Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Mickey 17” – Valdosta Daily Times

Published

on

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Mickey 17” – Valdosta Daily Times

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Mickey 17”

Published 8:14 pm Tuesday, March 11, 2025

By Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar

“Mickey 17” (Dark Comedy/Science-Fiction: 2 hours, 17 minutes)

Starring: Robert Pattinson, Steven Yeun, Naomi Ackie, Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette

Advertisement

Director:  Bong Joon Ho

Rated: R (Violent content, strong language throughout, sexual content and drug material.)

Movie Review:

Robert Pattinson stars as the titular character under the direction of Bong Joon Ho, who masterfully directed “Parasite” (2019), which received the Best Picture Oscar in 2020. “Mickey 17” is an adaptation of Edward Ashton’s science-fiction novel “Mickey7.” It is an eccentric treat for moviegoers wanting something different.

An impressive Pattinson plays Mickey Barnes, a man down on his luck on Earth. He takes a gig as an “expendable,” a disposable crew member on a critical space mission to colonize the ice planet Niflheim. As an expendable, Barnes does the dangerous tasks because his body can be re-cloned if his body dies or is severely injured. A new body is replicated with his memories intact. All is well until a mishap with the seventeenth incarnation of Mickey Barnes occurs.

Advertisement

“Mickey 17” is a different type of movie than Bong Joon Ho’s “Parasite,” which also garnered the moviemaker a Best Director Oscar. However, the photoplays are similar in that they have the same quirkiness that makes them enticing entertainment.

Think of “Mickey 17” as “Groundhog Day” (Director Harold Ramis, 1993) meets “Starship Troopers” (Director Paul Verhoeven, 1997). It has unconventional characters, comedy, action and plenty of adventure through a science-fiction lens. The problem is the comedy is rarely funny. Comedic moments can exist in sci-fi movies, but comedy and science fiction rarely mix well. A movie should primarily be one or the other to resolve this duality.

Otherwise, “Mickey 17” is an enjoyable movie. It takes one to a new place through imaginative means. Additionally, Pattinson is pleasing to watch. He inspires one to care about Mickey and his grueling profession.

Grade: B- (17th time is the charm.)

 

Advertisement

“Queen of the Ring” (Sports Drama: 2 hours, 20 minutes)

Starring: Emily Bett Rickards, Josh Lucas, Tyler Posey and Gavin Casalegno

Director: Ash Avildsen

Rated: R (Violence, including domestic violence, strong language and suggestive material)

Movie Review:

Advertisement

“Queen of the Ring” is another good wrestling movie following “The Wrestler” (2008), “Fighting with My Family” (2019) and 2023’s “The Iron Claw,” the latter two being biographical sports movies like “Queen of the Ring.” Director Ash Avildsen’s resume just improved with “Queen of the Ring,” a well-acted and energetic.

Mildred Burke (Rickards) is one of the first women to wrestle professionally when the sport is only legal for men in the United States. The small-town single mother improves her muscle mass and techniques in the ring, becoming the first woman million-dollar athlete. Her path to the championship belt is not easy, especially dealing with her abusive husband Billy Wolfe (Lucas), who doubles as her manager. Burke grapples with the issues and remains persistent in achieving success.

Ash Avildsen (“American Satan, 2017) keeps the movie’s focus mostly in the ring. The athletic moments are good, but Mildred Burke’s actions outside the ring impress more. Here, Emily Bett Rickards shines in this role. Her physical skills are good, but she is better with the dramatic roles outside the ring. If only the writers and Avildsen spent more time there, “Queen of the Ring” drama could be more impactful.

Grade: B (She is regal in the ring.)

 

Advertisement

“Ex-Husbands” (Drama: 1 hour, 39 minutes)

Starring: Griffin Dunne, Miles Heizer and James Norton

Director: Noah Pritzker

Rated: NR (Strong language, sexual references and thematic elements)

Movie Review:

Advertisement

The title “Ex-Husbands” sums up the plot of this movie by director-writer Noah Pritzker (“Quitters,” 2015). It is about a group of men, from senior citizens to age 30, who are exes. The movie turns into a nice drama about the bond between fathers and sons, led by Griffin Dunne, who first gained major attention for his roles in “An American Werewolf in London” (1981) and “After Hours” (1985).

“Ex-Husbands’” opening scene takes place in a cinema with Manhattan dentist Dr. Peter Pearce (Dunne) counseling his father, Simon Pearce (Richard Benjamin), recommending the elderly man not divorce his wife of 60 years, who is Peter’s mother Eunice (Marcia Kurtz). Six years later, Peter’s wife of 35 years (Rosanna Arquette) leaves him. Peter enters a midlife crisis mode. To cope with depression, Peter books a trip to Tulum, Mexico, unaware that his sons Nick (Norton) and Mickey (Heizer) are going there for the Nicks’ bachelor party. The brothers do not want their father at the festivities for fear. He would turn the event into a pity party about his divorce from their mother. However, their days in the coastal city become an eye-opening experience for the three men that strengthens their familial bonds.

Rarely do movies show multiple male perspectives during breakups, especially as a family affair. “Ex-husbands” does. While not all men in this family are married, their separations leave them without the women they love. Only one of the men, Simon, is happy about leaving his wife, although his son Peter objects.

Interestingly, we only see Eunice, Peter’s mother and Simon’s wife, briefly during the opening scene. More appearances may help the audience understand the elderly couple’s relationship more. Simon’s reason for ending the relationship is dubious. Viewers can see that Simon appears to have aged better than Eunice. However, an octogenarian talking about returning to the dating game is comical, although this is really a drama. Peter and Simon’s conversation inspires humor, not because it is meant to be funny but because of the circumstances that life delivers to all. This trend carries throughout this photoplay.

Again, this is a solid drama and a subtle comedy. It is like real life. It has unexpected moments of both joy and sadness. Despite all of this, “Ex-Husbands” is appealingly uplifting, despite depressing moments throughout its runtime. The good performances of actors Griffin Dunne, Miles Heizer and James Norton make one care about their characters even after the collapse of love.

Advertisement

Grade: B (Even your ex should appreciate this.)

 

“Night of the Zoopocalypse” (Animation/Horror: 1 hour, 31 minutes)

Starring: Gabbi Kosmidis

Directors: Ricardo Curtis and Rodrigo Perez-Castro

Advertisement

Rated: PG (Action/peril and scary images throughout.)

Movie Review:

“Night of the Zoopocalypse” is an energetic and adventurous animated horror movie for younger audiences. Its inspiration is an adaptation of the short story “ZOOmbies” by horror master-filmmaker Clive Barker (“Hellraiser” and “Candyman” series)

Seven zoo animals led by Gracie (Kosmidis), a wolf, and Dan (Harbour), a mountain lion, must survive the night after a meteorite causes a virus that turns some animals into zombies. The zoo animals of Colepepper Zoo thought that being a zoo made them safe. Now, they realize they are trapped with no means of exiting their captive home.

“Night of the Zoopocalypse” is a captivating movie for families looking for a children’s movie that offers some thrills. A very straightforward, conventional plot turns into an entertaining ride that leaves this zoo feeling like an amusement park.

Advertisement

Grade: B- (Visit this zoo, but remember it is not a petting zoo.)

 

“In the Lost Land” (Action/Adventure: 1 hour, 41 minutes)

Starring: Milla Jovovich, Dave Bautista, Amara Okereke and Arly Jover

Director: Paul W.S. Anderson

Advertisement

Rated: R (Violence and language)

Movie Review:

“Into the Lost Land” is lost on good storytelling although based on short story by the famed George R. R. Martin. The main characters have no chemistry in Constantin Werner and Paul W. S. Anderson’s screenplay. This feels cheap like one of those adventure movies on the Syfy Channel. You watch them because they appear intriguing, but when done you have to question why you wasted hours watching.

A queen (Amara Okereke) seeks a mystic power to achieve love. To retrieve it from the dangerous Lost Lands, she approaches the powerful witch Gray Alys (Jovovich). The witch grants wishes for a price and grants the queen’s request. Gray Alys then hires the brave hunter Boyce (Bautista), who is knowledgeable of the Lost Lands, as a guide. Gray Alys is ruled a heretic by the church is hunted by merciless missionaries of The Church led by The Enforcer (Jover), so her task with Boyce to achieve her task will be treacherous. They must survive murderous religious zealots and demons.

Paul W.S. Anderson once again directs his muse, wife Milla Jovovich. This movie feels like their “Resident Evil” movies, where Jovovich runs and fights in cyclical scenes. Jovovich is good in these action roles, but most of their collaborations are run of the mill B-movies.

Advertisement

Although based on the written work of George R. R. Martin, “Lost Lands” is a shabby story that concentrates more on action than a good story. The plot seems at the narrative’s midpoint. Elements of something fascinating exist within this narrative, but it remains lost far offscreen.

Grade: D+ (Wayward lands.)

 

“Rule Breakers” (Drama: 2 hours, 01 minutes)

Starring: Nikohl Boosheri Amber Afzali, and Mohamed Bentaleb

Advertisement

Director: Bill Guttentag a

Rated: PG (Thematic material and violent content)

Movie Review:

Angel Studios presents another movie based on a true story. This one is inspiring, despite some formulaic biodrama aspects.

Roya Mahboob (Boosheri) is an Afghanistan woman who runs programs to help girls in her country computer programming and robotics. Despite obstacles from a male-dominated society, she puts together a team of teenage girls who become the Afghan Dreamers. They are a robotics team that competes in robotics tournaments around the world. The team’s quest to gain recognition is constantly in flux as Afghan men and some foreign governments bombard them with barriers. Still, these young women remain vigilant and achieve their goals.

Advertisement

The script by director Bill Guttentag and cowriters Jason Brown and Elaha Mahboob gives one a chance to know the characters in this inspiring movie, yet the tougher cultural aspects touched on are rushed. Still, this is a good movie debut on the weekend of International Women’s Day.

Grade: B- (Movie Rule: Take a break and see this encouraging drama.)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA

Published

on

Movie Review – SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA
SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA is shared with the audience by investigator Steve Sue in a calm and charming manner, but this documentary tells a powerful, positive and fascinating story. The “hang loose” thumb, pinky sign that originated in Hawaii and carries many meanings is the focus of this film. I just learned this gesture is called a “Shaka” and has a worldwide impact.  And, there are Shaka Contests.  Who knew? And how do you throw a Shaka? For me, […]
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “I Was a Stranger” and You Welcomed Me

Published

on

Movie Review: “I Was a Stranger” and You Welcomed Me

Just when you think that you’ve seen and heard all sides of the human migration debate, and long after you fear that the cruel, the ignorant and the scapegoaters have won that shouting match, a film comes along and defies ignorance and prejudice by both embracing and upending the conventional “immigrant” narrative.

“I Was a Strranger” is the first great film of 2026. It’s cleverly written, carefully crafted and beautifully-acted with characters who humanize many facets of the “migration” and “illegal immigration” debate. The debut feature of writer-director Brandt Andersen, “Stranger” is emotional and logical, blunt and heroic. It challenges viewers to rethink their preconceptions and prejudices and the very definition of “heroic.”

The fact that this film — which takes its title from the Book of Matthew, chapter 25, verse 35 — is from the same faith-based film distributor that made millions by feeding the discredited human trafficking wish fulfillment fantasy “Sound of Freedom” to an eager conservative Christian audience makes this film something of a minor miracle in its own right.

But as Angel Studios has also urged churchgoers not just to animated Nativity stories (“The King of Kings”) and “David” musicals, but Christian resistence to fascism (“Truth & Treason” and “Bonheoffer”) , their atonement is almost complete.

Andersen deftly weaves five compact but saga-sized stories about immigrants escaping from civil-war-torn Syria into a sort of interwoven, overlapping “Babel” or “Crash” about migration.

Advertisement

“The Doctor” is about a Chicago hospital employee (Yasmine Al Massri of “Palestine 36” and TV’s “Quantico”) whose flashback takes us to the hospital in Aleppo, Syria, bombed and terrorized by the Assad regime’s forces, and what she and her tween daughter (Massa Daoud) went through to escape — from literally crawling out of a bombed building to dodging death at the border to the harrowing small boat voyage from Turkey to Greece.

“The Soldier” follows loyal Assad trooper Mustafa (Yahya Mahayni was John the Baptist in Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints”) through his murderous work in Aleppo, and the crisis of conscience that finally hits him as he sees the cruel and repressive regime he works for at its most desperate.

“The Smuggler” is Marwan, a refugee-camp savvy African — played by the terrific French actor Omar Sy of “The Intouchables” and “The Book of Clarence” — who cynically makes his money buying disposable inflatable boats, disposable outboards and not-enough-life-jackets in Turkey to smuggle refugees to Greece.

“The Poet” (Ziad Bakri of “Screwdriver”) just wants to get his Syrian family of five out of Turkey and into Europe on Marwan’s boat.

And “The Captain” (Constantine Markoulakis of “The Telemachy”) commands a Hellenic Coast Guard vessel, a man haunted by the harrowing rescues he must carry out daily and visions of the bodies of those he doesn’t.

Advertisement

Andersen, a Tampa native who made his mark producing Tom Cruise spectacles (“American Made”), Mel Gibson B-movies (“Panama”) and the occasional “Everest” blockbuster, expands his short film “Refugee” to feature length for “I Was a Stranger.” He doesn’t so much alter the formula or reinvent this genre of film as find points of view that we seldom see that force us to reconsider what we believe through their eyes.

Sy’s Smuggler has a sickly little boy that he longs to take to Chicago. He runs his ill-gotten-gains operation, profiting off human misery, to realize that dream. We see glimpses of what might be compassion, but also bullying “customers” and his new North African assistant (Ayman Samman). Keeping up the hard front he shows one and all, we see him callously buy life jackets in the bazaar — never enough for every customer to have one in any given voyage.

The Captain sits for dinner with family and friends and has to listen to Greek prejudices and complaints about this human life and human rights crisis, which is how the worlds sees Greece reacting to this “invasion.” But as he and his first mate recount lives saved and the horrors of lives lost, that quibbling is silenced.

Here and there we see and hear (in Arabic and Greek with subtitles, and English) little moments of “rising above” human pettiness and cruelty and the simple blessings of kindness.

Advertisement

“I Was a Stranger” was finished in 2024 and arrives in cinemas at one of the bleakest moments in recent history. Cruelty is running amok, unchecked and unpunished. Countries are being destabilized, with the fans of alleged “strong man” rule cheering it on.

Andersen carefully avoids politics — Middle Eastern, Israeli, European and American — save for the opening scene’s zoom in on that Chicago hospital, passing a gaudily named “Trump” hotel in the process, and a general condemnation of Syria’s Assad mob family regime.

But Andersen’s bold movie, with its message so against the grain of current events, compromised media coverage and the mostly conservative audience that has become this film distributor’s base, plays like a wet slap back to reality.

And as any revival preacher will tell you, putting a positive message out there in front of millions is the only way to convert hundreds among the millions who have lost their way.

star

Rating: PG-13, violence, smoking, racial slurs

Cast: Yasmine Al Massri, Yahya Mahayni, Ziad Bakri, Omar Sy, Ayman Samman, Massa Daoud, Jason Beghe and Constantine Markoulakis

Advertisement

Credits: Scripted and directed by Brandt Andersen. An Angel Studios release.

Running time: 1:43

Unknown's avatar

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘The Tank’ Review: A War Film More Abstract Than Brutal (Prime Video) – Micropsia

Published

on

‘The Tank’ Review: A War Film More Abstract Than Brutal (Prime Video) – Micropsia

The Tiger Is the Tank. Or rather, the type of German tank that gives the film its international title—just in case anyone might confuse this war story with an adventure movie involving wild animals. The tank itself is the film’s container, much as The Boat was in the legendary 1981 film it openly seeks to emulate in more than one respect, or as the more recent tank was in the Israeli film Lebanon (2009). Yes, much of Dennis Gansel’s movie unfolds inside a tank called Tiger, but what it is ultimately trying to tell goes well beyond its cramped metal walls.

This large-scale Prime Video war production has been described by many as the platform’s answer to Netflix’s success with All Quiet on the Western Front, the highly decorated German film released in 2022. In practice, it is a very different proposition. Despite the fanfare surrounding its release—Amazon even gave it a theatrical run a few months ago, something it rarely does—the film made a far more modest impact. Watching it, the reasons become clear. This is a darker, stranger movie, one that flirts as much with horror as with monotony, and that positions itself less as a traditional war film than as an ethical and philosophical meditation on warfare.

The first section—an intense and technically impressive combat sequence—takes place during what would later be known as the Battle of the Dnieper, which unfolded over several months in 1943 on the Eastern Front, as Soviet forces pushed back the Nazi advance. Der Tiger is the type of tank carrying a compact platoon—played by David Schütter, Laurence Rupp, Leonard Kunz, Sebastian Urzendowsky, and Yoran Leicher—that miraculously survives the aerial destruction of a bridge over the river.

Soon afterward—or so it seems—the group is assigned a mission that, at least in its initial setup, recalls Saving Private Ryan. Lieutenant Gerkens (Schütter) is ordered to rescue Colonel Von Harnenburg, stranded behind enemy lines. From there, the film becomes a journey through an infernal landscape of ruined cities, corpses, forests, and fog—a setting that, thanks to the way it is shot, feels more fantastical than realistic.

That choice is no accident. As the journey begins to echo Apocalypse Now, it becomes clear that the film is less interested in conventional suspense—mines on the road, the threat of ambush—than in the strangeness of its situations and environments. When the tank plunges into the water and briefly operates like a submarine, one may reasonably wonder whether such technology actually existed in the 1940s, or whether the film has deliberately drifted into a more extravagant, symbolic territory.

This is the kind of film whose ending is likely to inspire more frustration than affection. Though heavily foreshadowed, it is the sort of conclusion that tends to irritate audiences: cryptic, somewhat open-ended, and more suggestive than explicit. That makes sense, given that the film is less concerned with depicting the daily mechanics of war than with grappling with its aftermath—ethical, moral, psychological, and physical.

Advertisement

In its own way, The Tank functions as a kind of mea culpa. The platoon becomes a microcosm of a nation that “followed orders” and committed—or allowed to be committed—horrific acts in its name. The flashbacks scattered throughout the film make this point unmistakably clear. The problem is that, while these ideas may sound compelling when summarized in a few sentences (or in a review), the film never manages to turn them into something fully alive—narratively, visually, or dramatically.

Only in brief moments—largely thanks to Gerkens’s perpetually worried, anguished expression—do those ideas achieve genuine cinematic weight. They are not enough, however, to sustain a two-hour runtime that increasingly feels repetitive and inert. Unlike the films by Steven Spielberg, Wolfgang Petersen, Francis Ford Coppola, and others it so clearly references, The Tank remains closer to a concept than to a drama, more an intriguing reflection than a truly effective film.


Continue Reading

Trending