Entertainment
Todd and Julie Chrisley sue law firm for $25 million, say legal flub led to conviction
Embattled reality TV personalities Todd and Julie Chrisley are suing an Atlanta law firm and one of its attorneys, alleging that legal mistakes led to the couple’s conviction.
The lawsuit, filed June 5 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleges that Atlanta-based Balch & Bingham LLP and attorney Chris Anulewicz “put their own interests ahead of their clients’ lives” by taking on the couple’s case and appointing Anulewicz as the lead, which they say meant “money, publicity, and the kind of high-profile notoriety that brings in business.”
According to the Chrisleys, Anulewicz “had no meaningful criminal defense experience,” and “Balch knew this — or should have.” They also claim that while representing them, Anulewicz steered them into a $75,000 investment in his brother-in-law’s food truck business.
The lawsuit claims that the couple’s conviction and subsequent federal prison sentence were the result of an “unlawful, warrantless search of the Chrisleys’ warehouse” by the Georgia Department of Revenue, and that Anulewicz missed a deadline to suppress derivative evidence that was ultimately used as the foundation of the prosecution’s case.
“That illegal search launched the entire federal case,” reads the lawsuit. “The district court agreed the search was illegal and suppressed the physical documents. But Anulewicz — operating without supervision from Balch — never moved to suppress the derivative evidence: the emails, bank records, and financial documents that federal agents obtained because of what they learned from the illegal search.”
The couple is seeking $25 million in damages, claiming that because their team didn’t have the documents suppressed, they were convicted on every count.
“They served time in federal prison,” reads the suit. “They were separated from each other and from their children. They lost their television show and endorsement deals, costing them more than $25 million in income. Their reputations were destroyed. They have spent millions more in appeals and post-conviction proceedings, all of it an attempt to undo harm that a single timely motion would have prevented.”
In 2022, an Atlanta court found the “Chrisley Knows Best” couple guilty on charges of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States and tax fraud. Julie Chrisley was also charged with wire fraud and obstruction of justice.
Todd Chrisley received a 12-year sentence, along with 16 months’ probation, while his wife was sentenced to seven years in prison and 16 months’ probation.
In 2024, the Chrisleys’ daughter, Savannah, appealed to President Trump to free her mom and dad. During the Republican National Convention, she gave a speech about the “rogue prosecutors” who locked up her parents.
Last year, Trump granted the reality stars a full pardon.
Jay V. Surgent, an attorney who represents Todd and Julie Chrisley, said in a statement to The Times that the reality stars “have correctly been pardoned by President Trump.” He alleged that Georgia officials violated the “Chrisley Knows Best” stars’ constitutional rights due to their notoriety and criticized local authorities’ “improper seizure of evidence.”
Times staff writer Alexandra Del Rosario contributed to this report.
Movie Reviews
‘Hollywood Does Abortion’ Review: Politics and Pop Culture Intersect in a Doc That’s Broad in Scope but Sharp in Insight
Speaking about the abortion storylines of the 2010s, a media researcher remarks on how “divorced” Hollywood seemed from the “political reality” of the era.
On our shows, from Parenthood to Private Practice to Better Things, characters were freely exercising their right to choose, with support from sympathetic loved ones and reassuring medical professionals. Meanwhile, out in the real world, the rising Tea Party were passing a “tidal wave” of ever-tightening restrictions, turning those same scenes into increasingly inaccessible fantasies.
Hollywood Does Abortion
The Bottom Line A galvanizing start to a long-overdue conversation.
Venue: Tribeca Festival (Spotlight Documentary)
Directors: Barbara Attie, Janet Goldwater, Mike Attie
Screenwriter: Jamie Boyle
1 hour 36 minutes
Hollywood Does Abortion, premiering at Tribeca, aims to close that gap. Combining news footage, expert interviews and a dizzying array of film and TV clips, the documentary makes the case for the inextricable relationship between pop culture and politics, each side shaping the other. If it necessarily prioritizes breadth over depth, its sharp insights make for a galvanizing start to a long-overdue conversation.
It helps that despite the often dispiriting subject matter, Hollywood Does Abortion, directed by Janet Goldwater, Barbara Attie and Mike Attie, is a surprisingly easy watch. The pacing is brisk but never hurried, and its leaps between eras or topics never feels difficult to follow, thanks to writer-editor Jamie Boyle’s well-organized narrative flow. Statistics are trotted out judiciously to make a clear statement, rather than thrown at us willy-nilly.
The talking heads include academics and activists as well as creatives like Crazy Ex-Girlfriend creator Rachel Bloom and Dirty Dancing writer Eleanor Bernstein, and the film allows both their expert knowledge and their personal perspectives to shine through. (In a pointed touch, nearly all of them are women.) In one minute, they might be thoughtfully pushing back against former President Bill Clinton’s “safe, legal and rare” line, which stigmatized the choice even as it argued for the right to make it. In another, they might be laughing at their own irritated responses to a particularly irresponsible bit of storytelling.
If abortion is often regarded as a topic so complex and controversial that even the most powerful institutions and ambitious politicians are loath to go near it, Hollywood Does Abortion makes a point of presenting it as digestible and approachable.
Covering half a century’s worth of storytelling about reproductive rights — from a Maude episode that aired shortly before Roe v. Wade to Blonde, which released shortly after its overturn in 2022, and beyond — it lays out in clear and cogent detail how real-world conversations are reflected in our pop culture. Which, in turn, has the power to influence public thinking and even actual legislation around certain issues, à la the Will & Grace effect.
Like how Dirty Dancing taught the generation who came up after Roe what they stood to lose if those rights were repealed, by smuggling a back-alley abortion storyline into an irresistible teen romance. Or, on the flip side, how a particularly nasty episode of Law & Order inspired by George Tiller helped to justify his murder in retrospect, by turning the fictionalized version of him into the specter of every fervent pro-lifer’s nightmares.
And even within its limited run time, the film allows for nuance: The same Dirty Dancing clips that served as a necessary reminder of an uglier past resurface in another segment discussing how the frequent depiction of abortion as physically and emotionally traumatic helped portray it as something evil.
Hollywood Does Abortion’s biggest issue, insofar as it can even be fairly described as one, is simply the overabundance of worthy topics. The filmmakers are admirable in their ambition, touching on everything from the way male characters are depicted in these storylines (often furious at not having been allowed more say) to which types of stories remain underrepresented (basically anything that isn’t about a pretty young white woman getting a medical procedure) to Hollywood’s favorite wishy-washy plot cheats (like Cristina’s ectopic pregnancy on Grey’s Anatomy, the result of ABC refusing to let Shonda Rimes depict her going through with an abortion).
However, the doc’s wide-ranging view also means touching on things is all it has time to do. Though entire essays can and have been written about some of the individual storylines mentioned here (indeed, Slate critic Dana Stevens, who wrote one about Knocked Up’s “shmashmortion” approach, gets to reiterate some of her points here), the vast majority of referenced shows and movies appear only as out-of-context clips, and even the ones subject to more thorough discussion are allowed just a few minutes at most.
But such restraint is more a virtue than a drawback of the movie, which works precisely because it’s so judicious about recognizing what fits into its scope and what doesn’t. It’s plugged in enough to bring up, say, trad wife content on TikTok — a very modern form of pop culture — but smart enough to recognize that it’s another discussion for another day. It shows enough clips of conservative commentators spewing hateful rhetoric or prominent politicians like J.D. Vance demanding “more babies” to provoke justified fury, but leaves the hardcore history lessons for other books or docs to handle.
Very consciously, Hollywood Does Abortion positions itself as part of a larger discussion rather than its entirety. And while it can be devastatingly candid about the terror of the times we live in, it offers itself up as a call to fight rather than a concession of defeat.
Movie Reviews
‘The Patriot’ 4K UHD Blu-Ray SteelBook Review – Glossy Historical Epic Is The Ultimate Dad Movie
In 1776 South Carolina, widower and legendary war hero Benjamin Martin (Mel Gibson) finds himself thrust into the midst of the American Revolutionary War as he helplessly watches his family torn apart by the savage forces of the British Redcoats. Unable to remain silent, he recruits a band of reluctant volunteers, including his idealistic patriot son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger), to take up arms against the British. Fighting to protect his family’s freedom and his country’s independence, Martin discovers the pain of betrayal, the redemption of revenge and the passion of love.
For thoughts on The Patriot, please check out my thoughts on No Streaming Required:
Video Quality
The new 4K UHD Blu-Ray SteelBook of The Patriot offers a significant improvement in quality over the older Blu-Ray released in 2007, but no Blu-Ray copies of the movie are included in this package. The film was already released on 4K UHD Blu-Ray back in 2018, which I have and used to compare to this newer release. The implementation of Dolby Vision versus the strictly HDR10 of the previous release yields some incremental improvements, but the major selling point of this release is the inclusion of the Extended Cut in 4K UHD at long last, as opposed to the HD presentation in the last set. While it was believed that the unique footage in this cut could not properly be scaled up to meet 4K UHD standards, Sony has worked its magic by providing it along with the Theatrical Cut on 4K UHD, each version with its own disc.
These transfers invite a proper amount of film grain that resolves exceedingly well without being clumpy, splotchy, or unnatural. Even in the most challenging conditions, such as the smoky battlefield, the picture does not stumble with loose grain or banding, leaving you astounded by its complexity. Sony has not had any digital manipulation done to this transfer, so this disc is clear of DNR, compression artifacts, and other encoding shortcomings. The period production design is presented with tremendous clarity and depth. Skin tones appear more natural than the previous Blu-Ray with a world of fine detail apparent, especially as wounds compound on the battlefield. The costumes and other background textures within the environment are key to making this transfer feel so alive. Even the unique footage of the Extended Cut blends seamlessly with the theatrical footage, so you are in good shape no matter which version you watch.
The benefits of Dolby Vision are readily apparent, as it refines the color spectrum to achieve a more pinpoint execution of the intended hue. The black levels are a beast, always staying deep and flawless with great detail. Highlights in the film are just as brilliant, with the whites pure and balanced with no signs of blooming to be found. This is helpful with characters out under the blazing sun. There is a fair share of eye-popping colors to behold, especially within the foliage and other environmental flourishes. The rich shades within the foliage are quite impressive on all fronts. The colors are complex and completely accurate to what was intended by the creative team. Sony has come through with a pair of impeccable transfers for fans, and even those who own the previous 4K UHD might want to upgrade for the extended cut.
Audio Quality
This 4K UHD Blu-Ray ports over the previous Dolby Atmos track, which gives the film a stellar audio experience necessary for a period epic. The disc also provides the original DTS-HD 5.1 Master Audio track that still impressive in its own right. Those who choose to utilize the original track may not engage every speaker you have, but you will be treated to an ideal experience without any obvious age-related flaws. Dialogue is nice and clear without ever getting overpowered by the music or sound effects. The score from John Williams is deeply emotional and adds so much to the experience as it flows out with peerless fidelity.
With the Atmos track, you will find the front channels commanding most of the dialogue and other primary sounds, but subtle elements consistently expand to the surrounds, rears, and overhead speakers to make things feel more three-dimensional. The sounds up above do not steal focus unnecessarily, rather allowing the world to feel more expansive. Atmospheric sound effects are precisely rendered within the mix so that directionality is never in question. The low-end effects from the subwoofer are astounding due to the intense battle sequences. Sony has not set a foot wrong with this release. Optional English, English SDH, and a plethora of other subtitles are provided.

Special Features
Sony has provided The Patriot with a sleek new SteelBook featuring artwork that is truly lovely in person. Video of the SteelBook can be found at the top of this review.
Disc 1 (4K UHD – Theatrical Cut)
- Audio Commentary: Director Roland Emmerich and Producer Dean Devlin
- The Art of War: A ten-minute featurette that explores how combat was waged during this time and how the creative team approached realizing it on screen.
- The True Patriots: A ten-minute look at the process of bringing the soldiers into this feature, as well as the supposed historical accuracy at play.
- Theatrical Trailer (2:39)
Disc 2 (4K UHD – Unrated Version)
- Deleted Scenes: A 13-minute selection of unused material is provided here with optional audio commentary from director Roland Emmerich and Producer Dean Devlin.
- Visual Effects Featurette: A nearly ten-minute piece that shows how they pulled off some of the visual effects work in the film.
- Conceptual Art to Film Comparisons (4:48)
Final Thoughts
The Patriot is one of the ultimate examples of pure “dad movie” bliss. You get an epic historical story that sands down any nuances to a strict moral binary that plays well for a broad audience. If you are looking for historical accuracy, you should stay far away, as this feature has strictly different goals. This movie mostly accomplishes what director Roland Emmerich strives to do with all of his movies—to entertain a mass audience. This does not always result in the most artistically rewarding endeavors, but they can be satisfying. Even with a runtime nearing three hours, the film moves along at a great pace, and the ensemble delivers in all the ways it needs to. It’s American history through a shiny Hollywood lens, but that is what you want sometimes when you rather rest your brain for a few hours. Sony Pictures has released a sterling new Limited Edition 4K UHD Blu-Ray SteelBook featuring a top-notch A/V presentation as well as a welcome assortment of special features. For the Extended Cut in 4K UHD alone, this is worth an upgrade for fans. Recommended
The Patriot is currently available to purchase on 4K UHD Blu-Ray SteelBook and Digital.
Note: Images presented in this review are not reflective of the image quality of the 4K UHD Blu-Ray.
Disclaimer: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has supplied a copy of this disc free of charge for review purposes. All opinions in this review are the honest reactions of the author.
Entertainment
UFC Freedom 250: What to know about the White House bout, Paramount and the lawsuit
President Trump is known for being combative. And to mark his birthday Sunday, he’s literally picking a fight — actually seven of them. But a legion of opponents are determined to squash the celebration.
Trump has been gearing up for weeks for UFC Freedom 250, a mixed martial arts extravaganza that will turn the historic White House into a one-night fight house. The event designed to simultaneously celebrate his 80th birthday and commemorate America’s 250th anniversary will take place in a massive octagon-shaped structure that has been erected on the South Lawn of the White House.
The invitation-only event is scheduled to stream live on Paramount+, which is owned by David Ellison, one of Trump’s closest allies. UFC fights began streaming on the service earlier this year, with some airing on CBS, one of the first major deals signed under Ellison.
White House spokesman Davis Ingle has called the UFC card “one of the greatest and most historic sports events in history, and President Trump hosting it at the White House is a testament to his vision to celebrate America’s monumental 250th anniversary.”
But the gala is facing fierce legal challenges from activists who say UFC Freedom 250 is a scam flavored by financial and political corruption, accusing Trump and his close friends UFC chief Dana White and Ellison of benefiting financially from the event. Opponents say Trump has purchased stock in UFC’s parent company, TKO Group Holdings, while pointing out that UFC Freedom 250 is happening several weeks before the Fourth of July anniversary.
White House officials have called those allegations baseless and have asked a judge to dismiss the lawsuit.
As promo spots showing the combatants in fight mode fill the airwaves, the Public Integrity Project watchdog group has filed a lawsuit trying to derail the event. While the National Park Service is named as one of the defendants in the suit, environmental groups and former park service staff have decried the event.
Dana White, left, and then-President-elect Trump attend a UFC event held at Madison Square Garden in New York City in 2024.
(Sarah Stier / Getty Images)
Though some legal experts have predicted that those efforts may fall short, UFC Freedom 250 marks the latest in a relentless stream of furors shadowing Trump as he faces sharply declining poll numbers and harsh criticism over his economic and domestic policies, as well as his handling of the war with Iran. Here’s what we know about the event and what to expect Sunday.
What is UFC Freedom 250?
The event will take place in a mammoth claw-like outdoor arena that will spotlight the White House in the background. Undisputed lightweight champion Ilia Topuria will face off against current interim lightweight champion Justin Gaethje in the main event, which is billed as a five-round title unification battle.
A six-fight undercard, including a heavyweight interim title bout between Alex Pereira and Ciryl Gane, will precede the main event.
Who is putting on the fight?
White‘s UFC is staging the event. White, who has stressed in interviews that no taxpayer dollars are involved, has said that Trump made the suggestion of a White House event when they were together at a recent UFC fight.
Wouldn’t baseball or basketball be a more appropriate sport to feature in a celebration of America instead of a cage fight?
Perhaps. But Trump is a huge fan of boxing and mixed martial arts. He was flanked by several of the fighters who will be participating in the event when he first announced the bouts at the Oval Office. He gushed as he introduced them individually, calling them warriors: “No people in sports are tougher than these people.”
But Conor Friedersdorf, a staff writer for the Atlantic, put forth a different theory: “On Trump’s 80th birthday, blood sport will be the diversion of choice at the White House because he wants to associate his presidency and himself with the violent domination and humiliation of rivals,” he wrote in a newsletter. “America itself is weaker now on the world stage than it was when Trump began either of his presidencies.”
White has credited the president’s devotion to the sport with propelling it into the cultural mainstream, and he is predicting a record-breaking global audience.
Where can viewers watch the event?
UFC Freedom 250 will stream on Paramount+ as part of a $7.7-billion deal that Ellison struck with TKO Group Holdings, the owner of UFC. The broadcast starts at 5 p.m. Pacific.
Dana White, left, and President Trump attend UFC 327 in Miami in April.
(Julia Demaree Nikhinson / Associated Press)
The event is another apparent maneuver for Ellison to curry favor with Trump as he seeks his support and approval for a $111-billion deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery. Trump has made no secret for his desire for shake up Warner Bros. Discovery-owned CNN, which he regards as a hostile platform.
Will this be a star-studded event?
Don’t expect a New York Knicks-style celebrity row. Although several stars including Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, Adam Sandler, Mario Lopez and former star quarterback Tom Brady have reportedly been invited by White, none have indicated that they plan to show up.
White has said that 70,000 fans have registered for free tickets to attend the fan event at the Ellipse near the White House.
Since it’s Trump’s birthday, is UFC Freedom 250 a political event?
“This isn’t politics,” White said recently on ESPN’s “The Pat McAfee Show. “This is about the United States, what this country is about … If you love America, you’re going to love this event. It has nothing to do with politics. We just happen to be on the White House lawn and the president of the United States will be there.”
Why is there opposition to the fights?
The lawsuit filed by the Public Integrity Project contends that UFC Freedom 250 violates federal regulations that prohibit sporting events on federal park lands. Two Virginia activists who are plaintiffs in the suit claim that they “want to uphold the rule of law and protect our nation’s most cherished monuments from corrupt exploitation.”
The suit contends that the plan includes a weigh-in at the Lincoln Memorial and a pre-fight walkout from the Oval Office.
According to the suit, “The president is giving White and his company what none have enjoyed before: unfettered access to the White House and Lincoln Memorial to stage a private, for-profit sports event with all of the promotional and branding opportunities that accompany such access.”
Brendan Ballou, chief executive of the Public Integrity Project, said in an interview on MS NOW that the event and advertising is “fundamentally the private profiteering of our national monuments, and that is fundamentally what is violating the law and why we are suing.”
-
Missouri2 minutes ago
Missouri Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 winning numbers for June 11, 2026
-
Montana4 minutes ago6K+ Flathead Electric customers without power due to damaged transmission structure
-
Nebraska9 minutes agoData centers take center stage at North Omaha townhall
-
Nevada17 minutes agoNevada DMV Enforcement cracks down on stolen luxury cars sold openly on social media
-
New Hampshire19 minutes agoOfficer injured after being struck by vehicle while responding to crash in Londonderry, N.H. – The Boston Globe
-
New Jersey25 minutes agoNew Jersey man sentenced to 6.5 years for fatal Lehigh Valley plane crash
-
New Mexico32 minutes agoFlorida bans shelter animal imports from Texas and New Mexico over flesh-eating screwworm
-
North Carolina34 minutes agoNew Bern leader Linda J. Staunch receives Order of the Long Leaf Pine honor