Connect with us

Midwest

Controversial climate group facing bankruptcy, how did it get here?

Published

on

Controversial climate group facing bankruptcy, how did it get here?

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

One of the leading global environmental networks has been drained of hundreds of millions over the years as a result of several lawsuits filed against their involvement in anti-oil protests.

Greenpeace, an international environmentalist group, has been at the center of several highly controversial environmental cases over the years and has been accused of hiring protesters and rioters to advance their cause. 

Advertisement

Most recently, Greenpeace was found liable for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages resulting from a pipeline protest. The group recently said that such a ruling could “shut down Greenpeace USA.”

Here are some of the top cases that got Greenpeace to the dire straits it is in right now. 

1. Greenpeace hit with $660 million fine for pipeline protest

More than 800 people were arrested in 2016 during a monthslong protest, led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, opposing construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), an oil pipeline that runs from North Dakota to Illinois. 

JURY FINDS GREENPEACE LIABLE, ORDERED TO PAY HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OVER DAKOTA ACCESS OIL PIPELINE PROTESTS

Protesters demonstrating against the expansion of the Dakota Access Pipeline wade in cold creek waters confronting local police, near Cannon Ball, North Dakota, on Nov. 2, 2016. (John L. Mone)

Advertisement

Energy Transfer, the developer of the pipeline, sued Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International for $300 million on claims the climate groups orchestrated the protests by providing resources to the activists and, therefore, were liable for the expenses that resulted from construction being postponed. 

In March 2025, a North Dakota jury found Greenpeace liable for about $660 million resulting from the protest.

GREENPEACE VOWS MORE LEGAL ACTION AFTER GETTING HIT WITH $660M RULING THAT WOULD ‘SHUT DOWN’ ORGANIZATION

“Our lawsuit is about recovering damages for the harm Greenpeace caused our company. It is not about free speech. Their organizing, funding, and encouraging the unlawful destruction of property and the dissemination of misinformation goes well beyond the exercise of free speech. We look forward to proving our case, and we trust the North Dakota legal system to do that.”

The weekslong Morton County trial, which began in late February, heard testimony that claimed that Greenpeace not only trained the DAPL protesters, but purchased supplies to aid their resistance. 

Advertisement

Greenpeace activist Yeb Saño from the Philippines holds aloft a flag on a small boat after attempting to board a Shell oil platform being transported by the White Marlin ship on Jan. 31, 2023 in the Atlantic Ocean north of Gran Canaria, Spain. (Handout)

Greenpeace described the battle as “one of the most consequential free speech cases in recent history.”

2. Pirate-style protest leads to another massive fine

Greenpeace settled a lawsuit with Shell after four individuals affiliated with the group boarded and occupied a Shell oil company vessel for two weeks in 2023.  

The activists “unlawfully scaled” a moving vessel in the North Sea while carrying a banner reading “Stop Drilling. Start Paying.” 

Because of this incident, Greenpeace was ordered to make a payment of 300k pounds to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, and the group was barred from going within 500 meters of a Shell platform in the North Sea.

Advertisement

An activist of the environmental NGO Greenpeace climbs to take part in an action on a Shell platform, on the way to the North Sea, to expand an existing oil and gas field, off the coast of Cherbourg, northwestern France, on Feb. 6, 2023. (Lou Benoist)

3. ‘People vs. the Arctic’ lawsuit falls flat

In 2020, the Norwegian Supreme Court ruled against Greenpeace’s attempt to block new oil exploration in the country. 

Greenpeace was joined by Young Friends of the Earth Norway in a 2016 lawsuit filed against the Norwegian Government after several new oil and gas leases were granted in the Balian Sea. 

The lawsuit, known as “People vs. the Arctic,” was the first case to challenge the country’s constitution on environmental rights. The environmental groups claimed that the Arctic drilling would violate Section 112 of the Norwegian Constitution, which states that everyone has the right to a healthy environment. 

Despite extensive appeals, Greenpeace failed to secure a single victory in the Norwegian court system, which found at every level that the government in that they did not violate the country’s constitution.

Advertisement

DARK MONEY FUND POURED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO ECO ACTIVIST GROUPS BLOCKING HIGHWAYS, DESTROYING FAMOUS ART

Greenpeace has been involved in several high-profile environmental cases over the years. (Getty Images)

4. Another environmental group bites the dust? 

Commenting on the North Dakota ruling, a representative for Energy Transfer told Fox News Digital it was “very pleased that Greenpeace has been held accountable for their actions against us and that the jury recognized these were not law-abiding, peaceful protests as Greenpeace tried to claim.” 

The representative said their victory was shared with the local native tribe and people throughout North Dakota who “had to live through the daily harassment and disruptions caused by the protesters who were funded and trained by Greenpeace.” 

“It is also a win for all law-abiding Americans who understand the difference between the right to free speech and breaking the law,” said the representative, adding, “that Greenpeace has been held responsible is a win for all of us.”

Advertisement

Sushma Raman, a representative for Greenpeace USA, told Fox News Digital that the group will be appealing the decision, saying, “we will not back down from this fight, and we will not be silenced.” 

GREENPEACE CO-FOUNDER: NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF HUMANS ARE DOMINANT CAUSE OF WARMING CLIMATE

Greenpeace activists on the roof of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s house in Richmond, North Yorkshire after covering it in black fabric in protest at his backing for the expansion of North Sea oil and gas drilling. (Photo by Danny Lawson/PA Images via Getty Images)

Raman said that Energy Transfer “knows we don’t have $660 million” and claimed “they want our silence, not our money.” 

“This case should alarm everyone, no matter their political inclinations,” she said. “It’s part of a renewed push by corporations to weaponize our courts to silence dissent. We should all be concerned about the future of the First Amendment, and lawsuits like this aimed at destroying our rights to peaceful protest and free speech.” 

Advertisement

A representative for Greenpeace International pointed out to Fox News Digital that the ruling does not impact Greenpeace’s 24 other national and regional organizations. The representative said these groups will “continue functioning as normal even in the worst case scenario.” 

The representative also pointed out that Greenpeace is counter-suing Energy Transfer in a Netherlands court to recover all fines lost in the North Dakota case. 

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Midwest

Deputy AG denies 5-year-old, father has asylum claim after family released from ICE detention

Published

on

Deputy AG denies 5-year-old, father has asylum claim after family released from ICE detention

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said Sunday that the 5-year-old boy and his father, who were detained by ICE in Minneapolis last month, did not apply for asylum, as officials announced that the family was released over the weekend.

Blanche said there have been conflicting claims regarding the legal status of the boy, Liam Conejo Ramos, and his father, Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, who entered the U.S. in 2024, according to public reporting, though officials and the family’s lawyers dispute the circumstances of their entry and asylum processing. Lawyers representing the Ecuadorian family say they have an active asylum claim currently being processed, allowing them to remain in the country pending a court decision.

The deputy attorney general denied that they have a pending asylum case, echoing previous claims by the Department of Homeland Security, which described the family as being in the country illegally.

“That is not true. There’s a very meaningful dispute about whether they had properly applied for asylum,” Blanche said during an appearance on ABC’s “This Week.” 

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS TRUMP ADMIN TO RELEASE 5-YEAR-OLD, HIS DAD FROM IMMIGRATION DETENTION WITHIN 3 DAYS

“I cannot get into the … specifics of this litigation, but you can read the same briefs I can. And what you just said is not true.”

While some immigrants detained by federal agents do not have prior criminal records, Blanche added that the Trump administration considers unauthorized entry into the U.S. a crime and believes such individuals should be detained.

U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche arrives for a press conference on August 11, 2025, in Washington, D.C.  (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“The fact that they’re here illegally is a crime,” he said. “And so when you say they don’t have criminal records, they are – by their presence being here without status, having come into this country illegally or overstayed illegally, that is a crime.”

Advertisement

“There is a schism in the law right now about whether an illegal alien can be held pending their proceeding or whether they need to be released on bail,” he added. “We very strongly believe that they should be held and there’s a bunch of appellate cases.”

MEDIA RUNS WILD WITH ‘EGREGIOUS LIE’ ICE TARGETED 5-YEAR-OLD IN MINNESOTA, DHS SAYS CHILD WAS ABANDONED

Liam Conejo Ramos sits with father Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias after getting released from a detention facility in Texas. (Joaquin Castro)

Blanche’s comments come after several days of widespread backlash from attorneys and lawmakers who condemned the operation that detained the five‑year‑old when his father picked him up from school on Jan. 20.

The boy and his father were released from a detention center in Dilley, Texas, on Saturday, after a judge issued a ruling earlier in the day.  

Advertisement

Liam Conejo Ramos and his father pass through airport security after their release from federal custody on Feb. 1, 2026. (Joaquin Castro)

Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, posted on social media Sunday that he picked up the family Saturday night and escorted them back to Minnesota the next morning.

In a letter he also shared, the congressman wrote to the boy: “Don’t let anyone tell you this isn’t your home. America became the most powerful, prosperous nation on earth because of immigrants not in spite of them.”

Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, poses with Liam Conejo Ramos, father Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias and Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., following the family’s release from a detention center in Texas. (Rep. Ilhan Omar)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., celebrated their release on social media with a photo of her standing next to the family and Castro, writing, “Liam is home now and we are grateful to Joaquin Castro for traveling to Minneapolis with him and his dad. Welcome home Liam.”

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Detroit, MI

Red Wings on losing streak, still in playoff hunt

Published

on

Red Wings on losing streak, still in playoff hunt


The Red Wings have been streaking, in the wrong direction earning just one point on a recent home stand, but still are in the hunt for a playoff spot as the team heads towards the Olympic break., 

Show more



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee salt shortage; DNR urges residents to use less amid winter demand

Published

on

Milwaukee salt shortage; DNR urges residents to use less amid winter demand


Local businesses say road salt supplies are running low in Milwaukee, prompting the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to urge residents and contractors to think carefully about how much salt they use.

What we know:

Advertisement

Brad Davis, owner of Premier Landscape Products, said demand has surged as inventories lag following two relatively slow winters that limited stockpiling. His Milwaukee-based, veteran-owned company sells salt and provides commercial snow removal services.

“It’s been crazy. We’re one of the only distributers here in the Milwaukee area,” said Davis. “It’s insane.”

Advertisement

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

He said constant phone calls and inquiries have become the norm as customers search for salt.

Premier Landscape Products has salt available at a time when supplies are tight across the region, Davis said, though getting it has become more complicated.

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“We’re trying to keep prices down. Here at port – we had a large allotment – then it went to Illinois, we had an allotment there that closed,” Davis said. “And now it’s coming straight from the mine – 10 hours away.”

Advertisement

Davis said storms across the country have contributed to the shortage, with municipalities receiving priority access to salt supplies.

“We had some really intense ice storms and major storms that went through the heartland of our country that they are just not prepared,” said Davis.

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources said the shortage is a good reminder to evaluate how much salt is being used and to consider ways to reduce usage to protect waterways.

Advertisement

“If you use less, you’re still going to allow people to be safe and protect the environment at the same time,” said Shannon Haydin, stormwater section manager for the Wisconsin DNR.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Advertisement

Haydin said excess salt use sends chloride into lakes, groundwater and streams, where it can become toxic to aquatic life.

“We do have streams in southeastern Wisconsin that are as salty as the ocean,” said Haydin.

Dig deeper:

Advertisement

The DNR said it is not opposed to salt use altogether, noting it plays an important role in ice management and public safety, but officials hope people will think twice before using too much.

“You can reuse it and it’ll save you money and help save the environment,” said Haydin.

Advertisement

The DNR recommends measuring salt carefully, saying an 8-ounce coffee mug should be enough to salt about 10 sidewalk squares.

The Source: The information in this post was collected and produced by FOX6 News.

MilwaukeeWinter WeatherNews
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending