Connect with us

Lifestyle

The most pressing question about Tim Walz and JD Vance: Who should play them on SNL?

Published

on

The most pressing question about Tim Walz and JD Vance: Who should play them on SNL?

Who might play the VP candidates on SNL? A few ideas: Jim Gaffigan (clockwise from left), Melissa McCarthy, Will Ferrell, Jason Sudeikis, Zach Galifianakis and Jon Hamm.

Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for IMDb; Jeff Spicer/Getty Images; Lia Toby/Getty Images for Warner Bros.; Christopher Polk/Getty Images; Monica Schipper/Getty Images for IMDb; Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for SXSW


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for IMDb; Jeff Spicer/Getty Images; Lia Toby/Getty Images for Warner Bros.; Christopher Polk/Getty Images; Monica Schipper/Getty Images for IMDb; Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for SXSW

Now that Tim Walz has been named the Democratic candidate for vice president, it’s time to tackle the most pressing question left in media and politics: Who will play the earnest ex-schoolteacher-turned-governor-turned-dad jokes magnet on Saturday Night Live?

One favorite has already dropped out: comic actor Steve Martin told The Los Angeles Times he turned down an offer from SNL executive producer Lorne Michaels to play the Minnesota governor, a fellow balding, white-haired guy with a wide smile.

“I said, ‘Lorne, I’m not an impressionist,’” Martin told Times columnist Glenn Whipp. “You need someone who can really nail the guy.’ I was picked because I have gray hair and glasses.”

Advertisement

Fans had been circulating pictures of Martin online with SNL alum Maya Rudolph, adding to buzz she may reprise playing Vice President Harris – this time as the Democratic presidential nominee – when the show returns to new episodes this fall.

Why this discussion matters

Excitement over Martin reminded me of the moment Sarah Palin was named a vice presidential candidate in 2008, prompting loads of comedy nerds to send around emails noting how much Palin looked like another SNL alum, Tina Fey.

Fey’s impression of Palin eventually dominated pop culture so much, people believed the politician — then Alaska’s governor — really said, “I can see Russia from my house,” a line that Fey actually dropped during SNL’s season premiere in September 2008.

Advertisement

YouTube

Images of Gerald Ford as a clumsy doofus, George H.W. Bush as a patrician so stiff his words sounded like gibberish, and Al Gore as a stuffy know-it-all obsessed with the word “lockbox,” all come from devastating SNL parodies. So who plays Walz – and how – may affect how history remembers him more than anything he actually does.

(Ditto for GOP vice presidential candidate JD Vance, whose selection didn’t quite inspire the same level of SNL fancasting online).

I sympathize with purists who insist one of the show’s castmembers should get a shot at playing new figures like Walz or Vance — in the same way James Austin Johnson has electrified viewers with his amazing take on former President Donald Trump.

But Michaels discovered long ago that stunt casting celebrities brings attention and ratings. Even if they don’t really bother trying to imitate the people they’re playing, like Robert DeNiro and Ben Stiller (as Robert Mueller and Michael Cohen, respectively).

Advertisement

So here’s my short list of the folks left who Michaels should consider casting as Walz — along with a couple recommendations for Vance. Because teaching us how to laugh at these people just might help us understand them – or at least learn to tolerate them.

Jim Gaffigan

PROS: He’s a brilliant standup comic, with multiple Grammy nominations and specials aired or about to debut on Netflix, Prime Video and Hulu. He’s from the Midwest – raised in Indiana, championed by fellow Hoosier David Letterman – with bits centered on being a father of five, married to a wife so devout he calls her a “Shiite Catholic.” He’s got the stocky build and blonde, thinning hair, along with acting chops from loads of TV and film work, including TV Land’s The Jim Gaffigan Show, Law & Order and, recently, pal Jerry Seinfeld’s Netflix movie Unfrosted.

CONS: He doesn’t seem to be down with the SNL crew; despite a long career in comedy, he’s never hosted the show.

Tracy Letts

PROS: A consummate actor and playwright who has won Tony awards and a Pulitzer prize, he’s better known for his self-described specialty playing “a—holes in suits” in films and TV shows like Ford v. Ferrari, Lady Bird and Winning Time.

CONS: Though he had early roles in sitcoms like Seinfeld and The Drew Carey Show, he’s not really known for comedy.

Advertisement

Melissa McCarthy

PROS: Hear me out. She’s a brilliant comedic actor with a long history of guesting on the show. And she delivered a sidesplitting take on Trump’s former spokesperson Sean Spicer that perfectly captured his clueless bluster.

CONS: Despite his Big Dad Energy, Walz is such a masculine guy – hunter, former football coach ex-military – that, funny as it might be to see McCarthy give it a shot, SNL may just want a guy in the role.

Will Ferrell

PROS: Amazing at improvisational and sketch comedy, he’s an SNL alum who has played everyone from George W. Bush to former Attorney General Janet Reno.

CONS: His oddball energy is a little eccentric and sharp for playing a guy who comes off as America’s goofy father figure.

The ghost of Chris Farley

PROS: The SNL star had an over-the-top exuberance, unkempt blonde hair and talent for self-deprecating humor that seemed like a cartoonishly exaggerated version of Walz’s vibe – perfect for a parody sketch.

Advertisement

CONS: Just another reminder of what the comedy world lost in 1997 when he died at age 33 after an overdose. (Though his younger brother, comic and actor Kevin Farley, might also be an able contender).

Jason Sudeikis — as Walz and/or Vance

PROS: An alum of the show, he knows his way around sketch comedy and political impressions — he played Joe Biden and Mitt Romney at different times. He’s also got a facility with corny, dad-style humor, as evidenced by his time playing the earnest, fictional coach on Ted Lasso. Anyone who remembers his work as one half of a self-centered yuppie couple in the “Two A-holes” sketches (with another SNL ace, Kristen Wiig), also knows he has a knack for playing haughty, entitled white guys.

CONS: He doesn’t quite look like Walz – frankly, he’s a little too thin and good looking. And his success as Vance might be directly proportional to the quality of the fake beard and hairpiece they can slap on him.

My first choice for Vance: Zach Galifianakis

PROS: He’s got the bushy brown beard, the shock of thick hair and a talent for playing clueless egotists honed on his interview parody show, Between Two Ferns.

CONS: He’ll be so good we may forget how odd Vance is in real life.

Advertisement

Another great Vance: Jon Hamm

PROS: An ace dramatic actor whose secret weapon is a sharp knack for comedy (see 30 Rock, Bridesmaids), he’s also great at making audiences love difficult people (see Mad Men). His turn as a cult leader on The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt proves he can make great comedy out of playing quirky big shots. And he’s also a friend of SNL, hosting the show three times and making cameos in multiple skits.

CONS: Hamm will also need a convincing wig or two to make this work. And given all the other cool roles he’s been in recently — from Fargo to The Morning ShowSNL might have to work hard to keep him in the mix.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lifestyle

Morgan Wallen Walks Out with Tom Brady and Mike Tyson at Vegas Concert

Published

on

Morgan Wallen Walks Out with Tom Brady and Mike Tyson at Vegas Concert

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Wait Wait's Summer Break with Jason Isbell, Rachel Maddow, and more! : Wait Wait… Don't Tell Me!

Published

on

Wait Wait's Summer Break with Jason Isbell, Rachel Maddow, and more! : Wait Wait… Don't Tell Me!
Enlarge this image

Amy Sussman/Getty Images

Jason Isbell performs onstage during the 2024 MusiCares Person Of The Year Honoring Jon Bon Jovi at Los Angeles Convention Center on February 02, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images)

Amy Sussman/Getty Images

This week, Wait Wait celebrates the end of summer with some of our favorite guests including Jason Isbell, Rachel Maddow, Patti LuPone, and more!

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

L.A. contractors razed a native plant garden for kids. What happens now?

Published

on

L.A. contractors razed a native plant garden for kids. What happens now?

For more than a decade, visitors say the Children’s Garden at Elysian Park was a shady showcase for indigenous plants, with dense stands of mature native trees and shrubs lining the paths of the grounds just west of Grace E. Simon Lodge and creating a cool, restful places to walk, play and learn.

Then, in late June, all that lush undergrowth was leveled by a contractor hired by Los Angeles’ Department of Recreation and Parks to conform with the Los Angeles Fire Department’s brush clearance requirements. Since then, finger pointing and cries of “Ecocide” have reverberated on social media and during city meetings.

Update:

2:00 p.m. Aug. 9, 2024This story has been updated to include additional information provided by a Los Angeles Fire Department spokesperson.

“It was a magical environment,” said Shari Lee, a nearby resident who’s been walking the site for years. “Now it just seems sort of … blank.”

Advertisement

The Children’s Garden in Elysian Park after the brush clearance.

(Shari Lee)

These heated exchanges are all part of an ongoing and often contentious discussion about how a city like Los Angeles should manage urban wild lands with native plants. No one questions the need to remove such fast-growing invasives as black mustard, which becomes kindling for wildfires once it dries out in the summer.

But should green native shrubs like toyons and lemonade berry be treated the same way? Native plant enthusiasts say those plants control erosion, provide shade and habitat for wildlife and pose little fire danger.

Advertisement

Critics say that before the work was done, the city should have notified stakeholders, such as the Northeast LA Forest School, which pays to use the Children’s Garden (also known as the Children’s Arboretum) year round for outdoor instruction. They also believe there should have been an environmental evaluation of the site before Mariposa Landscapes Inc. of Irwindale did the work.

The trees and shrubs had been planted more than a decade earlier by the urban forestry nonprofit North East Trees, a project that included signage to identify the many native species added to the site, such as California buckeye, California black walnut and oaks.

Stones and trees surround a wet dirt path on a rainy day
A few trees and rocks at a no longer shady site

The Children’s Garden in Elysian Park on a rainy day in February, 2024 (top) and after the brush clearance on June 27, 2024. (Becca Hackett-Levy)

Today, the area looks denuded. The remaining trees have been trimmed so their limbs are at least 6 feet above the ground per fire prevention rules, some of the plant identification markers have been upturned and the dry, loose soil is covered with leaf debris.

Advertisement

Both Mariposa and North East Trees contract with the city on other projects. Neither was willing to be interviewed for this story.

The brush clearing was required by the Los Angeles Fire Department to protect a metal shed where the parks department stores fuel for lawn mowers, said Leon Boroditsky, principal ground maintenance supervisor for the forestry division of Recreation and Parks.

While fire inspectors issued a brush violation around the shed at the Children’s Garden in March, they would not have required those mature native shrubs to have been removed, Los Angeles Fire Department spokesperson Karla Tovar said Friday. Typically Recreation and Parks officials consult with fire inspectors about how the trimming should be conducted, Tovar said, but that didn’t happen this time.

LAFD is “saddened by the approach that was taken with this brush clearance,” Tovar said. “We look forward to collaborating with [Recreation and Parks] in future endeavors to make sure something like this doesn’t occur again.”

Boroditsky didn’t order the clearing; he was away when the project was contracted. He said that he didn’t know how long the shed had been at the site but that this appeared to be the first year the LAFD felt the building needed to be considered a structure under the brush-clearing rules.

Advertisement

The city is also trying to find out how and why North East Trees installed the native plant garden at the park in the first place. It happened about 20 years ago, said Rose Watson, public information director for Recreation and Parks, but the department can’t find any documents outlining the project or what plants were added to the site.

There are lots of unanswered questions, Boroditsky said, and the clearance has created so much uproar that the city plans to bring in an independent third-party “arboreal expert” to do their own evaluation.

“There have been a lot of knee-jerk reactions and inflammatory rhetoric happening,” Boroditsky said. The city doesn’t even have photos of what the area looked like before the clearing, he added, “which is why I’m saying they don’t have evidence to make some of those claims.”

The site is in what the fire department classifies as a “very high fire hazard severity zone,” Boroditsky said, and the rules for clearance in such spots are strict. For instance, in “areas within 200 feet of structures and/or 10 feet of roadside surfaces or combustible fence: Grass shall be cut to 3 inches in height. Native brush shall be reduced in quantity to three inches in height. This does not apply to individual native shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 feet apart, provided such shrubs are trimmed up from the ground to 1/3 of their height with all dead material being removed ….”

A tiny green plant surrounded with shade cloth and chicken wire for protection.

Volunteers located tiny native plants like this toyon that survived the brush clearing, wrapping them in shade cloth to protect them from the scorching sun.

(Jeanette Marantos / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

So basically, the city paid $12,500 for brush clearance to protect a metal storage shed. Critics question whether it would have been simpler and cheaper to just move the shed, say to the adjacent Grace E. Simon Lodge enclosure? “That’s really not something I can clarify now,” Boroditsky said. “That’s something we’re evaluating now.”

Becca Hackett-Levy, director of the Northeast LA Forest School, said the shed was at the Children’s Garden before she began using the location nearly eight years ago. She added that she was on maternity leave after the birth of her second child when she got panicked calls from parents saying the space she had paid the city to use for her year-round outdoor classroom had been devastated.

A metal storage shed barely visible at the edge of the Children's Garden in Elysian Park.

A storage shed at the edge of the Children’s Garden in Elysian Park reportedly triggered the brush clearance around the site. The Grace E. Simon Lodge is behind the fence to the left.

(Jeanette Marantos / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

After weeks of uncertainty, Hackett-Levy said she got a call from parks officials Tuesday who told her that they’d found some areas she might be able to use nearby. “They found some good spots in the area, and they’re even changing their mowing schedule to accommodate the school,” she said Wednesday. “I’m just so thankful and shocked, frankly.”

The other concerns won’t be so easily resolved.

An open space with sparse trees and dirt that was once the Children's Garden.

The Elysian Park Children’s Garden on Aug. 1, about a month after the brush clearance.

(Jeanette Marantos / Los Angeles Times)

Native plant supporters mobilized within hours of the clearing to locate and try to protect surviving baby native shrubs, dotting the area with small red and yellow flags to indicate their locations. Without shelter from the larger shrubs, they were vulnerable during the severe heat, said Brenda Contreras, director of the native plant and wildlife support group Coyotl wan Macehualli. So volunteers wrapped many of the plants in chicken wire and shade cloth for protection and carried in water to irrigate the survivors.

Advertisement

Elizabeth Birkenbuel, who lives above the site on Park Drive, was so distressed by volunteers lugging large containers of water on the slippery hill that she encouraged them to hook up hoses to her outdoor faucet so they could more easily fill their buckets.

The city typically does brush clearance in the area to remove invasive and highly flammable black mustard and castor bean plants, Birkenbuel said, “but it was really aggressively cleared this time, in a way I’ve never seen it done before. I was very shocked. I usually end my walks there in the summer because it was very shaded, lush and cool, but it’s vastly different now.”

Trees and brush shade the Children's Garden.

The Children’s Garden in Elysian Park, before the clearance of plants.

(Shari Lee)

Birkenbuel said she can’t afford to keep sharing her water; she’s hoping the city will provide an alternative source. That’s another thing Recreation and Parks is researching right now, Boroditsky said, along with why stakeholders weren’t given advance notice about the work, per usual, and whether the department needs to change its protocols for when it requires environmental review of a site before brush clearance can occur.

Advertisement

However, native plant advocates are still going to city meetings and onto social media to accuse the city of deception and “ecocide” by killing protected plants like California black walnut.

Boroditsky, a certified arborist, said the site still has lots of native trees, like buckeyes, walnut and oaks, that may have been trimmed to conform to clearance rules but that were not removed. “There is no evidence that protected trees were removed,” he said. Although he added that that’s partly because he didn’t have any photographs of the site before the clearance to confirm what plants were no longer there.

He accused community activists of guerrilla gardening in the area by planting more native plants before the city had time to assess what happened and what needed to change. Adding more plants before the city has a plan is a problem, he said, because similar brush clearing might have to be repeated in the future.

An empty space where the shady garden once stood.

The Children’s Garden in Elysian Park on Aug. 1, about a month after the brush was cleared.

(Jeanette Marantos / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

However, Contreras and Flink say no one is putting new plants into the ground, especially in the heat of summer, when they would have little chance of surviving. All they’re doing, Contreras said, is trying to identify the plants that survived the clearance and keep them alive until the rains come this winter, which, they worry, could result in problematic erosion in that stripped area.

Meanwhile, Mason Flink and Max Kanter, co-founders of Garden City LA, are trying to build awareness of land management at the park by leading free, hour-long tours on the West Loop Trail from Aug. 10 through Sept. 1 to demonstrate the ways public lands can be managed and how the public can get involved. The tour includes the cleared Children’s Garden and the thriving native plant Test Plot gardens they help tend near the Marian Harlow Grove.

Three preschoolers racing up a path toward thick shrubs in the Childrens Garden in Elysian Park

Preschoolers from the Northeast LA Forest School race up a path last fall toward the native shrubs in the Children’s Garden at Elysian Park.

(Becca Hackett-Levy)

“Before they cleared out all the native plants, our point of going through the Children’s Garden was to show how all this life was flourishing,” Flink said. “Now it will offer a stark visual contrast to the Test Plot native plant gardens to spark conversations among the participants.”

Advertisement

Los Angeles City Councilman Hugo Soto-Martinez, whose district includes that part of Elysian Park, has taken the role of mediator and hopes to bring everyone together to discuss what happened and how to avoid problems going forward.

The city “made a big mistake in not communicating with the community groups” who frequent that space, Soto-Martinez said in an interview. But Recreation and Parks “gave the correct instruction for the brush clearance,” he added, “because we don’t want a brush fire in that area with so many homes nearby.”

As for the storage shed that apparently triggered the $12,500 upset: “That’s one of the first things we thought about … couldn’t we have just moved it?” Soto-Martinez said. “I think that’s a very simple question to ask and a fair thing to keep asking.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending