Connect with us

Movie Reviews

F1 THE MOVIE Review

Published

on

F1 THE MOVIE Review
(CC, BB, Pa, CapCapCap, PP, Fe, FR, LLL, VV, S, N, A, D, MM):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

Strong but not fully developed Christian, moral worldview where the main race car driving hero kneels to pray silently before races, there are references to a racing “miracle” during the big race and references to pulling a “Hail Mary,” and movie promotes friendship, teamwork, a strong mother-son relationship, the importance of fathers (both the veteran hero and his rival teammate learn both their fathers died when they were young and the veteran still has a photo of him with his father as a young boy), doing the right thing is extolled at least twice, sacrifice wins the day and solves the major plot problem, and veteran racing hero pursues the feeling of ecstasy and peace that sometimes comes when driving a race car (the movie depicts it almost in a spiritual sense as if it brings the character closer to God, though, of course, the hero’s pursuit would be better if it were focused on Jesus), but there are some pagan, hedonistic and selfish motivations in the characters, though the movie has a very strong pro-capitalist or pro-business viewpoint (the veteran hero is trying to help his friend save his Formula 1 racing company, and teamwork and hard work are mentioned and depicted as very important to accomplishing that goal, such values are, of course, American values that also have a biblical tradition), plus two major female characters in the race car company have a feminist goal of being just as respected as the men in that male-dominated field, and there’s an apparent image of a Muslim mosque when the movie shifts to the final Formula 1 race of the annual season, which occurs in Abu Dhabi;

Foul Language:

About 43 obscenities (including one “f” word), one strong profanity (which perhaps can be considered somewhat borderline), where someone exclaims “Sweet Baby Jesus,” three GD profanities, four light profanities, and one of a racing team’s advisor/coach jokingly uses an obscene gesture against another team’s advisor/coach later in a race after the second guy had mouthed an “f” word at him earlier;

Advertisement

Violence:

Violence includes a few intense car crashes, including one where a car bursts into flames, and another driver pulls the driver out of his fiery car (the injured driver just burned his right hand, so he must sit out of the F1 racing circuit for three races to recover), past footage of a Formula 1 race shows a driver lying unconscious in the road, ,any intense car racing scenes, some lesser examples of crashes and spinouts and tires hitting tires during races, and team rivals have shoving match in one scene;

Sex:

No depicted lewd sex, but fornication is implied when an unmarried couple kisses passionately and then wake up in bed next to one another (the man has a nightmare about a major racing crash and sits up and gets out of bed while the woman is still sleeping in the bed), and race car driver’s manager wants them to find a girl when they visit a disco bar;

Nudity:

Advertisement

Upper male nudity as driver work out or walk around in a two or three scenes, and young driver goes to a disco with his manager and there are girls in some slightly skimpy clothes or dresses;

Alcohol Use:

Some brief alcohol use, especially in a disco scene;

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

Someone smokes a cigarette but no illicit drugs; and,

Advertisement

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Strong miscellaneous immorality overall such as corrupt businessman forges some papers against the racing car company in the movie so he can buy the company at a lower price after the big race, but his plans are foiled, and the hero is a nomad who’s had one marriage annulled and two divorces over period of 30 years (the story is that the crash that ended his Formula 1 racing career left him adrift and brought out his worst qualities until he found some peace as a nomad going from race to race while living in a van), it’s said that the hero once had a gambling problem, and he still likes to place an occasional informal bet, and when the hero’s friend gives him a chance to race the second half of the Formula 1 circuit again the hero is not above breaking the rules occasionally (though he at first does it on the racetrack to make the other drivers respect him and his teammate).

F1 THE MOVIE stars Brad Pitt as a veteran race car driver who clashes with a young racing phenom when an old friend of Pitt’s character, played by Javier Badem, asks his friend to help train the younger man in Formula 1 racing, 30 years after the veteran driver had a huge wreck that ended his own promising career in that pinnacle of international racing. F1 THE MOVIE has some of the best, most exciting racing scenes ever filmed, tells a compelling redemptive story with engaging characters where teamwork and sacrifice win the day, and includes some positive Christian references, but it has lots of light to medium foul language, plus five strong obscenities and profanities, an implied bedroom scene and some other, more concerns.

The movie begins with veteran race car driver, Sonny Hayes, meeting his old friend, Ruben Cervantes, who now owns a Formula 1 racing team. Thirty years ago, Sonny was a Formula 1 rookie phenom. However, he was a little reckless and suffered a major crash that wrecked his career. So, now Sonny is a racing nomad who lives in a van and goes from race to race.

Ruben offers Sonny $5,000 to be the second driver on Ruben’s Formula 1 team. Ruben also wants Sonny to help train the main driver, a young black racing phenom named Joshua Pearce, who’s still a little green or inexperienced. Riben also gives Sonny a first class plane ticket to the next grand prix race near the village of Silverstone in England. Ruben’s Apex Grand Prix team hasn’t won a race all season, and the board of directors is about to sell the company if the team can’t turn things around. Sonny seems reluctant, however, to take Ruben up on his offer.

Advertisement

The time for the preliminaries at Silverstone is about to start. Ruben thinks Sonny has decided not to come. However, a big smile appears on his face when Sonny suddenly arrives, grinning sheepishly, and informs Ruben he went to the wrong entrance.

Things don’t go well at first, though. Joshua rubs Sonny the wrong way when Joshua gets angry at a female on the pit crew who makes a mistake. Also, during the Silverstone race, Sonny won’t let Joshua pass him when Sonny manages to running ahead of Joshua. Sonny thinks Joshua is being a bit rude and acting entitled to passing Sonny. It also irks Joshua when Sonny ruins the race for them by deliberately bumping tires with the other drivers, and both his and Sonny’s car spin out of the race. The rest of the team isn’t too happy about it either. However, Sonny informs them that one of the reasons they’re not doing so well so far is because the other drivers don’t respect them. Thus, there’s a reason for Sonny’s apparently reckless behavior.

Things get even worse when Sonny advises the team to let Joshua keep waiting to change tires toward the end of another race so that, when he does change tires, Joshua will have fresher tires than the other drivers. At that point in the race, it’s started to rain. Using the team’s com system, Sonny advises Joshua to run fast on a straightaway but slow down on an upcoming curve. Joshua doesn’t listen and doesn’t slow down, and crashes. His car catches fire, and Sonny has to get out and run to Joshua’s car to pull him out of the burning car.

Happily, Joshua only burns his right hand slightly, but it means he’ll have to sit out the next three races on the circuit. However, Joshua’s loving mother, who travels with Joshua wherever he goes, isn’t happy. Joshua didn’t tell her that he ignored Sonny’s warnings about the curve. So, she’s extremely upset and reads Sonny the riot act. Sonny doesn’t tell her what really happened, though.

Naturally, without the fireworks between Sonny and Joshua, the team starts to do better when it gets a temporary replacement. So, when Joshua finally returns to the team, the question becomes, Can Sonny and Joshua bury the hatchet and finally become a team that can win?

Advertisement

Other twists occur, of course, to add more jeopardy to the story and its conflicts. Also, the movie finally reveals why Sonny never tried to return to the Formula 1 circuit and why he can’t quit racing.

F1 THE MOVIE has some of the most riveting racing scenes ever made. It tells a compelling redemptive story with engaging characters where teamwork and sacrifice win the day. The movie also promotes friendship, a strong mother-son relationship and the importance of fathers. It also has positive Christian references. For example, Bard Pitt’s racing hero, Sonny, prays silently before each race. The movie also has references to a “miracle” happening during one race and references to throwing a Hail Mary pass in football, an idiom that the racing team uses during one of its strategy sessions. In addition, the movie reveals that Brad Pitt’s character keeps racing, despite his age, because he’s pursuing the moment of ecstasy and peace that sometimes comes when a racing driver has become one with his machine on the track during a race. The movie depicts that moment in a spiritual sense, as if the driver is becoming closer to God. Of course, in reality, the hero’s pursuit would be better if it were focused overtly on Jesus.

F1 THE MOVIE also has a strong pro-capitalist or pro-business viewpoint. Brad Pitt’s character is trying to help his friend, Ruben, keep his racing company. The movie clearly shows that hard work and teamwork are crucial to making that happen.

Sadly, however, the movie also has lots of light to medium foul language, plus five strong obscenities and profanities. There’s also an implied bedroom scene between Brad Pitt’s character and the team’s female technical director, played by Kerry Condon. So, MOVIEGUDIE® advises extreme caution for F1 THE MOVIE. The movie would get a bigger audience if it eliminated more than half, or most, of the foul language.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

1986 Movie Reviews – Black Moon Rising | The Nerdy

Published

on

1986 Movie Reviews – Black Moon Rising | The Nerdy
by Sean P. Aune | January 10, 2026January 10, 2026 10:30 am EST

Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1986 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. It was also the start to a major shift in cultural and societal norms, and some of those still reverberate to this day.

We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly four dozen.

Yes, we’re insane, but 1986 was that great of a year for film.

The articles will come out – in most cases – on the same day the films hit theaters in 1986 so that it is their true 40th anniversary. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory. In some cases, it truly will be the first time we’ve seen them.

Advertisement

This time around, it’s Jan. 10, 1986, and we’re off to see Black Moon Rising.

Black Moon Rising

What was the obsession in the 1980s with super vehicles?

Sam Quint (Tommy Lee Jones) is hired to steal a computer tape with evidence against a company on it. While being pursued, he tucks it in the parachute of a prototype vehicle called the Black Moon. While trying to retrieve it, the car is stolen by Nina (Linda Hamilton), a car thief working for a car theft ring. Both of them want out of their lives, and it looks like the Black Moon could be their ticket out.

Blue Thunder in the movies, Airwolf and Knight Rider on TV, the 1980s loved an impractical ‘super’ vehicle. In this case, the car plays a very minor role up until the final action set piece, and the story is far more about the characters and their motivations.

Advertisement

The movie is silly as you would expect it to be, but it is never a bad watch. It’s just not anything particularly memorable.

1986 Movie Reviews will continue on Jan. 17, 2026, with The Adventures of the American Rabbit, The Adventures of Mark Twain, The Clan of the Cave Bear, Iron Eagle, The Longshot, and Troll.


Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Song Sung Blue’ movie review: Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson sing their hearts out in a lovely musical biopic

Published

on

‘Song Sung Blue’ movie review: Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson sing their hearts out in a lovely musical biopic

A still from ‘Song Sung Blue’.
| Photo Credit: Focus Features/YouTube

There is something unputdownable about Mike Sardina (Hugh Jackman) from the first moment one sees him at an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting celebrating his 20th sober birthday. He encourages the group to sing the famous Neil Diamond number, ‘Song Sung Blue,’ with him, and we are carried along on a wave of his enthusiasm.

Song Sung Blue (English)

Director: Craig Brewer

Cast: Hugh Jackman, Kate Hudson, Michael Imperioli, Ella Anderson, Mustafa Shakir, Fisher Stevens, Jim Belushi

Runtime: 132 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: Mike and Claire find and rescue each other from the slings and arrows of mediocrity when they form a Neil Diamond tribute band

We learn that Mike is a music impersonator who refuses to come on stage as anyone but himself, Lightning, at the Wisconsin State Fair. At the fair, he meets Claire (Kate Hudson), who is performing as Patsy Cline. Sparks fly between the two, and Claire suggests Mike perform a Neil Diamond tribute.

Claire and Mike start a relationship and a Neil Diamond tribute band, called Lightning and Thunder. They marry and after some initial hesitation, Claire’s children from her first marriage, Rachel (Ella Anderson) and Dayna (Hudson Hensley), and Mike’s daughter from an earlier marriage, Angelina (King Princess), become friends. 

Members from Mike’s old band join the group, including Mark Shurilla (Michael Imperioli), a Buddy Holly impersonator and Sex Machine (Mustafa Shakir), who sings as James Brown. His dentist/manager, Dave Watson (Fisher Stevens), believes in him, even fixing his tooth with a little lightning bolt!

The tribute band meets with success, including opening for Pearl Jam, with the front man for the grunge band, Eddie Vedder (John Beckwith), joining Lightning and Thunder for a rendition of ‘Forever in Blue Jeans’ at the 1995 Pearl Jam concert in Milwaukee.

There is heartbreak, anger, addiction, and the rise again before the final tragedy. Song Sung Blue, based on Greg Kohs’ eponymous documentary, is a gentle look into a musician’s life. When Mike says, “I’m not a songwriter. I’m not a sex symbol. But I am an entertainer,” he shows that dreams do not have to die. Mike and Claire reveal that even if you do not conquer the world like a rock god, you can achieve success doing what makes you happy.

Advertisement

ALSO READ: ‘Run Away’ series review: Perfect pulp to kick off the New Year

Song Sung Blue is a validation for all the regular folk with modest dreams, but dreams nevertheless. As the poet said, “there’s no success like failure, and failure’s no success at all.” Hudson and Jackman power through the songs and tears like champs, leaving us laughing, tapping our feet, and wiping away the errant tears all at once.

The period detail is spot on (never mind the distracting wigs). The chance to hear a generous catalogue of Diamond’s music in arena-quality sound is not to be missed, in a movie that offers a satisfying catharsis. Music is most definitely the food of love, so may we all please have a second and third helping?

Song Sung Blue is currently running in theatres 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Dead Man’s Wire review: Gus Van Sant tackles true-crime intrigue

Published

on

Dead Man’s Wire review: Gus Van Sant tackles true-crime intrigue

In 1977, a man named Tony Kiritsis fell behind on mortgage payments for an Indianapolis, Indiana, property that he hoped to develop into an affordable shopping center for independent merchants. He asked his mortgage broker for more time, but was denied. This enraged him because he suspected that the broker and his father, who owned the company, were conspiring to defraud him by letting the property go into foreclosure and acquire it for much less than market value. He showed up at the offices of the mortgage company, Meridian, for a scheduled appointment regarding the debt in the broker’s office, where he took the broker, Richard O. Hall, hostage, and demanded $130,000 to settle the debt, plus a public apology from the company. He carried a long cardboard box containing a shotgun with a so-called dead man’s wire, which he affixed to Hall as a precaution against police interference: if either of them were shot, tackled, or even caused to stumble, the wire would pull the trigger, blowing Hall’s head off.

That’s only the beginning of an astonishing story that has inspired many retellings, including a memoir by Hall, a 2018 documentary (whose producers were consultants on this movie) and a podcast drama starring Jon Hamm as Tony Kiritsis. And now it’s the best current movie you likely haven’t heard about—a drama from director Gus Van Sant (“Good Will Hunting”), starring Bill Skarsgård as Tony Kiritsis and Dacre Montgomery as Richard Hall. It’s unabashedly inspired by the best crime dramas from the 1970s, including “Dog Day Afternoon,” “The Sugarland Express,” “Network,” and “Badlands,” and can stand proudly alongside them.

From the opening sequence, which scores the high-strung Tony’s pre-crime prep with Deodato’s immortally groovy disco version of “Thus Spake Zarathustra” played on the radio by one of Tony’s local heroes, the philosophical DJ Fred Temple (Colman Domingo); through the expansive middle section, which establishes Tony as part of a thriving community that will see him as their representative in the one-sided struggle between labor and capital; through the ending and postscript, which leave you unsure how to feel about what you’ve seen but eager to discuss it with others, “Dead Man’s Wire” is a nostalgia trip of the best kind. Rather than superficially imitate the style of a specific type of ’70s drama, Van Sant and his collaborators connect with the essence of what made them powerful and memorable: their connection to issues that weighed on viewers’ minds fifty years ago and that have grown heavier since.

Tony is far from a criminal genius or a potential folk hero, but thinks he’s both. The shotgun box with a weird bulge, barely held together with packing tape, is a correlative of the mentality of the man who carries it. His home is filled with counterculture-adjacent books, but he’s a slob who loudly gripes during a brief car ride that his “shorts have been ridin’ up since Market Street,” and has a vanity license plate that reads “TOPLESS.” His eloquence runs the gamut from Everyman acuity to self-canceling nonsense slathered in profanity . He accurately sums up the mortgage company’s practices as “a private equity trap” (a phrase that looks ahead to the 2008 financial collapse, which was sparked by predatory lending on subprime mortgages) and hopes that his extreme actions will generate some “some goddamn catharsis” for himself and his fellow citizens, and “some genuine guilt” among Indianapolis’ lending class.

He’s also intoxicated by his sudden local fame. The hostage situation migrates from the mortgage company to Tony’s shabby apartment complex, which is quickly surrounded by beat cops, tactical officers, and reporters (including Myha’La as Linda Page, a twenty-something, Black local TV correspondent looking to move up. Tony also forces his way into the life of his idol Temple, who tapes a phone conversation with him, previews it for police, and grudgingly accepts their or-else request to continue the dialog and plays their regular talks on his morning show.

Advertisement

Despite these inroads, Tony is unable to prevent his inner petty schmuck from emerging and undermining his message, such as it is. He vacillates between treating Hall as a useless representative of the financial elite (when the elder Hall finally agrees to speak with Tony via phone from a tropical vacation, Tony sneers to Hall the younger, “Your daddy’s on the line—he wants to know when you’ll be home for supper!”) and connecting with him on a human level. When he’s not bombastic, he’s needy and fawning. “I like you!” he keeps telling people he just met, but Fred most of all—as if a Black man who’d built a comfortable life for himself and his wife in 1977 Indiana could say no when an overwhelmingly white police force asked him to become Tony’s fake-confidant; and as if it matters whether a hostage-taking gunman feels warmly towards him.

Ultimately, though, making perfect sense and effecting lasting change are no higher on Tony’s agenda than they were for the protagonists of “Dog Day Afternoon” and “Network.” Like them, these are unhinged audience surrogates whose media stardom turned them into human megaphones for anger at the miserable state of things, and the indifference of institutions that caused or worsened it. These include local law enforcement, which—to paraphrase hapless bank robber Sonny Wirtzik taunting cops in “Dog Day Afternoon”—wanna kill Tony so bad that they can taste it. The discussions between Indianapolis police and the FBI (represented by Neil Mulac’s Agent Patrick Mullaney, a straight-outta-Quantico robot) are all about how to set up and take the kill shot.

The aforementioned phone call leads to a gut-wrenching moment that echoes the then-recent kidnapping of John Paul Getty III, when hostage-takers called their victim’s wealthy grandfather to arrange ransom payment, and got nickel-and-dimed as if they were trying to sell him a used car. The elder Hall is played by “Dog Day Afternoon” star Al Pacino, inspired casting that not only officially connects Tony with Wirtzik but proves that, at 85, Pacino can still bring the heat. The character’s presence creeps into the rest of the story like a toxic fog, even when he’s not the subject of conversation.

With his frizzy grey toupee, self-satisfied Midwest twang, and punchable smirk, Pacino is skin-crawlingly perfect as an old man who built a fortune on being good at one thing, but thinks that makes him a fountain of wisdom on all things, including the conduct of Real Men in a land of women and sissies. After watching TV coverage of Tony getting emotional while keeping his shotgun on Richard, Jr., he beams with pride that Tony shed tears but his own son didn’t. (Kelly Lynch, who costarred in another classic Van Sant film about American losers, “Drugstore Cowboy,” plays Richard, Sr.’s trophy wife, who is appalled at being confronted with irrefutable evidence of her husband’s monstrousness, but still won’t say a word against him.)

Van Sant was 25 during the real-life incidents that inspired this movie. That may partly account for the physical realism of the production, which doesn’t feel created but merely observed, in the manner of ’70s movies whose authenticity was strengthened by letting the main characters’ dialogue overlap and compete with ambient sounds; shooting in existing locations when possible, and dressing the actors in clothes that looked as if they’d been hanging in regular folks’ closets for years. Peggy Schnitzer did the costumes, Stefan Dechant the production design, and Arnaud Poiter the cinematography, all of which figuratively wear bell-bottom pants and platform shoes; the soundscape was overseen by Leslie Schatz, who keeps the environments believably dense and filled with incidental sounds while making sure the important stuff can be understood. It should also be mentioned that the film’s blueprint is an original script by a first-timer, Adam Kolodny, with a bona-fide working class worldview; he wrote it while working as a custodian at the Los Angeles Zoo.

Advertisement

More impressive than the film’s behind-the-scenes pedigree is its vision of another time that unexpectedly comes to seem not too different from this one. It is both a lovingly constructed time machine highlighting details that now seem as antiquated as lithography and buckboard wagons (the film deserves a special Oscar just for its phones) and a wide-ranging consideration of indestructible realities of life in the United States, which are highlighted in such a way that you notice them without feeling as if the movie pointed at them.

For instance, consider Tony’s infatuation with Fred Temple, which peaks when Tony honors his hero by demonstrating his “soul dancing” for his hostage, is a pre-Internet version of what we would now call a “parasocial relationship.” An awareness of racial dynamics is baked into this, and into the film as a whole. Domingo’s performance as Temple captures the tightrope walk that Black celebrities have to pull off, reassuring their most excitable white fans that they understand and care about them without cosigning condescension or behavior that could escalate into harassment. Consider, too, the matter-of-fact presentation of how easy it is for violence-prone people to buddy up to law enforcement officers, especially when they inhabit the same spaces. When Indianapolis police detective Will Grable (Cary Elwes) approaches Tony on a public street soon after the kidnapping, Tony’s face brightens as he exclaims, “Hi Mike! Nice to see you!”

And then, of course, there’s the economic and political framework, which is built with a firm yet delicate hand, and compassion for the vibrant messiness of life. “Dead Man’s Wire” depicts an analog era in which crises like this one were treated as important local matters that involved local people, businesses, and government agents, rather than fuel for a global agitprop industry posing as a news media, and a parasitic army of self-proclaimed influencers reycling the work of other influencers for clout. Van Sant’s movie continually insists on the uniqueness and value of every life shown onscreen, however briefly glimpsed, from the many unnamed citizens who are shown silently watching news coverage of the crisis while working their day jobs, to Fred’s right hand at the radio station, an Asian-American stoner dude (Vinh Nguyen) with a closet-sized office who talent-scouts unknown bands while exhaling cumulus clouds of pot smoke.

All this is drawn together by Van Sant and editor Saar Klein in pop music-driven montages that show how every member of the community depicted in this story is connected, even if they don’t know it or refuse to admit it. As John Donne put it, “No man is an island/Entire of itself/Each is a piece of the continent/A part of the main.” The struggle of the individual is summed up in one of Fred’s hypnotic radio monologues: “Let’s remember to become the ocean, not disappear into it.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending