Entertainment
How to watch the Emmys and everything else to know, from the red carpet to the nominees

Six months after the nominations for the 75th Emmy Awards were announced, the Television Academy is finally ready to celebrate the best of the 2022-23 television season.
Hit shows such as “The Last of Us,” “The Bear” and “The White Lotus” have already notched a few early wins at the Creative Arts Emmy Awards, held earlier this month. Actors Nick Offerman and Storm Reid were recognized for their guest roles on HBO’s “The Last of Us,” which also took home wins for picture editing, main title design, prosthetic makeup , sound editing, sound mixing and visual effects. “The Bear” and “White Lotus,” meanwhile, won the awards for casting in a comedy series and casting in a drama series, respectively, among others.
Here’s a refresher for everything you need to know about the hot labor summer-delayed edition of the 2023 (but held in 2024) Emmy Awards.
When are the Emmys and why are they being held in January?
The 75th Emmy Awards will be held on Jan. 15 at the Peacock Theater at L.A. Live. The three-hour live telecast will kick off at 5 p.m. Pacific on Fox (and will be available the next day on Hulu).
Originally scheduled for September — when the ceremony is traditionally held — the Emmy Awards were postponed amid the historic dual Hollywood strikes by the Writers Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA that brought the industry to a halt.
The writers had already been on strike for two months when the Emmy nominations were announced in July. The actors walked out shortly after. Rather than proceed with no writers to write the show or presenters to hand out awards, Fox chose to push the event until after both labor disputes were resolved.
(The Creative Arts Emmy Awards, which were held Jan. 6 and 7, will airon FXX on Saturday .)
Who is hosting?
Anthony Anderson hosts the 75th Emmy Awards on Monday.
(Jae C. Hong / Invision / Associated Press)
Anthony Anderson, who was nominated for lead comedy actor for seven consecutive years for his work on the ABC sitcom “black-ish,” has been tapped to host the 75th Emmy Awards. Anderson currently hosts Fox’s music game show “We Are Family” along with his mother, Doris Bowman. Bowman reportedly also will be part of the telecast.
When does the red carpet start and how can I watch it?
Preshow coverage of the event will begin at 2 p.m. Pacific on both E! and KTLA. The cable network will begin with “Live From E! Countdown to the Emmys” before switching over to its official red-carpet coverage at 3 p.m. with “Emmys Live From E! Hosted by Laverne Cox.” Heather McMahan , Zanna Roberts Rassi and Amber Ruffin also have been tapped for E!’s Emmys lead-up show.
For L.A. locals, Sam Rubin , along with Jessica Holmes , Doug Kolk and Megan Henderson , will be hosting KTLA’s three-hour preshow, “Live From the Emmys.”
Additionally, People and Entertainment Weekly will livestream red-carpet coverage starting at 3 p.m. on their respective websites, YouTube and social media channels.
What shows and actors are nominated?
Among those vying for the top series prize in their respective categories are a number of shows that released their final season during the June 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, eligibility window , including “Succession,” “Better Call Saul,” “Ted Lasso,” “Barry” and “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.”
Other nominees for the night’s top prizes include returning favorites such as “Abbot t Elementary,” “The White Lotus,” “The Crown” and “Yellowjackets,” as well as newcomers “The Last of Us,” “The Bear,” “Wednesday” and “Andor.”
In addition to drama series, “Succession’s” nominations include those for lead drama actress (Sarah Snook), lead drama actor (Brian Cox, Kieran Culkin and Jeremy Strong), supporting actress (J. Smith-Cameron) and supporting actor (Nicholas Braun, Matthew Macfadyen, Alan Ruck and Alexander Skarsgård). Snook, Culkin and Macfadyen won Golden Globe awards for the show earlier this month.
“The White Lotus ,” which was previously in the limited series category, has nominations for drama series, supporting drama actress (Jennifer Coolidge, Meghann Fahy , Aubrey Plaza and Simona Tabasco ) and supporting drama actor (F. Murray Abraham, Michael Imperioli, Theo James and Will Sharpe).
Broadcast darling “Abbott Elementary” is once again up for comedy series, and it also has nominations for lead comedy actress (Quinta Brunson), supporting comedy actress (Janelle James and Sheryl Lee Ralph) and supporting comedy actor (Tyler James Williams).
Check out the complete list of 75th Emmy Awards nominations.
Who will win an Emmy award?
The Television Academy is predictable — except when it’s not. But most awards prognosticators, including The Times’ own columnist Glenn Whipp, are anticipating a big night for “Succession.” The HBO series is considered a shoo-in to take home the award for drama series, with Snook, Culkin and Macfadyen expected to take the awards for lead drama actress, lead drama actor and supporting drama actor, respectively.
Whipp expects the wins to be more spread out in the comedy field, with the series prize going to the final season of Apple TV+’s “Ted Lasso.” In the limited series categories, he anticipates a good night for Netflix’s “Beef” and its stars, Ali Wong and Steven Yeun.
The full list of Whipp’s predictions is available here.
Who are the presenters?
Among the celebrity presenters who have been announced for the ceremony are this year’s nominees Quinta Brunson (“Abbott Elementary”), Brett Goldstein (“Ted Lasso”), Jenna Ortega (“Wednesday”), Pedro Pascal (“The Last of Us”), Sheryl Lee Ralph (“Abbott Elementary”), Taraji P. Henson (“Abbott Elementary”), Juno Temple (“Ted Lasso”) and Hannah Waddingham (“Ted Lasso”).
Jason Bateman, Stephen Colbert, Joan Collins, Jon Cryer, Charlie Day, Jodie Foster, Marla Gibbs, Jon Hamm, Glenn Howerton , Ken Jeong, Rob McElhenney, Joel McHale, Holland Taylor and Taylor Tomlinson also have been announced as presenters.

Movie Reviews
'Pavements' review: Far more than just a music documentary

(Credits: Venice Film Festival)
Pavements – Alex Ross Perry
I’ll start with a disclaimer: before I had settled into my cinema seat at the press screening of Pavements, Alex Ross Perry’s unorthodox new documentary about Pavement, I’d never really listened to their music. Of course, I’d heard a few songs, I’d heard the band name, but I’d never delved deeper. These things often fall into a trap. Who are music documentaries for? Only for the fans? The whole point of Pavements was to avoid that, so I was sent in as a test.
“For Pavements, I was always trying to not think about the fans because that’s your worst audience,” Alex Ross Perry told Interview. With this new and admittedly odd movie about Pavement, he was doing everything possible not to make a classic fan-focused music documentary because, as a music fan himself, he was sick of it.
“So few bands want to do anything different now. It’s become so flat and uninteresting. Now it’s all about making a valuable piece of marketing,” he complained, not wanting to chain himself to that narrative. It’s something he’s been trying to avoid doing for a while now. As he’s also been working on a Metallica movie for some time, he’s been thinking this one thought a lot: “I want to make a good movie that grapples with a lot of this and isn’t fan service”.
So given that Pavements is purposefully not fan service, I felt fine to go in blind, to see what I’d learn and simply to find if it holds up as a film for someone outside of the band’s world. In short? It does.
Pavements is odd, really odd. It feels like a music documentary made by Nathan Fielder, as I know that if I had access to my phone, I would have quickly been googling, “Is Pavements real?”, “Was Joe Keery scripted in Pavements?”, “Was the Pavement musical real?”
Because it’s a wild web and you’re never quite sure what’s real or not. Not only does the movie tick the box of giving a good and thorough overview of Pavement, letting me leave the cinema now knowing a lot about the band, aware of a general timeline of their career, and with an insight into key moments and an understanding of the players, but it’s so much more than that. It feels like a movie, more so than a documentary, so I’ll call it that. The movie centres on these three points, all happening at the same moment; Alex Ross Perry is creating Slanted! Enchanted! A Pavement Jukebox Musical, he’s also cast actors who are preparing for their roles in Range Life, a classic biopic of the band, and Pavement, the actual band, are preparing for their actual reunion tour.
It’s a lot, but it’s brilliant. The moments focused on Range Life are genuinely laugh out loud funny, especially the bits showing Joe Keery’s melodramatic journey to becoming Stephen Malkmus, taking the piss out of method actors. There’s a nod towards Austin Butler’s obsessive Elvis transformation as Keery sits stoicly with an accent coach discussing his desire to get a photo of Malkmus’ tongue and later freaking out when he cant stop doing the slurring Stockton, California accent. It’s moments like these that make Pavements a worthwhile movie, totally independent of the band, because it makes it something way bigger.
Obviously, this is a film about Pavement, and it does hinge on real-life footage of the group and always comes back to an investigation into them and their success. But it’s more than that. In fact, I’d say it is a movie about music documentaries as a whole. It’s about music movies, or the way bands’ becomings are mythologised into somewhat of a fictional account, when their art is taken and twisted in that way. That is especially shown in two of the film’s most interesting moments.
The first is merely a gag. At one point, it breaks apart, pauses to show the ‘For Your Consideration’ banner of the movie as a joke about how the Oscars eat music biopics up, layering these fake clips of the fake film with melodramatic piano music as a piss-take of the genre.
The second is a more nuanced critique. After recounting the moment the band were pelted with mud and rocks during a 1995 Lollapalooza show, the screen splits in two. What the audience hears is the scene in Range Life where the band returns to their dressing room and falls into a dramatic depression, once again with some sad music on top as they launch into a heavy conversation about splitting up. But on the other side of the screen, you can see the real-life band joking around. It’s moments like that where Perry shows his focus, and it’s less on the band and more on making things interesting.
“The stories you hear, you know they never add up”: These are the words that appear onscreen at the start of the movie, pulled from the band’s track ‘Frontwards’. As someone who didn’t know the band and so didn’t know the song, that lyric merely became a kind of warning-slash-mission statement for the film. It’s as if Perry is using it to comment on the entire genre of music films, or the entire history of how bands are treated, the way their stories naturally become twisted, dramatised and fictionalised to a degree, over time.
From what I learn from the actual clips of Pavement in the movie, the overwhelming characteristic of the band is just sheer normality. They were a group of utterly normal people just wanting to make music, but found themselves at the centre of a storm of obsession that would never just settle for that. By building such a baffling and interesting nest around them here, bringing in the phoney movie and the wild musical, Perry allows the group to be the most normal part of it. This allows their actual story to be told purely because the entertainment and the drama are elsewhere. Not only is it somewhat genius, it’s also just a lot of fun—even if you’re not a fan.
Related Topics
Entertainment
Nezza's translated national anthem shines light on a forgotten Latina trailblazer

On Saturday night, singer Nezza sang a Spanish version of “The Star-Spangled Banner,” also known as “El Pendón Estrellado,” at Dodger Stadium, despite being told by an unnamed representative of the baseball organization that she sing it in English.
The 30-year-old pop singer, whose real name is Vanessa Hernández, uploaded the interaction on TikTok, where she proceeded to sing the Spanish version anyway. She captioned the video, “para mi gente [heart] I stand with you.”
In a tearful follow up TikTok video, she clarified that her decision to follow through with singing “El Pendón Estrellado” was in response to the ongoing immigration sweeps throughout Los Angeles
“I’ve sang the national anthem many times in my life but today out of all days, I could not,” Nezza said in the TikTok video.
The Dodgers did not issue a public comment on Nezza’s social media posts, but a team official said there were no consequences from the club regarding the performance and that Nezza would be welcome back at the stadium in the future.
“I just don’t understand how anyone can watch the videos that have been surfacing and still be on the wrong side of history,” Nezza told The Times.
Nezza’s performance has also sparked conversations about the origins of “El Pendón Estrellado,” resurfacing the legacy of a trailblazing Latina composer, Clotilde Arias.
“The lyrics and the story are the same,” said Nezza. “We’re still saying we’re proud to be American.”
In 1945, the U.S. State Department looked to commission a Spanish version of the national anthem, per the request of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who looked to strengthen political and business partnerships with Latin American countries amid World War II. His cultural efforts aligned with his 1933 Good Neighbor Policy, a Pan-Americanism objective that he implemented at the start of his first term to distance the U.S. from earlier decades of armed intervention.
Although “The Star-Spangled Banner” had already been translated to various languages by the time that President Roosevelt entered office, including two Spanish versions, no versions of the anthem were considered singable. In 1945, the Division of Cultural Cooperation within the Department of State, in collaboration with the Music Educators National Conference, invited submissions for the song in Spanish and Portuguese to promote American patriotism throughout Latin America.
Composer and musician Arias — who immigrated to New York in 1923 at the age of 22 from Iquitos, Peru — answered the call.
At the time, Arias had already established herself as a formidable copywriter for ad agencies, translating jingles and songs in Spanish for companies like Alka-Seltzer, Campbell Soup, Ford Motor Co., Coca-Cola (including the translation version of Andrews Sisters’ “Rum and Coca-Cola”) and others.
She submitted “El Pendón Estrellado,” which included singable lyrics that conveyed the original patriotic essence of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” It was accepted as the only official translation of the national anthem allowed to be sung, according to the National Museum of American History.
However, Arias would die in 1959 at age 58, leaving the song’s existence publicly unknown until 2006, when Roger Arias II, her grandson, dug out drafts of the sheet music and drafts hidden in the garage.
The unexpected find caught the attention of Marvette Pérez, the late curator of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History who at the time was programming Latino exhibits like “!Azúcar!: The Life and Music of Celia Cruz.”
To honor Arias’ legacy, Pérez organized an exhibit in 2012 titled “Not Lost in Translation: The Life of Clotilde Arias,” featuring real documents and photographs of the songwriter. The exhibit also commissioned the first-ever recording of “El Pendón Estrellado,” sung by the a cappella ensemble Coral Cantigas under the musical direction of Diana Sáez. The DC-chamber choir also performed during the exhibit’s opening day, which Arias’ son, Roger Arias, age 82 at the time, came to see.
“I was there when she was writing it,” Roger Arias told NPR at the time. “She’d sing it in her own way to see if it fits, and she would say, ‘How does that sound, sonny?’ And I would say anything she did sounded good to me. So, yes, she struggled through it, but she made it work.”
For Nezza, Arias’ “El Pendón Estrellado” is not only a symbol of American pride, but also a living piece of forgotten Latino history.
“Latino people are a huge part of building this nation,” said Nezza. “I think [the song] shows how we are such an important piece to the story of America.”
Movie Reviews
The Heart Within “The Phoenician Scheme”: A Film Review – The Montpelier Bridge

The title of Wes Anderson’s latest film offers a hint about the main flaw of this mostly delightful movie. The eponymous scheme is a convoluted business deal that never has a chance of making sense to most viewers. This deal amounts to nothing more than a diversion — and it’s often a distraction from what makes the film so charming. If you like neat, satisfying plots, skip this movie. But if you’re a fan of Anderson or perfectly executed deadpan performances, seek out this film at once.
Although the plot has as many wrinkles as the protagonist after one of his long baths, it can be boiled down simply enough: In 1950, ruthless, globetrotting tycoon Anatole “Zsa Zsa” Korda (Benicio Del Toro) pursues a career-capping business deal while attempting to reconnect with his devout, strong-willed daughter, Liesl (Mia Threapleton), and make her his sole heir.
Del Toro and Threapleton are a marvelous comedy duo, their verbal jousts a wonder to behold. Liesl faces daunting challenges striving to compel her father to conduct business with some regard for morality, and Korda exhibits unflagging elan in resisting Liesl’s civilizing influence, staying one step ahead of his rivals, and evading would-be assassins. Liesl’s refrain, “on a trial basis,” and Korda’s signature phrase, “Myself, I feel very safe,” are deliciously ironic.
The conflicts between this pair over contracts, tactics, and, most significantly, the sad fate of Liesl’s mother reveal their need for each other, and herein lies the film’s substance. While the first half of the narrative tends to keep that substance front and center, most of the second half becomes entrenched in the big scheme and other contrivances, and the whole artistic enterprise suffers as a result. In particular, a goofy disaster sequence involving quicksand and a climactic fight scene left this viewer cold. Finally, though, Anderson’s denouement brings us back to the film’s core concerns in richly satisfying fashion.
Beyond the subtle brilliance of Del Toro and Threapleton, Michael Cera, Riz Ahmed, and Hope Davis all perform nimble Andersonian supporting work. Unfortunately, his script shortchanges the estimable Jeffrey Wright and Scarlett Johansson, whose characters are poorly developed, and Anderson uses several other great actors to slight effect in forgettable fantasy sequences. Of course, the movie has impeccable production design and is a visual feast that rewards close attention to detail. For example, the opening credits are displayed on an immaculate overhead shot of Korda’s enormous bathroom, and among many subtle touches here, Anderson and his team slip in a clever joke with their placement of a bottle of wine. Later, Korda’s reading material on his lavish but minimalist private planes is also a source of humor and subtext; one of his books is titled “Questionable Authenticity.” Another captivating element of the movie is the score music by Alexander Desplat, whom I regard as one of this century’s best composers for film.
Returning to the title, I might have noticed a pattern with the names Anderson gives his creations. The titles of his best movies refer to settings (“Moonrise Kingdom” and “The Grand Budapest Hotel”) or people (“The Royal Tenenbaums”). While “The Phoenician Scheme” has both intriguing settings and endearing characters, the title refers to a very prominent element of the film that is also its most disposable: the plot. It’s as if Anderson is trying to keep his viewers at arm’s length, but he shouldn’t be afraid to draw us in closer. I’d rather he called the movie “Liesl and Zsa Zsa” or “Chez Zsa Zsa” (a section title from the movie), though I doubt he would ever risk using such earnest-sounding names.
In terms of character depth and emotional impact, which are often question marks in this director’s work, “The Phoenician Scheme” is several notches above 2021’s “The French Dispatch” but falls short of “Asteroid City,” his 2023 film. Still, unlike some critics, I resist the urge to turn sour on Anderson, even though his halcyon days may be behind him. He has a sophisticated, quasi-European sensibility that we could use more of in contemporary American cinema. To borrow a key line from “Asteroid City,” he should “keep telling the story.” Perhaps, however, he should take a brief sabbatical and return when he’s ready to tell a more focused, authentic tale.
“The Phoenician Scheme” plays at the Savoy through June 19.
-
News1 week ago
A former police chief who escaped from an Arkansas prison is captured
-
Technology1 week ago
Xbox console games are suddenly showing up inside the Xbox PC app
-
Technology1 week ago
Massive DMV phishing scam tricks drivers with fake texts
-
Arkansas1 week ago
Tennessee baseball coach Tony Vitello has funny apology on ESPN at super regional vs Arkansas
-
World1 week ago
Colombia’s would-be presidential candidate shot at Bogota rally
-
Politics1 week ago
Video: Why the U.S. Brought Back Kilmar Abrego Garcia
-
Texas1 week ago
Black bear spotted at North Texas gas station
-
Politics1 week ago
National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles County as anti-ICE protests rage: border czar Tom Homan