Indiana
Abortion ban, fetal anomaly and a ticking clock: ‘an impossible decision’ | Opinion
Fetal anomalies can be detected after 22 weeks, the point at which abortion is banned in Indiana.
First to Act: The inside story of how Indiana essentially outlawed abortion.
Watch as Indiana conservative lawyer James Bopp Jr., lawmaker Renee Pack (D), and reporter Niki Kelly give context to the fight for abortion access in the state of Indiana.
Amber Martin was 20 weeks pregnant with her son Arlo when she discovered her pregnancy was in danger. Living in Indiana, a red state with a near-total abortion ban, Martin feared what would happen next.
“It’s like somebody just rips a part of your heart out,” Martin said. “You’re about to find out that everything’s so great, and you get to see (your child), and you get to see their little face and what they look like in their hands and their feet, and everything was in place where it should have been — except that.”
That was a case of hydranencephaly, a rare condition in which the fetus’ brain does not properly develop due to spinal fluid in the brain. Hydranencephaly typically results in the death of the fetus after delivery.
For Martin, 41, and her fiance, Michael Dowd, 41, the discovery of Arlo’s hydranencephaly at her ultrasound appointment was world-shattering. Martin learned about the condition 20 weeks and four days into her pregnancy, starting the clock ticking on her treatment options.
It wasn’t, ‘Does Amber have an abortion or not?’
In Indiana, abortion is allowed only in cases of rape, incest, fetal anomalies or if the mother’s life is in danger. Even within those exceptions, treatment options have deadlines. Abortions for cases of fetal anomalies are banned after 22 weeks of pregnancy.
After receiving Arlo’s diagnosis, Martin had about a week and a half before she would lose access to legal abortion.
Martin transferred her care from Ascension St. Vincent Hospital, a Catholic facility that does not perform abortions, to IU Health University Hospital in Indianapolis. Her St. Vincent doctors offered Martin one path: Carry Arlo to term while having regular CT scans and ultrasounds. University Hospital gave Martin a choice between terminating the pregnancy immediately or delivering through induction, which would have resulted in the same outcome.
Martin chose a dilation and evacuation procedure, a kind of abortion.
“There’s no words to give somebody when they’re having to make an impossible decision between bringing someone to this earth and their own health,” Martin said, adding that she faced risk of sepsis. “That’s what we did. That’s the choice that we had to make. It wasn’t, ‘Does Amber have an abortion or not?’ It’s, ‘How do we help Arlo to have peace and be able to save my life at the same time?’”
Indiana abortion ban puts deadline on treatment options
Martin and Dowd received Arlo’s hydranencephaly diagnosis in time to have options, but that is not the case for every pregnancy. Dr. Carrie Rouse, an Indianapolis OB-GYN, said it is entirely possible for fetal anomalies to be detected after 22 weeks, the point at which abortion is banned in Indiana.
“The diagnosis of fetal anomalies is made through imaging, primarily ultrasound,” Rouse said. “It all depends on when the ultrasound is done. Fetal anomalies are most often diagnosed at the anatomic survey ultrasound, which is done usually between 18 and 20 weeks.
“But there are many different reasons why a patient may not have an ultrasound on that time frame. They may have a late diagnosis of pregnancy. They may have issues accessing care for many different reasons. The anomaly may not be detectable initially and developed later.”
Martin and Dowd, who live in Sheridan, want their experience to be a catalyst for change. They’re urging people to think more critically and empathetically about what abortion access really means. For the couple, choosing abortion felt similar to taking a loved one off life support.
‘The true purpose is intimidation’
Before mourning, though, Martin had to sign Indiana’s Abortion Informed Consent Certification form, which includes a list of statements that must be affirmed and signed off on before the pregnancy can be terminated. One of the statements is an acknowledgment that the fetus can feel pain “at or before twenty (20) weeks of postfertilization age,” even though that actually happens around 24 or 25 weeks, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Also, for every abortion, a terminated pregnancy report must be signed and submitted to the Indiana Department of Health. TPRs include confidential information about the patient receiving the abortion.
The IDOH stopped sharing individual TPRs in December 2023. However, a recent executive order signed by Gov. Mike Braun, calls for cooperation with Attorney General Todd Rokita’s push to publish the TPRs of individual patients.
In addition to experiencing the trauma of abortion in Indiana, Hoosier patients who undergo the procedure face fears that their private medical information could become public.
“The true purpose is intimidation,” said Liane Groth Hulka, the co-founder of Our Choice Coalition, a political action committee focused on advocating for reproductive rights. “Even patients that go through really traumatic experiences where they have to seek abortion health care for their own life because they were raped, among other things, they are subject to intimidation, to discrimination, by their need for health care.”
‘Come and sit with me’
Will elected officials, especially those who say they are proponents of saving life, step up and acknowledge that abortion bans can kill? As lawmakers consider the future of abortion policy in Indiana, Martin has one request.
“Talk to somebody who’s been through this,” she said. “Come and sit with me while I have to go through this. Come sit down next to me in this hospital bed.”
Martin and Dowd are advocating for everyone to have life-saving access to abortion and other reproductive rights.
“I’m gonna step back from that word, (abortion), for a second, because I think people take that word and they think that it means that I’m gonna go in and chop up a baby and kill them because I just want to,” Martin said. “It’s a medical term … And there’s lots of different surgical options, medications and therapies that happen underneath that word.
“And I think that’s where we get it messed up, and I think that’s where we’re lacking in education. And that’s the part that makes me extremely angry. People don’t always go and just choose this.”
Indiana’s reproductive reality is deeply concerning. Martin and Dowd hope Arlo’s death can be the cause for life-saving legislative progress and change.
Contact IndyStar opinion fellow Sadia Khatri at sadia.khatri@indystar.com.
Indiana
Indiana redistricting: Senate Republicans side with Democrats to reject Trump’s voting map
Indiana Republicans have defied intense pressure from President Donald Trump by rejecting his demands that they pass a voting map meant to favour their party in next year’s midterm elections.
In one of the most conservative states in the US, 21 Republicans in the Senate joined all 10 Democrats to torpedo the redistricting plan by a vote of 31-19. The new map passed the House last week.
If it had cleared the legislature, Republicans could have flipped the only two Democratic-held congressional seats in the state.
Trump’s call for Republican state leaders to redraw maps and help the party keep its congressional majority in Washington next year has triggered gerrymandering battles nationwide.
Republican-led Texas and Democratic-led California, two of the country’s largest states, have led the charge.
Other states where redistricting efforts have been initiated or passed include Utah, Ohio, New Hampshire, Missouri and Illinois.
Republican state Senator Spencer Deery said ahead of Thursday’s vote: “My opposition to mid-cycle gerrymandering is not in contrast to my conservative principles, my opposition is driven by them.
“As long as I have breath, I will use my voice to resist a federal government that attempts to bully, direct, and control this state or any state. Giving the federal government more power is not conservative.”
Indiana Governor Mike Braun, a Republican, said he was “very disappointed” in the outcome.
“I will be working with the President to challenge these people who do not represent the best interests of Hoosiers,” he said on X, using a popular nickname for people from the Midwestern state.
The revolt of Indiana Republicans came after direct months of lobbying from the White House.
On Wednesday, Trump warned on his social media platform Truth Social that Republicans who did not support the initiative could risk losing their seats.
He directly addressed the Republican leader of the state Senate, Rodric Bray, calling him “the only person in the United States of America who is against Republicans picking up extra seats”.
To liberals, it was a moment of celebration. Keith “Wildstyle” Paschall described the mood on Thursday as “jubilant”.
“There’s a lot of relief,” the Indianapolis-based activist told the BBC. “People had thought that we would have to move on to a legal strategy and didn’t believe we could defeat it directly at the statehouse.”
The new map would have redistricted parts of Indianapolis and potentially led to the ouster of Indiana’s lone black House representative, André Carson.
In the weeks before Thursday’s vote, Trump hosted Indiana lawmakers at the White House to win over holdouts.
He also dispatched Vice-President JD Vance down to Indiana twice to shore up support.
Nearly a dozen Indiana Republican lawmakers have said they were targeted with death threats and swatting attacks over the planned vote.
Ultimately, this redistricting plan fell flat in another setback for Trump following a string of recent Democratic wins in off-year elections.
The defeat appears to have added to Republican concerns.
“We have a huge problem,” said former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon during his podcast, The War Room.
“People have to realise that we only have a couple opportunities,” he said.
“If we don’t get a net 10 pickup in the redistricting wars, it’s going to be enormously hard, if not impossible, to hold the House.”
Texas was the first state to respond to Trump’s redistricting request.
After a lower court blocked the maps for being drawn illegally based on race, the Supreme Court allowed Texas Republicans to go ahead.
The decision was a major win for Republicans, with the new maps expected to add five seats in their favour.
California’s map is also expected to add five seats for Democrats.
Indiana
Trump post signals Indiana redistricting vote too close for comfort
Indiana redistricting doomed by lobbyists who misread Senate | Opinion
Deputy Opinion Editor Jacob Stewart: The out-of-state donors funding redistricting lobbyists need to ask for their money back.
President Donald Trump issued a lengthy late-night plea to Indiana lawmakers on the eve of their critical Dec. 11 redistricting vote, seemingly betraying a lack of confidence in a favorable outcome.
“Rod Bray and his friends won’t be in Politics for long, and I will do everything within my power to make sure that they will not hurt the Republican Party, and our Country, again,” Trump concluded the Truth Social post. “One of my favorite States, Indiana, will be the only State in the Union to turn the Republican Party down!”
This afternoon, the Indiana Senate will decide the fate of Trump’s desire to redraw the state’s congressional map to give Republicans two more favorable districts. But this fate has been very uncertain: Republican senators are split on the issue, with a number of them having remained silent. The vote count is expected to be tight.
Trump’s post last night is leaving many with the impression that it’s too close for comfort.
He repeated some familiar refrains noted in other posts over the last few weeks: lambasting the leadership of Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, promising to support primary challengers against those who vote down mid-decade redistricting, emphasizing the importance of holding the Republican majority in Congress to beat back the “Radical Left Democrats.”
But in length and in detail, this post delved deeper. He lumped Bray in with the likes of former Gov. Mitch Daniels, who Trump called a “failed Senate candidate,” though Daniels never formally entered the race against U.S. Sen. Jim Banks in 2024. Trump made statements about the Republican “suckers” Bray found to vote against redistricting with him, as though the vote had already occurred.
Those conclusion sentences alone ― promising that Bray and others will not hurt the country “again” ― seems to foretell an outcome.
That outcome will ultimately come to light in the mid to late afternoon when senators take a final vote on House Bill 1032, the redistricting bill.
It had passed the Indiana House by a 57-41 vote last week.
The proposed map gives Republicans the advantage in all nine of Indiana’s congressional districts, chiefly by carving up Indianapolis voters into four new districts. The current congressional map has seven seats held by Republicans and two by Democrats.
Contact IndyStar Statehouse reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on X @kayla_dwyer17.
Indiana
Indiana redistricting is up for a final, deciding vote in the state Senate – The Boston Globe
Indiana state senators are expected to take a final, high-stakes vote on redistricting Thursday after months of pressure from President Donald Trump, and the outcome is still uncertain.
Even in the face of one-on-one pressure from the White House and violent threats against state lawmakers, many Indiana Republicans have been reluctant to back a new congressional map that would favor their party’s candidates in the 2026 elections.
Trump is asking Republican-led states to redistrict in the middle of the decade, an uncommon practice, in order to make more winnable seats for the GOP ahead of next year’s elections. Midterms tend to favor the party opposite the one in power, and Democrats are increasingly liking their odds at flipping control of the U.S. House after the results of recent high-profile elections.
In Indiana, Trump supports passage of a new map drawn up by the National Republican Redistricting Trust designed to deliver all nine of the state’s congressional districts to the GOP. Republicans currently hold seven of the nine seats.
On Wednesday night, he sharply criticized party members who didn’t want to go along with the plan, and he repeated his threat to back primary challenges for anyone who voted against it.
“If Republicans will not do what is necessary to save our Country, they will eventually lose everything to the Democrats,” Trump wrote on social media.
The new map would split the city of Indianapolis into four districts, each included with large portions of rural Indiana — three of which would stretch from the central city to the borders of nearby states. Indianapolis now makes up one congressional district long held by Democratic U.S. Rep. André Carson.
The proposed map is also designed to eliminate the district of U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, who represents an urban district near Chicago.
A dozen lawmakers of the 50-member state Senate have not publicly declared a stance on the new maps.
If at least four of that group side with the chamber’s 10 Democrats and 12 other Republicans who are expected to vote no, the vote would fail in a remarkable rebuke to Trump’s demand.
Supporters of the proposed map need at least 25 yes votes; a tie would be broken with Republican Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith’s vote, who is in favor of redistricting.
In a Senate committee Monday, the redistricting legislation took its first step toward passage in a 6-3 vote, with one Republican joining the committee’s two Democrats in voting against it. However, a few of the Republican senators indicated they may vote against the bill in a final vote.
The Republican supermajority in the state House passed the proposed map last week. Twelve Republicans voted with the chamber’s 30 Democrats against the bill.
Nationally, mid-cycle redistricting so far has resulted in nine more congressional seats that Republicans believe they can win and six more congressional seats that Democrats think they can win. However, redistricting is being litigated in several states.
Texas, Missouri, Ohio and North Carolina quickly enacted new GOP-favorable maps. California voters recently approved a new map in response to Texas’ that would favor Democratic candidates, and a judge in Utah imposed new districts that could allow Democrats to win a seat, after ruling that Republican lawmakers circumvented voter-approved anti-gerrymandering standards.
Multiple Republican groups are threatening to support primary opponents of Indiana state senators who vote against redistricting. Turning Point Action pledged “congressional level spending” in state Legislature races if the redistricting measure does not pass. Trump has also vowed to endorse primary challengers of members who vote against the new map.
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire