Connect with us

Finance

A general introduction to lending and secured finance in USA

Published

on

A general introduction to lending and secured finance in USA

All questions

Overview

The present US company lending market stays refined, extraordinarily giant and extremely diverse, having quite a few kinds of debtors, mortgage merchandise and lenders. In 2021, the US mortgage market continued its robust rebound that began within the fourth quarter of 2020 after the coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic had brought about the US company lending market to plummet earlier in 2020. All through 2021, the US mortgage market was characterised by document or multi-year highs of provide of credit score, demand for credit score, low default charges and excessive mergers and acquisitions (M&A) exercise. In accordance with Refinitiv LPC, leveraged loans to company debtors in america accounted for roughly US$1.3 trillion in 2021, a rise of over 84 per cent over 2020. Debtors span each trade, and the mortgage markets they’ll entry relies upon largely on their capitalisation and credit score profile. Mortgage merchandise span from unsecured revolving credit score amenities for investment-grade firms and broadly syndicated covenant-lite time period mortgage amenities for large-cap leveraged mortgage debtors to extra conventional ‘membership deal’ senior secured credit score amenities for middle-market debtors (usually outlined as debtors with lower than US$500 million in annual gross sales or lower than US$50 million in earnings earlier than curiosity, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA)). Lenders embrace conventional banks, finance firms and institutional traders comparable to collateralised mortgage obligations (CLOs), hedge funds, mortgage participation funds, pension funds, mutual funds and insurance coverage firms.

Throughout 2021, the leveraged mortgage market climbed to new heights in lots of classes on account of traders in search of increased yields, low rates of interest, document quantities of provide, together with dry powder at non-public fairness companies, and different elements. The US economic system had adjusted to covid-19, M&A exercise was robust and supported the mortgage market, and rates of interest inspired debtors to refinance current debt or incur new debt. M&A exercise ramped up from 2020 with large exercise from non-public fairness companies, and mortgage issuance quantity soared in 2021. In accordance with the twice annual Monetary Stability Report, issued in November 2021 of the Federal Reserve (the Fed), the first measures of vulnerability from enterprise debt, together with debt-to-gross home product, gross leverage and curiosity protection ratios, have for essentially the most half returned to their pre-pandemic ranges, and enterprise debt has decreased on internet. This discount, along with earnings recoveries, low rates of interest, authorities help through the pandemic and monetary stimulus has restored many enterprise’ steadiness sheets. Nonetheless, the Fed acknowledges that dangers to the financial outlook stay, particularly for small companies and industries that had been most affected by the pandemic. As well as, default charges on leveraged loans fell on the similar time that underwriting requirements lessened. After rising quickly throughout 2020, the default fee declined to beneath pre-pandemic ranges through the first half of 2021. On the similar time, the typical credit score high quality of excellent leveraged loans continued to enhance. The US mortgage market has continued to learn from a current rest of quite a few US banking laws – specifically, the leveraged lending tips issued by federal regulators in March 2013, which had been additional clarified in November 2014 by a FAQ issued on the steerage and had beforehand had a powerful affect on the mortgage markets, have been considerably curtailed, as mentioned in additional element beneath. Extra developments over current years had the impact of easing sure elements of the chance retention guidelines and the Volcker Rule, however the Biden administration and different authorities officers have proposed rising the regulation of leveraged lending by banks and non-bank lenders.

Leveraged mortgage issuance ranges for M&A elevated dramatically throughout 2021. Refinitiv LPC famous that leveraged mortgage issuances for M&A greater than doubled in 2021, and leveraged buyout (LBO) exercise (which accounted for roughly 50 per cent of all M&A mortgage issuances in 2021) was up 154 per cent. Refinitiv LPC additionally stories an increase out there from leveraged refinancing exercise, which elevated by 43 per cent in 2021 due partly to low rates of interest, and a rise out there from new cash leveraged loans, which elevated by 69 per cent. Debtors skilled much less monetary misery in 2021, and the default fee fell to 0.6 per cent in 2021, the bottom in a decade based on FitchRatings, with the defaulted mortgage quantity reducing 85 per cent in 2021.

Advertisement

After the US leveraged mortgage market fell sharply in early to mid-2020, it recovered robustly in 2021 and has returned to be beneficial for debtors, in a multi-year pattern (excluding 2020) that has persevered for the reason that restoration from the monetary disaster (apart from the interval affected by covid-19). For instance, the market share of covenant-lite loans, which is dependent upon incurrence-based covenants slightly than upkeep covenants, has been rising persistently for the reason that hiatus through the monetary disaster. Different borrower-favourable phrases that stay prevalent within the US leveraged mortgage market embrace soft-call prepayment premiums, the flexibility to incur refinancing amenities, the flexibility to purchase again loans out there on a non-pro rata foundation, covenant baskets that may develop over time based mostly upon a proportion of adjusted EBITDA or consolidated whole property, the flexibility to reclassify basket capability below covenant exceptions, lodging designed to allow restricted situation transactions, and loosened collateral necessities. As well as, many debtors, particularly these owned by giant monetary sponsors, proceed to take the lead in drafting mortgage commitments and definitive mortgage documentation, and procure dedicated covenant ranges and baskets on the dedication stage.

Authorized and regulatory developments

Throughout most of 2021, the US authorities continued to supply some reduction to company debtors, different enterprise debtors and people affected by covid-19 by way of quite a few reduction payments together with the Coronavirus Help, Reduction and Financial Safety Act (CARES Act), the Paycheck Safety Program (established below the CARES Act) and the Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA). In late 2021 and into 2022, a number of the support offered below these payments was tapered or discontinued.

Essentially the most important regulatory focus of 2021 was the continued transition from LIBOR as the idea for rates of interest for loans. On 5 March 2021, the ICE Benchmark Administration introduced that it’s going to stop publication of one-week and two-month US LIBOR settings on 31 December 2021 and stop publication of the remaining US LIBOR settings on 30 June 2023. US regulators suggested US lenders to not difficulty any LIBOR-based loans after 31 December 2021 and to transition away to different reference charges, comparable to SOFR (secured in a single day financing fee), as quickly as doable. Throughout 2021, ARRC (Various Reference Charges Committee, convened by the US Federal Reserve Financial institution and by the New York Federal Reserve Financial institution) issued supplemental variations of its really helpful hardwire alternative language for US LIBOR syndicated and bilateral loans. Later in 2021, ARRC formally endorsed Time period SOFR, a ahead wanting SOFR Charge, produced by the CME Group, as a serious part of the hardwire language. In consequence, many institutional market members started incorporating the hardwired language, and SOFR loans appeared available on the market within the final quarter of 2021 with some regularity. Some LIBOR transition points are nonetheless negotiated together with the precise timing of the transition, the unfold adjustment on the transition time (since SOFR will not be credit-sensitive) and whether or not and the way a lot discretion must be given to lenders. Different potential replacements for LIBOR embrace credit-sensitive charges together with the American Interbank Provided Charge (Ameribor) and Bloomberg Quick-Time period Financial institution Yield Index fee (BSBY). Many mortgage agreements would require amendments in 2022 to implement the transition away from LIBOR. On 24 March 2021, the New York State legislature enacted a invoice that gives a framework and secure harbours for all contracts which might be ruled by New York regulation that use LIBOR as a benchmark and don’t embrace any fallback provisions. The New York State Governor signed the invoice into regulation on 6 April 2021. On 15 March 2022, the Adjustable Curiosity Charge (LIBOR) Act was signed into regulation by President Biden, establishing a nationwide framework for the alternative of LIBOR because the benchmark rate of interest for contracts missing efficient fallback provisions which might be both not possible or virtually not possible to amend previous to the tenor cessation date. By operation of regulation, the LIBOR Act will exchange remaining references to the commonest LIBOR tenors within the ‘legacy’ contracts with SOFR. In lots of respects the federal statute parallels the New York laws. The federal statute pre-empted in lots of respects a number of states’ laws ending a patchwork system of state-by-state legal guidelines.

From the aftermath of the 2007 monetary disaster till not too long ago, federal regulators had elevated their concentrate on the US company lending market, and leveraged lending specifically. In March 2013, federal regulators issued new leveraged lending tips to handle issues that lenders’ underwriting practices didn’t adequately tackle dangers in leveraged lending with acceptable allowances for losses. These tips apply to federally supervised monetary establishments which might be substantively engaged in leveraged lending actions. Compliance with the rules was required by Might 2013, however the full power of their influence solely began being felt by the market in 2014, notably within the fourth quarter. In November 2014, regulators launched an FAQ on the steerage, and of their Shared Nationwide Credit score Report issued the identical month, they chastised lenders for non-compliance. A lot of the consideration regarding federal steerage is concentrated on their assertion that ‘a leverage degree in extra of 6x Whole Debt/EBITDA raises issues for many industries’. In February 2018, these tips had been declared by the chair of the Fed and the top of the Comptroller of the Forex to not be legally binding on federally supervised monetary establishments which might be substantively engaged in leveraged lending actions. In accordance with Refinitiv LPC, for LBO transactions accomplished in 2021, 81 per cent had common debt-to-EBITDA ranges of six instances or increased. The Shared Nationwide Credit score Report issued in February 2022, which covers the primary and third quarters of 2021, discovered that although credit score danger improved modestly in 2021, banks’ credit score danger publicity to leveraged loans remains to be too excessive and lots of loans comprise phrases and buildings which might be too dangerous. The report famous that banks that originate and take part in leveraged lending transactions, and handle dangers effectively, make use of danger administration processes that adhere to regulatory security and soundness requirements and adapt to altering financial circumstances. Within the present credit score setting, efficient danger administration processes would be sure that reimbursement capability assessments are based mostly on lifelike assumptions of financial restoration and appropriately incorporate new debt that many debtors added to construct liquidity on account of covid-19 financial stress. The report famous that danger in 2022 can be affected by continued success in managing covid-19, inflation, provide chain points, excessive debt ranges, rising rates of interest and labour challenges.

Advertisement

Appointments to federal financing businesses below the Biden administration, such because the appointment of Janet Yellen because the Secretary of the Division of the Treasury, Jerome Powell because the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) and Lael Brainard because the Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve, are prone to lead to elevated regulation and enforcement of economic regulation. Some appointees and different politicians have mentioned reviving the 2013 leveraged lending steerage. This might lead to an elevated capability for non-bank lenders to lend to extremely levered debtors and should restrict leverage out there from regulated banks as effectively.

In December 2013, the ultimate Volcker Rule was issued, which limits the variety of buying and selling and funding actions of banking entities. Banking entities may even be required to adjust to in depth reporting necessities in respect of permitted buying and selling and funding actions. The Volcker Rule compliance interval started in July 2017, and the reporting necessities grew to become efficient in June 2014. In December 2016, danger retention guidelines that had been made relevant to CLOs got here into impact, initially casting a big shadow over the leveraged mortgage market (on condition that CLOs are a distinguished supply of capital for leveraged lending transactions), however a federal court docket resolution in February 2018 invalidated the principles insofar as they apply to open-market CLOs. In January 2020, 5 regulatory businesses authorised a proposal recommending that senior AAA CLO debt liabilities that meet sure necessities ought to now not be thought-about equity-like ‘possession pursuits’ below the Volcker Rule, and that the ‘mortgage securitisation’ carve-out from the definition of ‘lined funds’ ought to permit a small holdings of non-loan property, comparable to bonds, and in June 2020, these businesses revealed the ultimate guidelines. The mortgage securitisation exclusion was amended to permit CLOs to carry loans, money equivalents and as much as 5 per cent in debt securities (apart from ABS and convertibles), measured on the time such safety is acquired. Possession pursuits won’t embrace CLO notes that permit the removing and alternative of the supervisor for trigger even within the absence of an occasion of default. As well as, senior debt securities with sure traits won’t be thought-about prohibited possession pursuits so long as they’ve sure enumerated traits. These adjustments profit the CLO and mortgage markets. Additionally in 2018, the Financial Progress, Regulatory Reduction, and Client Safety Act was enacted and exempted smaller establishments. Regulators revised the Volcker Rule, efficient 1 January 2020, to simplify compliance and take away burdens to compliance whereas conserving the general function of the rule intact. Senator Elizabeth Warren proposed the Cease Wall Avenue Looting Act of 2021 which might successfully reimpose the risk-retention requirements for US CLO managers. The invoice would outline managers of CLOs as securitisers and require them to buy and maintain not less than 5 per cent of the worth of their managed CLOs.

Many federal monetary businesses search extra in depth regulation of the ‘shadow-banking’ sector. Some businesses have mentioned rising the ability of the Monetary Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) together with by amending Dodd Frank to increase the FSOC’s authority to designate a non-bank monetary establishment for regulation based mostly on each entity-specific standards and activity-based standards. If leveraged lending had been decided to pose a risk to monetary stability, any entity collaborating in leveraged lending may grow to be topic to regulation by the Fed. The FSOC recognized climate-related monetary dangers in 2021.

Federal regulators have additionally continued to implement sanctions and anti-corruption and anti-terrorism legal guidelines, and have not too long ago reinvigorated their efforts. In consequence, and in response to ever-increasing fines for violations, lenders have expanded the compliance phrases included in credit score documentation. These efforts have included broader representations and warranties with fewer materiality and data qualifiers, in addition to affirmative and unfavourable covenants that require compliance with sanctions laws and anti-bribery legal guidelines, and limit borrower actions in restricted international locations or with restricted entities to the extent that such actions would contain mortgage proceeds.

US banks additionally proceed to handle the Basel III necessities. Basel III requires banks to satisfy quite a few capital necessities to strengthen a financial institution’s liquidity and comprise its leverage. Amongst different issues, Basel III requires banks to extend their holdings of Tier 1 capital to not less than 7 per cent of their risk-weighted property to satisfy further liquidity and capital necessities. In December 2014, the Fed proposed that the eight largest US banks ought to adjust to capital necessities which might be much more restrictive than these outlined by Basel III, together with an extra capital cushion. In accordance with the Fed, many of the companies both already met the brand new necessities or had been taking steps to satisfy them by the top of a phase-in interval that ran from 2016 to 2019. The Fed issued revised steerage on 15 January 2021 describing intimately the upper requirements of capital planning expectations relevant to US financial institution holding firms topic to Class 1 requirements below the Fed’s framework versus these topic to Class 2 or 3 requirements. These are the bigger, extra systemically vital US financial institution holding firms. The Fed introduced that it’s going to attempt to finalise the final section of Basel III capital reforms by January 2023 with new necessities for ‘capital neutrality’ throughout the US banking system.

Advertisement

Outlook and conclusions

On the time of writing, members within the US leveraged mortgage markets are 2022 with guarded optimism given the improved well being circumstances and low default charges. Nonetheless, this optimism is offset by geopolitical dangers, widespread and excessive inflation, provide chain points, rising rates of interest, and potential new covid variants. Many direct lenders nonetheless have capital to place to make use of, however M&A exercise has stalled through the first and second quarters of 2022. Right now, the pattern of borrower-friendly debt phrases continues.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Making a business case for AI

Published

on

Making a business case for AI

Good morning. If you’re a CFO, you’ve been in a board meeting—or will be very soon—communicating your plan to invest in AI. For some insight into that process, I sat down with veteran tech CFO Mark Hawkins. His first piece of advice? “Clearly and unambiguously define the use case.” 

“The less difficult it is to understand, the more credible the opportunity,” he explained. “When people can’t explain it, as a seasoned executive, it creates a yellow flag for me.”

Hawkins spent more than 40 years in corporate finance, most recently as president and CFO of Salesforce, which then appointed him president and CFO Emeritus, a position he held through November 2021. He’s also been CFO at Autodesk and Logitech, and he held various positions at Dell and Hewlett-Packard (HP).

Bringing it back to AI, it’s important for CFOs to share with board members “the math, the ROI, the metrics of success” to help build credibility but also be transparent about any risks, and work on building trust, Hawkins said. “It would be wise to really articulate the governance framework for technology,” he added.

It’s also important to make clear the opportunities and potential outcomes—and how those align with the company’s overarching goals and principles.

Advertisement

“When you’re presenting to a super-sophisticated group of technologically advanced people, and most of them could have deep engineering and science backgrounds, it’s a different level of dialogue,” Hawkins continued. Use cases often require additional details, for example.

By 2027, spending on AI software likely will grow to $297.9 billion, with a compound annual growth rate of 19.1%, according to Gartner. The firm’s research also found that boards are asking about AI more than three times as often as considerations tied to cloud computing.

During our conversation, I asked him his personal thoughts on AI, which he compared to electricity, also “a big paradigm.” Artificial intelligence, he said, is going down the path of augmenting people’s abilities and productivity, a journey that potentially includes significant value creation and a chance to create business models that don’t yet exist.

Hawkins also took a moment to reflect a bit on his own journey, including when, at age 21, he joined HP—at the time, a $3.1 billion company. In 2023, its annual revenue was $53.7 billion. 

“It was the beginning of my journey into technology,” Hawkins said, “and I’ve been there ever since.”

Advertisement

Sheryl Estrada
sheryl.estrada@fortune.com

Leaderboard

Matt Lesmeister was promoted to CFO at flyExclusive, Inc. (NYSE American: FLYX), a private charter jet company, effective June 25. He will succeed interim CFO Billy Barnard. Lesmeister joined the company on May 30 as EVP and chief of staff and has 14 years of public company experience across various finance roles. Most recently, he served as VP of transformation and strategy at Fox Factory Holding Corp., Before that, Lesmeister served in various roles of increasing responsibility at United Technologies Corporation. 

Kevin Nihill was named CFO at Rhinebeck Bancorp and Rhinebeck Bank (Nasdaq: RBKB). Nihill replaced former CFO, Michael McDermott, who retired from the bank after 23 years. Nihill most recently served as EVP and CFO at St. Mary’s Bank. He also served as SVP and treasurer at Berkshire Bank.

Big Deal

Mercer recently published new research about the impact of AI on productivity. The findings, created in partnership with Oxford Analytica, suggest that AI may boost developed markets’ GDP growth up 0.5%, with emerging markets potentially seeing a 0.2% boost in GDP growth.

Another key finding is sectors will experience different AI-enabled productivity boosts: finance and insurance (14%), information and technology (13.4%), manufacturing (6.9%), health care and social assistance (6.3%), transportation and warehousing (5.7%), and hospitality and food service (3.1%, according to Mercer.

Advertisement

Going deeper

“Federal Reserve governor says AI is ‘not going to replace’ central bankers—at least not yet,”  is a new Fortune report by Michael del Castillo. He writes: “Lisa Cook, a Federal Reserve governor, isn’t afraid of losing her job to robots anytime soon. Speaking at an Economic Club of New York event on Tuesday, Cook said that when you’re a central bank governor every word counts in a way that not only caught her off guard at first but that likely will catch AI off guard for quite some time.”

Overheard

“By taking a human-first approach and developing AI tools that solve problems everyday people experience, businesses can reach a global audience with broad demographics.”

—Matthieu Rouif, CEO and cofounder of Photoroom, an AI-powered photo-editing app, writes in a new Fortune opinion piece.

Subscribe to the Fortune Next to Lead newsletter to get weekly strategies on how to make it to the corner office. Sign up for free.
Continue Reading

Finance

‘Females In Finance’ Collective Marks 1 Year And 1000 Members At NYSE

Published

on

‘Females In Finance’ Collective Marks 1 Year And 1000 Members At NYSE

Muriel Siebert, known as the ‘First Woman of Finance,’ was the first woman ever to own a seat on the New York Stock Exchange in 1967. She was a passionate advocate for gender equality and remembered as a woman who refused to take no for an answer. Known to have famously threatened the NYSE Chairman with the installation of a portable toilet on the trading floor if a women’s restroom was not granted, and her public appearances with her Chihuahua ‘Monster Girl,’ named in tribute to how neither one was intimidated by ‘the big dogs,’ she had an unyielding confidence and determination that cultivated a rare respectability for women of her era. So rare, she remained the only woman in a ratio of 1365:1 at the NYSE for over a decade.

FIF Collective

Fast forward 57 years later, and it seemed like the perfect fit for the ‘Female in Finance Collective (FIF), led by group CEO Meghan McKenna, to gather in the Muriel Siebel room at the NYSE on June 20th to celebrate its one-year birthday and surpassing its 1000 member milestone. The Collective, is described as ‘an invite-only, highly selective group of Founders, CEOs, CFOs, VPs of Finance, VC Partners, and leaders, with a mission to advance the profiles of women through board seats, job opportunities, networking, learning, and great parties around the world.’

McKenna, like Siebert, is described by many as a woman to whom it is impossible to say no. She is known for her brash humor, charming confidence, low tolerance for inequality, and unwavering belief that change is possible. She equates these attributes to her college basketball career and her humble upbringing in the Bronx as the daughter of a New York Police Officer. “I’ve always stayed true to what I know is right and stood up for others around me,” she says, “that hasn’t always been an easy path to take. I have worked in teams where I was told I was ‘tough to manage,’ just for being honest. But I stay true to my values. We owe that to ourselves and other women.”

Advertisement

McKenna, who founded FIF shortly before starting a new role as a Managing Director at Stifel Bank, says that although the idea had floated in her head for many years, it was the pause between roles that gave her the headspace to make it happen. Yet she was not ready to exit a career she loves and was looking for a home to combine her experience, talent, and FIF, which she found at Stifel. “This is an industry that can be more performative than meaningful when it comes to gender equity, but Stifel has walked the walk when it comes to supporting women,” she says. “My network is my net worth and the team at Stifel really understand and support that. They see the broad industry value FIF creates for everyone.”

She says FIF was born after two decades of seeing countless gaps and lost opportunities for women and bottom-line impacts on business. “Women are not progressing at a rate that makes sense for their capabilities and industry needs,” she says. The effect of this is backed by data, such as the 2022 World Economic Forum’s ‘Global Gender Gap Report,’ which revealed females in finance remain one of the most untapped business resources. The share of women in global C-suite roles in the financial services industry worldwide reached 18.4 percent in 2023, and predictions from a recent Statista Study estimate a growth to 21.8 percent by 2031.

Advertisement

For McKenna and the team at FIF, the idea of waiting another near-decade for a mere 3.4 percentage point increase in female representation is not a reality they are willing to accept. Yet the trillion dollar question remains, how can we improve this? While there is no magic bullet solution, they believe the right place to start, is to look to each other and initiate a collective effort for change.

The cost equals the commitment

FIF is not alone in this mission. There has been a widespread proliferation of communities and programs promising to empower women and accelerate their professional success, an approach many consider crucial for women. Yet unlike many of these networks, which incur sizable membership fees and restrict their events to women, FIF takes a different approach. McKenna says she wanted a ‘personally free network for qualifying women. “This is a network of decision-makers and investors who bring merit she says, “I want them to bring their passion to this mission at no cost but their commitment to cultivate change.”

A strategy for sponsors and allies

Instead, the monetization will come via paid talent matching and a sponsorship program for events and seminars open to men and women. This strategy appears to work well for McKenna, who has fostered a growing partner ecosystem of over 30 sponsors in year one, including names like Deloitte, Amazon, KPMG, Samsung Next, Netsuite, Davis Polk, and Ramp, hosted 12 events across the cities of New York, San Francisco, Boston and Washington DC.

Ken Egan, Partner at Cross Country Consulting, shares that he finds this approach effective as it focuses on bottom-line impacts and brings others along on the journey. In doing so, there is an organic allyship, something that critics of female-only networks often highlight as a missing link. “I have attended events and seen the value FIF brings,” he says, “This is a tough industry for women, and businesses in knowing how best to support but often showing up is half the battle. FIF forces people out of their comfort zones in a healthy way and creates a conscious and intentional level of connection.”

The burden of proof over potential

For venture capitalist Marissa Hodgdon, CEO of Sidelines.Vc, the nature of that intent is critical. She shares that a key challenge women in the finance industry face is the burden of ‘proof over potential.’ The ‘you know what you know’ effect that has worked very favorably for white males, who continue to receive more than 90% of annual VC dollars. She believes they will continue to do so unless women create a new wave of intentional change. Hodgdon, who is partnering with FIF to bring investment and advisory opportunities to the Collective, says, ‘we need to be targeted in putting opportunities for advisory roles and investment in front of women. FIF is the perfect forum for us to do this. A high caliber network of well-informed women creating change for themselves.”

The power of possibility

Much of the focus on financial leadership centers on business models—revenues, costs, niches, and leverage. However, what women often need are new mental models. Gaingels CEO Jennifer Jeronimo sees her firm’s partnership with FIF as a catalyst to create a new sense of possibility. Addressing the audience at the NYSE event, she gave the analogy of Roger Bannister, who shocked the world with the power of the possibility by breaking the record for the four-minute mile, once deemed hopelessly impossible, yet achieved by over 1000 runners since. Jeronimo wants to bring that same power of possibility to women in the VC realm and diversify the face of an industry that often looks and sounds the same.

What’s next for FIF?

Seaaoned finance exec and fractional CFO Amy Kux, a founding member of FIF says, “I have been part of many networks over the course of my career, but FIF is one of the only communities that promotes helping one another as its mission, and we cannot waver on that.”

This is an important factor for McKenna and the team at FIF as they look to the future and consider opportunities to grow the collective across new cities in the USA and international . McKenna says they will not put scale above substance and instead stay focused on their core values and strategic objectives by continuing to listen to one another. “We are a group of women who have created this as a labor of love and bootstrapped our way to now. We are not salaried, we do this voluntarily and most of us have full time jobs. Of course we want to grow and monetize to better resource and reinvest, but for now our core focus is not on headline growth but ensuring we maintain a high caliber community. That is what makes FIF so impactful.”

Muriel Siebert once said, “you create opportunities by performing not complaining.” For the women at FIF Collective this is a mantra for the next stage, as they look to build a future for females in finance by proving the power of connection, and collectively challenging the status quo.

Continue Reading

Finance

These 2 Finance Stocks Could Beat Earnings: Why They Should Be on Your Radar

Published

on

These 2 Finance Stocks Could Beat Earnings: Why They Should Be on Your Radar

Wall Street watches a company’s quarterly report closely to understand as much as possible about its recent performance and what to expect going forward. Of course, one figure often stands out among the rest: earnings.

Life and the stock market are both about expectations, and rising above what is expected is often rewarded, while falling short can come with negative consequences. Investors might want to try to capture stronger returns by finding positive earnings surprises.

Hunting for ‘earnings whispers’ or companies poised to beat their quarterly earnings estimates is a somewhat common practice. But that doesn’t make it easy. One way that has been proven to work is by using the Zacks Earnings ESP tool.

The Zacks Earnings ESP, Explained

The Zacks Earnings ESP, or Expected Surprise Prediction, aims to find earnings surprises by focusing on the most recent analyst revisions. The basic premise is that if an analyst reevaluates their earnings estimate ahead of an earnings release, it means they likely have new information that could possibly be more accurate.

Advertisement

Now that we understand the basic idea, let’s look at how the Expected Surprise Prediction works. The ESP is calculated by comparing the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate, with the percentage difference between the two giving us the Zacks ESP figure.

In fact, when we combined a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) or better and a positive Earnings ESP, stocks produced a positive surprise 70% of the time. Perhaps most importantly, using these parameters has helped produce 28.3% annual returns on average, according to our 10 year backtest.

Stocks with a ranking of #3 (Hold), or 60% of all stocks covered by the Zacks Rank, are expected to perform in-line with the broader market. Stocks with rankings of #2 (Buy) and #1 (Strong Buy), or the top 15% and top 5% of stocks, respectively, should outperform the market; Strong Buy stocks should outperform more than any other rank.

Should You Consider AGNC Investment?

The last thing we will do today, now that we have a grasp on the ESP and how powerful of a tool it can be, is to quickly look at a qualifying stock. AGNC Investment (NASDAQ:AGNC) holds a #3 (Hold) at the moment and its Most Accurate Estimate comes in at $0.56 a share 27 days away from its upcoming earnings release on July 22, 2024.

Advertisement

AGNC has an Earnings ESP figure of +5.66%, which, as explained above, is calculated by taking the percentage difference between the $0.56 Most Accurate Estimate and the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.53. AGNC Investment is one of a large database of stocks with positive ESPs.

AGNC is just one of a large group of Finance stocks with a positive ESP figure. Healthpeak (NYSE:DOC) is another qualifying stock you may want to consider.

Healthpeak is a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock, and is getting ready to report earnings on July 25, 2024. DOC’s Most Accurate Estimate sits at $0.44 a share 30 days from its next earnings release.

For Healthpeak, the percentage difference between its Most Accurate Estimate and its Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.44 is +1.15%.

Because both stocks hold a positive Earnings ESP, AGNC and DOC could potentially post earnings beats in their next reports.

Advertisement

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

Continue Reading

Trending