Connect with us

Illinois

Deadspin | Ohio State hopes to stay 'dialed in' vs. No. 18 Illinois

Published

on

Deadspin | Ohio State hopes to stay 'dialed in' vs. No. 18 Illinois


Jan 30, 2025; University Park, Pennsylvania, USA; Ohio State Buckeyes guard Micah Parrish (8) holds the ball as Penn State Nittany Lions forward Zach Hicks (24) defends during the first half at Rec Hall. Mandatory Credit: Matthew O’Haren-Imagn Images

Ohio State will seek its fourth straight win when it faces struggling No. 18 Illinois on Sunday afternoon in Champaign, Ill.

The Buckeyes (13-8, 5-5 Big Ten) have turned around their season with strong defense and the guard play of John Mobley Jr. and Bruce Thornton.

It’s been a good stretch for Ohio State.

After upsetting then-No. 11 Purdue on Jan. 21, the Buckeyes posted consecutive routs of Iowa (82-65 score) on Monday and at Penn State (83-64) on Thursday.

Advertisement

“That’s two games in a row that defensively we have been dialed in and really done a good job, and I think two games in a row we’ve rebounded really well now,” Ohio State coach Jake Diebler said.

“You’ve got to know that every single game you can’t sit and be too happy on your performance. We’ll celebrate this one, and then we’ve got to turn the page quickly. I’m proud of our guys for battling. That’s now two straight road games. We’ve got another tough one here coming up.”

Illinois (14-7, 6-5) has not been able to overcome the absence of center Tomislav Ivisic, who has missed the past three games due to mononucleosis.

That was never more evident than during an 80-74 overtime loss Thursday to a Nebraska team that had lost six straight.

Illini coach Brad Underwood criticized his players’ shot selection.

Advertisement

“Stunk. It’s terrible,” he said. “But that’s part of the problem, not having Tomi, and that’s one of the things that we’ve got to get figured out, because I have no idea when we get him back.”

Ivisic has averaged 13 points and 8.5 rebounds in 18 games this season.

“It’s big, for sure,” sophomore guard Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn said of not having Ivisic. “Tomi is a great player. He’s one of our starting guys, one of our best players for sure. That’s not an excuse. We have to have the next-man-up mentality.”

Underwood hinted on his post-game radio show Thursday that changes may be in the offing against Ohio State.

Advertisement

“I’ve got to do something with the starting lineup,” he said. “… We don’t know when we’re getting Tomi back, so we’ve got to figure it out in the meantime.”

In contrast, Diebler said he likes the combo of Mobley — a freshman — and Thornton, a junior.

Mobley had 19 points and eight assists against Penn State in embracing an expanded role with guard Meechie Johnson missing the past 11 games to tend to personal matters.

“It feels good,” Mobley said. “My whole life growing up, everybody labeled me as just a shooter, but it feels good to showcase my all-around game. Defense, offense, getting people involved, getting to the basket, also shooting.”

His play has drawn attention of the defenses, making Thornton more dangerous.

Advertisement

Thornton had 17 points vs. the Nittany Lions and is 11 for 18 from 3-point range during Ohio State’s winning streak.

“It was great because we were able to get Bruce open looks from three because we were able to move them around some, and I think that’s really important for us,” Diebler said. “We’ve got to continue to be versatile on the perimeter.”

–Field Level Media



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Illinois

Game Preview | #18 Purdue at Illinois | Boilers set eyes on double bye

Published

on

Game Preview | #18 Purdue at Illinois | Boilers set eyes on double bye


Game Preview | #18 Purdue at Illinois | Boilers set eyes on double bye

#18 Purdue 21-9 (13-6) at Illinois 19-11 (11-8)

There is one case where Purdue’s Big Ten Tournament standings are simple: if Purdue beats Illinois, it will get a double-bye in the Big Ten Tournament.

Advertisement

Purdue is one of three current Big Ten teams with six losses in the conference. Michigan adds another potential team as it has 5 losses in the conference and a final game at Michigan State to finish the season. That means at the end of the weekend, four Big Ten teams could be left with six losses. None of the teams below Michigan State vying for a double-bye play each other. So all could win, all could lose, or any mix of the two.

Illinois has less to battle for in the Big Ten Tournament. It can move up or down a spot or two, but it’ll be in line for a single game bye win or lose.

But Illinois has plenty to play for with its seeding. After a decent start to the season, Illinois has been plagued with injuries, illnesses, and inconsistent play. Illinois got back on track in its last game by beating Michigan on the road, 93-73, but it projects around the 8-9 seed currently which means a second round game, most likely, against a one seed.

A win against Purdue could be worth half a seed, and thrown in with a positive run in the Big Ten Tournament, and Illinois could find itself improving its stock in the final two weeks of the season.

Even if there weren’t a bunch of post-season implications, this is a fascinating matchup of styles. Illinois is one of the nation’s best offensive rebounding teams. Purdue’s struggled on the glass at times this year. Illinois is also one of the worst three-point shooting teams in the country.

Advertisement

Purdue will bring the #1 offense in the Big Ten to Champaign where it won at last year in dramatic fashion.

Glass worries

Matt Painter was watching Illinois take it to Michigan on Sunday. Illinois dominated the glass, grabbing 19 offensive rebounds on the way to throttling the Wolverines 93-73 on the road.

Painter said you always pay a bit more attention to what the team did in its last game, and that means for Purdue, it has to really concentrate on the rebounding battle with one of the best rebounding teams in the country. Illinois isn’t just big inside, it uses its advantages all over the roster to attack the glass.

“In lieu of everything,” Painter said about the way Illinois dominates the glass. “Their quickness got a lot of rebounds, but their physicalness at all positions. A lot of times you don’t see that across the board… but they have really good positional size, strength, and quickness across the board. Their guards get on the boards, their forwards, obviously their centers.”

Advertisement

Purdue’s lack of size and interior presence has been a problem for most the season. Not only on the glass, but with Purdue’s primary big men, Calebu Furst and Trey Kaufman-Renn, getting too caught up in scrums going for rebounds and getting in foul trouble. Kaufman-Renn has a strong history against Illinois, including a season-high 23 point performance against them last season, but he’s been foul prone in Big Ten play for Purdue.

Illinois is grabbing 36.1% of their misses, a number that’s inflated by the fact that Illinois is one of the most prolific three-point shooting teams in the country while also being one of the least efficient teams at shooting threes.

That will make for a fascinating matchup for both teams. Purdue would love if Illinois stays on the perimeter. Purdue is allowing teams to shoot just 30.5% from three – just .3% below what Illinois shoots as a team. That’s the 26th best mark in the country for Purdue’s defense. That’s the 323rd best shooting percentage in the country for Illinois.

But Purdue has been one of the worst teams at defending inside the arc, something Illinois does very well. Illinois is making 57.4% from two (14th best mark) and Purdue is giving up 56% from inside the arc (337th best mark).

But execution has not been Illinois’ strengths this season and Purdue has had flashes of effective defense that usually features turning teams over, something Illinois with its fast pace is prone to do.

Advertisement

Award season

This could be an important game for Purdue’s individual efforts. With Braden Smith and Wisconsin’s John Tonje locked into a back and forth player of the year race – it’s probably still Smith’s to win though Purdue’s four game losing streak that saw a two game struggle for Smith brought Tonje back into the mix.

Tonje and his Badgers will get a final game against Penn State at home on Saturday.

Tonje goes into the game averaging 19.1 points, 5.0 rebounds, and 1.7 assists on 47.1% field goal percentage and 38.2% from three.

Braden Smith is at 16.3 points a game, 4.5 rebounds, 8.7 assists, and 2.4 steals a game on 44.6% field goal shooting and 40.6% from three.

Advertisement

There’s probably a stronger than been discussed argument that Trey Kaufman-Renn is closer in the player of the year award than admitted because he shares the same team as the pre-season pick. TKR is leading the Big Ten in scoring 19.4 points per game, 6.1 rebounds, and 2.3 assists on 61.5% shooting from the floor.

Rule of thumb personally is if a player is going to finish breaking the assist per game record in all of the Big Ten, held by none other than Magic Johnson, he gets my vote for player of the year. A strong game and win against Illinois might take any other doubts out of play for Braden Smith.



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois voters favor keeping current state flag in public poll

Published

on

Illinois voters favor keeping current state flag in public poll


Illinois residents overwhelmingly support keeping the current state flag, Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias announced Thursday after a five-week public voting period to consider a redesign.

Current state flag holds strong

The backstory:

Advertisement

More than 165,000 of the nearly 385,000 votes cast—about 43 percent—favored the existing flag, outpacing the next five top designs combined. 

Voters were given the option to choose from the Illinois Flag Commission’s Top 10 new designs or select from three former flag iterations, including the current one, which has remained largely unchanged for a century.

Advertisement

“Some may call it an SOB – a seal on a bedsheet – and the vexillogical community may hate it, but people overwhelmingly prefer our current state flag,” Giannoulias said. “Thank you to everyone who made their voice heard on the future of this important symbol of state pride.”

What’s next:

The Illinois Flag Commission will submit its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly by April 1, after which lawmakers will decide whether to adopt a new flag, return to a previous design, or retain the current one.

Advertisement

The commission was created through Senate Bill 1818, sponsored by State Sen. Doris Turner (D-Springfield) and State Rep. Kam Buckner (D-Chicago), and signed into law by Gov. J.B. Pritzker in 2023. The panel selected its Top 10 designs in December from 4,844 public submissions received during a six-week entry period last fall.

The results of the redesign contest are below:

Advertisement

IllinoisNews



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois lawmakers brace for possible federal cuts to Medicaid

Published

on

Illinois lawmakers brace for possible federal cuts to Medicaid


SPRINGFIELD — Health care advocates, hospital officials and people who rely on Medicaid for their medical coverage warned state lawmakers Wednesday of consequences that could result from proposed cuts in federal Medicaid funding.

The video in the player above is from a previous report.

“This is it. This is absolutely it. This is the line,” said Carrie Chapman, senior director of litigation and advocacy at Legal Council for Health Justice, a Chicago-based advocacy group. “Medicaid stays or goes as the program that we’ve know it right now.”

Chapman was among nearly a dozen people who spoke Wednesday to an Illinois House budget committee that oversees spending for human services, including Medicaid, the public health insurance program that covers about 3.4 million lower-income people in Illinois.

Advertisement

Established in 1965 alongside Medicare, the federally funded health insurance program for seniors, Medicaid has traditionally targeted lower-income pregnant women, children, seniors, parents, and people with disabilities. In Illinois, the federal government pays approximately 51% of the cost of covering those individuals’ care.

However, with passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, Medicaid eligibility was expanded to include working-age adults with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level. Approximately 770,000 people in that category are covered by Illinois Medicaid and the federal government pays 90% of the cost for that expansion group.

Currently, according to the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, Medicaid pays for about half of all child births in Illinois and two-thirds of all nursing home days. Nearly 50% of Illinoisians living with HIV are covered by Medicaid, as well as almost 80% of people served by community mental health centers.

All told, according to the state comptroller’s office, Illinois spent about $36.9 billion on Medicaid in the fiscal year that ended June 30. Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Director Lizzie Whitehorn said about 62% of total state Medicaid spending comes from the federal government.

At issue was a budget resolution that recently passed the Republican-controlled U.S. House in Washington, which calls for deep cuts in federal spending. Part of that resolution calls on the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, to cut $880 billion from the federal budget deficit over the next 10 years.

Advertisement

Because Medicaid makes up a large part of all the programs the Energy and Commerce Committee oversees, many have assumed that cuts of that size would have to include substantial cuts to Medicaid.

“There’s no way they can cut that much out of the federal budget without touching Medicaid, because Medicaid is such a substantial portion of the discretionary funds that they have access to,” Rep. Anna Moeller, D-Elgin, who chairs the legislative appropriations committee, said after the hearing.

Whitehorn noted that the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act resulted in cutting the state’s uninsured rate in half and reducing the amount of uncompensated care delivered in Illinois by more than a third.

“Federal cuts would mean we have to limit services or eligibility,” she told the committee. “And we don’t have the money as a state to make up the difference.”

A.J. Wilhelmi, president and CEO of the Illinois Health and Hospital Association, described the list of proposals being considered in Washington as “both sweeping and shocking.” He said they include turning federal Medicaid spending into a block grant to states, establishing per capita caps on Medicaid benefits, and eliminating certain funding mechanisms, known as provider taxes, that are used to draw down additional federal matching funds to support the cost of operating hospitals.

Advertisement

“And make no mistake, there would be no hospital Medicaid program without hospital provider taxes,” he said.

Last month, Gov. JB Pritzker laid out a $55.2 billion budget proposal to the Democratic-controlled General Assembly to fund state government operations over the 2026 fiscal year, which begins July 1. In his budget address, however, he noted the uncertainty of various streams of federal funds that are used to help pay the cost of many state operations, including Medicaid.

Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, who serves on the committee, said Wednesday that the decision about future federal Medicaid funding is in the hands of the Republican-controlled Congress. He urged GOP members of the General Assembly to use their influence to persuade the three Illinois Republicans in the U.S. House to vote against cutting Medicaid funding.

“So I’ll just close with my request to the minority spokesmen and the minority members of this committee to come back in a week to share with this entire committee those letters and those emails and those texts in discussion with us about the things they have done to make sure that the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate and the president do not make these horrible, horrible, damaging, life-impacting cuts to our Medicaid system,” he said.

Republicans on the panel argued that the subject of federal budget negotiations was beyond the scope of the state legislative committee’s purview and suggested Wednesday’s hearing was more about partisan politics than solving the state’s budget issues.

Advertisement

“And so this, I think, is performative,” said Rep. William Hauter, R-Morton. “We don’t know what will happen. There’s a lot of things that we have no control over, budget negotiations going on at the national level.”

Moeller argued the hearing was more than a stage show, noting that Congress faces a March 14 deadline to pass a bill to renew federal spending authority or face a partial shutdown of the federal government.

“This hearing this morning is far more than performative,” she said. “We are going to be heading into our budget cycle, our budget making process, with huge uncertainty hanging over our heads. What happens on March 15, in the next few weeks, in Washington, D.C., will have a direct impact on the level of funding that we will have available for all of these important programs.”

Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending