Connect with us

Culture

Thank you, Oakland A’s

Published

on

Thank you, Oakland A’s

By now, much of the rage has passed. The takes have gone cold, the vitriol has been spewed, and all the jokes have been told about the dopey owner being born on third base and thinking he’s hit a triple. The Oakland Athletics will soon pass into history, which means the time has come to move on from the sadness of the funeral and turn instead to a much-deserved celebration of life.

In that spirit, this should be said: To the Oakland A’s, thank you.

For 57 summers, Oakland has had its own team. By extension, so did every kid like me, who would get a whole lot more out of baseball than just a lovely diversion. This game brought me closer to belonging.

In retrospect, it made perfect sense, the tension that came from growing up with dueling cultures. My parents came to the East Bay from the Philippines in the 1970s, and each of them harbored different ideas about blending in. My dad seemed mostly indifferent to the Americanization of his children, and his enjoyment of sport seemed tied mostly to his ability to wager on the outcome. My mom, however, seemed bent on ensuring that we kept a connection to our origins. We would eat the food and, at least, understand the language.

These are wonderful thoughts, and they remain top of mind, especially now with my own daughter and son. But back then, they led to a feeling of not quite belonging. On TV, the families did not look like mine, and they did not eat the food that my family ate. All of it felt weird.

Advertisement

Then when I was nine, an older cousin introduced me to baseball by showing me a newspaper page he’d taped to his wall. The blaring headline referenced the 40/40 club, and the photo showed a man holding up a base while wearing a uniform of green and gold. It was impossible to miss José Canseco.

Something about it must have been intriguing, because from that moment on the A’s became my gateway to a new world. They gave me something to watch after school and then talk about the next day. I just got baseball, and it was such a good feeling that the other sports would soon become required viewing too. This was in the late ’80s and the Bash Brothers ruled the American League. Rickey Henderson could run. Dave Stewart stared a hole through opponents before dominating them. Mark McGwire hit the ball a long, long way. And when Dennis Eckersley came to the mound, the game was over after a flurry of pinpoint fastballs and nasty sliders. Baseball required no cultural proficiency — to appreciate it required no translation.

Summers were spent buying baseball cards, and playing Bases Loaded on my Nintendo, and providing the play-by-play myself, and peppering it with phrases like “Holy Toledo!” because that’s what Bill King did, and as everybody knew, Bill King was the best. As my siblings got older, they started watching too, and that only made it more fun. Years later, baseball gave us yet another thing to share.

But more than anything else, baseball gave me something to chase, and only later in life did I come to appreciate this as a wonderful gift. It hadn’t occurred to me that it is more common to not know the desired destination. While playing was out of the question, writing about baseball at least seemed within reach. Soon the goal became getting into the press box. Thanks to a bunch of lucky bounces, it actually happened.

Every fall, a Hall of Fame ballot arrives at my mailbox. I was there when Derek Jeter collected his 3,000th hit. I was there when Dallas Braden gave Alex Rodriguez an impromptu lesson on workplace boundaries. I was there when the Chicago Cubs won their first World Series since 1908. And, yes, I was there when Bartolo Colon hit a home run.

Advertisement

It probably sounds silly, but no matter what happens next, I’ll always be able to say that I know what it’s like to touch a dream.

It wouldn’t have happened without the Oakland A’s.

While taking stock of my blessings, it’s clear that so many of them flow from baseball. It remains a constant in my life. It’s there in the backdrop of so many conversations with my brother. It was there this summer during the big family camping trip, when we mimicked the batting stances of the A’s starting lineup from 1988, crouching like Rickey and waving the bat like Carney Lansford. It was there 20 years ago, when we lost one of my sisters way too soon, and we did something that we all knew she would have wanted. That’s why she rests with the No. 3 jersey of her favorite A’s player, Eric Chavez.

I think of my sister often, especially now, and I wonder what she’d make of how it all worked out. Journalism requires that fandom be left at the press box door, so it has been years since my mood has hinged upon the outcome of an A’s game. Yet, baseball allowed me to meet my wife, the Yankees fan, who I’m convinced once took me to see “Moneyball” so she could revel in the heartache caused by her team to mine. It worked out pretty well — our kids are growing up in a house in which a ballgame is always on. So at least we know we’ll get that part right.

One morning recently, while I read aloud from a story about Shohei Ohtani — one that declared him the best player in the game — my daughter looked up from her breakfast with a take. She’s only six, but she has already exhibited the beginnings of an outsized and loving personality, not unlike one of her namesakes, my sister.

Advertisement

“Excuse you,” she said. “What about Aaron Judge?”

My wife and I could only smile.

So, thank you to the Oakland A’s. Thank you for existing. Thank you for 1989. Thank you for (mostly) being so good at baseball. Thank you for the Big Three. Thank you for the 20-game winning streak. Thank you for all those Sunday afternoons in right field with my brother and my best friend. Thank you for inspiring a very lucky kid, who grew up to be a very lucky man, who hopes very much that in Sacramento or Las Vegas, there’s a kid somewhere who can still be moved by something as wonderful as having a baseball team to call your very own.

(Top photo of the Oakland A’s celebrating after capturing the 1989 World Series by defeating the Giants: MLB via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You

Published

on

I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You

Advertisement

A famous poet once observed that it is difficult to get the news from poems. The weather is a different story. April showers, summer sunshine and — maybe especially — the chill of winter provide an endless supply of moods and metaphors. Poets like to practice a double meteorology, looking out at the water and up at the sky for evidence of interior conditions of feeling.

The inner and outer forecasts don’t always match up. This short poem by Louise Glück starts out cold and stays that way for most of its 11 lines.

And then it bursts into flame.

Advertisement

“Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” comes from Glück’s debut collection, “Firstborn,” which was published in 1968. She wrote the poems in it between the ages of 18 and 23, but they bear many of the hallmarks of her mature style, including an approach to personal matters — sex, love, illness, family life — that is at once uncompromising and elusive. She doesn’t flinch. She also doesn’t explain.

Here, for example, Glück assembles fragments of experience that imply — but also obscure — a larger narrative. It’s almost as if a short story, or even a novel, had been smashed like a glass Christmas ornament, leaving the reader to infer the sphere from the shards.

Advertisement

We know there was a couple with a flat tire, and that a year later at least one of them still has feelings for the other. It’s hard not to wonder if they’re still together, or where they were going with those Christmas presents.

To some extent, those questions can be addressed with the help of biographical clues. The version of “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” that appeared in The Atlantic in 1967 was dedicated to Charles Hertz, a Columbia University graduate student who was Glück’s first husband. They divorced a few years later. Glück, who died in 2023, was never shy about putting her life into her work.

Advertisement

Louise Glück in 1975.

Gerard Malanga

Advertisement

But the poem we are reading now is not just the record of a passion that has long since cooled. More than 50 years after “Firstborn,” on the occasion of receiving the Nobel Prize for literature, Glück celebrated the “intimate, seductive, often furtive or clandestine” relations between poets and their readers. Recalling her childhood discovery of William Blake and Emily Dickinson, she declared her lifelong ardor for “poems to which the listener or reader makes an essential contribution, as recipient of a confidence or an outcry, sometimes as co-conspirator.”

That’s the kind of poem she wrote.

Advertisement

“Confidence” can have two meanings, both of which apply to “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson.” Reading it, you are privy to a secret, something meant for your ears only. You are also in the presence of an assertive, self-possessed voice.

Where there is power, there’s also risk. To give voice to desire — to whisper or cry “I want you” — is to issue a challenge and admit vulnerability. It’s a declaration of conquest and a promise of surrender.

What happens next? That’s up to you.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Culture

Can You Identify Where the Winter Scenes in These Novels Took Place?

Published

on

Can You Identify Where the Winter Scenes in These Novels Took Place?

Cold weather can serve as a plot point or emphasize the mood of a scene, and this week’s literary geography quiz highlights the locations of recent novels that work winter conditions right into the story. Even if you aren’t familiar with the book, the questions offer an additional hint about the setting. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the books if you’d like to do further reading.

Continue Reading

Culture

From NYT’s 10 Best Books of 2025: A.O. Scott on Kiran Desai’s New Novel

Published

on

From NYT’s 10 Best Books of 2025: A.O. Scott on Kiran Desai’s New Novel

Inge Morath/Magnum Photos

Advertisement

Advertisement

When a writer is praised for having a sense of place, it usually means one specific place — a postage stamp of familiar ground rendered in loving, knowing detail. But Kiran Desai, in her latest novel, “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny,” has a sense of places.

This 670-page book, about the star-crossed lovers of the title and several dozen of their friends, relatives, exes and servants (there’s a chart in the front to help you keep track), does anything but stay put. If “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny” were an old-fashioned steamer trunk, it would be papered with shipping labels: from Allahabad (now known as Prayagraj), Goa and Delhi; from Queens, Kansas and Vermont; from Mexico City and, perhaps most delightfully, from Venice.

There, in Marco Polo’s hometown, the titular travelers alight for two chapters, enduring one of several crises in their passionate, complicated, on-again, off-again relationship. One of Venice’s nicknames is La Serenissima — “the most serene” — but in Desai’s hands it’s the opposite: a gloriously hectic backdrop for Sonia and Sunny’s romantic confusion.

Advertisement

Their first impressions fill a nearly page-long paragraph. Here’s how it begins.

Sonia is a (struggling) fiction writer. Sunny is a (struggling) journalist. It’s notable that, of the two of them, it is she who is better able to perceive the immediate reality of things, while he tends to read facts through screens of theory and ideology, finding sociological meaning in everyday occurrences. He isn’t exactly wrong, and Desai is hardly oblivious to the larger narratives that shape the fates of Sunny, Sonia and their families — including the economic and political changes affecting young Indians of their generation.

Advertisement

But “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny” is about more than that. It’s a defense of the very idea of more, and thus a rebuke to the austerity that defines so much recent literary fiction. Many of Desai’s peers favor careful, restricted third-person narration, or else a measured, low-affect “I.” The bookstores are full of skinny novels about the emotional and psychological thinness of contemporary life. This book is an antidote: thick, sloppy, fleshy, all over the place.

It also takes exception to the postmodern dogma that we only know reality through representations of it, through pre-existing concepts of the kind to which intellectuals like Sunny are attached. The point of fiction is to assert that the world is true, and to remind us that it is vast, strange and astonishing.

Advertisement

See the full list of the 10 Best Books of 2025 here.

Continue Reading

Trending