Connect with us

Lifestyle

How Charlie Chaplin used his uncanny resemblance to Hitler to fight fascism

Published

on

How Charlie Chaplin used his uncanny resemblance to Hitler to fight fascism

It’s been 85 years since The Great Dictator dazzled audiences in 1940. It was a big risk for one of the world’s most popular performers to take a stand against fascism on film.

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

Hollywood studios did not want Charlie Chaplin to make The Great Dictator. When he first started writing the script in 1938, the U.S. had not yet entered World War II. In fact, it still enjoyed friendly diplomatic relations with Nazi Germany, as well as many lucrative business ones.

So Chaplin financed The Great Dictator himself. He took advantage of his uncanny resemblance to Adolf Hitler by playing an obvious parody of the Nazi leader, named Adenoid Hynkel, in the film. But the parallels continued, as noted in the 2002 documentary, The Tramp and Dictator.

“Charlie Chaplin, the Little Tramp, and Adolf Hitler, the leader of Germany, had more in common than just a moustache,” says the narrator. “They were born in the same week of the same month of the same year. A few years before Chaplin became famous as the Tramp, Hitler was a tramp. Both were outsiders who left their homeland to conquer the world. They became the best loved and most hated men of their time.”

Advertisement

In The Great Dictator, Chaplin played another character as well: a likeable Jewish barber who finds himself mistaken for the odious Hynkel and who, at the end of the film, delivers an incredibly moving speech.

“I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be an emperor,” he gently informs an assembly of Hynkel’s army and advisors. “I don’t want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone if possible. Jew, gentile, Black man, white. We all want to help one another. Human beings are like that. We want to live by each other’s happiness, not by each other’s misery.”

Never before this film had the biggest star of silent film spoken aloud on screen.

Advertisement

YouTube

“Greed has poisoned men’s souls,” he continues, “has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.”

Later, Charlie Chaplin said he hoped that talking from his heart might even help to end the war.

“Machinery that gives abundance, has left us in want,” he says in the speech. “Our knowledge has made us cynical, our cleverness hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity. More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost.”

Advertisement

Some critics found the speech overly sentimental. Chaplin’s film also stirred the ire of right-wing politicians and power brokers in Washington including Sen. Joe McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover, who wrongly accused him of being a Communist sympathizer. The FBI would eventually compile a 1,900 page file on him.

The film was indeed subversive, and impressively so, said science fiction legend Ray Bradbury, who was interviewed in the documentary The Tramp and Dictator before his death in 2012.

“Comedy is the greatest way to attack anything like a totalitarian regime. They can’t stand it,” Bradbury said. “At the end of the speech, [Chaplin] dares to remind you that you don’t have to go on killing. You don’t have to be a totalitarian. You can make do with the worst people in the world. Somehow you must.”

Chaplin ended his speech with an appeal to the humanity of everyone facing war. “Let us fight for the world of reason,” he implored. “A world where science and progress will lead to all men’s happiness. Soldiers, in the name of democracy, let us all unite!”

The Great Dictator was released years before the world was aware of the extent of Nazi crimes against humanity. Later, Chaplin said he never would have made a comedy about Hitler had he known. But 85 years after it debuted, his movie stands as a testament to how art can stand up to tyranny, and how hard it can fight.

Advertisement
Demonstrators in Berlin wave flags and hold a poster reading "Peace with Russia and China" as they rally in front of a screen displaying a scene from the movie The Great Dictator during the "Peace - Freedom - Referendum" demonstration in May 2025.

Demonstrators in Berlin wave flags and hold a poster reading “Peace with Russia and China” as they rally in front of a screen displaying a scene from the movie The Great Dictator during the “Peace – Freedom – Referendum” demonstration in May 2025.

Ralf Hirschberger/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Ralf Hirschberger/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

Lifestyle

What Should a 21st Century Mechanical Watch Look Like?

Published

on

What Should a 21st Century Mechanical Watch Look Like?
Perhaps more like a screen. A decade after Apple Watch, industrial design legend Marc Newson returns to watchmaking to partner with Ressence, the Belgian startup known for its dome-like crystal designs. Newson aims to challenge a watchmaking industry that’s become obsessed with technical innovation at the expense of design.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Sunday Puzzle: Swapped first and last letters

Published

on

Sunday Puzzle: Swapped first and last letters

On-air challenge

I’m going to give give you clues for two words. Switch the first and last letters of the answer to the first clue to get the answer to the second. (Ex. Nutmeg or ginger / Long, heroic poems –> SPICE & EPICS)

1. Make a grand speech / Muse of love poetry
2. What a skull and crossbones signifies / Wandered around

3. Words to a song / Saint for whom the Russian alphabet is named

4. Yell / Amounts equal to ten $100 bills

Advertisement

5. Assignments for delivery drivers / Former Supreme Court Justice David ______

6. Small bag with a shoulder strap / Some gate fasteners

Last week’s challenge

Last week’s challenge came from Al Gori, of Cozy Lake, N.J. Name a place where games are played. Move the last two letters to the beginning. Change the new last letter to an “H.” The result, sadly, is what you might have when you leave this place.

Challenge answer

Casino, no cash

Winner

Mike Rombach of Pleasanton, California.

Advertisement

This week’s challenge

This week’s challenge comes from Mike Reiss, who’s a showrunner, writer, and producer for “The Simpsons.” Think of a famous living singer. The last two letters of his first name and the first two letters of his last name spell a bird. Change the first letter of the singer’s first name. Then the first three letters of that first name and the last five letters of his last name together spell another bird. What singer is this?

If you know the answer to the challenge, submit it below by Thursday, December 11 at 3 p.m. ET. Listeners whose answers are selected win a chance to play the on-air puzzle.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Barbra Streisand Reveals Her Deep Regret Over Selling Priceless Gustav Klimt Painting | Celebrity Insider

Published

on

Barbra Streisand Reveals Her Deep Regret Over Selling Priceless Gustav Klimt Painting | Celebrity Insider
Instagram/@barbrastreisand

Barbra Streisand has now come out of the closet with a very deep and tiring to tell remorse from her past—the once sold, now cherished, Gustav Klimt painting. The public has been granted access to the performer’s extensive emotions, and thoughts connected to the loss of this painting, which she bought in 1969 for $17,000 but sadly sold a few decades later. The star’s candid and honest confession has not only invited sympathy but, to a certain degree, has also made listeners share similar situations.

Advertisement

Streisand pointed out that her long time assistant was the one that prompted her to gather a collection of artworks that she had previously loved but eventually sold. One of the included works was Klimt’s “Miss Ria Munk on her Deathbed,” a painting that she acquired in her early days. Even though the $17,000 price for the painting was not her saying it was easy to part with, she still sold her Klimt in 1998 as she started to change her artistic likes to Frank Lloyd Wright and the Arts & Crafts movement. She rarely lets anyone know, she just says, “Oh how I regret selling her.” The title of the book her assistant assembled is not much different from her regret – ”You should never sell art you love.”

Very soon after, the post received immediate and emotional response. Most of them were sympathetic, one person commented, ”Perfect title, your assistant is telling the truth!” Another one pointed out that art has through the years always been characterized by the quality of being a story and therefore could be re-told in music.”

Streisand’s financial revelations have prompted plenty of comments and now they are especially relevant since Klimt’s masterpieces have become even more expensive and sought after. One person said, ”Today $17,000 looks like a large sum of money to almost everyone.” Someone else said even more strongly, ”Hey, if a Klimt painting comes my way, I will never be letting it go. In those days $17,000 was already a steal.”

Advertisement

A very smart statement gave an additional perspective about the time being right for Streisand to think back. The person referred to the auction news, saying, “A Gustav Klimt painting has been sold for a record $236.4m, making it the second most expensive artwork ever sold at auctions.” This mind-boggling sum allows one to see, in a way, the almost tragic story of Streisand’s buying and selling of her painting.

The story of the painting proved to be a true global one. A user, writing in her German language, expressed the same feeling of sadness as was, “Yes, it is indeed a big pity you have sold this picture. It is a wonderful testimony and… I am from Austria and I can tell you.” This response validates the idea of the painting being an important cultural artifact that is worth much more than just a monetary value.

Nevertheless, in calling the sympathies, some comments were slightly teasing the situation. One user said, “I don’t want to make your pain worse, but YOU SOLD THAT!!” Another replied, ”You should never sell Klimts they would be worth millions today.” Such humorous replies illustrate, to a degree, the almost incredulous financial hindsight surrounding the decision.

Moreover, Streisand’s post made people wonder about her collection of art in general. One of her fans even asked, “Barbra do you like paintings of Frida Kahlo?” while another one, was talking about her favorite artist saying, “The other one is Egon Schiele?” This has truly shown how the star’s personal taste still continues to fascinate and provoke curiosity among people. Her reflections on legacy extend beyond art, as seen in her mourning the loss of her White House rose garden legacy.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Ultimately, Barbra Streisand’s open and honest post is not just a case of a missed financial opportunity but also. It is, rather, a collective saga of the emotional burden of the things we throw away. The price at which her loss is counted is very high since it is a strong reminder that some of the things we love most are worth a lot more than the price tag on them. Her initiated communication suggests that the relationship between an artist and a collector can be very profound and lasting, even when the work is no longer physically present. She has also honored Nancy Pelosi for their shared fight for women’s health.

Continue Reading

Trending