Connect with us

Entertainment

Review: The quietly devastating ‘Stonewalling’ weighs the cost of a woman’s sacrifice

Published

on

Review: The quietly devastating ‘Stonewalling’ weighs the cost of a woman’s sacrifice

“Stonewalling” begins with a celebration, an idyllic out of doors gathering of younger Chinese language women and men who’ve been taking English courses in preparation for thrilling travels and new alternatives overseas. The 12 months is 2019, and the temper is optimistic, the meals and wine considerable. Their instructor stands and, in fluent if barely faltering English, presents them some ethereal phrases of encouragement: “Don’t over-engineer your life. … Typically life’s about ‘drift.’ Don’t overthink it. Stay in the mean time.” By the tip of this toughly noticed, brutally trustworthy film, that speech — and this whole dumb night, with its patio string lights, matcha desserts and banal chitchat — will look like purest fantasy.

Seated on the desk, and so quiet and unobtrusive that it takes a second to register her because the film’s principal character, is a reasonably 20-year-old faculty pupil named Lynn (Yao Honggui). She’s there together with her boyfriend, Zhang (Liu Lengthy), a refined go-getter with massive goals: They’ll be taught English, and Lynn will work as a flight attendant till they’ve saved sufficient to maneuver to the U.Okay. Within the meantime, they’re residing at a lodge within the metropolis of Changsha and getting by by way of odd modeling gigs. But as her boyfriend condescendingly natters on and on and posts his pics on TikTok, Lynn appears vaguely in poor health comfortable, not fully with this system, and never simply due to the persistent ache in her breast.

The supply of that ache is revealed in the end: Lynn is pregnant. In one of many plot’s sharpest formulations, she finds this out solely after being screened for a sketchy egg donor program, throughout which she observes firsthand — although possible not for the primary time — how simply and systematically ladies’s our bodies are subjugated to the whims of a demanding market. And so it’s with Lynn: Being pregnant might disqualify her for the donor program and disrupt her plans, however it additionally presents her with one thing of a possibility. Somewhat than procure an abortion, as Zhang needs her to, she might give delivery and, by way of an adoption association whose parameters are regularly being renegotiated all through, settle her mom’s excellent money owed.

Yao Honggui’s Lynn finds work modeling robes within the film “Stonewalling.”

(KimStim)

Advertisement

Working a beneficiant however unwasted, fully absorbing 147 minutes, “Stonewalling” is the third collaboration between the husband-and-wife filmmakers Huang Ji and Ryuji Otsuka, who dwell in Japan however who make downbeat portraits of privation and hardship in modern China. (Huang is Chinese language; Otsuka is Japanese.) Their newest work completes a type of thematic trilogy with their earlier “Egg and Stone” (2012) and “The Silly Fowl” (2017), during which the gifted Yao additionally performed remoted younger ladies in tough, more and more determined circumstances. Film by film, she and the filmmakers pull again the veil on a world whose merciless logic is dictated by financial necessity and the place ladies bear the brunt of that price at each flip.

So Lynn takes a break from faculty and her boyfriend and strikes again in together with her mother and father, who’ve a cramped condo and run an adjoining pharmacy-clinic. (Her mother and father are performed by Huang’s real-life mother and father, Huang Xiaoxiong and Xiao Zilong; the house we see on-screen is theirs.) The shift from Changsha’s gleaming high-rises and opulent outlets and places of work to Lynn’s smaller suburban hometown gives a visible jolt, although crucially, wherever she is, Lynn appears to take up barely any house. Almost each scene consists as a single-take grasp shot, observing the characters and their interactions at one thing of a take away, and displaying us how bodily and spiritually dwarfed they’re by their environs. (Otsuka shot the film himself; the fluid, restrained chopping is by Liao Ching-sung, identified for his work with the Taiwanese grasp Hou Hsiao-hsien.)

And so that you’ll spy folks wandering out and in of the body behind Lynn when she goes for a stroll or retreats to an open courtyard to make a telephone name. At different occasions you would possibly scan the faces in a crowded room the place Lynn’s mom learns to hawk skin-care merchandise in hopes of creating a couple of additional yuan. (Somebody is all the time promoting or studying to promote one thing in “Stonewalling,” whether or not it’s Lynn waxing breathlessly poetic concerning the deserves of youngsters’s toothpaste or her mother renegotiating the phrases of the child’s adoption.)

Two women share a seat on public transport.

Lynn (Yao Honggui) finally ends up shifting again house together with her mom (Huang Xiaoxiong) and father after realizing she is pregnant.

(KimStim)

Advertisement

When the film goes in for an rare closeup — a shot of ultrasound gel being smeared on Lynn’s stomach or of Lynn’s face as she places on a surgical masks within the rapid wake of the COVID-19 outbreak — the intimacy is startling, and instructive. For the digicam to lavish consideration on a single soul abruptly appears like an indulgence, a uncommon privileging of the person over the collective. The identical formal restraint characterizes the filmmakers’ use of music (composed by Ng Chor Guan), which fades up at solely the briefest situations and has the impact of enfolding the characters in a mild however fleeting embrace.

These remoted moments cross shortly and are all of the extra devastating for it. “Stonewalling” doesn’t sentimentalize or squeeze tears for Lynn, who, for all her meekness, naivete and often-foolish selections, is hard sufficient to have way back waived her proper to self-pity. She works arduous by way of her being pregnant, taking up doubtful and demeaning jobs, exhausting herself to an unhealthy diploma and attempting, at one level, to interrupt up a violent battle between her unhappily married mother and father. She absorbs each tragic indignity with the utmost calm, whether or not it’s a lady’s coldly appraising look or a person’s tidy valuation of the life rising inside her.

Acceptance, nevertheless, doesn’t imply ignorance. Towards the tip of “Stonewalling,” Lynn meets with Zhang and offers him cash, paying him again the small sum that he had earlier complained about spending on her now-canceled English courses. He refuses the cash, ashamed (lastly) of his habits, however she retains holding it out to him with a persistence that appears like a rebuke. It’s the quietly defiant gesture of somebody inured to the transactional nature of her relationships and who’s additionally discovered, in the end, exactly what she’s price.

‘Stonewalling’

Advertisement

In Mandarin with English subtitles
Not rated
Working time: 2 hours, 27 minutes
Taking part in: Laemmle Glendale

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Blue Sun Palace’ Review: An Intimate, Affecting and Dogma-Free Portrait of Chinese Immigrants in Working-Class New York

Published

on

‘Blue Sun Palace’ Review: An Intimate, Affecting and Dogma-Free Portrait of Chinese Immigrants in Working-Class New York

It’s become something of a movie fashion to forestall the title credits until well after an establishing sequence, if not deeper into the film. But when the title appears onscreen in Blue Sun Palace, at the half-hour point, there’s nothing self-consciously stylish about it: It marks a dramatic, ground-shifting change in perspective, a gut-punch of a narrative fracture, and one that writer-director Constance Tsang executes with assurance.

At the helm of her first feature, Tsang has made a sharp and tender story about dislocation, centering on a trio of hardworking Chinese immigrants in New York. In the movie’s first 30 minutes, Tsang draws us into the intimate orbit of her expatriate characters: a construction company employee and two colleagues at a massage parlor. Then, the sudden absence of one of them sets everything askew. Absence is the current that drives the narrative: absence from family, from homeland, from purpose. The world these characters inhabit, within an enclave of Flushing, Queens, is a place of in-between, captured in the evocative half-light of Norm Li’s cinematography, suggesting the cool-hot glow of the title’s blue sun. The poignant chords of Sami Jano’s elegantly lean score further fuel the angsty mood.

Blue Sun Palace

The Bottom Line

Low-key and gripping.

Advertisement

Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Critics’ Week)
Cast: Wu Ke-Xi, Lee Kang Sheng, Xu Haipeng
Director-screenwriter: Constance Tsang

1 hour 57 minutes

The Blue Sun Palace is a restaurant outside the movie’s main New York setting, making its appearance late in the proceedings. It’s in another, unnamed restaurant that the film kicks off, without ceremony, in a remarkable sequence. The eatery itself is barely seen, Li’s camera moving between Hunan native Didi (Xu Haipeng) and Cheung (Lee Kang Sheng), from Taiwan, holding them close as they dig into spicy chicken and fall into each other’s gaze.

It will be a while before we know their names, or who they are to each other. There’s a sense of established emotional intimacy between them, but at the same time they’re still getting to know each other. Eventually, the likely deduction is that he’s been a client of hers at the massage parlor she runs. When he speaks of his loneliness, his words are muted and restrained, and her eyes well with compassion, the play of feeling on Xu’s face breathtaking. This is not your standard first date. But it is a turning point, the infatuation deepening during an entranced karaoke duet. Didi and Cheung’s morning-after pillow talk is a beautifully played depiction of awakening and connection, mischievous and light even as it delves into the weightier territory of hopes and dreams, a conversational turn sparked by a calendar photo on Didi’s wall.

Advertisement

For Didi, some of those dreams involve Amy (Wu Ke-Xi), her closest friend at the massage parlor and the third key character. Amy is a gifted cook, and she and Didi talk of opening a restaurant together. In the meantime, they, along with Josie (Murielle Hsieh) and Fei (Zheng Lisha), spend their days and nights massaging the bodies of their male customers. A sign on the front door warns, “No Sexual Services,” but exceptions are made — sometimes grudgingly. And, as one tense scene demonstrates, not every client is respectful, to put it mildly.

As to the business’ unseen proprietor — it’s unlikely that the four women have ownership stakes — the movie offers no information or hints. There are a couple of other instances where Tsang could have made the narrative details less hazy, although these lingering questions don’t unmoor the story or lessen its impact.

What is clear is the bond among the parlor’s four women, the sisterly humor that gets them through the workaday hours and helps them withstand the overall sense of displacement. In ways both obvious and offhand, they nurture one another. The feast Amy prepares for Lunar New Year evokes fond and tearful memories of home for Josie. In the here and now, Didi’s maternal warmth is the glue holding everything together. But things break apart, and, as one character notes, “It’s funny how quickly the people you love become strangers.”

Picking up the story after a specific cataclysm and an unspecified length of time, Tsang turns her focus to the question of how to go on, and whether devotedness can devolve into clinging to what’s gone. Amy, obsessed with repairing a ceiling leak, worries it like a wound. Cheung, who has only one friend at work (Leo Chen), fields mirthless calls from his wife and daughter in Taiwan that are always about money, nothing else. When he takes Amy to the restaurant from the opening scene, you might call it a dramatic version of an Annie Hall joke, the bit where Alvy’s attempt to duplicate the romantic hilarity of a lobster dinner with Annie falls numbingly flat with another woman. Cheung’s disappointment aside, for Amy the fraught dinner gives way to the simplest and most difficult realization of all: “I just need to change something.”

While Xu’s compelling vibrancy suffuses Blue Sun Palace, her co-stars offer thornier portrayals. Playing in an unpredictable register, Wu (Nina Wu) gives pulsing life to Amy’s wary brittleness and its eventual melting. Lee, the longtime muse of Taiwanese director Tsai Ming-liang, carries Cheung’s yearning and joy, his guilt and sorrow, in a performance that’s all the more gripping for being measured and contained.

Advertisement

As to the resolution of these characters’ story, it remains an open question in the subtly moving final scenes. In massage parlor reception areas and backrooms, working-class restaurants and karaoke bars, Tsang and her strong cast, with superb contributions from production designer Evaline Wu Huang, have captured something evanescent and life-giving, and grounded it in kitchen clatter and workplace chatter, the gritty day-to-day.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Jake Gyllenhaal sings his way through Season 49 finale of 'Saturday Night Live'

Published

on

Jake Gyllenhaal sings his way through Season 49 finale of 'Saturday Night Live'

On his third go-round as guest host of “Saturday Night Live,” Jake Gyllenhaal presided over the 49th season finale with everything going for him. His lead role in the Prime Video revival of “Road House” was well-received. He’s still getting bad-boy mileage out of “All Too Well,” Taylor Swift’s 10-minute take down of him. And his new series “Presumed Innocent” for Apple TV+ will be out next month.

But is he funny? The night’s grab bag of sketches, several of which required full-throated singing from the actor, made a strong case that maybe Gyllenhaal is one of those actors who is presumed (innocently?) to have a strong sense of humor due to one-offs like his classic “Mr. Music” bit in “John Mulaney & The Sack Lunch Bunch” until it’s actually time to perform comedy in a live setting like “SNL.”

The season finale was rough, folks, and not because of giggles or any technical problems. You couldn’t blame the writing completely because there were some novel premises along the way and some decent jokes. But in at least half of the sketches where the host was driving the sketch, line deliveries felt off or flat and the audience response seemed muted. These included a disastrous one about an uphill bicyclist interrupting a couple (Mikey Day and Chloe Fineman) mid-breakup, a filmed “Scooby-Doo” parody that was more gory and gross than funny, a customer service sketch targeting Southwest Airlines and a domestic scene about a father threatening his daughter’s boyfriend after sneaking a cookie.

Better were sketches about an NYPD press conference meant to protect character actors (in which Jon Hamm made a cameo), a dance revue featuring beautiful girls and very plain boys, and a late sketch about a high-voiced tavern dweller named Snake Eyes (James Austin Johnson). Johnson book-ended the show with that performance and a cold open as former President Trump, while a “Weekend Update” joke swap once again went well past the line of good taste. A title card near the end of the show honored actor Dabney Coleman, who died this week.

Gyllenhaal gave it some real energy, but given that this was the last episode of the season, even his enthusiastic singing couldn’t save the episode from feeling disappointing. Speaking of singing, this week’s musical guest Sabrina Carpenter performed her viral hit “Espresso” and a mix of “Feather” and “Nonsense,” though she ended the latter with some risque new lyrics for the show.

Advertisement

The last cold open of the season returned to politics. Johnson did his Trump impression, showing the former president at his new home: a barricade outside a Manhattan courthouse. The embattled politician complained about his trial (“They say very mean things about me while I am trying to sleep.”) and he remarked that the gag order placed on him “sounds like a challenge on ‘RuPaul.’” In the course of the speech, Trump asked his supporters to dox a juror who appears on camera (“She’s juror No. 9, but to me she’s like a six, maybe.”) and revealed that the worst sentence he could get is more time at the White House; he’d rather lose, call the election rigged and raise more money for “Stop the Steal.” He dangled the possibility of revealing his “Veepee,” who could be Tim Scott (Devon Walker), Kristi Noem (Heidi Gardner, holding a gun and a toy puppy), or Hannibal Lecter (Michael Longfellow), who Trump said was “giving me Pence vibes.” The former president promised it’ll be the “Summer of Trump with Trump Espresso,” a Jan. 6-style event in July and a Jewish edition of the Bible he calls “Trump Torah.”

Gyllenhaal’s monologue focused on him hosting the finale of the 49th season, instead of the more prestigious slot of the episode that will kick off the historic 50th season. So, the actor passionately sang a version of “End of the Road” by Boyz II Men with help from cardigan-wearing cast members Ego Nwodim (who sadly did not play Rep. Jasmine Crockett this week), Kenan Thompson, Walker and Punkie Johnson. Gyllenhaal sang that Pedro Pascal, Zendaya and even recent host Ryan Gosling turned down the gig. He sang, “It’s been 49 years, over 900 shows, costumes and wigs and a room full of blow.”

Advertisement

Best sketch of the night: Don’t think too hard about a retailer’s cheap goods

A mock ad for Xiemu (a parody of problematic Chinese retailers Temu and Shein) promises fast fashion at incredibly low prices. How is it so cheap? “Don’t worry about it,” the ad says. They’re not made with forced labor and no prisoners are involved. “Why bring that up?” one of the actors in the ad asks. The ad also coyly denies long working hours, and promises all workers are paid, “Even ones with wrong religion.” The clothes and jewelry soon fall apart, cause rashes or induce lead poisoning for the fashion models in the ad. When one of them (Nwodim) asks, “Is this shady?” the response is, “If it was, would you stop buying?” Everyone responds, “No.”

Also good: There’s something about these boys

The daffiest sketch of the night may have been this old-timey musical revue that at first featured a trio of ladies (Nwodim, Fineman and Sarah Sherman), but then shifts gears as the host (Gyllenhaal) sings an introduction for “beautiful boys, luscious salty boys,” who are all wearing variations of khaki pants or shorts and gray shirts. Two patrons watching the show (Thompson and Gardner) are at first unimpressed (“It’s like they didn’t even try”) but are soon captivated by the story of each boy, one sporty, one a scholarly virgin and another the son of a burger scion. It’s very silly, but the naughty wordplay in the song is clever, and the crane shot with the boys swinging their legs in the air toward the camera is sublime. Bonus points for the high notes Gyllenhaal and Thompson both hit at the conclusion.

‘Weekend Update’ winner: Another Colin Jost-Michael Che joke-off

Advertisement

Marcello Hernandez and Thompson were great as cicadas returning to mate and scream after years underground, but of course it was Jost and Che’s joke-off, where they write jokes for each other that they must read for the first time on camera, that stole the show. Che admitted at the start of the joke-off that the civil rights leader who sat in on December’s installment was an actor. This time, he said, he invited a real-life rabbi, “Rabbi Jill,” who appears to be Jill Hausman from the Actors Temple in New York. Hausman grimaced but stayed almost silent throughout the segment as Che and Jost read jokes about protesters at a Jerry Seinfeld commencement speech (Jost: “The only chant you’ll hear from me is ‘Free Weinstein!’”) and one for Che about Pope Francis saying sexual pleasure is a gift from God, but in response to a question about altar boys. Things got worse with a joke about texting middle school kids with sexual innuendo, a dig at Jost’s wife Scarlett Johansson‘s voice from the movie “Her” being used by ChatGPT (Jost: “Without that body, what’s the point of listening?”), and the introduction of a puppet dressed in Jewish religious wear. Jost was forced to read some antisemitic material in front of the rabbi while holding the puppet, but it was Che who was most roundly defeated by being forced to start a public feud with rapper Kendrick Lamar. He read, “I want to call out the biggest b— of all, Kendrick Lamar. No! Or should I say littlest. Your war with Michael Che is just beginning.” A visibly shaken, yet laughing, Che muttered, “I don’t like that one bit.”

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – Old Henry

Published

on

Movie Review – Old Henry

Read Time:3 Minute, 2 Second

If you’re hankerin’ to watch a western that flew under the radar, look no further than Old Henry, staring Tim Blake Nelson. This is an overall well-made movie. The only thing better than the writing is the acting and that’s because Tim Blake Nelson is one of the best, and most underrated, actors around these parts. 🙂

How long is the movie? Exactly as long as it needed to be and not a minute extra. The runtime is on the short side, at about 92 minutes. The pacing works perfectly, and every moment serves a purpose. That’s a rare feat these days.

——Content continues below——


Advertisement

The World’s Most Indispensable Movie App

The RunPee app tells you the best times to
run & pee during a movie
so you don’t miss the best scenes.

As seen on


Download the RunPee app.
100% free (donation supported)

Get the RunPee app at the Google Play Store
     

Get the RunPee app at the Google Play Store

Read more about the RunPee app.

Advertisement

If you haven’t already seen the movie then please come back and drop me a comment after you see it. I’d love to know what others think.

Grade: A+

Analysis

[Spoilers ahead. Don’t read this if you haven’t seen the movie.]

What do we learn in the first scene with Henry, his son Wyatt, and the brother-in-law? Henry is a hard worker, and hard on Wyatt, but fare. Wyatt, is about as rebellious as a young man could be at this time and doesn’t like to work hard. The first thing we see Wyatt do is pick up a rock and put it in the cart to haul off. And he makes it seem like it’s the hardest thing he’s ever done, while his father is standing in a ditch chopping away with a pick-axe.

What’s the last thing we see Wyatt do in the movie? Haul a heavy rock up to the top of a hill to place on his father’s tombstone. No one told him to do it, he just saw that it needed doing. This is character development at its best. We have no idea what Wyatt will do with his life, but we have no doubt that he’s going to take the lessons he learned from his father, especially in the last few days, and make the most out of his life.

The Reveal

The reveal was deftly handled because it didn’t seem like there was anything to reveal, even though there were hints of it. If I paused the movie after each scene to analyze it, it may have been obvious from much earlier in the movie what the reveal would be. But the clues were subtle and covered up. Like trying to follow someone’s trail after a hard rain. The fact that the bad guys were following a trail may have just been part of the story, but it also serves the double purpose of telling the viewer that there is a trail being left throughout the movie that only an astute viewer might notice.

Advertisement

Writing

Potsy Ponciroli wrote and directed the movie. Potsy gave this script a great deal of tender loving care. This is an example of a script ready to be turned into a movie. I would love to talk to Potsy about the drafts that led up to this and how long it took for him to cut and trim everything just so. I feel confident that Potsy knew when there was nothing left to cut or polish in this script. It’s as near to perfect as any script can be. That doesn’t mean it’s the best movie ever. It just means it’s the best movie it could be.

Ratings

This movie has a 7.2/10 on IMDb. That’s not bad for an IMDb rating which I’ve noticed usually trends a little lower than ratings elsewhere. But I’m not sure why. At RottenTomatoes this has a 95% from the critics and 92% from the audience. That’s a little more like it.

Don’t miss your favorite movie moments because you have to pee or need a snack. Use the RunPee app (Androidor iPhone) when you go to the movies. We have Peetimes for all wide release films every week, including IF, Fall Guy, Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes and coming soon Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga and many others. We have literally thousands of Peetimes—from classic movies through today’s blockbusters. You can also keep up with movie news and reviews on our blog, or by following us on Twitter @RunPee.
If there’s a new film out there, we’ve got your bladder covered.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending