Connect with us

Finance

Bank Hapoalim to finance 12 Hotels in Netherlands with 260M Euros

Published

on

Bank Hapoalim to finance 12 Hotels in Netherlands with 260M Euros

Bank Hapoalim has been leading the banking system in Israel over the years in the field of hotel financing in cooperation with leading hotel groups in Israel and the world, as part of the trend of increasing investments by Israeli companies, foundations and institutional bodies abroad. 

The hotel industry in the world has recovered impressively from the corona crisis and in recent years tourism in the world in general and in Europe in particular is showing record figures even compared to the period before the corona.

In recent days, Bank Hapoalim completed a significant financial closing to finance the purchase and renovation of a portfolio that includes 12 hotels in Amsterdam and other major cities in the Netherlands. The total cost of the purchase and renovation is estimated at 405 million euros.  

As part of the financing, Bank Hapoalim organized and led a syndication deal in the amount of 260 million euros, for the purchase and renovation of the hotels. The move is carried out in cooperation with the Dutch bank ING – one of the largest banks in the Netherlands and Europe – which participates in the financing of the transaction. 

Advertisement

The deal was made as part of Fatal chain’s partnership with leading institutions in Israel and was recently completed. As part of the transaction, 12 hotels were purchased for approximately 360 million euros and the chain intends to invest an additional 45 million euros in upgrading the hotels.

The purchased hotels consist of five hotels in Amsterdam, including the iconic Eden Hotel, as well as seven hotels in the cities of Rotterdam, The Hague, Eindhoven, Groningen, and Maastricht, totaling 1,522 rooms. With the completion of the purchase, the Fatal chain owns 26 hotels in the Netherlands, which together include approximately 4,000 rooms. 

The financing transaction was carried out by the overseas financing unit in the complex financing products sector under the management of Benny Haddad in the business division of Bank Hapoalim. 



Advertisement

Finance

Some motorists who pay monthly for insurance ‘charged annual rates close to 30%’

Published

on

Some motorists who pay monthly for insurance ‘charged annual rates close to 30%’

Some motorists are continuing to pay high interest rates when spreading the cost of their car insurance, according to analysis by Which?

The consumer group said some firms are charging annual percentage rates (APRs) comparable to expensive credit cards.

Some firms are still charging APRs of close to 30% on monthly motor insurance payments, Which? said.

Which? said it had found that between February and March 2026, several firms were charging APRs above 25% and some were charging as much as 29.9%.

It said that paying monthly is often the only realistic option for households facing financial pressure, creating a “poverty premium”.

Advertisement

Two years ago, some firms were charging rates above 35% APR, according to Which?

It said that while some providers have lowered their rates since then, it believes that progress has been too slow.

Which? said that between February and March, it attempted to contact 61 car insurance brands, asking about the representative APRs charged to their customers who pay monthly.

Some 48 responded with their rates, or said they did not charge extra for paying in instalments

Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at Which? said: “Millions of motorists rely on monthly payments to afford essential car insurance cover, yet many are still being charged interest rates comparable to an expensive credit card.”

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said: “The industry recognises that many households are under financial pressure, and it understands why spreading the cost of cover is essential for many motorists.

Premium finance is widely used across the market with charges that can differ between insurers and by product.

“Our members remain committed to improving outcomes, and this includes being open about the fact that providing this service involves genuine operational costs – including keeping cover in place for a period even when payments are delayed or missed.

“Our premium finance principles make clear that any charges must be fair, transparent, and reflective of the costs incurred by insurers. The FCA’s (Financial Conduct Authority’s) own market study found that premium finance can deliver fair value for consumers and that the overall cost of premium finance has fallen since 2022.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Why Your Idle Cash Is Losing Value and How to Secure Much Higher Yields in 2026

Published

on

Why Your Idle Cash Is Losing Value and How to Secure Much Higher Yields in 2026

Cash accounts are having a moment, thanks to the decent interest rates they now pay, at long last. But selecting one can be a daunting task given the profusion of choices —from money market accounts to money market mutual funds to a small clutch of newly hatched money market exchange-traded funds.

The term money market has become a catch-all description for a variety of interest-bearing products that follow different rules. The offerings also vary in yield, ease of accessibility and, to a small degree, levels of safety. “In some respects, money market has become more of a marketing term than a technical term,” says Ted Rossman of Bankrate, a website that evaluates bank products. “There’s a lot of confusion about this.”

Continue Reading

Finance

Aussie lawyer warns of ‘middle class’ family battles after budget introduces ‘backdoor death tax’

Published

on

Aussie lawyer warns of ‘middle class’ family battles after budget introduces ‘backdoor death tax’
Family lawyers could be among the professions kept extra busy after the budget tax changes pass. · Getty

Australians are expected to pass on trillions of dollars in assets in the coming years as the grey tsunami of wealthy baby boomers crashes across the economy. But some of those expecting the windfall could be more likely to find themselves in a potential dispute with their loved ones as tax changes introduced to trusts commonly used in estate planning increase the likelihood of conflict.

Lawyers who deal with contested wills and estates foresee issues of conflict more likely to arise if the proposed changes go ahead. Alun Hill is the national director of the contested estates division of Armstrong Legal and believes there will be more reasons for discontent and for wills to be challenged due to the increased tax take being slipped in.

“It widens the battleground,” he told Yahoo Finance. “It just creates more reason why there might be someone who wants to contest a will.”

RELATED

Under the changes in Labor’s controversial budget, the unprecedented 30 per cent minimum level of capital gains tax will apply to the most common form of estate planning trust, known as a the testamentary discretionary trust.

Advertisement

While the government says its legislation pertaining to tax changes for trusts will be brought before parliament later this year, the slated changes would come into effect from July 1, 2028, and only specifically exclude fixed testamentary trusts. Fixed trusts are different from discretionary trusts as trustees don’t have the discretion to change the proportion of income a beneficiary is entitled to.

“Discretionary trusts aren’t just used as a tax minimisation vehicle,” Hill said. “Traditionally they’ve been used to provide the trustee with the ability to do what’s necessary to carry out the intentions of the testator (the person who wrote the will).”

While the finer details remain to be seen, the new tax floor regardless of the income of beneficiaries and the overall higher CGT on assets, will mean beneficiaries will see less passed on than previously expected – and that can be grounds for a challenge.

“What this really does is create the potential for claims being made against the estate by the spouse or by whoever the intended beneficiary is, who is no longer receiving adequate provision or appropriate provision under the testamentary trust,” Hill said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending