Kankakee judge rules portion of SAFE-T Act addressing Illinois bail reform unconstitutional

KANKAKEE, Unwell. (WLS) — A Kankakee County choose dominated Wednesday that the portion of the SAFE-T Act, that ends money bail in Illinois, is unconstitutional.

States attorneys in 65 Illinois counties had challenged the brand new legislation in a listening to final week.

Illinois SAFE-T Act beneath hearth in courtroom, the place opponents say it violates state Structure

In line with the Kankakee County State’s Lawyer, the ruling means the pre-trial launch and bail reforms spelled out within the legislation is not going to take impact in these counties come Jan. 1.

Learn the choose’s determination right here

The portion of the legislation would have allowed judges to determine if a defendant doesn’t pose a public security threat, they might be launched with out posting money bail.

ABC7 Chicago Authorized Analyst Gil Soffer explains why the choose believes this portion of the SAFE-T Act is unconstitutional.

“Particularly what this choose is saying is that judges, the judiciary, has the inherent energy to make choices about pre-trial launch and bail, and, on this case, the legislature inappropriately took that away from the judiciary, so that they discovered it was a violation of separation of powers,” Soffer stated.

Different elements of police accountability and coaching will nonetheless take impact on that date.

What’s the Secure-T Act?

The Illinois Lawyer Normal’s workplace is anticipated to attraction the ruling to the Illinois Supreme Courtroom.

In an announcement, Gov. JB Pritzker wrote, “In the present day’s ruling is a setback for the rules we fought to guard via the passage of the SAFE-T Act. The Normal Meeting and advocates labored to exchange an antiquated legal justice system with a system rooted in fairness and equity. We can not and shouldn’t defend a system that fails to maintain folks protected by permitting those that are a risk to their group the power to easily purchase their method out of jail. I thank the Lawyer Normal for his work on this case and stay up for the Illinois Supreme Courtroom taking on the attraction as quickly as potential.”

Kankakee County State’s Lawyer Jim Rowe wrote partly, “(The SAFE-T Act) amended the State Structure and eroded the constitutional protections of the Sufferer Rights Act, all whereas disenfranchising the folks of their Constitutional proper to vote on such reforms.”

Illinois Lawyer Normal Kwame Raoul stated in an announcement, “Though the courtroom’s determination is binding within the 64 circumstances that have been consolidated in Kankakee County, you will need to word that it isn’t binding in every other case, together with these involving legal defendants in any of the state’s 102 counties. To definitively resolve this problem to the pretrial launch parts of the SAFE-T Act, Governor Pritzker, the legislative leaders named within the consolidated circumstances and I intend to attraction the circuit courtroom’s determination on to the Illinois Supreme Courtroom, the place we are going to ask the courtroom to reverse the circuit courtroom’s determination.

“Many of the SAFE-T Act’s provisions have been in impact for greater than a yr, and no matter as we speak’s circuit courtroom determination, all elements of the SAFE-T Act, together with the pretrial launch parts addressed within the courtroom’s determination, will go into impact Jan 1. For example, the suitable of people awaiting legal trials – individuals who haven’t been convicted of a criminal offense and are presumed harmless – to hunt launch from jail with out having to pay money bail will go into impact in a number of quick days, regardless of the courtroom’s ruling in opposition to these provisions. Illinois residents in all counties must be conscious that the circuit courtroom’s determination has no impact on their means to train their rights which can be protected by the SAFE-T Act and the Illinois Structure.”

Home GOP Chief Jim Durkin stated, “In the present day’s ruling is a victory for the usually uncared for victims of crime and the women and men of legislation enforcement who put on the badge on daily basis. Laws of this magnitude should not solely be judged on substance, but in addition on course of. In that regard, the Illinois Democrats failed Illinoisans.

“To be able to repair this one-sided, anti-law enforcement, and anti-victim act, it’s crucial to have a clear and substantive negotiation with all events, not only a few stakeholders and political insiders. The folks of the State of Illinois deserve nothing much less.”

INTERACTIVE SAFETY TRACKER | Observe crime and security in your neighborhood