Connect with us

Illinois

The Runout: Previewing Indiana football’s Week 2 game against Western Illinois

Published

on

The Runout: Previewing Indiana football’s Week 2 game against Western Illinois


BLOOMINGTON — Indiana football isn’t just playing Western Illinois on Friday night. 

“You are fighting human nature,” coach Curt Cignetti said during his weekly appearance on Inside Indiana Football. 

Cignetti was referencing the fact that Western Illinois comes to Memorial Stadium riding a 25-game losing streak that dates back to 2021. The program has changed coaches three times since its last winning season in 2017. 

Advertisement

Indiana football built up a bit of momentum with a 31-7 win over FIU in the opener, but Cignetti wants to make sure his team doesn’t get tripped up by overlooking a clearly inferior opponent. 

More: Will Indiana football WR Donaven McCulley be available against Western Illinois?

Jump into our weekly preview, The Runout, for what stood out during the week, players to watch, a prediction and more:

Indiana football vs. Western Illinois: Tale of the tape

  • When: Friday, Sept. 6 at 7:00 ET
  • Where: Memorial Stadium (52,626), Bloomington, Indiana
  • TV: Big Ten Network
  • Line: N/A
  • Series: This is the first meeting between the programs

More: What are the most important stats from Indiana football’s win over FIU? Consider these

Indiana football players to watch vs Western Illinois

Myles Price, WR

Price has been looking for his second career 100-yard receiving game since 2021. He first reached the milestone when he had nine catches for 175 yards for Texas Tech in a win over Iowa State. 

Advertisement

He might not be able to surpass that total on Friday night, but the speedster should be in line for a big day against a Western Illinois secondary that gave up 394 passing yards in its season opener against Northern Illinois.

Price, who had four catches for 29 yards, forced three missed tackles in the opener. 

He’s going to be hard for the Leathernecks to contain in the open field — their defense combined for 11 missed tackles — and gave up four receptions of 20 yards or more through the air for 173 yards and three scores. 

Trey Wedig, OT

Indiana’s offensive line had a strong showing in the run game. 

The group consistently won at the point of attack and played with a physicality that’s been lacking the last few seasons. Things weren’t as clean when IU dropped back to pass, and Wedig struggled more than the rest of his linemates.

Advertisement

The Hooisers gave up six quarterback pressures in the season-opener and Wedig gave up half of them, according to Pro Football Focus. He had the lowest pass-blocking rating among the starters at 48.2 on 35 snaps. 

Some growing pains were to be expected considering Wedig hadn’t played tackle in a game since 2022, but a bounceback performance would help give him some confidence with a UCLA team with a much more imposing defensive front on deck. 

The Bruins had five sacks and 11 tackles for loss in their opener against Hawaii. 

Advertisement

Andrew Turvy, DE

Turvy played more snaps in the season-opener than his first two seasons at Indiana. 

He played the fourth most snaps of IU’s defense ends ahead of scholarship players like Jacob Mangum-Farrar (11) and Venson Sneed Jr. (11). He was plenty productive as well with three quarterback pressures including a sack.

Will Turvey be a one-hit wonder or land a permanent spot on the two-deep? The role is there for the taking since the Hooisers don’t have a ton of depth at defensive end behind Mikail Kamara and Lanell Carr. 

More: Curt Cignetti said not to expect too many freshmen to play. He meant it.

Indiana football: Week 2 Odds and Ends

Tip of the cap: Indiana football tackled pretty well for a team that only went full contact in practice one time during the offseason. Cignetti was pleased with how IU’s defense swarmed to the ball — he said they consistently had  “multiple hats at the point of contact” — and it was a key factor in limiting FIU to just three explosive plays. 

Advertisement

Heavy plate: Indiana’s starting safeties Shawn Asbury II and Josh Sanguinetti were basically interchangeable on Saturday. The Hoosiers also had multiple guys on the defensive front (Mikail Kamara and Marcus Burris) rotating between defensive end and tackle. Those roles could change week-to-week based on defensive coordinator Bryant Haines’ game plan, but he clearly values versatile players that allow him to throw different looks at the competition.  

“Inexcusable”: Indiana was called for nine penalties for 80 yards in the opener and seven of those were called on the offense. Cignetti addressed the topic after the game, during his press conference on Monday and again on his weekly coach’s show. He said the team had some issues with penalties during a pair of scrimmages during fall camp as well. It’s clear the offense isn’t getting a mulligan on those miscues and have to clean things up in a hurry to tamp down Cignetti’s frustration. 

Indiana football stat of the week

25: Here’s a bit more on Western Illinois’ lengthy losing streak — the Leathernecks haven’t won a game since beating Illinois State 38-31 on Oct. 30, 2021, their average margin of defeat during the streak is 29.8 points and they have only played four one-possession games.

More: Mind Your Banners: Defense shines IU’s season-opening win against Florida International

Advertisement

Indiana football quote of the week

 “We’re up 21-0, as a coach that’s where you really got to do the job. Not being satisfied, keeping the hammer down, really being on the kids trying to detect any relaxation or warm fuzzies,” — Indiana coach Curt Cignetti on Inside Indiana Football

Herald-Times prediction: Indiana 58, Western Illinois 10

Western Illinois has given up 50-plus points in its last four matchups against FBS opponents going back to the 2022 season. The Hoosiers should be able to hit that number for the first time since 2021 against Idaho without having to keep their starters in the game for much more than a half. The first-team defense shouldn’t have to strain too hard to get a shutout either. The focus will be on staying healthy and getting some youngsters reps. 

Michael Niziolek is the Indiana beat reporter for The Bloomington Herald-Times. You can follow him on X @michaelniziolek and read all his coverage by clicking here.





Source link

Advertisement

Illinois

Illinois vs Iowa prediction, analysis, Elite Eight expert picks for men’s March Madness

Published

on

Illinois vs Iowa prediction, analysis, Elite Eight expert picks for men’s March Madness


The men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament continues with Elite Eight action Saturday with No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 9 Iowa on the two-game schedule.

USA TODAY Sports’ college basketball experts have analyzed all the angles and determined a path to victory for each side. Here’s everything you need to know before the Elite Eight matchup tips off.

USA TODAY has a team of journalists covering the men’s NCAA Tournament to keep you up to date with every point scored, rebound grabbed and game won in the 68-team tournament.

Advertisement

Illinois will win Elite Eight game vs Iowa if…

  • John Leuzzi: It replicates what it did defensively against Houston.
  • Jordan Mendoza: It controls the interior.
  • Ehsan Kassim: Wagler can win the matchup against Stirtz.
  • Austin Curtright: If its defense plays like it did against Houston.

Iowa will win Elite Eight game vs Illinois  if…

  • John Leuzzi: It limits Illinois on offensive rebounds, and second chance opportunities.
  • Jordan Mendoza: it’s knocking down 3-pointers.
  • Ehsan Kassim: Hawkeyes can make the game slower paced and Illinois misses shots.
  • Austin Curtright: Its bench contributors of Alvaro Folgueiras, Tate Sage and others continue their strong play.

Illinois vs Iowa: 1 Stat to watch

  • John Leuzzi: Bennett Stirtz vs. Keaton Wagler at the point guard battle.
  • Jordan Mendoza: 3-point shot.
  • Ehsan Kassim: Illinois 3-point shooting.
  • Austin Curtright: Illinois’ defense has been outstanding in the NCAA Tournament, despite ranking outside the top 20 in KenPom’s adjusted defensive efficiency.

Illinois vs Iowa Elite Eight prediction

  • John Leuzzi: Iowa
  • Jordan Mendoza: Illinois
  • Ehsan Kassim: Illinois
  • Austin Curtright: Illinois

3 Illinois vs 9 Iowa

  • Opening Moneyline: Illinois (-275), Iowa (+227)
  • Opening Spread: Illinois (-6.5)
  • Opening Total: 139.5

How to Watch Illinois vs Iowa in the Elite Eight

No. 3 Illinois takes on No. 9 Iowa at Toyota Center on March 28 at 6:09 PM The game is airing on TBS.

Stream March Madness on Sling

2026 Men’s March Madness full schedule

See the schedule, live scores and results for all of the NCAA Tournament action here.

  • March 17-18: First Four
  • March 19-20: First Round
  • March 21-22: Second Round
  • March 26-27: Sweet 16
  • March 28-29: Elite 8
  • April 4: Final Four
  • April 6: National Championship



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Bears stadium deal should not include lawmaker perks or raise property taxes

Published

on

Bears stadium deal should not include lawmaker perks or raise property taxes



Publicly funded stadium deals can involve questionable incentives for politicians. The megaprojects bill in Illinois would drive up neighbors’ property taxes.

Any deal between Illinois and the Chicago Bears for a new stadium must avoid giveaways to lawmakers and property tax increases for others.

The Bears own the former Arlington Park Racecourse in Arlington Heights and have said they’re also considering Northwest Indiana for a stadium development. A bill in the Illinois General Assembly would offer property tax breaks to such “megaprojects.”

Agreements for publicly funded stadiums in other cities often have included luxury suites and free tickets for lawmakers. Local officials in Kansas City have been criticized for getting access to tickets and suites during ongoing stadium negotiations. Officials in Arizona have repeatedly used free access to publicly funded stadiums to host guests.

Advertisement

A bill in Ohio would prohibit state lawmakers from knowingly accepting free or discounted tickets to pro sports events. The proposal comes amid negotiations with the Cleveland Browns over public funding for a new stadium.

Offering free admission and luxury suites to lawmakers who make decisions about publicly funding stadiums creates a clear conflict of interest.

From a taxpayer perspective, such perks can divert public resources if lawmakers have an incentive to offer a team or other megaproject a tax break when that revenue could go toward broadly shared public benefits. From a free-market standpoint, these arrangements distort competition by subsidizing select teams and projects rather than encouraging municipalities to make themselves attractive for private investment.

Illinois legislators should ensure that any stadium agreement with the Bears does not include free tickets or luxury accommodations for lawmakers.

Perks for politicians are only half the story. The proposed incentive package in Springfield, HB 910 House Amendment 1, would be devastating for taxpayers.

Advertisement

Much of the current discussion revolves around the massive property tax reductions the bill would provide for so-called megaprojects as an attempt to spur economic development.

While negotiating targeted tax incentives is bad policy to begin with, the legislation would make Illinois’ property tax crisis even worse for other taxpayers. Although approved megaprojects would pay steeply discounted property taxes, a clause in the bill allows a taxing body to count the cash value of the megaproject in its total assessed value.

In other words, taxing bodies can still increase taxes as if the project were paying normal tax rates, generating increased revenue, but the project would not pay those higher taxes. Neighboring businesses, homeowners and renters would pay more to make up for the team’s discount.

Here is some of what’s in the bill, which has passed out of committee and could be called for a full House vote any time:

  • To qualify, a project must have at least $500 million in eligible costs, which can include the property purchase and can be retroactive up to five years before the megaproject certificate is issued. The project must be completed within seven to 10 years, but that can be extended by five years. The site must be operated for at least 20 years; the tax incentive would last at least 23 years and up to 40 years.
  • The megaproject’s assessment would be frozen so that its property tax bill is calculated on the “base year” of the project, meaning the value of the property before any improvements, such as a stadium.
  • However, for purposes of issuing bonds and property tax extension limitation calculations, the taxing body could use the current fair cash value of the property. In other words, new development, which is generally exempt from Property Tax Extension Limitation Laws, would allow for the levy to grow beyond the limited rate, which other taxpayers will have to cover.

The bill’s “incentive agreement” allows for separate payments from the megaproject entity, such as the Bears, or an alternative source, to affected taxing bodies in addition to property taxes bill. The payment amount would be negotiated with taxing bodies.

Illinoisans already pay the highest property taxes in the nation. Homeowners in Arlington Heights pay average annual property taxes of more than $8,000. HB910 would make it even worse. One simple solution is to strike this language from the bill:

Advertisement

Projects to be valued at fair cash value for purposes of bonded indebtedness and limitations on property tax extensions. Projects to which an assessment freeze applies pursuant to this Division shall be valued at their fair cash value for purposes of calculating a municipality’s general obligation bond limits and a taxing district’s limitation on tax extensions.

Removing that language would ensure that businesses, homeowners and renters in the megaproject area would not face higher property taxes because of an incentive agreement.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Obituary for Tessie Lee Woods at Carl E. Ponds Funeral Home Inc.

Published

on

Obituary for Tessie Lee Woods at Carl E. Ponds Funeral Home Inc.


Tessie Lee Woods, age 91, departed this earths life surrounded by her loved ones. She was Born on October 25, 1934, in Arkansas to the late Connie and Deanner Holliman. Tessie attended school in Arkansas and, later in life, moved to Rockford, Illinois, where she met and married Robert B.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending