Connect with us

Health

Trump’s V.A. Squeezes Mental Health Care in Crowded Offices, Raising Privacy Concerns

Published

on

Trump’s V.A. Squeezes Mental Health Care in Crowded Offices, Raising Privacy Concerns

In a Boston V.A. hospital, six social workers are conducting phone and telehealth visits with veterans from a single, crowded room, clinicians say. In Kansas City, providers are planning patient care while facing each other across narrow, cafeteria-style tables in a large, open space, according to staff members.

And in South Florida, psychiatric nurses have been treating veterans with mental health conditions in a hallway near a bathroom, sitting down with them in a makeshift medical bay jury-rigged out of filing cabinets and a translucent screen.

“People walking by can hear everything that’s going on,” said Bill Frogameni, an acute care psychiatric nurse at the Miami V.A. hospital and director of the local chapter of the National Nurses United union, referring to the patient intake setup in a V.A. outpatient facility in Homestead, Fla., outside Miami.

“The nurses are triaging these patients asking standard questions: ‘Do you feel like harming yourself or others? How long have you been feeling suicidal? Do you have a plan to harm yourself?’” Mr. Frogameni said. “It’s very personal stuff.”

The cramped conditions are the result of President Trump’s decision to rescind remote work arrangements for federal employees, reversing a policy that at the V.A. long predated the pandemic. Since Mr. Trump’s order, the Department of Veterans Affairs has been scrambling to find adequate office space for tens of thousands of health care employees, even those who see most or all of their patients virtually, while maintaining the legal requirement of confidentiality.

Advertisement

V.A. officials say the agency is handling its return to office responsibly, with the goal of improving care for veterans. While nearly 60,000 employees are being shifted into federal office space, another 45,000 have been allowed exemptions or extensions and can continue working from home for now. That includes a six- to eight-month pause for select clinicians categorized as “telemental health” providers, according to V.A. documents.

Staff members concerned about patient privacy can notify supervisors, who will give them what they need, said Peter Kasperowicz, a V.A. spokesman. If any staff members lack appropriate work space, he added, “that in itself is a violation of V.A.’s return-to-in-office-work policy.”

But interviews with three dozen V.A. employees, internal agency documents and photographs provided to The New York Times from six V.A. facilities depict crowded or stopgap office spaces where clinicians say they are being asked to administer mental health treatment or discuss sensitive information in open settings where conversations can be overheard.

Veterans have noticed the lack of privacy, clinicians say. They described patients newly hesitant to discuss issues like legal problems, substance abuse and intimate partner violence, limiting the effectiveness of their treatment. Some clinicians said they had trouble hearing patients over the phone or during video calls in their new, telemarketing-style work spaces.

Providers have been instructed to use headphones, computer privacy screens and even convex mirrors to block veterans’ view of other people in the room, documents and interviews show. In an internal memo, V.A. workers were told to prepare to work in crowded environments by avoiding strong perfumes or “heating or consuming pungent foods” while at their desks.

Advertisement

Some providers told The Times that they are quitting or retiring early rather than work in conditions that jeopardize patient privacy or undertake long commutes just to talk to patients on video. The V.A. is already suffering from “severe” shortages of psychologists and psychiatrists, according to an agency report.

“They were going to put us around conference tables with headsets and laptops,” said Dr. Nicole Stromberg, 61, an addiction psychiatrist who retired on Thursday after 11 years at the V.A., much of it spent in leadership positions.

For the past five years, Dr. Stromberg has been working remotely, seeing around 500 veterans spread out across 35 counties in Michigan. She said terminating treatment with her patients has been so painful that she often leaves the sessions crying.

“It’s really exhausting and really hard and not even what I want to do,” she said. “And I feel guilty, because I feel like doctors should be sticking it out until the end. That’s the commitment we made.”

The V.A. pioneered telehealth two decades ago to help reach its geographically dispersed patient population, hiring mental health providers for fully remote jobs to treat veterans in other counties or even states. During the first Trump administration, the V.A. aggressively expanded its use of virtual mental health care, which it considered a successful innovation.

Advertisement

But mandating that federal employees work from the office has been a priority for Elon Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency — in part, the billionaire explained in a Wall Street Journal opinion essay he cowrote shortly after the election, because it “would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome.”

Mr. Kasperowicz characterized the current pushback as coming from “a small but vocal minority” of V.A. employees who were “telling tall tales in a desperate attempt to avoid returning to the office at all costs.”

Referring to the photographs provided to The Times, he disputed that patient confidentiality was being violated and said that in each location, clinicians could get access to private offices when needed.

“The central — and false — premise of your hit piece is that V.A. employees are improperly discussing sensitive info in crowded spaces,” he said. “These photos show the opposite of that. They actually undermine the false narrative The New York Times is trying to push.”

Mr. Kasperowicz said no sensitive information was discussed in the medical bay in the Florida facility, which he described as “appropriately private.” He acknowledged issues at two V.A. facilities highlighted by The Times but said officials had worked to resolve them.

Advertisement

In Michigan, for instance, Mr. Kasperowicz confirmed that officials at a clinic outside Grand Rapids had learned on April 16 of a “small group of telehealth providers performing virtual visits in a converted conference room.” But he said that, 12 days after the situation came to light, the providers had been given access to smaller private spaces for sensitive exchanges.

The agency was “no longer a job where the status quo is to phone it in from home,” he added.

A White House spokeswoman said that the return-to-office mandate would mean “better services for our veterans.”

“Many private companies are ending remote work because numerous studies show that employees are more productive and collaborative in-person,” Anna Kelly, the spokeswoman, wrote in a statement.

Deadlines for returning to office were set for April and May. At the time of the executive order, more than 20 percent of the V.A.’s staff had been working remotely.

Advertisement

The anticipated impact of the return-to-office mandate on V.A. mental health prompted protests from medical and professional organizations after an initial Times report in March.

In an April 11 letter, the chief executive of the National Association of Social Workers warned V.A. Secretary Doug Collins that providers working in such spaces were “at serious risk of violating HIPAA regulations and other federal privacy laws.”

“These conditions create profound ethical concerns and could endanger the professional licensure of V.A. social workers,” Anthony Estreet wrote.

Leaders of the American Psychiatric Association and American Psychological Association also appealed to Mr. Collins, asking that mental health providers be exempted from the return-to-work order lest they quit, leaving their patients stranded without care.

Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, the president of the American Nurses Association, said many nurses have approached her to report overcrowded conditions that risked violating patient privacy laws.

Advertisement

“There’s not enough office space,” she said. “People are doubled up. People are working in hallways.”

The V.A.’s expansion of telehealth in Mr. Trump’s first term has helped veterans, said Dr. Harold Kudler, who served as the agency’s chief consultant for mental health services from 2014 to 2018.

By 2023, virtual care made up 54 percent of mental health visits. Studies showed that teletherapy had lowered the cost of care and reduced wait times by an average of 25 days. A study of rural veterans found a 22 percent reduction in the likelihood of suicidal behavior among those provided care over video tablets.

Dr. Kudler, who is now in private practice, said in his conversations with current V.A. personnel that many had expressed “despair” about “abrupt and unreasoning change.”

“Once you break that system that way, it’s going to be a very long time coming back,” he said.

Advertisement

Alarms have sounded from within the agency about return-to-office mandates. Kevin Galpin, a top V.A. official who oversees teletherapy, wrote in a memo last month that clinicians require “private, secure and therapeutic office spaces” to deliver care, and that open-plan work stations “are inconsistent with this guidance,” according to a copy reviewed by The Times. (Mr. Galpin declined to comment.)

In interviews, V.A. clinicians described a chaotic spring, as two large waves of employees were given deadlines to report to a federal office space. Some described having to work out of hallways or split offices the size of closets. Many spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retribution.

A social worker who treats homeless veterans in California said she was placed with a dozen other staff members in a windowless mailroom that was so crowded with undelivered packages that she had to move boxes to reach her cubicle.

In Ohio, the V.A. asked more than 70 telehealth providers to start working out of a suburban office park, but many were unable to log into the V.A.’s computer system, according to an employee. Mr. Kasperowicz said that internet equipment there had failed and that workers have been allowed to work from home while repairs are made.

Many clinicians said the changes had prompted them to start looking for jobs outside the agency, which often pay significantly higher salaries.

Advertisement

Dr. Anil Kulangara and Dr. Catherine Shim, married psychiatrists who had been treating patients remotely at the American Lake clinic in Tacoma, Wash., said they were deeply discouraged on April 14, when they reported to the office spaces they had been assigned.

“It seemed a little unreal, almost laughable,” Dr. Kulangara said. They weren’t given keys for the building or the office, which still contained the belongings of previous occupants. When they were able to get in, they discovered that the I.T. setup would not allow them to see patients, so they raced home, they said.

“At no point in this did anyone explain why this was important to do, other than to comply” with an executive order, Dr. Kulangara said. “We tried. It’s not worth it, and it doesn’t make any sense. It was such an obvious harm to us and to our patients and no one seemed willing to push back.”

Both doctors officially resigned last week, citing the discontinuation of remote work as the reason. Though both have received offers for new jobs, Dr. Kulangara said, “we have been literally sick to our stomachs thinking of what is going to happen to our patients,” a combined case load of more than 500 veterans suffering from PTSD, sexual trauma and severe mental illness.

In total, 10 clinicians told The Times that they had left their jobs, or were in the process of leaving, because of the changes.

Advertisement

One psychiatrist said she decided to quit as soon as she learned she would have to see patients over a video link from an open-plan office. Finding a new job was easy: Within weeks, she said, she had three offers, including one that paid 20 percent more than the V.A.

Another psychiatrist practicing in Virginia, who was hired for a fully remote position, said she has accepted a new job in the private sector rather than commute to a V.A. building to conduct virtual treatment, which would restrict the time she spends with her young children.

The psychiatrist said it took less than two weeks to find a new job. But she is torn about the decision, because it means terminating treatment with 600 veterans who need care.

“I’m angry,” she said. “I have one patient on hospice — he is recounting trauma, he only has a few months left to live, and I don’t think he will be rescheduled before he passes.”

The Trump administration has said it plans to eliminate 80,000 V.A. jobs, or roughly one-sixth of the total work force, but officials say the layoffs will target administrative and support staff and will have no affect on patient care.

Advertisement

Dr. Stromberg, the psychiatrist from Michigan, said her anxiety began mounting when V.A. clinicians were told to remove Pride flags and stop using pronoun identifiers. As an administrator, she had supported D.E.I. programs, so she feared she would be targeted in the layoffs.

The return-to-office order, she said, left her little choice but to retire early.

Six weeks ago, she began telling patients that she was terminating their treatment. They are mostly veterans who returned from war with undiagnosed PTSD and struggle with addiction, she said; by her estimate, a quarter of them have already made suicide attempts. And it is unlikely that her position will be filled after her departure, she said.

“Termination is difficult anyway,” she said. “A psychiatrist and a patient, it’s an oddly intimate relationship.”

Nearly all of them have responded with hurt and confusion, Dr. Stromberg said: Their sessions were virtual, so why did it matter where she was? She reminds them of the executive order that Mr. Trump signed on Jan. 20, phasing out remote work for federal employees, one of his first official acts.

Advertisement

“This was not an easy decision,” she said. “It’s not the right one for my patients. And it’s one I’m really feeling forced to make.”

Kitty Bennett, Susan C. Beachy and Kirsten Noyes contributed research.

Health

Parkinson’s risk increases with exposure to common chemical, study suggests

Published

on

Parkinson’s risk increases with exposure to common chemical, study suggests

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A pesticide commonly used in America’s food supply has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, new research suggests.

A UCLA study published in the journal Springer Nature Link suggests that exposure to chlorpyrifos could increase the risk of the neurological disease.

The chemical is often used on agricultural products like soybeans, fruit and nut trees, broccoli, cauliflower and other row crops, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

EARLY PARKINSON’S COULD BE DETECTED DECADES BEFORE SYMPTOMS WITH SIMPLE BLOOD TEST

Advertisement

The study compared 829 people with Parkinson’s to 824 people without the disease over a 45-year period, focusing on their proximity to chlorpyrifos.

The researchers also conducted mouse experiments, where mice inhaled the pesticide as humans would for 11 weeks. Experiments were also carried out on zebrafish to study cell-level brain damage.

Chlorpyrifos is often used on agricultural products like soybeans, fruit and nut trees, broccoli, cauliflower and other row crops, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (iStock)

In humans, the study revealed that long-term exposure to chlorpyrifos led to more than a 2.5 times higher risk of Parkinson’s.

In mice, exposure to the pesticide caused movement problems similar to Parkinson’s symptoms, loss of dopamine-producing neurons, increased brain inflammation and build-up of harmful proteins.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Zebrafish suffered brain cell death and damage linked to failure in the cell’s “cleanup system,” according to the study press release.

Dr. Jeff Bronstein, director of the Movement Disorders Program at UCLA and professor of neurology and molecular toxicology, noted that previous human studies also suggested an association between chlorpyrifos exposure and Parkinson’s.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

“[We were] surprised that the mechanism of toxicity was apparent in both mice and zebrafish,” he said. “We rarely find such consistent results in different animal models.”

Advertisement

A researcher commented that the consistency in results between human and animal subjects is “rare.” (iStock)

The researcher emphasized that the association between pesticide exposure and Parkinson’s was “very strong,” and the longer someone was exposed, the higher the risk became.

“People should avoid exposure to CPF and similar pesticides (organophosphates) by not using them in their home, eating organics, and washing fruits and vegetables before eating them,” Bronstein advised.

Study limitations

The study did have some limitations, the researchers acknowledged, primarily that it was observational, meaning it shows an association but cannot prove causation.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Advertisement

It also estimated exposure based on participants’ locations, and did not measure diet, indoor exposure or personal lifestyle behaviors. Additionally, the results of the animal models can’t be translated directly to humans.

There was also the possibility that chlorpyrifos was used along with other chemicals, which means it could be difficult to measure its specific impact, the study noted.

Chlorpyrifos is used to control different kinds of pests, like termites, mosquitoes and roundworms, among crops. (iStock)

Industry reaction

Chlorpyrifos is used to control different kinds of pests, like termites, mosquitoes and roundworms, among crops, according to the National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC) at Oregon State University.

People can be exposed to the pesticide by breathing it in or by consuming contaminated food or water.

Advertisement

In 2021, the EPA banned the use of chlorpyrifos on food crops, but a federal appeals court overturned that decision in 2023, allowing its use to resume on some crops while regulators revisit the rule.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

In January 2026, the EPA issued an update outlining plans to move forward with a rule that would ban most uses of chlorpyrifos.

“Chlorpyrifos is subject to registration review, a process required under FIFRA (the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) in which registered pesticides are comprehensively evaluated every 15 years against current safety standards and the latest scientific evidence,” the EPA said in a statement sent to Fox News Digital.

“EPA is currently developing a revised human health risk assessment for chlorpyrifos as part of that review, and will consider this study alongside any other relevant submissions,” the agency said in a statement sent to Fox News Digital. (Getty)

Advertisement

“EPA is currently developing a revised human health risk assessment for chlorpyrifos as part of that review, and will consider this study alongside any other relevant submissions. Where the science calls for stronger protections or tolerance revocations, EPA will act without hesitation and without delay.”

Fox News Digital reached out to several manufacturers of the chemical for comment.

“People should avoid exposure to CPF and similar pesticides.”

Corteva, an Indiana agrichemical company formed in 2019 through the merger of Dow Chemical and DuPont, announced in 2020 that it would end production of chlorpyrifos within the year, citing declining sales.

In April 2022, the German chemical company BASF requested the cancellation of its pesticide registrations for products containing chlorpyrifos. 

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“BASF does not manufacture chlorpyrifos and does not have any pesticide registrations issued by the U.S. EPA for chlorpyrifos-containing products,” the company told Fox News Digital. 

No products from Corteva or BASF were included in the study linking chlorpyrifos to Parkinson’s disease.

Continue Reading

Health

‘Call a Boomer’ payphones help cure loneliness, spark friendships across generations

Published

on

‘Call a Boomer’ payphones help cure loneliness, spark friendships across generations

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Along a bustling sidewalk in Boston, a bright yellow payphone invites folks to “call a Boomer.”

Almost 3,000 miles away in Reno, Nevada, a nearly identical phone prompts residents of Sierra Manor – an apartment complex for seniors – to “Call a Zoomer.” The goal is simple: to get strangers to talk to each other.

The project, often referred to as simply “Call a Boomer,” is the latest initiative from Matter Neuroscience, a New York-based company dedicated to mapping the “biomarkers of happiness.”

NEARLY HALF OF SENIORS IMPROVE WITH AGE — AND RESEARCHERS THINK THEY KNOW WHY

Advertisement

By connecting “two of the loneliest demographics” (older adults and younger adults), the project aims to prove that on a molecular level, “humans need one another in order to be happy,” according to Calla Kessler, a social strategist at Matter Neuroscience.

Along a bustling sidewalk in Boston, a bright yellow payphone invites folks to “Call a Boomer.” (Matter Neuroscience)

“Younger adults and older adults tend to experience the highest levels of loneliness of any age group,” the company wrote on its website. “So the goal of this project is to inspire generational connection through meaningful conversations, despite differences in age, lifestyle or politics.”

GRANDPARENTS WHO BABYSIT THEIR GRANDCHILDREN STAY MENTALLY SHARPER, NEW STUDY REVEALS

The hope, according to Kessler, is that the calls will shift the brain’s focus from stress to bonding.

Advertisement

“Our neuroscience angle is cannabinoids over cortisol,” Kessler told Fox News Digital. “Cannabinoids are the feel-good neurotransmitter in our brain that creates that warm feeling with a friendship — and when you activate cannabinoids, you’re counteracting the negative effects of cortisol, which is our primary stress hormone.”

“Younger adults and older adults tend to experience the highest levels of loneliness of any age group,” the company noted. (Matter Neuroscience)

This isn’t Matter’s first round of payphones. Its initial experiment connected one of the most liberal cities in the U.S. (San Francisco) with one of the most conservative (Abilene, Texas).

“We basically just wanted people to find common ground and encourage people to think beyond labels,” Kessler said.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Advertisement

She noted that the negative results were “almost negligible,” with most participants enjoying their time speaking to different people.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Now, the focus has shifted from political labels to generational divides.

The negative results have beem “almost negligible,” with most participants enjoying their time speaking to different people. (Matter Neuroscience)

As the “Call a Boomer” experiment continues, the team is busy collecting audio files of these intergenerational chats to prove that simple connections with other humans can help improve mental health.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“Our research is essentially trying to find a non-pharmaceutical cure to depression,” Kessler added.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Looking ahead, she said, “we’ll definitely be doing fun things that we hope get people’s attention and inspire them to learn a little more about themselves.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Family pleads for help as teen faces life-threatening bone marrow failure

Published

on

Family pleads for help as teen faces life-threatening bone marrow failure

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A New York City father is desperately seeking a donor to save his teenage son’s life.

Max Uribe, now 15 and a high-school freshman, has just weeks until he will need to be hospitalized with a rare blood disorder that could lead to a deadly cancer.

“Max was just 6 when we first noticed there was something wrong with his blood counts,” his father, Juan Uribe, told Fox News Digital. “At the time, we thought it was due to a viral infection, but they never fully recovered back to their normal level.”

RFK JR. ANNOUNCES ‘HISTORIC CRACKDOWN’ ON ‘BROKEN’ ORGAN DONATION SYSTEM

Advertisement

In December 2024, Max’s condition grew worse, and he was diagnosed with clonal cytopenia, a condition involving the blood and bone marrow.

“All three of his blood counts are low — red, white and platelets,” Uribe said. 

Max Uribe, pictured with his parents and sister, is in urgent need of a stem cell transplant to save his life. (Uribe Family)

In August 2025, another bone marrow biopsy revealed that Max is on a path to bone marrow failure, creating an urgent need for a stem cell transplant.

“The disease has continued to progress, as his blood counts continue to drop, and therefore, we have to take him to transplant in May of this year,” Uribe said.

Advertisement

MOM WITH NO SYMPTOMS HAD STAGE 4 COLORECTAL CANCER — AND A RARE SURGERY SAVED HER LIFE

If left untreated, Max’s condition could lead to MDS (myelodysplastic syndrome), a type of blood cancer, and from there possibly into acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

A bone marrow match must have a specific type of HLA (human leukocyte antigen), which are proteins found on the surface of most cells in the body, according to the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP).

Max Uribe, pictured with his parents, will be hospitalized for a transplant in May, as his blood count has been steadily decreasing. (Uribe Family)

The closer the donor’s HLA markers are to the patient’s, the more likely the body will accept the new cells without a high risk of complications.

Advertisement

People from the same ethnic background are more likely to share similar HLA types, meaning a patient is most likely to find a compatible donor among individuals with similar ancestry, per the NMDP.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Non-Hispanic White patients have a 79% chance of a perfect match. That drops to 49% for Hispanic/Latino patients, 29% for Black patients and even lower for mixed ancestries, the NMDP reports.

Because Max is a “very rare combination” of half-Colombian from his father and a mix of Italian, British and German from his mother, his path to a perfect match is proving much more difficult, Uribe noted.

“For a kid like Max, with complex, mixed heritage, the math is devastating.”

Advertisement

“For a kid like Max, with complex, mixed heritage, the math is devastating,” he said. “The thinking is, we need large numbers if we’re going to have that perfect match for my son.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Max, who participates in competitive tennis and varsity wrestling, just had additional blood work done on Friday, which revealed that his counts continue to plummet.

“We’re at the point where this is beginning to manifest a bit more, which is why the urgency is so critical,” Uribe said.

Because Max is a “very rare combination” of half-Colombian from his father and a mix of Italian, British and German from his mother, his path to a perfect match is proving much more difficult. (Uribe Family)

Advertisement

If a donor is not secured by Max’s hospitalization in May, the medical team will have to proceed with a partial match, which is not ideal for a number of reasons.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“The survival rate is meaningfully lower with a partial match, and there’s more risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD), which could lead to complications in the process,” Uribe said. With GVHD, the donor cells begin to attack the body.

Max Uribe, an active athlete, is on a path to bone marrow failure, requiring a stem cell transplant. (Uribe Family)

To help prevent this with a partial match, Max would likely need chemotherapy and immunosuppressants for a longer period of time, which could weaken his immune system.

Advertisement

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Anyone interested in donating can order a free test kit on the Team Max website. The kit includes a quick cheek swab that is sent back to the lab to determine whether someone is a match.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending