Finance
Secretary of State investigating campaign finance complaint from Douglas County resident over group supporting school funding measure

A Douglas County resident has lodged a criticism towards a bunch advocating for a faculty tax and bond measure, and state elections officers are actually investigating.
Tiffany Baker, of Parker, filed a marketing campaign finance criticism towards a difficulty committee referred to as Put money into DCSD that’s registered to foyer in assist of Douglas County poll points 5A and 5B.
The proposed $60 million mill-levy override would pay Douglas County College District lecturers and faculty workers extra, and the $450 million bond would construct new faculties and restore others.
The college board voted unanimously in assist of the measures — the primary time the deeply divided board agreed on one thing. Regardless of the unified entrance, the divisions stay, and battles which have performed out within the boardroom have left many residents with uncooked emotions.
The Secretary of State’s workplace reviewed the criticism and recognized “a number of potential violations of Colorado marketing campaign finance legal guidelines.”
The criticism alleges that Put money into DCSD accepted prohibited contributions through the use of an area fireplace station to marketing campaign for the measures, made an improper contribution to candidates within the 2022 election, and failed to incorporate required disclaimers on marketing campaign communications.
The Put money into DCSD chair and spokesperson stated that they’re working intently with the Secretary of State and have been advised {that a} violation might not have occurred.
“They’re nonetheless within the technique of reality gathering so we’re ready on them to request extra data. Sadly anybody can file a criticism whether or not there are deserves to the criticism or not,” stated Christa Gilstrap.
Put money into DCSD has till Nov. 10 to reply and adjust to the regulation.
Within the criticism, Baker offered Fb posts from Oct. 16 promoting an occasion hosted by Put money into DCSD on the Larkspur Hearth Station. Screenshots present the group inviting individuals to come back to the Oct. 20 occasion, promising that a lot of candidates operating within the election can be in attendance.
The publish said that the occasion was “hosted by native residents” and never coordinated with any candidate or marketing campaign committee.
Beneath marketing campaign finance regulation, utilizing authorities property for a political occasion associated to an area poll subject is a prohibited contribution. The criticism alleges Put money into DCSD did not return the contribution required by Colorado marketing campaign and political finance legal guidelines.
Baker additionally alleges the group made improper contributions to a lot of candidates within the November election by inviting them and promoting their presence on the marketing campaign occasion. Solely the attendance of GOP candidates, together with candidates for the state legislature and the clerk and recorder’s, assessor and sheriff’s workplace, was marketed on the publish.
A “paid for by” disclaimer assertion should seem on a marketing campaign communication when an individual spends $1,000 or extra in a single yr on election communications. The Fb posts didn’t function a disclaimer.
“I’d don’t have any drawback if the candidates merely confirmed up on the discussion board however I feel it’s incorrect for the 5A/5B poll committee to be selling partisan political candidates,” Baker wrote within the criticism. Baker stated the publish conveys the message that Douglas County voters who assist 5A and 5B ought to vote for these candidates. The Secretary of State stated the information alleged present Put money into DCSD might have violated marketing campaign finance regulation. It stated nevertheless, the difficulty committee has an opportunity to adjust to the regulation inside 10 days. Put money into DCSD can even dispute the allegations, and state officers should conduct a further overview inside 30 days.

Finance
Interim Vice President for Finance Speaks on University Deficit at USG Senate

Interim Vice President for Finance Reka Wrynn announced to the Undergraduate Student Government (USG) on Wednesday that the University of Connecticut had reduced its budget deficit from $37.9 million to $12.6 million, adding that tuition and fees were likely to increase.
“We don’t have those exact amounts yet, but yeah, it’s inflation,” Wrynn said. “The cost of things goes up. But I will say that the university is committed to any time we increase tuition and fees that there is an increase in the financial aid bucket.”
Photo courtesy of Stock Go.
The university is in the process of implementing what Wrynn called a financial sustainability plan consisting of three key pillars: growing enrollment, resource reallocation and personnel optimization and reduction, adding that the “guiding principle” of these initiatives was to keep students from being “negatively impacted.”
“We want to hear back from you,” Wrynn said. “If you know you’re being negatively impacted, we want to hear that, so you know certainly we’ll look into them.”
Wrynn announced that UConn plans to increase enrollment by 4,000 students over the next five years. Multiple senators questioned this initiative, citing a housing crisis on the Storrs campus along with shrinking access to amenities like areas for students to study.
Wrynn said that there was no housing crisis at UConn, saying there were plenty of empty beds available across UConn’s multiple campuses.
“Don’t believe everything you read. We have plenty of empty beds this year,” Wrynn said. “At the Storrs campus, in Stamford, in Hartford, we have empty beds right now. So, we would like to grow enrollment to fill those beds.”
When pressed by one senator regarding the number of available beds on the Storrs campus, Wrynn said she believed there were roughly 550 available beds on the campus. Wrynn added that a private development just outside of campus was also underway to provide more housing for students, in addition to housing expansions at the Hartford and Stamford campuses.
Other senators questioned Wrynn regarding student access to study spaces on campus, which Wrynn claims there are plenty of, according to data given to her by the Dean of the UConn Library.
Senators challenged Wrynn’s claim and said they frequently had to search every floor of the library to find space to study. One senator brought forward concerns about the accessibility of spaces known as study pods, which are inaccessible to some students due to their raised nature.
Wrynn added that resources would be reallocated to “our high priority areas,” to ensure they experience as little cuts as possible.
A senator representing the African American Cultural Center (AACC) asked Wrynn why so many black organizations had experienced such large cuts to their budgets. Wrynn said it was because those organizations were not a part of those high priority areas.
“Primarily non-academic funds were the funds that were swept,” Wrynn said. “I would have to dig into the specific case to see, you know, maybe to step back a little bit in that there’s only so much money, right, to spread around and things get more expensive every year, whether it’s the travel or whatever the event is that you’re looking to participate in.”
Wrynn also spoke on UConn’s loss of federal research grants since the change in administration. The university had 63 of its grants terminated, which provided $41.3 million in funding for ongoing and future research.
Wrynn said that UConn is in the process of shifting its research priorities to be in line with the priorities of the Trump administration, something she says is usually procedure.
“We are pivoting as we do every four years when there’s a new administration,” Wrynn said. “We tend to pivot and realign our research priorities with the priorities of that administration and seek out research awards that are along uh those lines.”
Those research priorities include national security, quantum information science, biosciences, artificial intelligence and health, wellness and quality of life, according to Wrynn.
Senators asked Wrynn what UConn’s research priorities were during the Biden administration to make the shift in priorities clearer to students. Wrynn said she was not familiar with those priorities herself but said they were published somewhere online.
A UConn Today article from September 2021 lists genomics and neuroscience, climate studies, cybersecurity, energy, personalized medicine, cancer detection and care, manufacturing innovations among others as previous research priorities.
In addition to federal cuts, Wrynn mentioned the constant funding risk from the state government, which can reduce UConn’s funding by up to five percent without the approval of the legislature, according to her.
“That’s always a risk in our budget,” Wrynn said. “If they should choose to do that throughout the year for any given reason, then that would create an additional reduction in our budget. And so, we just continue to remind people of that risk.”
State funding dropped to $268.2 million in Fiscal Year 26 from $319.5 in Fiscal Year 25. $95.7 million, or 18% of FY 25 funds were denoted as temporary support.
Wrynn said the university expected another $15 million decrease in state funding for FY 27 but had submitted a request for $12 million to be put back into permanent funding.
While the university is operating under a deficit this financial year, Wrynn said that UConn still had the funds to cover current expenses for the time being.
According to Wrynn, the university has a balance of cash funds set aside for circumstances like this, similar to a savings account. But those funds are limited according to Wrynn.
“As you all know, when you spend that money down from your savings account, that’s one time funding,” Wrynn said. “It can Band-Aid the problem for one year, but once you spend it, it’s gone. And so, it doesn’t solve any problems.”
Finance
What Is World Liberty Financial? The Trump Family DeFi Project Explained – Decrypt

In brief
An Ethereum-based DeFi project
What can you do with World Liberty Financial?
The Trump family’s involvement
Conflict of interest concerns
Daily Debrief Newsletter
Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Finance
New Jersey says parish finance director stole more than $500,000 in church funds

CNA Staff, Oct 18, 2025 /
14:15 pm
Officials in New Jersey have charged a former parish financial director with the theft of more than half a million dollars in church funds.
Joseph Manzi has been charged with second-degree theft by unlawful taking after he allegedly stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from St. Leo the Great Parish in Lincroft.
Manzi was the subject of an August lawsuit by the parish in which he was alleged to have “systematically, secretly, and dishonestly utilized parish funds for his own personal benefit.” The civil suit claimed he had stolen upwards of $1.5 million.
In an Oct. 17 press release, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin’s office said Manzi had been officially criminally charged with the theft. Platkin in the release said Manzi used the funds “not to feed his family or for some kind of emergency, but to live a more lavish lifestyle.”
Manzi stopped working at the Lincroft parish in June of this year, the office said. Afterwards, church staff reviewed credit card statements and found “numerous unauthorized charges that were determined to allegedly be for Manzi’s personal benefit.”
The state alleged that Manzi used stolen funds for “event vendors, vehicle repairs, financing, and purchases, including a Cadillac SUV,” as well as purchases such as luxury clothing, sports event tickets and “chartered fishing trips.”
Manzi is facing up to 10 years in prison and fines of up to $150,000.
It was not immediately clear why the prosecutor’s office charged Manzi with about $1 million less in theft than the August civil suit alleged. The attorney general’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Oct. 18 seeking clarification on the figures.
On its website, the St. Leo parish said the controversy “will not prevent Saint Leo the Great Parish from working every day to live our mission – to serve Parishioners and the community in God’s name with the greatest of love and compassion.”
“We ask you all to stand together in our shared faith and to pray for a swift and just conclusion to this troubling chapter,” the parish said.
-
Alaska6 days ago
More than 1,400 seeking shelter as hundreds wait to be evacuated after catastrophic Western Alaska storm, officials say
-
Education1 week ago
Video: 3 Former College Teammates Reunite on Rangers Coaching Staff
-
North Carolina1 week ago
Guide to NC State Fair 2025: Tickets, transportation, parking, new rides and special event days
-
World1 week ago
Albanian judge killed in courtroom shooting amid growing anger over justice system reforms
-
News6 days ago
Trump Halts Billions in Grants for Democratic Districts During Shutdown
-
World5 days ago
What are NATO’s national caveats and why do they hinder fast response?
-
News5 days ago
A Supreme Court ruling on voting rights could boost Republicans’ redistricting efforts
-
World6 days ago
European Commission delays decision on asylum seeker quotas