Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
What does one do on the morning of the Academy Award nominations? Wake up early? Try to sleep in? Wait for your publicist to call?
Having returned home late from a friend’s dinner the night before, Kate Hudson debated the best course of action ahead of last month’s nominations — before deciding she needed to wake up and hear the news either way.
“It’s been such a ride,” she says. “I wanted to be able to go back to sleep knowing that this part is over. Or I wanted to just wake up and celebrate and be tired. You prepare yourself for everything. But you just feel completely unprepared for when your name is called.”
Hudson’s lead actress Oscar nomination for her turn as Claire Sardina in “Song Sung Blue” is the culmination of an incredible awards season, in which she’s also been nominated for a Golden Globe, an Actor Award and a BAFTA. Based on a true story, the movie follows Claire and her husband, Mike (Hugh Jackman), who headlined the popular Milwaukee-based Neil Diamond cover band Lightning & Thunder in the 1980s and ’90s.
Hudson with Hugh Jackman in “Song Sung Blue.”
(Sarah Shatz / Focus Features)
The honor comes 25 years after Hudson received her first and only previous Oscar nod for playing Penny Lane in her breakthrough role in “Almost Famous.” And although she’s had a slew of successes in the interim — including the now-classic rom-com “How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days” and other hit movies; Netflix’s Lakers-inspired comedy series “Running Point,” currently in postproduction on its second season; and the popular podcast “Sibling Revelry,” which she hosts with brother Oliver Hudson — it can sometimes seem that we’ve underappreciated, and perhaps underestimated, Kate Hudson.
But for her, being recognized for “Song Sung Blue” isn’t some long-awaited vindication. As always, it’s about the work.
“When you’re acting, all you want to do are the things that stretch you, that are exciting,” she says. “You have these opportunities that come, and they don’t come very often, and so you get excited by that process. I don’t think you look from the outside in and say, ‘I always knew I could do this.’ It’s more, my drive is to continue doing this. It’s more, when you look into a horizon and you’re like, ‘Oh, that looks interesting. I wonder what that’s gonna be?’ versus, ‘I’m gonna do that and I’m gonna be good at that.’”
Share via
So the most rewarding part of the movie is not the possibility of adding trophies to her decor, but rather how complex and layered Claire is, who during the course of the movie survives a tragic accident. The role provided Hudson with “so many wonderful things to soak in and perform.”
“There was no one note,” she says of her onscreen alter ego. “There were 10. Everything mattered. The process was really extensive, which is something that I long to do all the time. But it doesn’t happen very often that you get to play so many different things in one movie. That’s our drug as an artist. It mattered that I got this right. There was a personal stake attached to it for me, which was not wanting to let Claire down and wanting to honor her life experience.”
While much of the industry has transformed in the 25 years between Hudson’s Oscar nominations, much has also stayed the same. “It hasn’t changed so drastically that it feels like it’s a different world,” she says. “The soul of our industry is very present. I was talking about this with Ethan Hawke [who is nominated for his turn in ‘Blue Moon’]. We’ve been having so much fun with this. We love it. And it’s nice when you’ve been doing it for so long and then you’re in the conversation and you still just love it and enjoy it.”
“I see where I had the opportunity and where that privilege comes from,” Hudson says of her Hollywood pedigree. “But I also don’t discount how much work needs to go into getting to where [I am]. It doesn’t just happen. It’s something you have to create.” (Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
Did she have a hint when filming “Song Sung Blue” that it could become a career-defining moment for her? “I don’t ever get that far outside of myself,” she says. “The goal is really just to make the best version of something that you love, and then walk away from it and hope that you’ve created something that ends up translating.”
“Song Sung Blue” also marked the first time, since becoming a mother, that she was able to leave her children for an extended period to film a movie. “I feel so lucky right now. My kids are a bit older and I can really get into my creative space,” she says, before adding with a laugh, “I don’t have any more strollers in my house. It’s a whole new world.”
As is her nature, Hudson talks openly and honestly about how being a mother has intertwined with her career. “Mothering doesn’t stop,” she says. “I remember being in a meeting with my dad. Within this meeting I had two phone calls, one from the school and one from someone else asking me a question about my kids. And I had to take these calls because I’m the epicenter. And my dad looked at me and he goes, ‘I don’t know what that’s like.’ I loved that he said that. He was so proud. And also like, ‘Wow, I wouldn’t know what that is, as a man.’”
(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
Being able to celebrate this moment with her family, including her parents Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell, is the “cherry on top” to the entire awards season for Hudson. There are not that many mother-daughter pairs who can both boast Oscar nods. “I honor that so deeply,” she says. “My mom’s 80 years old. She’s had a phenomenal career. She’s my No. 1 best friend in the world. Even though I’ve had a different type of career and we’re very different actresses, that’s my mommy and I learned from her first. So there’s something about being in the same industry and being able to celebrate each other in these moments that becomes even more meaningful because it’s understood differently.”
Hudson has never shied away from being the daughter of famous parents. “To pretend that’s not a huge part of my life would be dishonest,” she says. “It would be irresponsible to say that there isn’t an opportunity that comes from growing up in this town. The difference is if you take it for granted or if you honor it. I see where I had the opportunity and where that privilege comes from. But I also don’t discount how much work needs to go into getting to where [I am]. It doesn’t just happen. It’s something you have to create.”
She particularly credits her parents with the work ethic they instilled in her from a young age to have respect for the craft and the job. “You don’t just show up and think you’re gonna become an actor. You have to take it seriously. My dad always said put your head down and you just do the work. You just just keep plugging away.”
That perspective also helps her see this experience as having a bigger purpose than just her nomination. “It really feels special to be a part of the community this year that’s talking about the importance of celebrating cinema in the theater and how much we need to be saving this industry and nurturing it,” she says. “We have to protect it or else we lose the art form.”
After the hubbub abates, Hudson says the hardest part will be knowing that it will be time to say goodbye to the character and the movie. “It’s the saddest goodbye because you really love a character, and then that moment marks the real letting go of that experience,” she says. “It’s really like sending your kids to college. You’re like, well, now it just lives. It lives without me having to support it. That makes it really emotional. Win or lose, you know?”
(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
Seven-time Oscar nominee Richard Burton continues to have an intriguing afterlife, four decades following his death. At this year’s BAFTA awards, a movie about his early life, Mr. Burton, earned a nomination for best British Film. Mr. Burton, directed by Marc Evans, was also one of the audience favorite films at January’s Palm Springs International Film Festival. It opens in theaters this week and, aided by a strong cast, should appeal even to audiences who have fuzzy recollections of the once notorious actor.
The film begins with a quotation from Elizabeth Taylor (who married Burton twice after a scandalous, heavily publicized affair that began during the shooting of Cleopatra in 1962). In it, Taylor states that Richard never would have found fame and fortune without the efforts of his adoptive father, Philip Burton (superbly played by Toby Jones in the film). Richard (Harry Lawtey of Industry) was actually born Richard Jenkins, the son of a Welsh miner who abandoned the family after the death of Richard’s mother. Richard was then raised by his older sister and her husband, but his talent was spotted by his teacher, Philip Burton, who recognized the young man’s appreciation of literature and drama.
Mr. Burton
The Bottom Line An incisive origin story.
Philip Burton was himself an aspiring writer who penned some dramas for the BBC and had a number of contacts in the theater. But the film suggests that he felt disappointed by his progress and may have compensated in part by playing a mentorship role to Richard. Whether he also felt a physical attraction to young Richard is treated subtly and never definitively answered in the film.
Opening scenes contrast the comfortable but modest living conditions of Philip, who resides in a boarding house owned and overseen by a sympathetic landlady (trenchantly played by Lesley Manville), and the tension in Richard’s household. His brother-in-law demands that Richard drop out of school to contribute to the family finances; the boy resists following his father into the mines but gets a job at a clothing store instead.
Eventually Burton comes up with the idea that Richard can move into the boarding house and return to school, but this may require Burton adopting Richard as his son. Richard is comfortable with this arrangement, and Philip suggests that Richard may have an opportunity for a fellowship to study acting at Oxford. But when Richard’s father and fellow students suggest that Philip may have something more than a paternal interest in the handsome young aspiring actor, Richard flees in terror.
It is to the film’s credit that it refuses to come to any definitive conclusion about Philip’s interest in Richard. There was never anything overtly untoward about their close bond, and until the end of his life, Richard continued to express gratitude for Philip Burton’s mentorship. Yet it may be significant that we never see any hint of Philip’s romantic or sexual interest in women. Richard did leave Burton’s household for several years, but when he had his breakthrough role in Stratford in 1951, portraying Prince Hal in Shakespeare’s Henry IV plays, Philip returned and (at least in this telling) helped Richard to a triumphant opening night.
Richard Burton quickly moved on from there. He earned his first Oscar nomination in 1952 for My Cousin Rachel, and in 1954, he starred in the first Cinemascope epic, The Robe. (Other memorable roles included Becket and Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, his finest collaboration with Taylor.) Burton also continued acting in theater, and the 1964 production of Hamlet, in which he starred under the direction of John Gielgud, remains perhaps the most phenomenally successful production of the play in modern theatrical history.
Since unknown backstories behind startling successes always compel, Mr. Burton has a lot going for it. Lawtey doesn’t quite match Burton’s thrilling vocal delivery (who could?), but he convinces us of the young actor’s talent and potential instability. But it is really Jones, in one of the finest performances of his long career, who holds our attention throughout the movie. The subject of mentorship is not treated frequently onscreen, but Mr. Burton may be remembered as one of the definitive explorations of the theme. All the technical credits help to ground the film — cinematography by Stuart Biddlecombe is especially striking — but it is the performances that truly mesmerize.
KTLA-owner Nexstar Media Group said it has closed its deal to acquire rival Tegna’s TV stations, despite opposition from eight state attorneys general who filed a lawsuit to block the merger.
The acquisition was approved by the Federal Communications Commission’s Media Bureau and the Justice Department, Irving, Texas-based Nexstar said Thursday.
“This transaction is essential to sustaining strong local journalism in the communities we serve,” Nexstar founder and Chief Executive Perry Sook said in a statement. “By bringing these two outstanding companies together, Nexstar will be a stronger, more dynamic enterprise — better positioned to deliver exceptional journalism and local programming with enhanced assets, capabilities and talent.”
Sook also mentioned President Trump and FCC Chairman Brendan Carr by name in the statement, saying the company was “grateful” they recognized the “dynamic forces shaping the media landscape” and allowed the transaction to move forward. Trump had supported the deal.
The surprise announcement came only a day after eight state attorneys general, including California’s Rob Bonta, sued to stop the deal, arguing it would give Nexstar too much control of local TV stations. At the time, Bonta said the combination would cause “irreparable harm to local news and consumers who rely on their reporting as a critical source of information.”
Nexstar is the largest TV station owner in the U.S., with 164 outlets including KTLA in Los Angeles. If the merger with Tegna succeeds, Nexstar would have 265 TV stations reaching 80% of the U.S. and multiple outlets in a number of markets.
The suit also claimed it would give the combined company too much leverage in negotiating fees from pay-TV providers that carry their stations, which could raise costs for consumers.
The plaintiffs in the suit also include state attorneys general in Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Virginia.
FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez said the merger violates the existing national ownership cap of 39% under federal law and said the acquisition did not receive a vote before the entire commission. The FCC approved this deal with waivers, meaning the company can operate in violation of that ownership cap.
“A transaction of this magnitude, which includes new and novel issues before the FCC, demands open deliberation before the full Commission, not a quiet sign-off meant to avoid public scrutiny,” Gomez said in a statement. “Given the increasingly alarming pace of reckless media consolidation, the American public deserves to know how and why this decision was made.”
The FCC did not respond to an immediate request for comment.
Times staff writers Stephen Battaglio and Meg James contributed to this report.
Movie Reviews
At the start of “Project Hail Mary,” Ryan Gosling wakes up aboard a spaceship bound for parts unknown, with no memory of how he got there. After discerning that he’s traveled beyond the confines of our solar system and all his shipmates are dead, he breaks into the ship’s ample supply of vodka and drinks himself into a stupor.
Sounds like a laugh riot, right?
In the hands of co-directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, it is. “Project Hail Mary” is the type of movie that theaters have been lacking for quite some time: A heady sci-fi saga and an irreverent buddy comedy, stuffed with hijinks that keep the film moving at the speed of light. (Until it doesn’t, anyway. More on that later.)
Through a series of flashbacks, we learn that Gosling’s amnesiac astronaut is a middle school science teacher named Ryland Grace, who stepped away from being a top-level biologist after publishing a paper that made him a laughingstock in the scientific community. His paper’s assertions suddenly seem more credible, however, when microscopic alien organisms known as Astrophage are discovered feeding (and breeding) off the sun’s energy, plunging the Earth into an extinction-level crisis.
The full scope of how Grace ended up alone in deep space is slowly revealed throughout the film, but the why is that Astrophage has begun dimming every nearby star except for one: Tau Ceti, a real star approximately 12 light years away from Earth.
Lord and Miller adapted “Project Hail Mary” from the novel of the same name by “The Martian” author Andy Weir, and it shows. Much like Matt Damon’s stranded astronaut Mark Watney, Gosling’s Grace keeps us entertained via self-shot video updates being sent to no one, wryly narrating both his occasional moments of brilliance and his near-constant self-doubt in being chosen as humanity’s last hope.
“Project Hail Mary” really takes off when Grace discovers he’s not the only scientist orbiting Tau Ceti in search of answers. Also on a mission to save his planet is a pint-sized, faceless alien who resembles a many-legged, anthropomorphic Stonehenge. After making contact and rigging up a crude translation device, Grace and the alien (dubbed “Rocky”) settle into a buddy comedy rhythm as they work together to save their respective species.
Rocky is, in a word, adorable. A mix of practical and digital effects, the creature, voiced by puppeteer James Ortiz, would fit right in with Jim Henson’s creations. When Rocky decides to move into Grace’s ship — a feat made possible by what is effectively a temperature-controlled hamster ball — he crashes around the ship like E.T. hunting for Reese’s Pieces. (An earlier homage to “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” reinforces Spielberg’s influence on the story.)
Lord and Miller — the duo behind “The Lego Movie,” “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse,” and the “21 Jump Street” remake — are some of the most naturally funny filmmakers currently working. Where Ridley Scott’s “The Martian” is a sci-fi drama with occasional moments of levity, “Project Hail Mary” is more like an intergalactic “The Odd Couple,” or “Planes, Trains and Automobiles” on a cosmic scale.
That tone is perfect for Gosling, who cements his status here as one of Hollywood’s most versatile leading men. Even with his movie-star looks, he’s believable as a scientist who refuses to believe in himself. It’s a twitchy, scream-filled performance that calls to mind his role in “The Nice Guys,” one of the most undersung comedies of the past decade.
Rocky isn’t Grace’s only comic foil, either. Back on flashback Earth, the stone-faced Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller, “Anatomy of a Fall”), who recruits Grace for the Hail Mary project, stoically deals with his low self-esteem and regular freakouts, as does Carl (Lionel Boyce, “The Bear”), a security guard assigned to keep Grace on task.
All told, The first 70 percent of “Project Hail Mary” ranks among the most broadly entertaining blockbusters in recent memory. That’s why it’s so disappointing when the film loses its way when trying to land the proverbial ship. Lord and Miller are frustratingly faithful to Weir’s source material, which means slogging through a series of false endings and saccharine, emotionally manipulative scenes. The better choice would have been lopping a half hour off the film’s 156-minute runtime.
Nevertheless, if you can mentally prepare yourself for a dramatic downshift in tone, “Project Hail Mary” is well worth a trip to the theaters. It’s a rollicking adventure that offers something for moviegoers of almost any age, anchored by a star turn from Gosling and a puppet that is out of this world.
Rating: *** (out of 4)
“Project Hail Mary” will be released in theaters March 20.
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Family rallies around Oklahoma father after head-on crash
Drummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
Wildfire forces immediate evacuation order for Farnam residents
How ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
Massachusetts community colleges to launch apprenticeship degree programs – The Boston Globe
Police looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’
‘It’s Not a Penalty’: Bednar Rips Officials For MacKinnon Ejection | Colorado Hockey Now
Talarico reportedly knew Colbert interview wouldn’t air on TV before he left to film it