Movie Reviews
Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Daddio’ on Netflix, a contrived but enjoyable actor's duel between Dakota Johnson and Sean Penn
Daddio (now on Netflix) is what you call a good ol’ two-hander, a single-setting drama consisting of one drawn-out conversation between two people. Some consider My Dinner with Andre to be the benchmark for this storytelling method, which ends up being a test for all parties involved: Can the filmmakers put together a compelling narrative with just dialogue? Will the actors make the most of the intense focus on their performances? And will the audience hang with the minimalist structure and presentation without being tempted to go back to the streaming menu and find something with a little more physical movement? Writer/director Christy Hall and stars Sean Penn and Dakota Johnson are hopefully up for the task.
DADDIO: STREAM IT OR SKIP IT?
The Gist: We never learn her name, but the credits call her – I dunno, should we cringe at this? – Girlie (Johnson). She hops in a cab at the airport, destination Midtown New York City. It’s nighttime. The taxi is an old-school, battered yellow cab, not a Tesla or a Subaru driven by some Uber part-timer. No, behind the wheel is Clark (Penn), a weathered and lightly salty seen-it-all Noo Yawker type who heavily peppers his speech with profanity. He grumbles at another cabbie who honks at him, beefs about the Uber guys (“These f—in’ apps”), tells his passenger, “You f—in’ won, sweetheart, you did.” Ugh. Travel and the airport suck the life outta you and now you gotta listen to Mr. Chatty Cabbie here, going on about how people always stare at their phones, so if you pick up your phone you’re all extra self-conscious about looking at it instead of engaging in conversation you might not want to have.
At least Clark isn’t boring, or too boorish. (OK, maybe he’s a little boorish. But it’s forgiveable.) He isn’t a talk-about-the-weather-or-that-new-Netflix-show kind of guy. No, he waxes about how an increasingly cashless society means he gets smaller tips these days, how salt and tea used to be currency – and how “Girlie” strikes him as someone who can “hold her own.” He’s right about that, because she doesn’t shrink away from his crass tone, and if she’s initially a little annoyed by his blahblahblah, she soon leans into it, realizing that this might not be the usual dull conversation between two people who only seem to have basic biology in common.
Now, I’m not saying Clark could be the star interrogator for the homicide squad, but he notices the details (a variety of cues tell him that “Girlie” is coming home to New York rather than visiting) that allow him to ask relevant questions (“Where’d you go for a visit?”). She shares that she visited her half-sister in Oklahoma, where they grew up, which leads to the story about how she ended up in New York and who her parents are and to the “daddy issues” that Clark sniffs out like a drug dog that just found a brick of cocaine in a pile of luggage. Meanwhile, she texts with an unnamed lover who seems rather needy and desperate to see her – and then sends her a dick pic, because all he wants is sex, it seems. Clark sniffs that out too, including the little fact that her desperate lover is married. He knows these things, because he was the guy who’s been married and had things on the side. And now this conversation is interesting, not, as the lady once put it, the usual mindless getting-to-know you chitchat.
What Movies Will It Remind You Of?: Locke was more of a one-and-a-half-hander, since Tom Hardy spends the entire movie in his car making phone calls (of increasing urgency, I might add).
Performance Worth Watching: In a movie that encourages a degree of performative acting, Johnson is a degree or two less performative than Penn. Johnson, winner of Saddest Eyes in Hollywood five years running, makes the most of a movie heavily stocked with studious closeups.
Memorable Dialogue: “Girlie” puts an edge on her end of the convo after Clark makes a comment about her “lifting her leg” on things in order to claim her territory: “I don’t mind squatting.”
Sex and Skin: A few brief over-the-shoulder shots of “Girlie”’s sexting yields female toplessness and graphic male underwearlessness.
Our Take: How much one enjoys Daddio depends wholly upon one’s desire to spend 100 minutes in tight quarters with Penn and Johnson, to the point where you can almost smell their breath (and are thankful for the moment when Clark shares a stick of gum with his passenger). Save for a standout extended cameo in Licorice Pizza, Penn’s output has been marginal for a decade, and it’s good to see one of the most intense actors in the game sink his teeth into a meaty, character-driven role, even if he leans into some of the contrivances of the stagey setup. Quietly becoming one of the upper-tier actors of her generation, Johnson avoids such temptations, holding back a little more, playing her character coy without cliche, and maintaining a run of strong performances including Cha Cha Real Smooth and The Lost Daughter (not to mention the surely intentional comedy of the Madame Web press tour).
You may need to forgive the film for its tendency to play out in a predictably quasi-literary fashion, where the dialogue is overly thick with metaphor and double-entendre, and the characters are heavily fortified with irony. Clark comes off like the overconfident older not-a-gentleman who likely masks some insecurities, “Girlie” is surely more worldly than she seems, and when they talk about the “ones and zeros” of her computer-programming career, they’re obviously talking about more than just computer programming. But Penn and Johnson make sure these prickly, but endearing characters aren’t privy to simple definitions, and while Hall’s script tends to feel more capital-W Written than natural, and not particularly profound in its observations of Men And Women And What Makes Them Tick, the two actors find enough pathos in their exchanges to make the film feel, if not cathartic, at least moderately satisfying.
Our Call: Daddio is no game-changer, but a lot less has been done with a hell of a lot more than one setting, two talented actors and a rock-solid script. STREAM IT.
John Serba is a freelance writer and film critic based in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Movie Reviews
Jeremy Schuetze’s ‘ANACORETA’ (2022) – Movie Review – PopHorror
PopHorror had the chance to check out Anacoreta (2022) ahead of its streaming release! Does this meta-horror flick provide interesting story telling or is it a confusing mess.
Let’s have a look…
Synopsis
A group of friends heads to a secluded woodland cabin for a weekend getaway, planning to film an experimental horror movie. As the shoot progresses, the project begins to fall apart—until a real and terrifying presence emerges from the darkness.
Anacoreta is directed by Jeremy Schuetze. It was written by Jeremy Schuetze and Matt Visser. The film stars Antonia Thomas (Bagman 2024), Jesse Stanley (Raf 2019), Jeremy Schuetze (Jennifer’s Body 2009), and Matt Visser (A Lot Like Christmas 2021)
My Thoughts
Antonia Thomas delivered an outstanding performance as the female lead in Anacoreta. It was remarkable to watch her convey such a wide range of emotions with authenticity and depth. I was continually impressed by her ability to switch seamlessly between different dialects. I absolutely loved her delivery of the dialogue of telling The Scorpion and the Frog fable.
Anacoreta employs a distinctive, meta-horror style of storytelling. The narrative follows a group of friends creating a “scripted reality” horror film, and as the plot unfolds, the boundary between their staged production and their actual lives becomes increasingly blurred. This was interesting, but at the same time frustrating as a viewer.

Check out Anacoreta on Prime Video and let us know your thoughts!
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years
“So it’s like Avatar?” one character quips in Disney and Pixar’s “Hoppers,” bluntly translating the film’s high-concept premise for the sugar-fueled kids in the audience. And yes, the comparison is apt. The story follows a nature-obsessed teenage girl who manages to quite literally “hop” her consciousness into the body of a robotic beaver in order to spark an animal rebellion against a greedy mayor determined to bulldoze their forest for a freeway.
It’s a clever hook. The kind of big, elastic idea Pixar used to make look effortless. “Hoppers” does not reach the rarified air of “Up,” “Wall-E,” or “Inside Out,” but after a stretch of uneven originals like “Turning Red” and “Luca,” and outright misfires such as “Elemental” and “Elio,” this feels like a genuine course correction. The environmental messaging is clear without being preachy, the animals are irresistibly anthropomorphized, and the studio’s once-signature emotional sincerity is back in sturdy form.
Pixar can afford to gamble on originals when it has a guaranteed cash cow like this summer’s “Toy Story 5” waiting in the wings, but “Hoppers” earns its place in the catalogue. Director Daniel Chong crafts a warm, heartfelt film that occasionally strains under the weight of its own ambition, yet remains grounded by character and theme. Its meditation on conservation and animal displacement feels timely in a way that never tips into after-school-special territory.
We meet Mabel, voiced with bright conviction by Piper Curda, as a child liberating her classroom pets and returning them to the wild. Her moral compass is shaped by her grandmother, voiced by Karen Huie, who imparts wisdom about nature’s sanctity. True to both Pixar tradition and the broader Disney playbook, this beacon of guidance does not survive past the opening act. Loss, after all, is Pixar’s favorite inciting incident.
Years later, Mabel is still fighting the good fight, squaring off against the smarmy Mayor Jerry, voiced with slick menace by Jon Hamm. He plans to flatten the glade where Mabel and her grandmother once found solace. Mabel’s resistance feels noble but futile. The animals have already mysteriously vanished, the machinery is coming, and her last-ditch plan involves luring a beaver back to the abandoned forest in hopes of jumpstarting the ecosystem.
That’s when the film gleefully pivots into mad-scientist territory. At Beaverton University, Mabel discovers her professor, voiced by Kathy Najimy, has developed a device that can project human consciousness into synthetic animals. The process, dubbed “hopping,” allows Mabel to inhabit a robotic beaver and infiltrate the forest from within. It’s an inspired escalation that keeps the film buoyant even when the plotting grows predictable.
Her new posse includes King George, a lovably beaver voiced by Bobby Moynihan with distinct Bing Bong energy; a sharp-tongued bear voiced by Melissa Villaseñor; a regal bird king voiced by the late Isiah Whitlock Jr.; and a fish queen voiced by Ego Nwodim. As is often the case with Pixar, even in its lesser efforts, the world-building is meticulous. The animal hierarchy, complete with titles like “paw of the king,” is layered with jokes that play for kids while slyly winking at adults.
The plot ultimately follows a familiar template. Scrappy underdog rallies community. Corporate villain twirls metaphorical mustache. Emotional third-act sacrifice looms. At times, you can feel the machinery working a little too cleanly. Pixar, and Disney at large, has grown increasingly reliant on sequels and established IP, and “Hoppers” does not radically reinvent the wheel. In an animated landscape where films like “K-Pop: Demon Hunters,” “Across the Spider-Verse,” and “Goat” are pushing stylistic and narrative boundaries, being safe and sturdy may not always be enough.
And yet, there is something refreshing about a Pixar original that remembers how to tug at the heart without squeezing it dry. “Hoppers” is playful, peppered with cheeky needle drops, and builds to a sweet emotional catharsis that may or may not have left this critic a little misty-eyed. It feels earnest and engaged.
“Hoppers” may not be top-tier Pixar. But it is a welcome return to form, a reminder that the studio still knows how to marry big ideas with a bigger heart.
HOPPERS opens in theaters Friday, March 6th.
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?
Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.
movie review
HOPPERS
Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.
“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine.
Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”
Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”
What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence.
Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.
What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”
Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity.
The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared.
So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.
From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out.
Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power.
Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”
That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities.
No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression.
Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it.
But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.
“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.
Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts7 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO7 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon5 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

