Connect with us

Fitness

Why The Heart Exercise ‘Sweet Spot’ May Be 560 Minutes Weekly, Not 150

Published

on

Why The Heart Exercise ‘Sweet Spot’ May Be 560 Minutes Weekly, Not 150

(Photo by Prostock-studio on Shutterstock)

The Standard Exercise Guideline Cuts Heart Risk by Only 8%, New Data Show

In A Nutshell

  • Hitting the standard 150-minutes-per-week exercise guideline was associated with only about an 8% to 9% reduction in heart disease risk across all fitness levels, a reduction the researchers describe as “consistent but modest.”
  • Cutting heart disease risk by 30% or more appeared to require exercise volumes roughly three to four times higher than the minimum recommendation, around 560 to 610 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity per week.
  • A person’s cardiorespiratory fitness level independently contributed to lower heart disease risk beyond what exercise volume alone explained, with each additional unit of fitness linked to approximately 2% lower risk.

For decades, the exercise advice handed out in doctor’s offices, schools, and government health campaigns has told everyone to get at least 150 minutes of moderate activity per week, and your heart will thank you. Millions of Americans have taken that suggestion very seriously, treating it as a finish line of sorts. A new large-scale study suggests it may be closer to a starting block.

Published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, the research tracked more than 17,000 adults over nearly eight years and found that hitting the standard 150-minute weekly target was associated with only about an 8% to 9% reduction in heart disease risk. To cut that risk by 30% or more, the data pointed to a much higher threshold: somewhere around 560 to 610 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity per week. That’s roughly an hour and a half of moderate-to-vigorous activity per day.

Beyond raw minutes, the study identified a second factor that most public health guidelines barely acknowledge: how physically fit a person already is. Even after accounting for how much someone exercised, people with higher cardiorespiratory fitness, basically how well the heart and lungs deliver oxygen during exertion, had meaningfully lower heart disease risk. Fitness, the data suggest, may also play an independent protective role that extra exercise time alone doesn’t fully replicate.

What the 150-Minute Guideline Actually Delivers

To understand what was measured, it helps to understand how it was measured. Researchers drew on data from the UK Biobank, a large British health research database that recruited around 500,000 adults between the ages of 40 and 69. For this study, the team focused on a subset of roughly 17,000 participants who wore a wrist-based motion sensor for seven consecutive days. That device-based measurement is a meaningful advantage over most prior research, which relied on people self-reporting their own exercise habits, a method well-known for overestimating actual activity levels.

Participants also completed a stationary bike test at enrollment, which allowed researchers to estimate each person’s cardiorespiratory fitness level. After filtering for those without prior heart disease and with complete data, 17,088 people made it into the final analysis.

Advertisement

Over a median follow-up of just under eight years, 1,233 of those participants experienced a cardiovascular event: irregular heart rhythms, heart attacks, heart failure, or stroke. Researchers used an advanced statistical model to map how different combinations of weekly exercise volume and fitness level related to those outcomes.

What emerged was a clear tiered picture. At the guideline level of 150 minutes per week, the risk reduction was described by the researchers as “consistent but modest,” coming in at roughly 8% to 9% across all fitness levels. To push that figure to 20%, participants needed approximately 340 to 370 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity per week, more than double the recommendation. Reaching a 30% reduction required jumping to roughly 560 to 610 minutes per week.

Even robust cardiovascular fitness failed to protect against the health pitfalls of sitting.
A new study found that 150 minutes of weekly exercise cuts heart disease risk by only 8–9%. Meaningful protection may require up to 610 weekly. (Foto de Alexander Redl en Unsplash)

Why Fitness Matters Beyond Step Count

One of the more meaningful findings concerns what fitness itself adds to the equation, independent of how much someone moves. Using a statistical technique designed to isolate fitness’s effect from exercise behavior, the researchers found that each additional unit of fitness was associated with approximately 2% lower heart disease risk. The authors note this pattern is consistent with fitness carrying heart-protective effects through biological pathways, such as changes in heart structure and improved blood vessel function, that weekly exercise volume doesn’t fully capture.

Lower-fitness individuals also faced a steeper climb to reach the same risk reductions as their fitter counterparts. According to a table the researchers built to translate findings into practical targets, a person with low fitness needed roughly 30 to 50 more minutes per week than a high-fitness person to achieve the same percentage reduction in risk. Reaching a 20% risk reduction, for example, required approximately 370 minutes per week for lower-fitness individuals compared to approximately 340 minutes for those with higher fitness.

What a Genetic Analysis Added

Beyond tracking real-world behavior, the research team added a layer of genetic analysis to test whether the associations they found were likely to reflect true cause and effect, rather than the result of other lifestyle factors that active, fit people tend to share. This type of analysis uses inherited genetic differences between people as a kind of natural experiment.

The genetic findings offered partial support for the observational results. Genetically predicted higher fitness was most clearly linked to lower heart failure risk, with odds roughly 21% lower compared to those with genetically lower fitness levels. Evidence for other cardiovascular outcomes was less consistent, and the case for exercise behavior itself, as opposed to fitness as a physical trait, was weaker still across the genetic analysis.

Advertisement

The researchers explain this gap by noting that genetic tools are better suited to capturing stable biological traits like fitness than complex behaviors like weekly exercise habits. They conclude that the observational findings remain “the strongest available evidence for guiding activity-based prescriptions.”

Rethinking What Exercise Advice Should Do

The study’s authors propose that future guidelines may need to draw a clearer line between two distinct goals: the minimum exercise volume needed to avoid the worst cardiovascular outcomes, and the substantially higher volumes needed for substantial cardiovascular risk reduction. They also suggest that measuring a person’s fitness level, not just asking how much they exercise, could help doctors set more personalized targets.

About 11.6% of participants in the study, roughly 1,980 out of 17,088, managed to hit or exceed the 560-minute-per-week mark, confirming that such volumes are achievable but represent a high bar for most people. For those with low baseline fitness, the challenge is compounded: they face both higher absolute risk and the need to put in more work to see the same relative benefit.

The 150-minute guideline isn’t wrong. For the large share of Americans who don’t even hit that threshold yet, getting there still delivers real cardiovascular benefit. But for those who have cleared that mark and assumed they were done, this research makes a solid case that meaningful heart protection may require considerably more.


Disclaimer: This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. The findings described are based on observational research and should not be used to self-diagnose, treat, or make changes to an exercise or health regimen without consulting a qualified healthcare provider. Individual health needs and risk factors vary. Speak with your doctor before significantly increasing your physical activity level.

Advertisement

Paper Notes

Limitations

Several important constraints apply to these findings. The UK Biobank cohort skews toward healthier, predominantly white, middle-aged to older adults living in the United Kingdom, which limits how well the results translate to younger people, non-white populations, or other countries. Physical activity was measured during only a single seven-day window, which may not reflect a person’s typical long-term habits. Fitness was estimated using a submaximal bike test rather than a gold-standard maximal effort test, introducing some measurement uncertainty, particularly for individuals with unusual heart rate responses to exercise. The study also measured exercise and fitness at a single point in time, so it can’t account for how those behaviors change over years. Despite the genetic analysis component, the observational design cannot fully rule out unmeasured lifestyle or health factors. The genetic instruments used in the analysis explained limited variation in physical activity behavior, and substantial heterogeneity was detected across genetic variants for several outcome pairs; the authors addressed this using random-effects models. Patients and members of the public were not involved in the study’s design or conduct.

Funding and Disclosures

The authors declared no specific grant funding from any public, commercial, or not-for-profit agency. No competing interests were declared. The study was conducted using the UK Biobank resource under Application Number 1050630 and was approved by the North West Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (reference 11/NW/0382).

Publication Details

Paper Title: Joint non-linear dose–response associations of device-measured physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness with cardiovascular disease: a cohort and Mendelian randomisation study | Authors: Zhide Liang, Senyao Du, Shiao Zhao, Xianfei Wang, Qiang Yan, Baichao Xu, Sanfan Ng, Ziheng Ning | Journal: British Journal of Sports Medicine (BMJ Group) | DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2025-111351 | Status: Published online ahead of print, accepted 6 April 2026

Fitness

Adding Exercise to GLP‑1 Therapy Improves Long-Term Benefits, Multinational Study Finds – Health & Fitness Association

Published

on

Adding Exercise to GLP‑1 Therapy Improves Long-Term Benefits, Multinational Study Finds – Health & Fitness Association

The combination could save billions in healthcare costs, leading fitness organizations to call for deeper integration of structured exercise in GLP-1 treatment.

Pairing GLP-1 therapy with regular structured exercise would improve long-term health outcomes, reduce downstream costs, and generate positive economic returns across multiple countries, according to new multinational research by the Health & Fitness Association developed by FTI Consulting’s Center for Healthcare Economics and Policy. 

Released as a white paper entitled From Weight Loss to Lasting Value: Structured Exercise and the Economics of GLP-1 Therapy, the research compares impacts of GLP-1 therapy as a standalone obesity treatment with GLP-1 therapy combined with exercise in five countries. 

The research was developed in collaboration with the HFA Foundation and four fitness industry federations: AUSactive, Exercise New Zealand, Fitness Industry Council of Canada, and ukactive.

The white paper provides some of the strongest evidence to date that exercise significantly enhances the value of GLP-1 treatment for patients, healthcare systems, employers, and society as a whole.

Advertisement

Across all five countries studied, the analysis found that a combined approach supports improved long-term health outcomes, reduced healthcare costs, and produced positive economic returns.

Combining regular exercise with GLP-1 therapy is estimated to generate:

  • United States: US$120 billion in economic and societal value over 10 years and a 496% return on investment, rising to 1,572% and US$393 billion over 30 years.
  • Australia: A$182 million in economic and societal value over 10 years and a 59% return on investment, rising to 457% and A$1.4 billion over 30 years.
  • Canada: C$3.5 billion in economic and societal  value over 10 years and a 105% return on investment, rising to 526% and C$17.9 billion over 30 years.
  • New Zealand: NZ$51 million in economic and societal  value over 10 years and a 27% return on investment, rising to 306% and NZ$592 million over 30 years.
  • United Kingdom: £2.7 billion in economic and societal  value over 10 years and a 164% return on investment, rising to 717% and £13 billion over 30 years.

The findings demonstrate that as GLP-1 use expands, exercise should play an essential role in helping patients and health systems maximize the long-term value from new generations of weight-loss drugs.

The fitness industry has an unprecedented opportunity to be part of the solution as GLP-1 usage continues to grow. 

“GLP-1 medications are rapidly changing obesity treatment, but weight loss alone is not the full measure of success,” says Greta Wagner, interim president and CEO of the Health & Fitness Association and president of the HFA Foundation. “The health and fitness industry has long known that lasting wellness requires more than a number on a scale; it requires strength, function, and sustainable healthy life habits. This research confirms that exercise, especially strength training, helps patients sustain the benefits of GLP-1 treatment over time. It sends a clear message that exercise belongs at the center of GLP-1 care.”

Based on this data, HFA, HFA Foundation, AUSactive, Exercise New Zealand, Fitness Industry Council of Canada, and ukactive are calling on policymakers, payers, and healthcare systems to integrate structured exercise into GLP-1 treatment pathways. 

Advertisement

Specifically, the groups are asking that: 

  1. Structured exercise, including strength training, be recognized as an essential part of obesity care;
  2. GLP-1 care models include exercise support;
  3. Referral pathways are established between healthcare providers and qualified exercise professionals;
  4. Patient access to qualified exercise professionals and fitness facilities be supported; and
  5. Outcomes beyond weight loss be measured, including long-term health and economic value.

This call to action builds on a recent joint position statement signed by the participating fitness industry groups, the World Obesity Federation (WOF), and the World Federation of the Sporting Goods Industry (WFSGI), which emphasized the urgency of ensuring physical activity and nutrition are central to systems supporting the global roll-out of obesity medications. 

Download the complimentary full report to see how structured exercise can help unlock the full promise of GLP-1 therapy.

Continue Reading

Fitness

From Weight Loss to Lasting Value: Structured Exercise and the Economics of GLP-1 Therapy – Health & Fitness Association

Published

on

From Weight Loss to Lasting Value: Structured Exercise and the Economics of GLP-1 Therapy – Health & Fitness Association

This white paper is complimentary.

GLP-1 medications are reshaping obesity care and creating new opportunities to improve long-term health outcomes. But weight loss alone is not the full measure of success. As use of these medications grows, policymakers, payers, healthcare providers, and patients face an important question: what helps ensure that the benefits of GLP-1 therapy are sustained over time?

This first-of-its kind multi-country research examines the health and economic value of combining GLP-1 therapy with structured exercise. The findings make clear that structured exercise help protect and extend the investment being made in GLP-1 treatment by supporting more sustainable health outcomes, reducing costly downstream medical events, and generating substantial economic value.

Across all five studied markets, the research projects that combining structured exercise with GLP-1 therapy can generate substantial health, economic, and societal value compared with GLP-1 therapy alone:

  • United States: US$120 billion in economic and societal value over 10 years and a 496% return on investment, rising to 1,572% and US$393 billion over 30 years.
  • Australia: A$182 million in economic and societal value over 10 years and a 59% return on investment, rising to 457% and A$1.4 billion over 30 years.
  • Canada: C$3.5 billion in economic and societal value over 10 years and a 105% return on investment, rising to 526% and C$17.9 billion over 30 years.
  • New Zealand: NZ$51 million in economic and societal value over 10 years and a 27% return on investment, rising to 306% and NZ$592 million over 30 years.
  • United Kingdom: £2.7 billion in economic and societal value over 10 years and a 164% return on investment, rising to 717% and £13 billion over 30 years.

If public and private payers are investing in GLP-1 therapy, they should also be asking what helps that investment produce more sustainable health and economic returns. Structured exercise is one of the clearest answers.

Methodology

Advertisement

The research was conducted by by FTI Consulting’s Center for Healthcare Economics and Policy in partnership with a multinational coalition of fitness sector organizations, including the Health & Fitness Association, the HFA Foundation, AUSactive, Exercise New Zealand, Fitness Industry Council of Canada, and ukactive. 

Drawing on the existing body of research on GLP-1 therapy, weight loss, physical activity, and related health outcomes, the analysis modeled the incremental health and economic impact of adding structured exercise to GLP-1 therapy across participating markets. The model compares combined treatment against GLP-1 therapy alone over 10-year and 30-year horizons.

Continue Reading

Fitness

Fitness: Beyond exercise, move more and live longer

Published

on

Fitness: Beyond exercise, move more and live longer

With so much emphasis being placed on accumulating a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous exercise a week, there’s little discussion about what you should be doing the other 9,930 minutes.  

Sure, the estimated 20-per-cent reduction in mortality risk among individuals who meet the recommended amount of physical activity is impressive enough on its own. But there’s even greater improvements in longevity when you do more than just rest on the laurels of meeting the bare minimum.

A recent study published in the journal of Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism took on the challenge of determining the impact of supplementing 150 minutes of intentional physical activity with more incidental movement during the day.  

“Important questions remain regarding the joint and comparative benefits of light physical activity and moderate to vigorous physical activity,” said the study’s authors, who hail from the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ont. 

Light physical activity broadly covers most of the movement behaviours outside of deliberate exercise. Household chores and yard work, strolling to the store, bus stop or coffee shop, playing with the kids, walking the dog and low-intensity recreational activities like lawn games, fishing and leisurely paddling are examples of the type of activity that people engage in over the course of a day and/or weekend. 

Advertisement

Early studies on the benefits of light physical activity have been faced with difficulty distinguishing between light and moderate intensity activity — especially when using self-reported data. But the newest generation of wearables, which track any and all activity over the course of the day, have negated the bias related to personal recall and the self-determination of movement/exercise intensity. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study, the researchers extrapolated a subset of 3,949 study subjects (an almost equal number of males and females) aged 40 and older who wore an accelerometer to record their daily activity. Their movement history was then cross-referenced with death records to establish mortality risk.

“The most notable finding was the substantial joint effect of light physical activity and moderate to vigorous physical activity on reducing mortality risk, which exceeded the maximal benefit of either intensity alone,” the researchers said. 

The combination of 335 minutes a day of light physical activity and 20 minutes a day of moderate/vigorous physical activity yielded an impressive six-fold reduction in mortality risk. But even about half that effort, 220 minutes of light physical activity a day and 10 minutes of moderate/vigorous activity, resulted in three-fold lessening in risk.

If that seems like a lot of minutes to be active, keep in mind that light physical activity is pretty much any movement you perform while not sitting. And in this particular cohort most of the higher-intensity activity was more moderate than vigorous and 45 per cent of the participants accumulated their exercise minutes in short bouts of less than 10 minutes.  

“These comparisons underscore how crucial physical activity is as a modifiable risk factor for longevity, emphasizing that its protective effect likely surpasses the impact of major health risks, particularly when light physical activity and moderate/vigorous physical activity are considered together,” the researchers said.

Advertisement

Still not convinced you can find the time to make a significant dent in your mortality risk?  A substantial number (58 per cent) of the study subjects accumulated the combined amount of light and moderate/vigorous physical activity needed to realize the three-fold improvement in longevity. Twenty-six per cent combined both intensities in a dose large enough to obtain a six-fold reduction in mortality risk. 

“This suggests that health-enhancing levels of physical activity are reasonable and attainable for most adults,” the researchers said. 

That’s an important message for both active and not-so-active Canadians. What you do all day matters as much as a single workout. That’s not to downplay the benefits gained by hitting the gym regularly, but if you spend the rest of the day sitting at a desk or staring at a screen, you’re not doing all you can to add years to your life. 

As for those of you who struggle sustaining a regular workout schedule, the impact of short bouts of exercise combined with getting out of your chair more often is not only doable, it’s impressive enough to make you rethink your current lifestyle. Simple choices like going to the park with the kids, biking to the library, getting up from your desk more often and leaving the car at home the next time you want to hang out at the coffee shop all contribute toward the goal of four to six hours a day of light physical activity. Combine that with 150 minutes a week of intentional exercise in the moderate to vigorous range, even in short bouts, and you’ll have more years to enjoy life to its fullest. 

Those extra years might be motivation enough to get you out of your chair, but knowing that you’re also more likely to be in good health and with energy enough to continue doing the things you love is added incentive to move more and sit less. 

Advertisement

Editor’s Picks

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending