Connect with us

Entertainment

A take on ‘Jesus Revolution’ from one who was there, defending Rowling and more

Published

on

A take on ‘Jesus Revolution’ from one who was there, defending Rowling and more

‘Revolution’ soft-pedals

Katie Walsh is so proper on in her criticism of “The Jesus Revolution!” [“They Know Not What They Do,” Feb. 23]. I used to be there on the Orange County coast 50 years in the past and really concerned within the motion.

I noticed the film on Feb. 24 and to its credit score it’s superbly filmed with nice surroundings of the Newport Seaside shoreline, the actors are nice, and it does depict each the constructive and among the inner conflicts of the motion.

The movie doesn’t go far sufficient. It fails to say that Chuck Smith condemned gays and lesbians. I properly recall a Sunday morning sermon through which he declared, “They’re referred to as queers as a result of that’s what they’re — queers!” This was lengthy earlier than the acronym “LGBTQ” was fashioned.

The movie doesn’t point out that Smith embraced Hal Lindsey’s e book, “The Late Nice Planet Earth,” and preached that Henry Kissinger’s surname matched the mark of the Beast and “bore watching” because the attainable Antichrist.

Advertisement

The movie doesn’t point out that Smith preached the approaching rapture of Christians and the return of Jesus of Nazareth to planet Earth. And so passionately that he ordered the message “Jesus is coming quickly…” on the outside wall of his new sanctuary. A number of years later the message was eliminated as a result of all of that by no means occurred.

Positive, the Jesus Revolution helped 1000’s of hippies to get off of medicine. However solely by getting hooked on a unique drug — Jesus as preached by Smith and his trainees. And this drug has not labored for everybody.

Misdirected religion and beliefs will be illusive and typically harmful.

David William Salvaggio

Redlands

Advertisement

Deep dive into drag

Thanks to Christopher Knight for the brilliantly well-written commentary on drag [“Don’t Be a Drag, Just Be a Queen,” Feb. 23]. It was nice to examine the best way drag deliberately confounds sexism’s definitions about what a fascinating lady or actual man appears to be like like. And the way drag, for even nonperforming younger and previous, is usually a brave act of defending their very own sense of self.

Mother and Dad took me to a drag present in San Francisco again within the ’60s, once I was an impressionable preteen. The jokes largely went over my head, however the sense of full-out exuberance in being who you’re was a tonic in a time when being a woman was to be thought-about less-than and most choices supplied to younger ladies had been to be a buttoned-down housewife, nurse, instructor or mom.

I really like the best way being a lady is each celebrated and critiqued by drag on the similar time.

Suvan Geer

Santa Ana

Advertisement

The place have all of the individuals gone?

Mary McNamara’s column describing the exodus of half one million Californians to different states [“Despite Exodus, State’s Still in a Jam,” Feb. 20] was an eye-opener.

As a Maryland transplant a few years in the past I used to be particularly impressed together with her astute remark that “the absence of something approaching a good crab cake” is one in every of a number of causes given. I’ve been looking for one in SoCal for 55 years with out success, so I really feel her ache.

I hope she is going to reward her readers if she ever finds one.

Paul Updegrove

Sherman Oaks

Advertisement

Not that simple to disregard

I used to be upset that Mary McNamara, whose columns I normally get pleasure from, determined to make use of her platform to weigh in towards J.Ok. Rowling and Rowling’s protection of women-only areas [“It’s Time to Just Ignore J.K. Rowling,” Feb. 21].

Slightly than have empathy for girls who’ve been bodily abused by males (as Rowling has been by her ex-husband) or ladies who’ve been raped, McNamara’s snarky column appeared solely to have empathy for trans ladies who nonetheless have male genitals and want to use women-only areas.

McNamara writes: “Rowling’s personal trauma is horrible and simple. It doesn’t, nonetheless, grant her particular perception into the transgender neighborhood.”

What does McNamara imply? Rowling doesn’t declare to have perception into the transgender neighborhood. She claims to have perception from her personal expertise into the neighborhood of girls who’ve skilled abuse by the hands of males (or, “individuals with penises”) or who concern that they may grow to be a sufferer of male sexual violence.

Rowling stands up for these ladies, however McNamara doesn’t.

Advertisement

It isn’t transphobic to state the truth that ladies proceed to undergo sexual violence and abuse by the hands of males and deserve women-only protected areas. It might be unlucky that in defending that quite giant neighborhood of girls, some trans ladies who would by no means damage a lady could not be capable to use sure bogs, spas or different women-only areas.

Talking out to guard ladies from triggering or potential abuse shouldn’t be transphobic and isn’t saying that each one trans ladies are abusers, simply as it’s not saying that each one males are abusers.

Joanne Parrent

Los Angeles

::

Advertisement

Do I agree with Rowling? I don’t know. However the one arguments I’ve seen on the matter don’t truly deal with her level; they simply accuse her of transphobia.

Accusing Rowling of transphobia probably feels good, but it surely by no means addresses her argument.

Barry Carlton

El Cajon

::

Advertisement

We reside in a horribly male-dominated society. Girls are raped and abused by males each second, minute, hour, day, life. But we’re demanding that ladies settle for our dominators and abusers in our locker rooms, with their sexual organs absolutely uncovered.

Maybe one can argue that time if ladies had been completely equal to males and had been valued and cherished, however that’s not actuality. So till ladies have equality and worth, no male sexual organs allowed in ladies’s locker rooms.

Kathryn Kosmeya-Dodge

Santa Monica

::

Advertisement

Thanks to McNamara for saying what she mentioned about J.Ok. Rowling. It merely wanted to be mentioned.

Marie Mulligan

Manhattan Seaside

Differing on ‘Dilbert’

I used to be happy to see that the L.A. Occasions has joined many different newspapers across the nation in rightly discontinuing the cartoon strip “Dilbert,” as a lot as I’ve loved it over time [“Comics Change,” Feb. 27].

I’m amazed that Scott Adams would harm his profession in such a reckless means by mouthing clearly racist and merciless views. This has nothing to do with “political correctness” or “wokeism.” It’s about decency and good manners, which he ought to have discovered from his dad and mom.

Advertisement

Doug Weiskopf

Burbank

::

Why within the identify of wokeness have you ever made the choice to cancel the “Dilbert” cartoon? It’s by far the perfect of your comics.

I can solely guess the pointy-head boss will need to have been behind this.

Advertisement

Wally can be happy with you.

Chris Bisgaard

Eagle, Idaho

::

Anybody who has adopted “Dilbert” for a few years should admit that the strip has devolved from a mordant commentary on the company office to a barely hidden right-wing assault on any company effort to extend variety, inclusiveness or ecological consciousness.

Advertisement

However even worse, it’s simply not humorous anymore.

It most likely ought to have been dropped a very long time in the past, however now that Adams has revealed his true nature as a racist, it needed to be dropped.

And to Elon Musk and different Adams defenders: This has nothing in any way to do with free speech. The precise to free speech applies to governments, to not what newspapers select to print (or what distributors select to distribute).

Racism shouldn’t be acceptable and needs to be banished from the general public sphere every time attainable.

David Weber

Advertisement

Hollywood

::

Thanks for eradicating his strip. Though very humorous and true many occasions, Scott Adams is clearly a racist.

The Occasions wants its personal editorial cartoonist: Deliver again Michael Ramirez! He’s sharp and would get the readers engaged with a unique perspective.

The late, nice Paul Conrad did precisely that when The Occasions was conservative And he was not!

Advertisement

Mary Dickinson

Alta Loma

Different bookstores

Melissa Gomez’s story [“‘Queen of Pasadena’ Inspires a Dream Move,” Feb. 19] says Nikki Excessive’s bookstore was not the primary one in Los Angeles to be owned by a lady of coloration, however you solely return to 2019 to quote attainable candidates for who is perhaps first.

I imagine my spouse, Julie Swayze, was the primary. In 2006, she opened Metropolis Books on Essential Avenue, within the coronary heart of DTLA. Scott Timberg did a function story on our opening and Nita Lelyveld lined our closing on the entrance web page of the Sunday, Sept. 18, 2011, version of the Los Angeles Occasions.

Advertisement

Steve Bowie

Pasadena

::

Kudos to Nikki Excessive and Octavia’s Bookshelf, a much-needed addition to the Altadena/Pasadena Black and Latino communities.

Additionally it is essential to acknowledge Rita Dyson, the proprietor of the Altadena/Pasadena Black and Latino Multicultural Bookstore, which opened in 1989 [“Altadena Store Offers Books on Minorities,” Dec. 27] and closed in 1993 [“A Common Cause: Rita Dyson Is Struggling to Save Her Most Uncommon Bookstore,” Sept. 13] after monetary challenges; a flood that destroyed the bookstore, requiring her to maneuver to a unique location; and native squabbles about ethnic identification and labels that proceed to at the present time [“My Black Ancestors Were Erased From My Family’s Memory,” Feb. 13; “I Don’t Call Myself Latinx, but the Conservative War Against it Is Ludicrous,” Feb. 15].

Advertisement

My household, my former college students, and my Altadena and Pasadena colleagues and neighbors have fond recollections of Rita’s heat greeting on the door, full of life shows and wonderful books from Kids’s Guide Press, Aunt Lute, Latin American publishers, Africana research and different books that described the variety of experiences of nonwhite individuals.

My younger youngsters and college students relished seeing themselves portrayed within the youngsters’s books that Rita carried in her retailer. To at the present time they’re avid readers and I credit score her efforts and her braveness in opening her bookstore, a primary in our Pasadena/Altadena communities.

And to Nikki Excessive, this neighborhood is the correct area for you.

Suzette Vidal

Altadena

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Entertainment

Review: In 'Gasoline Rainbow,' carefree kids hit the road during a fleeting moment when they can

Published

on

Review: In 'Gasoline Rainbow,' carefree kids hit the road during a fleeting moment when they can

The New Orleans-based filmmaking brothers Bill and Turner Ross have made a name for themselves over the past 15 years with their lyrical, poetic documentaries. But with 2020’s “Bloody Nose, Empty Pockets,” they blurred the line between fiction and nonfiction, setting up an imaginary scenario in an actual dive bar on its last night of business, observing a curated group of regulars as they shut it down for good.

The new “Gasoline Rainbow” is their first official narrative feature, informed by their documentary roots and eye for capturing spontaneous beauty. During the Covid-19 quarantine of 2020, Bill and Turner Ross dreamed up a wild road film, which they loosely scripted and cast with five young first-time actors from Oregon. They play a group of friends from a small town called Wiley, who hit the road with the only things you need for an adventure: a dream, a posse, a van and the abiding belief that “anywhere’s better than here.”

The dream is to see the Oregon coast, 513 miles from their landlocked town. The posse is three boys — Makai Garza, Micah Bunch and Tony Aburto — and two girls, Nathaly Garcia and Nichole Dukes. The van gets them started on their adventure, but they soon learn that it’s not a necessary component. After spending the night partying in a cow field with a guy they meet on the side of the road, they return to find the van on blocks, vandalized, the tires stolen, and that’s when things really get interesting. They have to rely on each other and the kindness of strangers and community to make it all the way to the beach, to the Party at the End of the World, a mysterious event they hear about that becomes their ultimate destination.

Though the events on this journey are planned and produced by the filmmakers, the relationships are real, the interactions and conversations undeniably authentic. If pioneering English documentarian John Grierson’s definition of nonfiction filmmaking was the “creative treatment of actuality,” “Gasoline Rainbow” could ostensibly fit under that umbrella.

But this is not a documentary and it’s far more productive to consider the ways in which the Ross brothers have synthesized their influences and inspirations — such as “My Own Private Idaho,” “The Wizard of Oz,” “Easy Rider” and the 1984 documentary “Streetwise” — into their own unique form that exudes a singular kind of ragged, unpredictable vitality.

Advertisement

A scene from the movie “Gasoline Rainbow.”

(Department of Motion Pictures)

Each actor is a discovery with a special presence, but there is no one star or standout, which feels intentional. While “Gasoline Rainbow” is a heady slice of pure, uncut youthful energy, it is also a portrait of collectivism, caretaking and a celebration of mutual aid.

It’s apt that a film like this was born out of the isolation and confinement of 2020. There was a desire for freedom and movement, combined with the progressive value of taking care of each other that rose out of quarantine and the Black Lives Matter movement. In “Gasoline Rainbow,” the kids come by this sense of mutual protection naturally, but the value is reinforced along the way by the heavily-pierced punk hitchhikers who teach them how to hop a train to Portland in exchange for their leftover food, and the middle-aged rockers who provide a party, a couch to crash, breakfast and a boat ride. Micah’s cousin Noah underscores the importance, telling them, “I like the way you treat each other.”

Advertisement

These values of care and respect threaded throughout are why we never fear for their safety. They make decisions as a group, look out for each other and demonstrate their awareness by asking the strangers they meet, “Are you cool?” The film isn’t about the risks of a harrowing journey. In turn, it gives us a freedom as viewers to focus on their life stories that emerge in snippets of conversation, and those of the people they meet along the way. Their guides are fascinating in their own right, like Gary, a Portland skater who shepherds them through the city for a night, and later ferries them to the party.

This age — not kids, not quite adults — is such an impossibly short time, and it’s poignant to drink in their openness and pliability as people, their youthful trust and imperviousness, to watch them blossom and bond. They haven’t hardened into grown-ups yet and they know they have this one moment in time to enjoy fleeting youth, before jobs, bills and responsibilities. Nichole says that she fears not having enough time to figure things out, and this film is a celebration of that moment.

“Gasoline Rainbow” is also stunningly gorgeous, with carefully composed shots capturing the vast Oregon landscape, raspberry sunsets, golden fields, the beach at night and in the misty morning. The gritty urban space of Portland is so wildly different from their one-stoplight town, it’s intoxicating, the gang drawn in by the all-night parties, skate parks, rock festivals and free-flying freak flags.

Though a larger cultural commentary is not overt, certain realities necessarily come through, with jokes about cops, corporate logos emblazoned on train cars, discussions about parents in rehab and what it’s like to be the only black kid in small-town Oregon (“It sucks”). It’s a depiction of today’s youth, shaped by contemporary culture, but there is also a timelessness to their experience. The Ross brothers capture those universal feelings of a certain age: possibility, togetherness with your tribe, unmoored from traditional family structures.

The structuring destination of the Party at the End of the World speaks to this idea of time running out, and it imparts a sense of existential dread that hovers around the edges, but forces the characters, and the audience to remain in the moment, to embrace serendipity, surprise, and coincidence. As it all coalesces, there is a sense of visceral, emotional catharsis that could only be achieved at the end of a long journey. That the Ross brothers manage to impart this feeling to an audience after an hour-and-48-minute cinematic adventure is a true triumph. This wild, vicarious ride through youthful adventure is absolutely worth taking, for your own nostalgia and for the reminder that the kids are indeed alright.

Advertisement

‘Gasoline Rainbow’

Not rated

Running time: 1 hour, 48 minutes

Playing: Now in limited release

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes’ Review: A Legend Opens Up in Nanette Burstein’s Engaging HBO Doc Based on Rediscovered Audio Recordings

Published

on

‘Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes’ Review: A Legend Opens Up in Nanette Burstein’s Engaging HBO Doc Based on Rediscovered Audio Recordings

A celebrity from the age of 11, Elizabeth Taylor was practiced at public relations for almost all her life, so there aren’t many personal revelations in Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes. But Nanette Burstein‘s elegantly constructed documentary, mostly in Taylor’s own words backed by illuminating archival images, works as a lively bit of film history about movie stardom in the volatile 1960s as the studio system was fading and the media exploding.

The film — which premiered at Cannes in the Cannes Classics sidebar — is based on 40 hours of recently rediscovered audiotapes, recordings Taylor made in the mid-1960s for a ghost-written memoir (long out of print). It was the most frenzied moment of her fame, when she was coming off the paparazzi-fueled scandal that was Cleopatra. Taylor, who died in 2011, recalls her many marriages — four when she made these recordings, since she was on the first of two to Richard Burton — and her career, from her start as a child in Lassie Come Home (1943) through her Oscar-winning performance in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966).

Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes

The Bottom Line

An entertaining if unsurprising time capsule.

Advertisement

Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Cannes Classics)
Cast: Elizabeth Taylor
Director: Nanette Burstein
Writers: Nanette Burstein, Tal Ben-David

1 hour 41 minutes

As she did in Hillary, about Hillary Clinton, and The Kid Stays in the Picture, based on Robert Evans’ autobiography, Burstein stays out of her celebrity subject’s way. Taylor’s voice is playful, almost girlish. Occasionally she is blunt, but more often seems cautiously aware of being recorded. Richard Meryman, the Life magazine reporter doing the interviews, is heard asking questions at times, but Taylor is firmly in control, at least on the surface.

Beneath that you can tell how beautifully Burstein and her editor and co-writer, Tal Ben-David, shaped the visuals. The archival photos and news clips offer a telling backdrop of images and sound bites, often more informative than what Taylor says — from shots of crowds filling the streets of London to see her on the day of her second wedding, to the actor Michael Wilding, to film of her in mourning black at the funeral of her beloved third husband, the producer Mike Todd, who died in a plane crash. The visual exceptions are the clichéd, recurring establishing shots of an old-fashioned reel-to-reel tape recorder, next to a martini glass.

Advertisement

Moving chronologically, Taylor begins with her desire to act even as a child. Photos from that time offer a reminder that she was always astonishingly beautiful. These early sections are fine but bland. She was too young to be married the first time, to Nicky Hilton, she says, and the second marriage just didn’t work out. George Stevens gave her subtle direction and bolstered her confidence when she made A Place in the Sun (1951). When she made Giant with him five years later, he berated her, telling her she was just a movie star and not an actress, a charge that often dogged her.

Taylor becomes sporadically more biting as the film goes on, displaying a sharp-tongued wit and personality. That is particularly true when she talks about her marriage to Eddie Fisher, the first of her marital scandals, covered endlessly in tabloids. It was public knowledge that Fisher and his wife, Debbie Reynolds, were the Todds’ best friends. Shortly after Mike Todd’s death, Fisher left his wife, whose image was always cheery and wholesome, for Taylor. “I can’t say anything against Debbie,” Taylor sweetly says on the tape, and without taking a breath goes on, “But she put on such an act, with the pigtails and the diaper pins.” She says of Fisher, “I don’t remember too much about my marriage to him except it was one big frigging awful mistake.”

Burstein includes some enlightening sidelights from that period. A news clip of the recently married couple has them surrounded by journalists on the steps of a plane, with one reporter asking Fisher about his bride, “Can she cook?” Even as a tease, who would dare say that now?

That fuss was nothing next to Cleopatra (1963), now notorious as the film so over-budget it almost bankrupted 20th Century Fox, and the set on which Taylor and Burton, each married to other people, indiscreetly sparked to each other from the start. The Vatican newspaper weighed in on the affair, disapprovingly. Taylor says her own father called her “a whore.” In one of the film’s more telling scenes, she says of their affair, “Richard and I, we tried to be what is considered ‘good,’ but it didn’t work,” a comment that at once plays into the moralistic language of her day and resists it. These signs of Taylor’s savvy awareness of herself as a public personality are the film’s most intriguing, if scattershot, moments.

The film also shows how besieged the couple was by the paparazzi, at a turning point in celebrity culture. Occasionally other voices are heard in archival audio, and in this section George Hamilton says of the press, “They were not going for glamour anymore. They were going for the destruction of glamour,” suggesting a longing for the old pre-packaged studio publicity days. But Taylor herself is never heard complaining. A realist, she made hiding from the paparazzi into a game for her children so they wouldn’t be frightened.

Advertisement

The recordings end at the point where she is assuring Meryman that she and Burton would be together for 50 years. The film then takes a quick trot through the rest of her days, including rehab at the Betty Ford Center and raising money for AIDS research. But the last word should have been Taylor’s. There is a private Elizabeth, she says. “The other Elizabeth, the famous one, really has no depth or meaning to me. It is a commodity that makes money.” The movie star Taylor is the one who most often comes through in the film, but that is engaging enough.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

All of Billie Eilish's senses are alive on the ravishing 'Hit Me Hard and Soft'

Published

on

All of Billie Eilish's senses are alive on the ravishing 'Hit Me Hard and Soft'

Billie Eilish has been singing about looking — and being looked at — for nearly half her life.

Now 22, she broke out at 13 when her song “Ocean Eyes” went viral on SoundCloud; “Bad Guy,” the smash single from her star-making 2019 debut album, scoffed at the suspicions of a crush’s girlfriend: “You said she’s scared of me? I mean, I don’t see what she sees.”

Eilish is still pondering the illusory nature of perception on “Hit Me Hard and Soft,” her third studio LP in a career that’s already brought her nine Grammys, two Oscars and more than 100 million followers on Instagram. The album opens with “Skinny,” a breathy ballad in which she observes that “people say I look happy just because I got skinny.” Disappointed but not surprised, she’s continuing her thoughts on celebrity from 2021’s “Happier Than Ever,” which arrived as part of a wave of high-profile records (including ones by Olivia Rodrigo and Lorde) questioning the healthiness of pop’s social media era.

“The internet is hungry for the meanest kind of funny,” she sighs in “Skinny,” “And somebody’s gotta feed it.”

Advertisement

Yet as its title suggests, the ravishing “Hit Me Hard and Soft” moves beyond looking to explore the more tactile pleasures and risks of Eilish’s other senses. Sequenced intentionally, no doubt, right after “Skinny,” “Lunch” is a funky come-on about enjoying a woman’s body — “She dances on my tongue / Tastes like she might be the one” — while the rootsy “Wildflower” compares her involvement in a love triangle to the torture of being burned alive: “You say no one knows you so well,” she goes on, “But every time you touch me I just wonder how she felt.”

With 10 songs in just under 45 minutes — a study in crispness here in the age of “Cowboy Carter” and “The Tortured Poets Department” — Eilish’s album gives the impression of someone who’s accepted the unnatural demands of stardom and wants to figure out how to lead a full life in spite of them.

“Hit Me Hard and Soft” mostly upholds Eilish’s signature electro-goth sound: the blend of folky guitars, glassy synths and programmed beats she’s been developing with her brother and producer, Finneas, since the two began making music in their parents’ house in Highland Park. But the newfound emotional liberation in her storytelling extends to the adventurous structures of tunes like “L’Amour de Ma Vie,” which starts out as a low-key soul shuffle before transforming into a propulsive rave jam, and “Bittersuite,” which makes good on its title with three distinct parts.

In an unusual decision for this proudly self-contained duo, Eilish and Finneas welcomed contributions in the studio from their touring drummer, Andrew Marshall, and the Attacca string quartet (though both fit seamlessly into the siblings’ established sonic universe). What registers as a bigger shift is the gutsiness of Eilish’s singing: Long known as a committed whisperer, she belts here in a way we’ve never heard from her before; it’s a total thrill to witness her climb up, up, up in “The Greatest,” a thrashing rock song about unrequited love in which she congratulates herself for surviving “all the times I waited for you to want me naked.”

Advertisement

That survivor’s chutzpah surfaces again in the skulking “The Diner,” which she narrates from the imagined perspective of a stalker; the song is filled with unnerving details: “I came in through the kitchen looking for something to eat / I left a calling card so they would know that it was me.” Yet Eilish, who presumably drew from real-life experiences she’s discussed, delivers the song with a smirk. She even offers her version of a breezy summertime bop in “Birds of a Feather,” with a promise of never-ending devotion over lush acoustic guitars set to an easygoing groove.

“I want you to see how you look to me,” she tells her lover — a fresh application for an old instinct.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending