Connect with us

Illinois

Illinois lawmakers consider banning third-party companies from selling restaurant reservations 

Published

on

Illinois lawmakers consider banning third-party companies from selling restaurant reservations 


Some Illinois lawmakers are proposing a legislation that would ban third-party service companies from selling restaurant reservations online.

Other states like California, Nevada, and Florida are considering similar proposals after New York passed a law last year.

Margaret Croke, who is the State Representative for Illinois’ 12th District is one of the sponsors of the bill that would ban the illegal sale of restaurants reservations online.

“I think this is going to help you get the reservation that you been wanting from that fun hot new restaurant that for some reason you’re racking your brain and why you can’t do this,” Croke said.

Advertisement

Croke is backing the proposed ordinance after running into problems herself trying to book a table at popular restaurants downtown.

“This doesn’t impact Resy, Open Table, Tock, actually those organizations have been in favor of legislations like this across the country,” she said. “This really impacts only those third-party vendors who are using bots and sometimes they are using individuals, but they’re actually taking something that is free and reselling them.”

She’s been working with the Illinois Restaurant Association, which drafted the ordinance.

“I think it will allow the customers of these restaurants to get these restaurants, and it would reduce no shows, which also helps the employees because you know, a lot of these third-party apps they’ll make reservations and people won’t show,” IRA president Sam Toia said.

Known as the Restaurant Reservation Anti-Piracy Act, it would ban third-party reservation service companies from listing, advertising, promoting, or selling reservations unless there’s a written agreement between the third party and the restaurant.

Advertisement

“Customers shouldn’t have to compete with bots or predatory third-parties’ resellers they should not,” he said.

One of the third-party companies is Appointment Trader. Founder Jonas Frey told NBC Chicago he feels as though his small company is being targeted and argues restaurants do not own the reservations, but the consumers.

“It’s not the restaurant’s reservations, it’s the person’s reservation,” Jonas Frey, Appointment Trader’s founder said. “It shouldn’t be prohibited that you sell what you own if you change your mind, especially if you have to be liable for no show fee if you don’t go—that’s crazy then there’s a restriction on what you can do with it.”

The platform launched in 2021 and has more than 80,000 active users. The website and app allow users to list, trade, and sell their appointments or reservations. Frey said they have piracy measures and metrics in place to combat against bots and scalpers.

“If every restaurant had the ability to dictate how their reservation can be sold it’s not going to be an actually free market so I can’t see how that could benefit any consumer,” he said. “We are the one that puts the little guy that generally does not have the ability have access to restaurants like this into those restaurants and they claim that we are hurting restaurants because we generate no shows and that’s literally made up.”

Advertisement

The proposed bill passed the committee unanimously, according to State Rep. Croke. The bill now heads to the House floor.



Source link

Illinois

Arlington Heights mayor says Springfield needs to get Bears stadium deal done in next two weeks

Published

on

Arlington Heights mayor says Springfield needs to get Bears stadium deal done in next two weeks


Conversations in Springfield about a new Chicago Bears stadium in Arlington Heights are heating up, and the village’s mayor said a decision on a stadium deal could come by the end of the month.

Arlington Heights Mayor Jim Tinaglia said the Bears won’t wait around much longer.

The Illinois House was back in session this week, and the next couple weeks could be crucial to making a Bears stadium deal a reality.

Tinaglia said the Bears won’t wait until the end of the state’s legislative session in May to get a deal done; a deal that, for the Bears, must include certainty on their property taxes.

Advertisement

“The pressure is on to try and wrap it up with capital ASAP,” Tinaglia said

Tinaglia has been watching Springfield closely as talks between the Pritzker administration, state lawmakers, and the Bears continue regularly.

“I can promise you that no one at Halas Hall wants to wait till the end of May for this to be solved,” TInaglia said.

Lawmakers are debating a major tax incentive package aimed at keeping the bears in Illinois. The bill would allow the Bears — or any developer investing more than $500 million dollars in a project – to negotiate property taxes directly with local governments for up to 40 years.

The measure advanced out of an Illinois House committee last month, but has yet to receive a full floor vote.

Advertisement

Now, with the primary elections over in Illinois, Tinaglia said it’s time to act. The legislation still needs 60 votes in the Illinois House and 30 in the Illinois Senate to pass.

Tinaglia said he’s confident a deal can get done.

Lawmakers from Chicago initially pushed back on any deal to help the Bears build a stadium in Arlington Heights, hoping to keep the team in Chicago.

But after talks stalled, the Bears expanded their stadium search to Indiana, a move that raised the stakes as Indiana lawmakers quickly approved their own legislation to lure the Bears across the state line.

Meantime, the Kansas City Chiefs struck a deal to move across state lines from Missouri to Kansas, a warning sign that NFL teams are willing to leave if the right deal isn’t on the table.

Advertisement

“That really opened up everybody’s eyes that, ‘Hey, maybe they would really leave. Somebody else is doing it, right?’” Tinaglia said.

That also helped push Illinois leaders to move faster and have a more united front to keep the Bears from leaving the state.

“It wasn’t about Arlington Heights versus Chicago any longer. This is now about keeping one of the most fabulous franchises in the whole NFL here in Illinois,” Tinaglia said.

The mayor said Gov. JB Pritzker and Illinois state Rep. Kam Buckner (D-Chicago) have been the key negotiators to make a deal to keep the Bears in Illinois happen-

The Illinois legislative session ends May 31, but Tinaglia said a stadium deal needs to move forward in the next two weeks to bring the Bears to Arlington Heights and avoid losing them to Indiana.

Advertisement

“If we can get that done sometime before the end of the month, the hope is that we actually have a vote and kind of rest the concerns of the team,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois basketball vs VCU how to watch, series history, and players to watch

Published

on

Illinois basketball vs VCU how to watch, series history, and players to watch


Illinois basketball got a big win on Thursday night, but the celebrating is now over, as VCU awaits.

The Illini looked incredible against Penn. This is exactly what I was hoping for, and now Illinois gets a chance to knock off another double-digit seed to advance to the Sweet 16.

VCU is clearly tough, though. They knocked off a talented North Carolina squad in the first round, and now they have even more confidence. Illinois has to be ready for a battle.

Advertisement

Here is the Illinois basketball vs VCU how to watch, series history, and players to watch

  • Illinois basketball vs VCU – How to watch

Illinois moved on to the Round of 32, and the No. 3 seed will now face No. 11 VCU. This is a massive game that will decide which program moves on to the second weekend and the Sweet 16.

Advertisement

The Illinois vs VCU contest will take place on Saturday, March 21, at 6:50 p.m. CT/7:50 p.m. ET. We get the main channel, as CBS will televise the big matchup.

  • Illinois basketball vs VCU – Series history

I want to say there is a long history between Illinois and VCU. These two teams have been around the basketball universe for a while, but there has only ever been one matchup.

Advertisement

Illinois and VCU played in Miami, Florida, back in December 2016. Led by some incredible defense, the Illini took out the Rams, 64-46.

So, what I am saying is that Illinois is undefeated against VCU.

  • Illinois basketball vs VCU – Players to watch

Advertisement

I think the first player you have to recognize is Terrence Hill Jr. Illinois is familiar with getting to the second weekend of the NCAA tournament with a Terrance Shannon Jr., but it seems that Hill is just as electric.

In the game against North Carolina, Hill was going off. He can shoot from anywhere, and he has the stones to just lob shots up when you are least expecting it. For the season, he is averaging 14.9 points per game, but he showed up in a big way in the biggest spotlight against the Tar Heels, dropping 34 points and shooting 7-of-10 from three-point range.

I am interested in seeing how VCU’s big man, Lazar Djokovic, does against Illinois’ size. He stands at 6-foot-11, and I was impressed with Djokovic against North Carolina. This kid can play.

Illinois could give VCU some problems with our size. Throwing two 7-foot-1 or bigger players at them could cause problems. I think the Illini guard length will also be a bit of a shock.

Advertisement

I think David Mirkovic could feast once again. Djokovic might be wrapped up in guarding Tomislav Ivisic, so Mirkovic can bully his way into the paint. That might end up being the game plan on Saturday.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Joliet City Council approves plans for Illinois’ largest data center

Published

on

Joliet City Council approves plans for Illinois’ largest data center



The Joliet City Council on Thursday approved plans for a 795-acre data center, which would be the largest such facility in Illinois.

Advertisement

The proposed site would go in a rural field right next to the Chicagoland Speedway at the intersection of Rowell and Bernhard roads. That’s where 24 buildings housing the equipment would be built. The developer, HW Technology Park Development LLC, said the project would be up and running in 2030.

“This annexation agreement sets clear expectations for infrastructure, services, and community benefits while helping ensure the project moves forward in a responsible way,” Joliet City Manager Beth Beatty said in a statement. “It also delivers substantial new revenue for local taxing bodies and longterm financial benefits for the community.”

At a public hearing on the data center on Monday, Joliet officials listened to several hours of comments from the public, mostly from people opposed to the data center over concerns about its impact on health and utility bills.

“I just want to make sure that when we make decisions that are huge like this, that we have all the information,” said Sean Richards, who lives in neighboring Lockport and believes the new data center would have broader impacts and health risks for kids. “The people in here that are voting yes or no, I did not elect them, but yet they are making decisions that will directly affect people in Lockport, and New Lenox, and in Elwood and other municipalities.”

ComEd officials said the energy needed to keep the center operating would not raise electric bills for residents or businesses. The developer said no water would be needed to cool the facility, only to get it up and running. They also said it could bring Joliet $2 billion in tax revenue.  

Advertisement

Joliet officials estimated the project would create 7,000 to 10,000 construction jobs and 700 permanent jobs. The developer also has pledged $100 million to improve sidewalks, streets, and other city services in Joliet.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending