Connect with us

Health

New York Doctor Indicted in Louisiana for Sending Abortion Pills There

Published

on

New York Doctor Indicted in Louisiana for Sending Abortion Pills There

A state grand jury in Louisiana has indicted a New York doctor for providing abortion pills to a Louisiana resident. The case appears to be the first time criminal charges have been filed against an abortion provider for sending pills into a state with an abortion ban.

The charges mark a new chapter in an escalating showdown between states that ban abortion and those that want to protect and expand access to it. It is challenging one of the foremost strategies used by states that support abortion rights: shield laws intended to provide legal protection to doctors who prescribe and send abortion pills to states with bans.

The charges were brought against Dr. Margaret Carpenter, who was operating under New York’s telemedicine abortion shield law, which stipulates that New York authorities will not cooperate with prosecutions or other legal actions filed against New York abortion providers by other states.

Telemedicine abortion shield laws, which have been adopted by eight states so far, have become a significant avenue for providing access to abortion for women in states with bans without requiring them to leave their state. Doctors, nurse practitioners and other health care providers in states with shield laws have been sending more than 10,000 abortion pills per month to states with abortion bans or restrictions.

Legal experts said the case ratchets up the legal wars over abortion and will almost certainly end up in federal court and possibly the Supreme Court. It is expected to become a major test of whether states can apply criminal laws to people acting outside their borders.

Advertisement

Since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturning the national right to abortion, the United States has been divided between states that restrict abortion and states that protect abortion.

“There’s just been a sense that if you were in a blue state, you’re shielded from the consequences of Dobbs,” said Mary Ziegler, a law professor and abortion expert at the University of California, Davis. “Prosecutions like this undermine that assumption, and we don’t know exactly how, or how much, but you can’t take that for granted.”

Federal courts will have to sort out “where the line will be drawn and even which precedents the courts will be willing to overrule,” she said. “It’s not clear what will happen.”

The Louisiana indictment, by a grand jury in West Baton Rouge Parish, follows what is believed to be the first civil suit filed against an abortion provider in a shield-law state. That case was filed in December by the Texas attorney general, Ken Paxton, also against Dr. Carpenter, for prescribing and sending pills to a woman in Texas.

On Friday, Tony Clayton, the district attorney who oversees West Baton Rouge, said in an interview, “I just don’t know under what theory could a doctor be thinking that you should ship your pills to Louisiana to abort our citizens’ babies.”

Advertisement

He added: “The pill may be legal in New York. It’s not legal in Louisiana.”

In response to the charges, Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York said in a video posted on X, “I will never, under any circumstances, turn this doctor over to the state of Louisiana under any extradition request.” She pledged “to do everything I can to protect this doctor and allow her to continue the work that she’s doing that is so essential.”

The use of abortion medication has grown significantly in recent years. Medication abortions now account for nearly two-thirds of pregnancy terminations in the United States. The method is typically used through 12 weeks of pregnancy and involves two drugs — mifepristone, which stops a pregnancy from developing, followed a day or two later by misoprostol, which causes contractions similar to a miscarriage.

In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration lifted a rule requiring patients to obtain mifepristone in person, allowing the medication to be sent through the mail.

The ability to mail the medications, bolstered by shield laws, has made it much more difficult for states with bans to prevent their residents from getting access to abortion. The actions filed against Dr. Carpenter in Texas and Louisiana are part of a campaign to limit that access.

Advertisement

Abortion opponents are also pressing the Trump administration to revive a 151-year-old federal anti-vice law known as the Comstock Act and use it to try to prevent the mailing of abortion pills.

In the Louisiana case, the grand jury indicted Dr. Carpenter and her medical practice for “criminal abortion by means of abortion-inducing drugs.”

Dr. Carpenter, of New Paltz, N.Y., did not comment on the case on Friday, and efforts to reach lawyers representing her were unsuccessful.

The court documents, which include few details, indicate that the case involved a girl who was under 18 whose mother ordered abortion pills and gave them to her in April 2024. The mother was also charged with violating the state’s abortion ban.

Mr. Clayton, the West Baton Rouge district attorney, said the authorities became aware of the case after a police officer responded to a 911 call placed by the teenager.

Advertisement

“The officer at the time thought he was dealing with a child who was having a miscarriage,” Mr. Clayton said. After the police took the teenager to a hospital, the authorities learned that she had taken abortion medication and the investigation became criminal, he said.

Mr. Clayton, who declined to disclose the age or other details about the girl, said that “the evidence will show that the child had planned a reveal party” and did not want an abortion. He said that charges would not be filed against the girl.

Police records show that the mother, whose name The New York Times is not disclosing to protect the identity of her daughter, was arrested and released on bond. Attempts to reach her on Friday were unsuccessful.

“The allegations in this case have nothing to do with reproductive health care,” said Liz Murrill, the state attorney general. “This is about coercion. This is about forcing somebody to have an abortion who didn’t want one.”

The attorney general of New York, Letitia James, said in a statement, “This cowardly attempt out of Louisiana to weaponize the law against out-of-state providers is unjust and un-American.”

Advertisement

She added: “Medication abortion is safe, effective and necessary, and New York will ensure that it remains available to all Americans who need it.”

Dr. Carpenter is a specialist in reproductive health and a co-founder of the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, an organization that advocates access to telehealth abortion in all 50 states.

“Shield laws across the country enable licensed health care professionals to successfully deliver reproductive health care to patients in under-resourced areas nationwide,” the coalition said in a statement on Friday, adding, “This state-sponsored effort to prosecute a doctor providing safe and effective care should alarm everyone.”

Anti-abortion activists praised the Louisiana charges.

“This case exposes how mail-order abortion drugs are fueling an epidemic of coercion, a new form of domestic violence against mothers and their babies,” Katie Daniel, director of legal affairs for SBA Pro-Life America, said in a statement. The statement commended Louisiana for tightening laws against abortion medication and said, “In blue states, pro-abortion politicians are doing the polar opposite, shielding abortionists.”

Advertisement

In the Texas lawsuit, Dr. Carpenter was accused of providing abortion pills to a 20-year-old woman in July. The suit said the woman later asked the “biological father of her unborn child” to take her to the emergency room because of “severe bleeding,” and he learned at that time that she was nine weeks pregnant.

Mr. Paxton said that by filing the Texas lawsuit, he was seeking to have the court stop Dr. Carpenter from continuing to provide abortion medication to patients in Texas, and to apply Texas’ ban on abortion to her. The ban carries a penalty of at least $100,000 for each violation.

Kirsten Noyes contributed research.

Health

New weight-loss shot shows major fat reduction, but experts urge caution

Published

on

New weight-loss shot shows major fat reduction, but experts urge caution

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An experimental medication was shown to help boost weight loss by up to 20%, a study found.

Eloralintide, a once-weekly injectable manufactured by Eli Lilly in Indianapolis, led to “meaningful, dose-dependent weight loss” in adults who were overweight or obese but did not have diabetes, according to a press release.

The drug was generally well-tolerated by the study participants.

An experimental medication was shown to help boost weight loss by up to 20%, a study found. (iStock)

Advertisement

The Phase 2 trial, which was funded by Eli Lilly, included 263 adults. After 48 weeks, they had lost between 9.5% and 20.1% of their body weight, compared to 0.4% for those taking the placebo.

Treatment with eloralintide was also linked to improvements in waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profiles, glycemic control and markers of inflammation, all of which can increase cardiometabolic risk, according to the researchers.

WEIGHT LOSS DRUGS COULD ADD YEARS TO AMERICANS’ LIVES, RESEARCHERS PROJECT

“The weight loss we saw in the study is clinically impactful,” lead study author Liana K. Billings, M.D., director of clinical and genetics research in diabetes and cardiometabolic disease at Endeavor Health in Skokie, Illinois, said in the press release. 

“With this degree of weight loss in only 48 weeks, we see people having improvement or resolution in other conditions like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea and more weight-related conditions.”

Advertisement

Eloralintide, a once-weekly injectable manufactured by Eli Lilly in Indianapolis, led to “meaningful, dose-dependent weight loss” in adults who were overweight or obese but did not have diabetes. (Getty Images)

“Furthermore, in the study, we did not see a nadir or plateau of weight loss, so I would expect weight loss to continue if the study continued for a longer duration. Additionally, up to 90% of participants on eloralintide improved by at least one BMI category,” she added.

The results were published in The Lancet and presented at ObesityWeek 2025 in Atlanta, Georgia, earlier this month.

AMERICA’S FATTEST STATES REVEALED — AND HOW OZEMPIC IS CHANGING THE MAP

While popular GLP-1 drugs — including Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and Zepbound — work by mimicking the gut hormone GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1), eloralintide is a selective amylin receptor agonist that works by mimicking a pancreas hormone called amylin.

Advertisement

Similar to GLP-1s, it helps to slow digestion, reduce appetite and control blood sugar after meals. It has not yet been FDA-approved for clinical use.

While GLP-1 drugs work by mimicking the gut hormone GLP-1, eloralintide is a selective amylin receptor agonist that works by mimicking a pancreas hormone called amylin. (iStock)

The biggest side effects noted for eloralintide were mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue, the researchers noted. These effects were greater at higher doses.

“Obesity is a complex condition, and no single treatment works for everyone,” said Billings.

“To truly address each patient’s needs, we need therapies with different mechanisms of action so that each person can receive the treatment that offers the best balance of effectiveness and tolerability for them.”

Advertisement

COULD GLP-1 WEIGHT-LOSS MEDICATIONS LIKE OZEMPIC BECOME THE ‘EVERYTHING DRUG’?

Based on the trial results, the reseachers plan to launch Phase 3 clinical studies for obesity treatment by the end of this year, the president of Lilly Cardiometabolic Health confirmed to Fox News Digital. The drug is also being evaluated for use in combination with GLP-1 medications.

Dr. Brett Osborn, a Florida neurosurgeon and longevity expert, shared some concerns about the new anti-obesity agents being developed.

“Bottom line: If an individual has an experienced and competent physician supervising their care — and driving the formation of healthy habits in addition to simply using the medication — they will lose weight,” a doctor said. (iStock)

“Between all the agents out there, there is no way any person cannot lose weight when coupled with progressive resistance training and attention to their daily macronutrient intake, even if only a little,” the doctor, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

“Yet big pharma will continue to search for novel targets to introduce a new drug that will likely prove similarly, yet not more, efficacious than the current agents. There are enough agents out there to drive weight loss to a malnutrition status.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Osborn also noted that the lower cardiovascular risk associated with the drug was likely due to the participants losing body fat, which reduces the risk for all age-related diseases.

“Some side effects are rare or take time to show up, so it is important to monitor new drugs like eloralintide for safety over the long term.”

“Bottom line: If an individual has an experienced and competent physician supervising their care — and driving the formation of healthy habits in addition to simply using the medication — they will lose weight,” he said.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Sue Decotiis, M.D., a medical weight-loss doctor in New York City, also shared her thoughts on eloralintide’s potential as an alternative treatment.

“It seems that the more receptor systems that are influenced, the more weight a patient can lose,” she told Fox News Digital. “This is why tirzepatide (Mounjaro, Zepbound), which hits two receptors, induced more weight loss than Ozempic and Wegovy.”

“To truly address each patient’s needs, we need therapies with different mechanisms of action so that each person can receive the treatment that offers the best balance of effectiveness and tolerability for them,” a researcher said. (iStock)

“In my practice, I witnessed significantly better results with tirzepatide when patients were switched from Ozempic.”

Advertisement

Hitting more receptors may be the answer for those patients who do not respond well or who “hit the wall” with simpler drugs, according to Decotiis, who also was not involved in the study.

“For long-term safety and results, peptide drugs show promise,” she said.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Whitney Di Bona, in-house attorney and consumer safety advocate for Drugwatch, noted that while the Phase 2 results are “promising,” it is important to be cautious.

“These drugs have been used for years, but new safety concerns keep appearing,” the Florida-based expert told Fox News Digital. Some of those include a potentially serious eye condition, delayed stomach emptying, bowel obstruction and serious digestive problems, which have led to many lawsuits.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

“Some side effects are rare or take time to show up, so it is important to monitor new drugs like eloralintide for safety over the long term,” Di Bona advised. “Even with careful studies, some risks may only become clear after the drug is used by many people.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Natural Belly-Fat Burners That Help Women Over 50 Lose Weight Fast

Published

on

Natural Belly-Fat Burners That Help Women Over 50 Lose Weight Fast


Advertisement


Natural Belly-Fat Burners That Help Women Over 50 Lose Weight




















Advertisement











Advertisement




Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

‘Perfect storm’: Doctors warn of alarming rise in adult-onset food allergies

Published

on

‘Perfect storm’: Doctors warn of alarming rise in adult-onset food allergies

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

More adults are suddenly developing allergic reactions later in life — and experts aren’t sure why.

Nearly 50% of adults developed at least one food allergy in adulthood, according to a 2019 investigation published in JAMA.

Illana Golant, founder and CEO of the Food and Allergy Fund (FAF) in New York City, told Fox News Digital that she developed allergies in her 40s.

GUT IMBALANCE MAY BE DRIVING AMERICA’S FOOD ALLERGY EPIDEMIC, EXPERTS WARN

Advertisement

“That is not fully understood at all or recognized … we don’t know why they’re starting at certain points,” she said.

FAF hosted a forum last week in Washington, D.C., attended by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, FDA Chief Martin Makary and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya.

Nearly 50% of adults develop food allergies later in life, studies have shown. (iStock)

Health officials and researchers are investigating whether allergies may be caused by gut health microbes.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Makary shared how the function of microbiomes has evolved over time.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

The intestine hosts over a billion different types of bacteria, which normally live in balance, according to Makary.

“But when it’s altered by the modern-day diet and by antibiotics and other exposures … that disequilibrium can cause inflammation [and] health problems, and it may be implicated in food allergies,” he said.

Ilana Golant, FAF founder and CEO (left), chats with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Washington, D.C., at the Food Allergy Fund Forum. (Ashley J. DiMella/Fox News Digital)

Golant shared that there seems to be a “critical inflection point,” as some foods trigger adults more than children.

Advertisement

“Seafood shellfish [and] tree nuts seem to be proliferating among adults,” she noted.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Shellfish was the top allergen in adults, according to a 2018 survey of over 40,000 people that was published in the Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

Golant said she luckily knew about allergies when she had her first anaphylactic reaction.

“If I didn’t know about food allergies, I would have thought I was having a heart attack,” said the founder of the Food and Allergy Fund. (iStock)

Advertisement

“If I didn’t know about food allergies, I would have thought I was having a heart attack,” she said. “Genetics can’t change so quickly. In a generation, food allergies have skyrocketed.”

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Approximately one in 10 adults are affected by food allergies, according to FAF.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“It’s very much the perfect storm of a variety of environmental triggers,” Golant added. “We still don’t know which ones and … if there is one primary [trigger], but my guess is that more likely, it is a perfect storm.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending