” by Jay-Z. The Pacers are on to the next round, and there is internal belief they can keep going even beyond that.

Advertisement

“We’re talking about eight more wins for an NBA championship. The league is wide open this year,” Carlisle said after this team won Game 5. “There are a lot of great teams, but it’s wide open. And we’ve just got to keep believing.”

That belief was obvious in the final win against Cleveland. The Cavaliers took a 44-25 lead in the second quarter and were on track to roll over the Pacers in Game 5. It would have been easy for Indiana to give up and use their upcoming home game in the series as a crutch.

Instead, they battled back. Haliburton hit five huge threes in the second quarter, and other role players found the bottom of the net. As shots went in, the energy level grew. Suddenly, the Pacers defense was better, too, and they were down by just four points at halftime.

Early in the third frame, the Pacers took a 65-64 lead and never looked back on their way to a 114-105 win. Everyone filled a key role in the second half as the blue and gold won in Cleveland for the third time of the series.

They believed, even at the low point of a 19-point deficit, that they could come back and win. Haliburton led the way, but it was a total team effort. And that team is knocking on the door of a Finals appearance and wondering, “why not us?”

Advertisement

“We’re different than every other team in the NBA. We don’t just have one guy who scores all the points. We defeat teams in different ways,” Haliburton said after the win.

The Celtics are without superstar Jayson Tatum for the rest of the playoffs. The Knicks are great but only finished with one more win than the Pacers this season – and Indiana beat New York in the second-round last year.

The Knicks are a new-look team, and the Celtics have other stars. But after crushing the Cavs and gaining a ton of experience last year, the Pacers see a path to getting eight more wins. So far, they’ve backed up all their talk. Doing so on the next stage, a larger one, will be their biggest test yet. But they’ve met every single one with victories so far in the playoffs and can do it again.



Source link

Advertisement

Indiana

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.

Published

on

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.


(CHALKBEAT INDIANA) — When Pete Hinnefeld and his wife started looking for a preschool for their daughter, they hoped to send her to the same school her brother attended, which was just down the road from their house and offered Spanish-language immersion.

To do this for Lydia, then age 3, they were prepared to pay the $600 monthly cost.

But after voters approved a property tax referendum to fund early learning for children living within the Monroe County Community School Corporation, the family’s preschool bill was cut by more than half. Nearby preschool cut down time spent commuting to their parents’ house for babysitting, and helped Lydia build social skills.

The family are one of hundreds now benefitting from the 2023 referendum, which has more than doubled the number of children attending 3- and 4-year-old preschools in the district.

Advertisement

“For us, this is why you pay taxes,” Hinnefeld said. “It’s important for young kids to have access to school and if parents need to work, it’s an opportunity to let them work.”

The referendum put forward by the district, located in Bloomington, is a first in the state, offering all families tuition support on a sliding scale based on income, no matter whether children attend a district preschool or a partner provider.

It represents a local solution to problems with accessing and affording early learning that have left thousands of Indiana families waiting for help. Indiana in December 2024 froze its Child Care and Development Fund, or CCDF, and On My Way Pre-K dollars, which provide funding for early learning for income-eligible households.

A $200 million funding increase for CCDF approved by the State Budget Committee this week will allow Indiana to begin issuing vouchers againin May to around 14,000 more children, for a total enrollment of around 57,000. Those funds will last around one year.

Still, around 20,000 children will remain on the waitlist, and families may have fewer options for where to use their vouchers as hundreds of providers have closed since the freeze was announced, according to early learning advocates in the state. In a recent survey of early childhood educators in Indiana — which includes those working in a variety of settings — 90% of respondents said families are struggling to pay tuition.

Advertisement

A statewide universal preschool program is unlikely, Republican leaders have said. Instead, a legislative proposal this year would have let cities and counties — not just school districts — ask voters to fund preschool seats. It failed to get traction, but its advocates expect it to return.

The political climate isn’t especially promising for local tax increases: A new Indiana law has placed caps on property tax revenue that are already affecting local budgets. Lawmakers also recently restricted when schools can place referendums on the ballot.

Still, a new local revenue stream could be a boon in some Indiana communities, such as those with high demand for preschool, existing programs, and high social cohesion, said Sam Snideman, vice president of government relations for United Way of Central Indiana.

“There are going to be communities where this makes a ton of sense,” Snideman said. “The increasing challenge for an entity that goes before the public for a referendum is making a very clear value case. What is the common good and what is in the community interest is very important.”

School district’s pre-K enrollment doubles after referendum

Before Monroe schools brought the referendum request to voters, the district conducted a study that showed there were not enough early learning seats to serve children in the community, said Timothy Dowling, director of early learning and enrollment at Monroe schools. And families couldn’t always afford the seats that were available.

Advertisement

But the district also knew that research links quality early learning improved later academic outcomes, Dowling said.

“We wanted to do everything we can to help our students get the benefit of early learning, because we know it pays off in huge dividends,” Dowling said.

The referendum equated to around a $50 increase yearly for a home with an assessed value of $250,000, according to the district website, and also paid for instructional supplies for K-12 students. It passed with 55% of the vote; Dowling said the community study and transparency about how the referendum funds would be used were key to its success.

As a result of the successful referendum, all families in the district qualify for at least $4,000 in tuition assistance for preschool for 4-year-olds, whether their children attend a district school or at one of seven community providers.

Around 76% students in the district’s program attend for free based on their family’s income, Dowling said. Families in the lowest income tier who send their children to community providers receive $8,000 in tuition assistance.

Advertisement

The program also offers tuition assistance for 3-year-old preschool based on income and where the student attends school. For families making 225% or less of the federal poverty level, preschool is free at district programs. Often those families struggled the most to afford child care, even when state child care vouchers were available, Dowling said.

In 2024-25, the year after the referendum passed, the number of 4-year-olds attending preschool doubled from 184 to 378, with 64 of those children attending preschool at outside centers. This year, the district expanded preschool for 3-year-olds, based on the timeline laid out in the referendum. Enrollment jumped from 78 to 123, with another 33 students attending community child care centers, Dowling said.

With multiple types of providers, families have options, said Kelly Sipes, the executive director for Penny Lane Childcare Centers, which is a partner provider with the district. Those who need transportation might choose a district-run preschool, she said, but those who need year-round care during school holidays can choose a center like Penny Lane instead.

Her centers are usually at capacity, Sipes said, and child care needs in the community persist. When CCDF funding was cut, some of her families turned to the funding from the district instead.

“It’s awesome for the families,” Sipes said. “We should be all in this together as a community.”

Advertisement

Pitching child care: ‘We live in a society’

Replicating referendum-funded preschool might work well in communities where school-based providers already exist, and where there’s a sufficient tax base and steady demand for child care, Snideman said. It would also be an incentive to attract working families.

But it could be a harder sell in rural districts, where there are fewer families and less demand.

Generally, school referendums pass in districts that are wealthier, and in areas with less farmland, said Larry DeBoer, a Purdue University professor emeritus of agricultural economics, who has studied school referendums in depth.One of the biggest predictors of success is whether a school district has tried to pass a referendum before — even if they’ve failed, a second referendum is more likely to pass, DeBoer said.

Monroe schools had previously passed an operating referendum the year before its 2023 preschool referendum. As a county, Monroe has a slightly lower per-person income than Indiana as a whole, and has more students than the small and medium-sized districts most likely to propose successful ballot measures. It’s home to Indiana University, and tends to vote Democratic in a largely conservative state.

A legislative proposal this year, HB 1430, would have given the power to levy preschool referendums to counties and cities, potentially casting a wider net for both family demand and child care providers.

Advertisement

The bill did not receive a hearing, in part because Indiana legislative leaders are usually reluctant to consider bills with a fiscal impact in even-numbered years where they don’t pass a state budget. And the most recent state budget passed in 2025 was tight, with cuts to spending and programs due to a revenue shortfall.

The bill’s author, Rep. Blake Johnson, a Democrat, said that conversations about the bill have been fruitful, and that he expects the idea to return in a future session.

Given budget concerns, a locally funded solution that communities can tailor to their own needs may be more successful than a statewide one, said Patrick McAlister, who leads the Preschool Choice Alliance, a statewide group.

“This is an economic development need. Here’s the tool and the option to exercise it or not,” Johnson said.

A successful referendum would be a boon to working parents who struggle to afford the cost of early learning, said McAlister, who used to be the director of the Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation. But even for non-parents, a preschool referendum could have a positive impact on property values and in other ways, McAlister said.

Advertisement

Ultimately, it would be one part of an “all and above strategy” addressing care for children from birth to age 2.

“We live in a society,” McAlister said. “There are certain things we hold true and caring for children is a value many people share.”

Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl

Published

on

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl





© Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Ty Simpson was a guest on the “Downs 2 Business” podcast with Caleb Downs and Josh Downs, and he discussed why he believed Indiana beat Alabama in the Rose Bowl.

The Crimson Tide’s offense was unable to score a touchdown against the Hoosiers in the 38-3 loss. Simpson shone a light on why he felt Indiana had so much success against Alabama on X.

“From my point of view, I was like they don’t much,” Simpson said. “I was like they do the same thing every down and so when I get the ball, I knew exactly what was going to happen. They just didn’t mess up, bro. They were in the exact same spot they were supposed to be, and they were so well coached. It was so much different than the SEC. In the SEC, they’ll play man, they’ll do these unorthodox coverages because kind of how it is. That game was crazy to me. Of course, I got hurt; that was a bummer. But I just knew what they were going to do, but we couldn’t really run the ball. We didn’t really throw it. It was so crazy to me how it happened.”

Advertisement

Indiana went on to beat Oregon in the semifinals of the College Football Playoff, and the Hoosiers defeated Miami in the National Championship after defeating the Crimson Tide.

Simpson and Caleb Downs are now both gearing up to be drafted this month.







Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance

Published

on

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance


Indiana may be one of the most decorated programs in college basketball history, but a brand name no longer has the recruiting pull it used to. In the past, the Hoosiers had a foolproof sell: it’s Indiana. Nowadays, in the NIL era, the playing field has been leveled. 

To win in the transfer portal and recruiting as a whole, a program like Indiana needs a premier recruiter – and it has one in Darian DeVries.

Heading into his second season as the Hoosiers head man, DeVries is on an absolute heater, as he just landed his sixth transfer (Villanova guard Bryce Lindsay) on Wednesday night. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far:

Advertisement

Indiana Hoosiers head coach Darian Devries reacts in the first half of the NCAA game at Value City Arena on Saturday, March 7, 2026 in Columbus, Ohio. | Samantha Madar/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

Indiana won’t have a talent problem in 2026-27

On one hand, the expectations are high in Bloomington – especially after the turnaround Curt Cignetti engineered in just two quick years on the gridiron. And an NCAA Tournament appearance isn’t exactly the Herculean task a College Football Playoff berth, let alone a national title, is. 

Then again, DeVries didn’t have much time to craft his 2025-26 roster, and the end result wound up being less-than ideal from a talent perspective. All things considered, DeVries didn’t do a poor job given the roster he had. But it was also his roster. 

Advertisement

Coaching is a balance of roster-building, X’s and O’s and culture. It’s up to DeVries to tailor a roster fit to his coaching strengths. Here in the 2026 offseason, he’s sent a message: recruiting will not be a problem. As a result, talent won’t be a weakness – it’ll be a strength. 

The question now: can DeVries take advantage of an uber-skilled crew? Can he mesh the pieces and, ideally, create a product better than the sum of its parts? If the 2025-26 season was any sign, the answer is yes – which means a Big Dance appearance should be the bare minimum next year. 

Advertisement

How will the backcourt depth chart shake out?

Notre Dame guard Markus Burton celebrates during a NCAA men’s basketball game against Missouri at Purcell Pavilion on Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2025, in South Bend. | MICHAEL CLUBB/SOUTH BEND TRIBUNE / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Hoosiers are going to have a loaded guard rotation, and DeVries has a variety of options in terms of a starting backcourt.

Advertisement

Markus Burton is a surefire starter at lead guard, but then DeVries can choose between Bryce Lindsay and Jaeden Mustaf at the two, or, potentially, he could run both together at shooting guard and small forward.

What about Duke transfer Darren Harris, though? He’s more of a wing, but it’s not exactly clear how he’ll fit in the fold. And incoming combo guard Prince-Alexander Moody can also compete for minutes. 

Fortunately, DeVries can’t exactly go wrong. A Burton-Lindsay starting backcourt would be undersized but loaded, chock-full of shooting and playmaking, while a Burton-Mustaf combo would be a slashing nightmare for opponents, strong defensively and tough on the boards. 

And if Moody shocks the college hoops world and manages to sneak in over both Lindsay and Mustaf, that means the Hoosiers have a bona fide star on their hands. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far.

Advertisement

The Hoosiers should be much better on the glass

Indiana could have been a lot better on the boards a year ago. The Hoosiers were No. 296 in offensive rebounding rate and No. 122 in defensive rebounding rate, per Bart Torvik. As a squad, Indiana was often undersized – and sometimes by a huge margin. Naturally, the glass suffered, affecting both sides of the floor. 

Advertisement

Mar 20, 2026; Tampa, FL, USA; Alabama Crimson Tide forward Aiden Sherrell (22) shoots against Hofstra Pride forward Victory Onuetu (6) in the second half during a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Benchmark International Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images | Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

In 2026-27, the Hoosiers should flip the script in that department. With incoming big men Aiden Sherrell (Alabama) and Samet Yigitoglu (SMU) combining for 14.1 total rebounds per outing despite neither playing more than 30 minutes per game in this past campaign, Indiana should have a dominant glass-cleaning unit in the frontcourt in 2026-27.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending