Connect with us

Health

J. Robin Warren, Who Proved That Bacteria Cause Ulcers, Dies at 87

Published

on

J. Robin Warren, Who Proved That Bacteria Cause Ulcers, Dies at 87

Dr. J. Robin Warren, an Australian pathologist who shared a Nobel Prize for discovering that most stomach ulcers were caused by the bacterium Helicobacter pylori — and not, as had been widely believed, stress, alcohol or spicy foods — died on July 23 in Inglewood, Australia. He was 87.

His death, at a care home, was announced by the University of Western Australia in Perth, where he was an emeritus professor for many years. His daughter-in-law Gigi Warren said the cause was complications after a recent fall.

In 1984, Dr. Warren and his collaborator, the gastroenterologist Barry Marshall, published a paper in the British medical journal The Lancet describing their finding that the spiral-shaped bacterium now commonly called H. pylori festered in the stomachs of patients with ulcers and gastritis. Dr. Warren had first noticed the bacterium on a gastric biopsy sample in 1979.

The paper’s conclusion upended centuries of conventional wisdom about the cause of ulcers. (Psychoanalysts had even written of the “peptic ulcer personality.”) Doctors typically prescribed stress reduction, a bland diet and, starting in 1977, drugs like Tagamet and Zantac to tame the burning acids. Severe cases were sometimes treated with surgery.

When the study was published, gastroenterologists were skeptical. They expressed concern about whether to trust potentially paradigm-shifting findings made by two unknown researchers in Australia. And the idea that bacteria could even grow in the stomach was considered blasphemy.

Advertisement

“For about 100 years, or 1,000 years, the standard teaching in medicine was that the stomach was sterile and nothing grew there because of corrosive gastric juices,” Dr. Warren told The New York Times in 2005 after he and Dr. Marshall won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. “So everybody believed there were no bacteria in the stomach. When I said they were there, no one believed it.”

The study was also at odds with the marketing done by pharmaceutical companies, which had spent millions of dollars developing acid reduction drugs. Those medicines cleared up ulcers, but the condition often returned again and again. Dr. Warren and Dr. Marshall’s work suggested that antibiotics would be a more effective treatment.

“The prospect that antibiotics might cure ulcers was a serious threat to the world record profitability of the recently developed wonder drugs that stopped the secretion of gastric acid and healed ulcers rapidly,” Dr. William S. Hughes wrote in “The Great Ulcer War” (2014), a history of the Australian duo’s fight over proving that H. pylori caused ulcers.

Fed up with the skepticism and pushback after their paper was published, Dr. Marshall had a rather unconventional idea: infecting themselves with H. pylori.

“I didn’t like that idea at all,” Dr. Warren later said, “so I think I just said no.”

Advertisement

But Dr. Marshall went through with it, gulping down a broth of the bacterium. A few days later, he became severely ill with gastritis — the precursor to an ulcer.

That still wasn’t enough proof. It would take almost a decade for physicians to finally accept the findings and change how they treated ulcers: with antibiotics, just as they would treat any other bacterial infection.

“Now there is the possibility of curing the condition, which was unthought of before,” Hugo Gallo-Torres, a Food and Drug Administration official, said in 1994, adding, “We had treated ulcers with anti-secretory compounds for so many years, it was hard to accept that a germ, a bacterium, would produce a disease like that.”

John Robin Warren was born on June 11, 1937, in North Adelaide, Australia. His father, Roger, studied viticulture and was a winemaker. His mother, Helen (Verco) Warren, was a nurse who had dreams of becoming a doctor but couldn’t afford medical school.

He studied medicine at the University of Adelaide, graduating in 1961. He wanted to specialize in psychiatry, but he wasn’t accepted into the residency program. He chose clinical pathology instead, committing himself to a solitary life staring into a microscope.

Advertisement

“In practice, ‘Clinical Pathology’ meant mainly laboratory hematology, which I thoroughly enjoyed,” Dr. Warren wrote in his Nobel autobiography. “Although the usual work entailed reporting on blood smears and bone marrow, we had a wide range of other tasks, including examining feces for parasites, examining urine and testing skin and nails for fungus.”

In 1968, he became a pathologist at Royal Perth Hospital, which is affiliated with the University of Western Australia.

“He was a bit eccentric,” Dr. Marshall said in an interview. “You’re a pathologist living down in the basement there, cutting up dead bodies and that. So you didn’t have to be a people person really to succeed at that job.”

What Dr. Warren did have was a kind of scholarly stubbornness.

“He’s uninfluenced by other people’s opinions,” Dr. Marshall said, adding that even when colleagues laughed at their attempts to prove H. pylori caused ulcers, “as far as he’s concerned, that was the facts. And if you didn’t believe it, it’s because you were just incompetent or something.”

Advertisement

Dr. Warren married Winifred Williams, a psychiatrist, in 1962. She died in 1997. They had five children. (Complete information on survivors was not immediately available.)

At the outset of Dr. Warren’s obsession with H. pylori, his wife was among the few people in his life not to deem him crazy — though she was certainly qualified to do so.

“Before I met Barry, Win was the only person to accept my work and encourage me,” he wrote in his Nobel autobiography. “As a psychiatrist, she could have suggested I was mad. But she stood beside me and helped me when no one else would.”

Health

New cancer vaccine delivers stunning result against one of the deadliest skin cancers

Published

on

New cancer vaccine delivers stunning result against one of the deadliest skin cancers

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A new injectable therapy is showing positive results in reducing melanoma throughout a five-year period.

The personalized mRNA cancer therapy, called intismeran autogene, combined with the cancer immunotherapy drug KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), is a collaboration between Merck and Moderna.

The results from the phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in Chicago on May 27.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Advertisement

After about a five-year follow-up, the combo drug was found to reduce the risk of melanoma recurrence or death by 49% compared to pembrolizumab alone.

The researchers analyzed data from 157 patients with high-risk stage 3 and 4 melanoma whose cancer had been removed via surgery. The participants were split into two groups — one received the combo therapy and the other only received pembrolizumab, according to a press release.

The therapy was found to reduce the risk of melanoma recurrence or death by 49% compared to pembrolizumab alone after a five-year follow-up. (iStock)

The findings revealed that the combination group saw benefits that were “sustained and durable over time.”

Intismeran autogene is designed using mutations identified in a patient’s own tumor, with the intention of teaching the immune system what the cancer looks like so that it can recognize and attack it.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

According to the researchers, intismeran is “well-tolerated” with a “manageable” safety profile. 

The most commonly cited side effects of the personalized mRNA vaccine plus KEYTRUDA were fatigue, injection-site pain, chills, fever and headache. The researchers reported no new long-term safety concerns and no severe vaccine-related adverse events.

The combination therapy is currently being evaluated in a phase 3 study — the final confirmation stage.

Patients with late-stage melanoma have a “significant risk” of cancer recurrence, according to an expert. (iStock)

Advertisement

In a Merck press release from January, Kyle Holen, MD, Moderna’s senior vice president and head of development, oncology and therapeutics, noted that this data highlights the “potential of a prolonged benefit … in patients with resected high-risk melanoma.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“We continue to invest in our platform in oncology because of encouraging outcomes like these, which illustrate mRNA’s potential in cancer care,” he said.  

Dr. Marjorie Green, senior vice president and head of oncology, global clinical development at Merck Research Laboratories, also commented that for many patients with stage 3 or 4 melanoma, there is a “significant risk of recurrence following surgery.”

Researchers confirmed that the combination therapy is currently being evaluated in a phase 3 study. (iStock)

Advertisement

“As such, demonstrating the longer-term potential of intismeran autogene and KEYTRUDA to reduce the risk of recurrence for certain patients with melanoma is a meaningful milestone,” she said.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

The company cited encouraging five-year follow-up data and pointed to upcoming late-stage INTerpath trial results with Moderna in several hard-to-treat cancers.

Continue Reading

Health

New ways to prevent flu revealed in ‘accidental’ lab breakthrough, study finds

Published

on

New ways to prevent flu revealed in ‘accidental’ lab breakthrough, study finds

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An accidental lab discovery has opened the door to entirely new ways of preventing the flu.

While investigating how influenza replicates, researchers discovered that different flu strains use completely different strategies to infiltrate human cells, SWNS reported.

By targeting the specific molecules the viruses rely on, scientists found that they could block them from entering new cells and halt their replication altogether.

5 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE GETTING YOUR FLU SHOT, ACCORDING TO DOCTORS

Advertisement

Researchers say these “fundamental insights” into seasonal influenza highlight a clear path toward developing better preventive medications.

“The hope is that fundamental, curiosity-based research like this helps to pave the way for novel strategies to treat and prevent influenza infections,” principal investigator Dr. Emily Bruce, from the University of Vermont’s Larner College of Medicine, said in the SWNS report.

While investigating how influenza replicates, researchers discovered that different flu strains use completely different strategies to infiltrate human cells. (iStock)

While several flu strains cause illness, H1N1 and H3N2 influenza A viruses are the most common. However, current flu tests cannot differentiate between them, and clinical treatments are identical for both.

Although vaccines and antivirals are available, Bruce noted a “dire” need for better medications to stop the virus from spreading cell to xxcell.

Advertisement

“You don’t get sick when a virus is in one cell,” he noted. “You get sick because a virus replicates itself and goes into many more cells.”

HOW LONG YOU’RE CONTAGIOUS WITH THE FLU — AND WHEN IT’S SAFE TO GO OUT

The study, which was published in The Journal of Virology, originally aimed to map how viral RNA segments are transported within cells to create new viral particles.

The team used H1N1 and H3N2 viruses isolated from the nasal passages of positive patients in 2022.

Clinical treatments remain identical for both primary strains of the flu virus. (iStock)

Advertisement

During the investigation, the team unexpectedly stumbled upon a cellular pathway that blocked the virus from entering lung cells, SWNS reported.

RESEARCHERS LOCKED FLU PATIENTS IN A HOTEL WITH HEALTHY ADULTS — NO ONE GOT SICK

The data revealed that when a specific human protein called Rab11B was depleted, H3N2 viruses failed to enter human lung cells. H1N1 viruses were completely unaffected.

Using reverse genetics, the team mapped this defect and uncovered a brand-new, H3N2-specific role for Rab11B during viral entry.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Advertisement

This discovery challenged the scientific assumption that all flu viruses enter cells the same way.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“Viruses are like pirates from different countries hijacking someone’s ship,” Bruce said. “Different viruses, like different types of pirates, use different methods to get onboard.”

This discovery challenged the scientific assumption that all flu viruses enter cells the same way. (iStock)

“We had previously thought that all flu viruses used the same way to get into a cell, but we discovered that this is not true,” she went on. “H1N1 and H3N2 need different proteins to get in, and if you get rid of the right protein, a specific virus can’t get in.”

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

While these findings identify a critical cellular pathway for viral entry, the study was conducted using isolated cells, the researchers acknowledged.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Further research is needed to determine whether blocking the protein is safe and effective within a live, complex human respiratory system.

Bruce and the team hope to conduct further research to determine whether this Rab11B-dependency is a fundamental property of H3N2, or if it’s a trait unique to currently circulating flu strains.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

One extra serving of processed meat a day linked to higher cancer risk

Published

on

One extra serving of processed meat a day linked to higher cancer risk

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Eating processed meat like ham, sausage and bacon may be linked to a higher risk of certain types of cancer, according to new research.

While health organizations have already confirmed that processed meat can contribute to colon cancer, this study looked closer at cancers in the upper digestive tract, where the link has historically been less clear.

To understand these connections, researchers from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), one of the world’s largest long-term nutrition and cancer cohorts, tracked the health and diets of 450,112 people across Europe for an average of 14 years. 

FREQUENT HEARTBURN MAY BE A WARNING SIGN OF A MORE DANGEROUS CONDITION, DOCTOR SAYS

Advertisement

The study group included 131,426 men and 318,686 women, according to the study’s press release.

During the follow-up period, 876 people developed stomach cancer and 215 people developed esophageal adenocarcinoma, which is cancer of the tube connecting the mouth to the stomach.

For female participants, eating both processed meat and white meat was linked to an increased risk of developing the disease. (iStock)

Researchers tracked where the stomach cancers grew, separating them into the upper part of the stomach near the throat and the lower part of the stomach.

The researchers also sorted the tumors into two categories based on how the cancer cells appeared under a microscope: intestinal, which forms more organized structures, and diffuse, in which the cells are more scattered throughout the tissue.

Advertisement

BACTERIA IN YOUR MOUTH MAY TRAVEL TO THE GUT AND TRIGGER STOMACH CANCER, RESEARCH FINDS

After adjusting for other lifestyle factors, the researchers found that for every extra 30 grams of processed meat a person ate per day, their overall risk of stomach cancer went up by 9%. Eating that same extra 30 grams a day was also linked to a 13% higher risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

A standard single slice of regular deli-sliced ham or lunch meat averages around 28 grams, according to USDA data and nutritional tracking databases.

An extra 20 grams of white meat, such as chicken and turkey, was linked to a 12% higher risk of cancer in the main body of the stomach. (iStock)

An extra 20 grams of white meat, such as chicken or turkey, was linked to a 12% higher risk of cancer in the main body of the stomach, the researchers noted.

Advertisement

The study also revealed differences between men and women. For male participants, only processed meat showed a clear, statistically significant link to a higher risk of stomach cancer. For female participants, however, eating both processed meat and white meat was linked to an increased risk.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

These findings align with global health benchmarks, particularly those established by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer.

The agency has long classified processed meat as a known human carcinogen, primarily due to its strong, well-documented links to colorectal cancer.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

However, health organizations have also consistently pointed to a potential, yet less definitive, relationship between these meats and cancers of the stomach.

Eating 30 grams of processed meat a day, or the equivalent to one slice of ham, was linked to a 13% higher risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. (iStock)

Further scientific investigation is needed to confirm the findings and to account for other underlying risk factors, such as certain stomach infections, which could interact with dietary habits.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

A key limitation of the study is its reliance on self-reported diets, which can sometimes lead to inaccuracies in how participants recall their meat consumption over time, the researchers noted.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The findings were published in the International Journal of Cancer.

Fox News Digital reached out to the researchers requesting comment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending