Connect with us

Entertainment

To keep ‘Frankenstein’ human, Guillermo del Toro trusted his craftspeople

Published

on

To keep ‘Frankenstein’ human, Guillermo del Toro trusted his craftspeople

Vital organs of the same cinematic body, the artists who handcrafted Guillermo del Toro’s imposing “Frankenstein” helped ensure the experience of watching it feels immersive.

“When a movie is the best possible incarnation of itself, it’s a universe you fall into; as the youth says, it’s a vibe,” Del Toro says during an interview at the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah, where he was in attendance to screen a restoration of his 1992 feature debut, “Cronos.”

Like Victor Frankenstein, who diligently selects body parts from corpses to stitch together his humanoid creation, the Mexican director carefully assembled his troupe of movie magicians. Of course, their talents mattered immensely to him, but so did their drive and their willingness to participate in the “team sport” of filmmaking.

“The cohesive personality of the film, the expressiveness of the film, depends on every aspect being orchestrated without an ego,” Del Toro says. “Each department sustains the department next to them.”

Del Toro clearly knows how to pick them. The Envelope recently caught up with makeup effects veteran Mike Hill, seasoned production designer Tamara Deverell, costume virtuosa Kate Hawley and acclaimed composer Alexandre Desplat, all Oscar-nominated for their work on “Frankenstein.”

Advertisement

And just like organs that constantly communicate with each other, their work is intimately intertwined. Nothing is conceived in isolation on a Del Toro film. “We all know what everyone’s doing within the different departments, so we all echo each other,” says Hawley.

1

2 Kate Hawley (costumes) of "Frankenstein" in London

1. Tamara Deverell. 2. Kate Hawley. (Lauren Fleishman / For The Times)

Advertisement

In casting his acolytes, Del Toro seeks the alchemy that only human minds and hands can accomplish building tangible worlds. “The audience knows when something is digital, and when something has been crafted with real materials,” Del Toro explains. “I really believe people can tell the difference. Maybe they can’t articulate it, but they can feel it.”

Hill agrees. His mandate to create the prosthetics and makeup that transformed Jacob Elordi into the Creature aimed to make him look like an artwork that Victor Frankenstein handcrafted. Every part of him was by design, with the scars on his body reflecting incisions that those studying human anatomy in the 18th century would have made.

“If the monster felt fake, we would’ve lost the movie,” says Hill. “The Creature had to feel real. Not to put down VFX, but there’s a human quality they can’t catch.”

For Deverell, “Frankenstein” represented both the continuation of a creative partnership that dates back to the 1990s and an opportunity to showcase her multi-faceted skills. “Guillermo and I speak in a language of art history, and he is steeped in cinematic history,” she says.

With a team of technicians and craftspeople, Deverell constructed breathtaking sets, including Victor’s laboratory with giant batteries that required intricate steam and lighting mechanisms.

Advertisement

Undoubtedly, her pièce de resistance is the full-size Arctic ship where the opening sequence unfolds. Though the production considered existing vessels, none of them measured up. “There were specific action beats that Guillermo wanted, and a look that we all wanted,” she says. “To have complete creative control, there’s only one way to do it.”

To anyone who disagreed with the need for a ship, Del Toro would explain that it was not an extravagance. “It’s actually what tells the audience the scale of the movie,” he says.

1 Alexandre Desplat.

2 Mike Hill.

1. Alexandre Desplat. 2. Mike Hill. (Lauren Fleishman / For The Times)

Advertisement

The first half hour of the film, Del Toro believes, establishes its ambition and operatic quality. There are no digital doubles in that sequence, but real stunt performers aboard a ship that’s not a miniature but a massive structure that moves thanks to a giant gimbal.

It’s the way Del Toro pursues ideas by way of collaboration that brings Hawley back to his worlds (she even worked with him on his unmade version of “The Hobbit”). She’s learned to conceive her pieces considering that in his movies real water, mud, snow and fake blood might be in play.

“There’s something that happens with real materiality, real construction, there’s an alchemy to it,” Hawley says. “What a fabric does and performs is not always predictable, but the outcome and the potential you see in something then becomes the magic.”

As production timelines get shorter and A.I. utilization creeps into the filmmaking process, Hawley believes artists are trying to hold onto the craft as much as possible. “We came here to build worlds,” she says. “That’s what we did as kids. That’s what we do. This is our church.”

Del Toro admits he can be a “pain in the ass,” especially when dealing with his film’s production design and makeup effects. He atones by constantly reassuring his artisans. “They need to know that even if you are torturing them you admire them,” he says.

Advertisement

The only element of the film where Del Toro actively hopes to be surprised is the score. And Desplat is committed to delivering.

“Writing music is using your imagination. It’s not using references. It makes no sense to me,” says Desplat, who believes most scores today sound like work that has come before. “I hear many composers use references, but what for? That’s not what we do. We have the film to be inspired by. That’s enough.”

For “Frankenstein” — his third creature movie with Del Toro, after “The Shape of Water” and “Pinocchio” — Desplat thus avoided Gothic compositions to create a counterpoint to the images, highlighting the fragility of Elordi’s Creature, who he thinks of as the core of the film.

Also tying together the film’s craftsmanship is Del Toro’s awards campaign for “Frankenstein,” which he’s navigated to the tune of “F— AI.” The chant has resonated with those fighting to keep art made by humans for humans. “Frankenstein,” in turn, is the director’s latest monument to the beauty of imperfection.

“Art is the thing that we should never let go of, never surrender to mechanization or artificial intelligence,” Del Toro adds. “We need to grasp on it because this is the last point of contact between humans.”

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

‘Mr. Burton’ Review: Harry Lawtey Plays Richard Burton in a Poignant Drama About the Actor and His Adoptive Father

Published

on

‘Mr. Burton’ Review: Harry Lawtey Plays Richard Burton in a Poignant Drama About the Actor and His Adoptive Father

Seven-time Oscar nominee Richard Burton continues to have an intriguing afterlife, four decades following his death. At this year’s BAFTA awards, a movie about his early life, Mr. Burton, earned a nomination for best British Film. Mr. Burton, directed by Marc Evans, was also one of the audience favorite films at January’s Palm Springs International Film Festival. It opens in theaters this week and, aided by a strong cast, should appeal even to audiences who have fuzzy recollections of the once notorious actor.

The film begins with a quotation from Elizabeth Taylor (who married Burton twice after a scandalous, heavily publicized affair that began during the shooting of Cleopatra in 1962). In it, Taylor states that Richard never would have found fame and fortune without the efforts of his adoptive father, Philip Burton (superbly played by Toby Jones in the film). Richard (Harry Lawtey of Industry) was actually born Richard Jenkins, the son of a Welsh miner who abandoned the family after the death of Richard’s mother. Richard was then raised by his older sister and her husband, but his talent was spotted by his teacher, Philip Burton, who recognized the young man’s appreciation of literature and drama.

Mr. Burton

The Bottom Line

An incisive origin story.

Advertisement

Release date: Friday, March 20


2 hours 4 minutes

Philip Burton was himself an aspiring writer who penned some dramas for the BBC and had a number of contacts in the theater. But the film suggests that he felt disappointed by his progress and may have compensated in part by playing a mentorship role to Richard. Whether he also felt a physical attraction to young Richard is treated subtly and never definitively answered in the film.

Opening scenes contrast the comfortable but modest living conditions of Philip, who resides in a boarding house owned and overseen by a sympathetic landlady (trenchantly played by Lesley Manville), and the tension in Richard’s household. His brother-in-law demands that Richard drop out of school to contribute to the family finances; the boy resists following his father into the mines but gets a job at a clothing store instead.

Advertisement

Eventually Burton comes up with the idea that Richard can move into the boarding house and return to school, but this may require Burton adopting Richard as his son. Richard is comfortable with this arrangement, and Philip suggests that Richard may have an opportunity for a fellowship to study acting at Oxford. But when Richard’s father and fellow students suggest that Philip may have something more than a paternal interest in the handsome young aspiring actor, Richard flees in terror.

It is to the film’s credit that it refuses to come to any definitive conclusion about Philip’s interest in Richard. There was never anything overtly untoward about their close bond, and until the end of his life, Richard continued to express gratitude for Philip Burton’s mentorship. Yet it may be significant that we never see any hint of Philip’s romantic or sexual interest in women. Richard did leave Burton’s household for several years, but when he had his breakthrough role in Stratford in 1951, portraying Prince Hal in Shakespeare’s Henry IV plays, Philip returned and (at least in this telling) helped Richard to a triumphant opening night.

Richard Burton quickly moved on from there. He earned his first Oscar nomination in 1952 for My Cousin Rachel, and in 1954, he starred in the first Cinemascope epic, The Robe. (Other memorable roles included Becket and Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, his finest collaboration with Taylor.) Burton also continued acting in theater, and the 1964 production of Hamlet, in which he starred under the direction of John Gielgud, remains perhaps the most phenomenally successful production of the play in modern theatrical history.

Since unknown backstories behind startling successes always compel, Mr. Burton has a lot going for it. Lawtey doesn’t quite match Burton’s thrilling vocal delivery (who could?), but he convinces us of the young actor’s talent and potential instability. But it is really Jones, in one of the finest performances of his long career, who holds our attention throughout the movie. The subject of mentorship is not treated frequently onscreen, but Mr. Burton may be remembered as one of the definitive explorations of the theme. All the technical credits help to ground the film — cinematography by Stuart Biddlecombe is especially striking — but it is the performances that truly mesmerize.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Nexstar finalizes acquisition of Tegna’s TV stations, despite opposition

Published

on

Nexstar finalizes acquisition of Tegna’s TV stations, despite opposition

KTLA-owner Nexstar Media Group said it has closed its deal to acquire rival Tegna’s TV stations, despite opposition from eight state attorneys general who filed a lawsuit to block the merger.

The acquisition was approved by the Federal Communications Commission’s Media Bureau and the Justice Department, Irving, Texas-based Nexstar said Thursday.

“This transaction is essential to sustaining strong local journalism in the communities we serve,” Nexstar founder and Chief Executive Perry Sook said in a statement. “By bringing these two outstanding companies together, Nexstar will be a stronger, more dynamic enterprise — better positioned to deliver exceptional journalism and local programming with enhanced assets, capabilities and talent.”

Sook also mentioned President Trump and FCC Chairman Brendan Carr by name in the statement, saying the company was “grateful” they recognized the “dynamic forces shaping the media landscape” and allowed the transaction to move forward. Trump had supported the deal.

Advertisement

The surprise announcement came only a day after eight state attorneys general, including California’s Rob Bonta, sued to stop the deal, arguing it would give Nexstar too much control of local TV stations. At the time, Bonta said the combination would cause “irreparable harm to local news and consumers who rely on their reporting as a critical source of information.”

Nexstar is the largest TV station owner in the U.S., with 164 outlets including KTLA in Los Angeles. If the merger with Tegna succeeds, Nexstar would have 265 TV stations reaching 80% of the U.S. and multiple outlets in a number of markets.

The suit also claimed it would give the combined company too much leverage in negotiating fees from pay-TV providers that carry their stations, which could raise costs for consumers.

The plaintiffs in the suit also include state attorneys general in Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Virginia.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez said the merger violates the existing national ownership cap of 39% under federal law and said the acquisition did not receive a vote before the entire commission. The FCC approved this deal with waivers, meaning the company can operate in violation of that ownership cap.

Advertisement

“A transaction of this magnitude, which includes new and novel issues before the FCC, demands open deliberation before the full Commission, not a quiet sign-off meant to avoid public scrutiny,” Gomez said in a statement. “Given the increasingly alarming pace of reckless media consolidation, the American public deserves to know how and why this decision was made.”

The FCC did not respond to an immediate request for comment.

Times staff writers Stephen Battaglio and Meg James contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Review: ‘Project Hail Mary’ borders on miraculous

Published

on

Review: ‘Project Hail Mary’ borders on miraculous

Movie Reviews

Ryan Gosling’s funny sci-fi adventure is one of the most purely entertaining blockbusters in recent memory, even though it doesn’t quite stick the landing.

Movie review: Ryan Gosling in “Project Hail Mary.” Jonathan Olley/Amazon MGM Studios

At the start of “Project Hail Mary,” Ryan Gosling wakes up aboard a spaceship bound for parts unknown, with no memory of how he got there. After discerning that he’s traveled beyond the confines of our solar system and all his shipmates are dead, he breaks into the ship’s ample supply of vodka and drinks himself into a stupor.

Sounds like a laugh riot, right?

In the hands of co-directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, it is. “Project Hail Mary” is the type of movie that theaters have been lacking for quite some time: A heady sci-fi saga and an irreverent buddy comedy, stuffed with hijinks that keep the film moving at the speed of light. (Until it doesn’t, anyway. More on that later.)

Advertisement

Through a series of flashbacks, we learn that Gosling’s amnesiac astronaut is a middle school science teacher named Ryland Grace, who stepped away from being a top-level biologist after publishing a paper that made him a laughingstock in the scientific community. His paper’s assertions suddenly seem more credible, however, when microscopic alien organisms known as Astrophage are discovered feeding (and breeding) off the sun’s energy, plunging the Earth into an extinction-level crisis.

The full scope of how Grace ended up alone in deep space is slowly revealed throughout the film, but the why is that Astrophage has begun dimming every nearby star except for one: Tau Ceti, a real star approximately 12 light years away from Earth.

Lord and Miller adapted “Project Hail Mary” from the novel of the same name by “The Martian” author Andy Weir, and it shows. Much like Matt Damon’s stranded astronaut Mark Watney, Gosling’s Grace keeps us entertained via self-shot video updates being sent to no one, wryly narrating both his occasional moments of brilliance and his near-constant self-doubt in being chosen as humanity’s last hope. 

Movie review: Ryan Gosling in
Ryan Gosling in “Project Hail Mary.”

“Project Hail Mary” really takes off when Grace discovers he’s not the only scientist orbiting Tau Ceti in search of answers. Also on a mission to save his planet is a pint-sized, faceless alien who resembles a many-legged, anthropomorphic Stonehenge. After making contact and rigging up a crude translation device, Grace and the alien (dubbed “Rocky”) settle into a buddy comedy rhythm as they work together to save their respective species.

Rocky is, in a word, adorable. A mix of practical and digital effects, the creature, voiced by puppeteer James Ortiz, would fit right in with Jim Henson’s creations. When Rocky decides to move into Grace’s ship — a feat made possible by what is effectively a temperature-controlled hamster ball — he crashes around the ship like E.T. hunting for Reese’s Pieces. (An earlier homage to “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” reinforces Spielberg’s influence on the story.) 

Advertisement

Lord and Miller — the duo behind “The Lego Movie,” “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse,” and the “21 Jump Street” remake — are some of the most naturally funny filmmakers currently working. Where Ridley Scott’s “The Martian” is a sci-fi drama with occasional moments of levity, “Project Hail Mary” is more like an intergalactic “The Odd Couple,” or “Planes, Trains and Automobiles” on a cosmic scale. 

That tone is perfect for Gosling, who cements his status here as one of Hollywood’s most versatile leading men. Even with his movie-star looks, he’s believable as a scientist who refuses to believe in himself. It’s a twitchy, scream-filled performance that calls to mind his role in “The Nice Guys,” one of the most undersung comedies of the past decade.

Movie review: Ryan Gosling, left, and and Sandra Hüller in a scene from
Ryan Gosling, left, and and Sandra Hüller in a scene from “Project Hail Mary.”

Rocky isn’t Grace’s only comic foil, either. Back on flashback Earth, the stone-faced Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller, “Anatomy of a Fall”), who recruits Grace for the Hail Mary project, stoically deals with his low self-esteem and regular freakouts, as does Carl (Lionel Boyce, “The Bear”), a security guard assigned to keep Grace on task.

All told, The first 70 percent of “Project Hail Mary” ranks among the most broadly entertaining blockbusters in recent memory. That’s why it’s so disappointing when the film loses its way when trying to land the proverbial ship. Lord and Miller are frustratingly faithful to Weir’s source material, which means slogging through a series of false endings and saccharine, emotionally manipulative scenes. The better choice would have been lopping a half hour off the film’s 156-minute runtime.

Nevertheless, if you can mentally prepare yourself for a dramatic downshift in tone, “Project Hail Mary” is well worth a trip to the theaters. It’s a rollicking adventure that offers something for moviegoers of almost any age, anchored by a star turn from Gosling and a puppet that is out of this world.

Rating: *** (out of 4)

Advertisement

“Project Hail Mary” will be released in theaters March 20.

Profile image for Kevin Slane

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending