Culture
Pochettino's tactics: How he can energise the USMNT ahead of the 2026 World Cup
Following an underwhelming Copa America as the host nation this summer and with a men’s World Cup to be played mostly on home soil two years away, the USMNT needed to go big in replacing Gregg Berhalter as head coach.
Consider their statement made.
There is a strong argument to say Mauricio Pochettino will become the most distinguished coach in the history of the United States men’s soccer team when he puts pen to paper. Across 649 games in the biggest competitions in the European club game since 2009 — including 45 in the UEFA Champions League, one of which was in its final — the 52-year-old Argentinian has built a wealth of experience, his bio weighty enough to become the face of the USA’s all-important 2026 World Cup campaign.
But reputation aside, what can USMNT fans expect from a Pochettino team? And is his appointment a good tactical fit for the current generation of American players?
Ever since Gregg Berhalter first took over almost six years ago, the shadow of the men’s World Cup being co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico in 2026 loomed large. An objective at the heart of his tenure was to integrate young talent into the senior national team, with prospects such as Christian Pulisic (above, right), Tyler Adams and Sergino Dest establishing themselves in the side under his leadership.
There was a feeling that group was approaching its collective peak ahead of this summer’s Copa America, also played on U.S. soil, but while the debate rages on around the relative quality of the ‘golden generation’ of American players at Berhalter’s disposal, there is no doubt they underperformed. Defeat to Panama in their second of three group-stage matches may have hinged on an early red card for Tim Weah, but there was a worrying lack of creativity and forward drive from midfield, in a team seemingly still too reliant on Pulisic for moments of attacking inspiration.
The good news is that Pochettino is renowned for his work with younger players, and he should relish the opportunity to develop the squad he’ll inherit, with plenty of enthusiasm and exciting, versatile options in different areas of the pitch. Players including Folarin Balogun, 23, Gio Reyna and Yunus Musah, both 21, will appeal to Pochettino — players with star power, but also with something to prove.
Pochettino’s preference for working with young players is a deep-rooted belief that stems from his own formative years when Marcelo Bielsa — later his manager at Spain’s Espanyol and with the Argentine national team — handed him an early chance at Newell’s Old Boys club in their homeland, along with several other promising players who went on to make a major impact in the first team.
He also believes that it’s difficult to change the mentality or habits of more seasoned veterans who are sometimes unable to adjust to his methods. Pochettino seems wary of allowing a couple of big names to dominate a dressing room — remember, this is a man who lined up alongside both Argentina icon Diego Maradona and Brazilian superstar Ronaldinho in his playing days.
Pulisic carries status and reputation, but doesn’t dominate to a detrimental extent. Pochettino disliked working with a star-studded Paris Saint-Germain side from January 2021 to summer 2022, with big-name forward trio of Lionel Messi, Neymar and Kylian Mbappe undermining his focus on the team’s cohesion without the ball.
In that respect, the profile of this USMNT squad, in terms of their ages and characters, seems likely to suit him, with plenty of time to form relationships with the players ahead of that World Cup in just under two years.
Pochettino took Tottenham to their first-ever Champions League final in 2019 (Chris Brunskill/Fantasista/Getty Images)
Tactically speaking, Pochettino is renowned for a high-pressing ideology, something that he prefers a young squad for, insisting that it’s not about physical capacity but how much players are prepared to run.
To explore his style further, we can look at The Athletic’s playstyle wheel, using his solitary season in charge of Chelsea to outline how his team looked to play compared with Europe’s top seven domestic leagues. Those defensive metrics stand out, with their rating of 89 out of 99 for Intensity speaking to the front-footed nature of their press.

A rating of 96 for Central Progression points to a desire to build attacks carefully and patiently through the middle — something that will suit the technical players at the heart of the USMNT midfield. While many failed to hit their rhythm in the three games at the Copa America, Pochettino will have plenty to work with in that part of the pitch.
Adams, 25, brings unrivalled defensive tenacity at the base of the three-man midfield setup, and is a talented ball progressor who can pick out incisive passes to the more advanced No 8s, while 22-year-old Johnny Cardoso is a strong tackler who is a similarly natural tempo-setter from deep. The technical ability and versatility of Weston McKennie, 25, proved invaluable to Berhalter across the final years of his tenure, while Reyna provided real forward drive and fearlessness from a more advanced position as the USA won the CONCACAF Nations League in March this year.
Throw in the ball-carrying ability of Musah, the devilish late runs of Luca de la Torre, 26, even the creativity and weight of pass of Malik Tillman, 22, and there are plenty of options for Pochettino to chop and change.
Pochettino will have plenty of talent to utilise in America (Robin Alam/ISI Photos/Getty Images)
Less encouraging from the playstyle wheel above will be a rating of 32 for Chance Prevention. Chelsea’s tally of 77 league goals scored last season was their third-highest in the past 15 years, but it came at a considerable cost, as they shipped more league goals (63) than in any other season since the Premier League was founded in the early 1990s.
As unglamorous as it may sound, international football is grounded in having strong defensive foundations first and Pochettino did not showcase that in his most recent spell in the dugout.
Such shortcomings would naturally put more focus on the individual quality of the back line and goalkeeper; areas where the States’ current roster has its problems. Goalkeeper Matt Turner barely played for his Premier League club Nottingham Forest last season and his kicking and distribution were at times questionable during the Copa America. Of the other options at the position, Ethan Horvath, of Cardiff City in English football’s second-tier Championship, is a step down in quality again and conceded a poor goal when he came on after Turner was injured in that match against Panama.
Matt Turner had a disappointing time at this summer’s Copa America (Robin Alam/ISI Photos/Getty Images)
Then there is a shortage of obvious candidates to replace centre-back Tim Ream, who turns 37 in October, plus doubts over the strength in depth that exists behind him and the other current starter at that position, Chris Richards.
Pochettino’s possession game will have to exert more control if they are to sufficiently mask that weakness on the biggest stage.
Ultimately, international soccer is a tricky arena to navigate. With plenty of time between sets of games, and a disproportionate share of straight-knockout, ‘do-or-die’ matches, ambitious projects can be reduced to individual results, years of work washed away in a few minutes of action.
It makes such managerial dismissals as Berhalter’s — and, indeed, appointments like Pochettino’s — difficult to evaluate; the “perfect” candidate nearly impossible to find. But for a squad as young as the one the U.S. currently has, with the eyes of the world set to be fixed firmly on them in two years’ time, a high-profile name like him certainly brings the experience and know-how required, even if this is his first venture into the international game as a coach.
Golden generations don’t last forever.
At the very minimum, Pochettino will bring a welcome dose of belief and expertise to this one.
Additional reporting: Michael Cox and Mark Carey
(Top photos: Getty Images)
Culture
What Happens When We Die? This Wallace Stevens Poem Has Thoughts.
Whatever you do, don’t think of a bird.
Now: What kind of bird are you not thinking about? A pigeon? A bald eagle? Something more poetic, like a skylark or a nightingale? In any case, would you say that this bird you aren’t thinking about is real?
Before you answer, read this poem, which is quite literally about not thinking of a bird.
Human consciousness is full of riddles. Neuroscientists, philosophers and dorm-room stoners argue continually about what it is and whether it even exists. For Wallace Stevens, the experience of having a mind was a perpetual source of wonder, puzzlement and delight — perfectly ordinary and utterly transcendent at the same time. He explored the mysteries and pleasures of consciousness in countless poems over the course of his long poetic career. It was arguably his great theme.
Stevens was born in 1879 and published his first book, “Harmonium,” in 1923, making him something of a late bloomer among American modernists. For much of his adult life, he worked as an executive for the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, rising to the rank of vice president. He viewed insurance less as a day job to support his poetry than as a parallel vocation. He pursued both activities with quiet diligence, spending his days at the office and composing poems in his head as he walked to and from work.
As a young man, Stevens dreamed of traveling to Europe, though he never crossed the Atlantic. In middle age he made regular trips to Florida, and his poems are frequently infused with ideas of Paris and Rome and memories of Key West. Others partake of the stringent beauty of New England. But the landscapes he explores, wintry or tropical, provincial or cosmopolitan, are above all mental landscapes, created by and in the imagination.
Are those worlds real?
Let’s return to the palm tree and its avian inhabitant, in that tranquil Key West sunset of the mind.
Until then, we find consolation in fangles.
Culture
Wil Wheaton Discusses ‘Stand By Me’ and Narrating ‘The Body’ Audiobook
When the director Rob Reiner cast his leads in the 1986 film “Stand by Me,” he looked for young actors who were as close as possible to the personalities of the four children they’d be playing. There was the wise beyond his years kid from a rough family (River Phoenix), the slightly dim worrywart (Jerry O’Connell), the cutup with a temper (Corey Feldman) and the sensitive, bookish boy.
Wil Wheaton was perfect for that last one, Gordie Lachance, a doe-eyed child who is ignored by his family in favor of his late older brother. Now, 40 years later, he’s traveling the country to attend anniversary screenings of the film, alongside O’Connell and Feldman, which has thrown him back into the turmoil that he felt as an adolescent.
Wheaton has channeled those emotions and his on-set memories into his latest project: narrating a new audiobook version of “The Body,” the 1982 Stephen King novella on which the film was based.
A few years ago, Wheaton started to float the idea of returning to the story that gave him his big break — that of a quartet of boys in 1959 Oregon, in their last days before high school, setting out to find a classmate’s dead body. “I’ve been telling the story of ‘Stand By Me’ since I was 12 years old,” he said.
But this time was different. Wheaton, who has narrated dozens of audiobooks, including Andy Weir’s “The Martian” and Ernest Cline’s “Ready Player One,” says he has come to enjoy narration more than screen acting. “I’m safe, I’m in the booth, nobody’s looking at me and I can just tell you a story.”
The fact that he, an older man looking back on his younger years, is narrating a story about an older man looking back on his younger years, is not lost on Wheaton. King’s original story is bathed in nostalgia. Coming to terms with death and loss is one of its primary themes.
Two days after appearing on stage at the Academy Awards as part of a tribute to Reiner — who was murdered in 2025 alongside his wife, Michele — Wheaton got on the phone to talk about recording the audiobook, reliving his favorite scenes from the film and reexamining a quintessential story of childhood loss through the lens of his own.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
“I felt really close to him, and my memory of him.”
Wheaton on channeling a co-star’s performance.
There’s this wonderful scene in “Stand By Me.” Gordie and Chris are walking down the tracks talking about junior high. Chris is telling Gordie, “I wish to hell I was your dad, because I care about you, and he obviously doesn’t.”
It’s just so honest and direct, in a way that kids talk to each other that adults don’t. And I think that one of the reasons that really sticks with people, and that piece really lands on a lot of audiences, and has for 40 years, is, just too many people have been Gordie in that scene.
That scene is virtually word for word taken from the text of the book. And when I was narrating that, I made a deliberate choice to do my best to recreate what River did in that scene.
“You’re just a kid,
Gordie–”
“I wish to fuck
I was your father!”
he said angrily.
“You wouldn’t go around
talking about takin those stupid shop courses if I was!
It’s like
God gave you something,
all those stories
you can make up, and He said:
This is what we got for you, kid.
Try not to lose it.
But kids lose everything
unless somebody looks out for them and if your folks
are too fucked up to do it
then maybe I ought to.”
I watched that scene a couple of times because I really wanted — I don’t know why it was so important to me to — well, I know: because I loved him, and I miss him. And I wanted to bring him into this as best as I could, right?
So I was reading that scene, and the words are identical to the script. And I had this very powerful flashback to being on the train tracks that day in Cottage Grove, Oregon. And I could see River standing next to them. They’re shooting my side of the scene and there’s River, right next to the camera, doing his off-camera dialogue, and there’s the sound guy, and there’s the boom operator. There’s my key light.
I could hear and feel it. It was the weirdest thing. It’s like I was right back there.
I was able to really take in the emotional memory of being Gordie in all of those scenes. So when I was narrating him and I’m me and I’m old with all of this experience, I just drew on what I remembered from being that little boy and what I remember of those friendships and what they meant to me and what they mean to me today.
“Rob gave me a gift. Rob gave me a career.”
Wheaton recalls the “Stand By Me” director’s way with kids on set, as well as his recent Oscars tribute.
Rob really encouraged us to be kids.
Jerry tells the most amazing story about that scene, where we were all sitting around, and doing our bit, and he improvised. He was just goofing around — we were just playing — and he said something about spitting water at the fat kid.
We get to the end of the scene, and he hears Rob. Rob comes around from behind the thing, and he goes, “Jerry!” And Jerry thinks, “Oh no, I’m in trouble. I’m in trouble because I improvised, and I’m not supposed to improvise.”
The context for Jerry is that he had been told by the adults in his life, “Sit on your hands and shut up. Stop trying to be a cutup. Stop trying to be funny. Stop disrupting people. Just be quiet.” And Jerry thinks, “Oh my God. I didn’t shut up. I’m in trouble. I’m gonna get fired.”
Rob leans in to all of us, and Rob says, “Hey, guys, do you see that? More of that. Do that!”
The whole time when you’re a kid actor, you’re just around all these adults who are constantly telling you to grow up. They’re mad that you’re being a kid. Rob just created an environment where not only was it supported that we would be kids — and have fun, and follow those kid instincts and do what was natural — it was expected. It was encouraged. We were supposed to do it.
They chanted together:
“I don’t shut up,
I grow up.
And when I look at you I throw up.”
“Then your mother goes around the corner
and licks it up,”
I said, and hauled ass out of there,
giving them the finger over my shoulder as I went.
I never had any friends later on
like the ones I had when I was twelve.
Jesus, did you?
When we were at the Oscars, I looked at Jerry. And we looked at this remarkable assemblage of the most amazingly talented, beautiful artists and storytellers. We looked around, and Jerry leans down, and he said, “We all got our start with Rob Reiner. He trusted every single one of us.”
And to stand there for him, when I really thought that I would be standing with him to talk about this stuff — it was a lot.
“I was really really really excited — like jumping up and down.”
The scene Wheaton was most looking forward to narrating: the tale of Lard Ass Hogan.
I was so excited to narrate it. It’s a great story! It’s a funny story. It’s such a lovely break — it’s an emotional and tonal shift from what’s happening in the movie.
I know this as a writer: You work to increase and release tension throughout a narrative, and Stephen King uses humor really effectively to release that tension. But it also raises the stakes, because we have these moments of joy and these moments of things being very silly in the midst of a lot of intensity.
That’s why the story of Lard Ass Hogan is so fun for me to tell. Because in the middle of that, we stop to do something that’s very, very fun, and very silly and very celebratory.
“Will you shut up and let him tell it?”
Teddy hollered.
Vern blinked.
“Sure. Yeah.
Okay.”
“Go on, Gordie,”
Chris said. “It’s not really much—”
“Naw,
we don’t expect much from a wet end like you,”
Teddy said,
“but tell it anyway.”
I cleared my throat. “So anyway.
It’s Pioneer Days,
and on the last night
they have these three big events.
There’s an egg-roll for the little kids and a sack-race for kids that are like eight or nine,
and then there’s the pie-eating contest.
And the main guy of the story
is this fat kid nobody likes
named Davie Hogan.”
When I narrate this story — whenever there is a moment of levity or humor, whenever there are those brief little moments that are the seasoning of the meal that makes it all so real and relatable — yes, it was very important to me to capture those moments.
I’m shifting in my chair, so I can feel each of those characters. It’s something that doesn’t exist in live action. It doesn’t exist in any other media.
“I feel the loss.”
Wheaton remembers River Phoenix.
The novella “The Body” is very much about Gordie remembering Chris. It’s darker, and it’s more painful, than the movie is.
I’ve been watching the movie on this tour and seeing River a lot. I remember him as a 14- and 15-year-old kid who just seemed so much older, and so much more experienced and so much wiser than me, and I’m only a year younger than him.
What hurts me now, and what I really felt when I was narrating this, is knowing what River was going through then. We didn’t know. I still don’t know the extent of how he was mistreated, but I know that he was. I know that adults failed him. That he should have been protected in every way that matters. And he just wasn’t.
And I, like Gordie, remember a boy who was loving. So loving, and generous and cared deeply about everyone around him, all the time. Who deserved to live a full life. Who had so much to offer the world. And it’s so unfair that he’s gone and taken from us. I had to go through a decades-long grieving process to come to terms with him dying.
Near the end
of 1971,
Chris
went into a Chicken Delight in Portland
to get a three-piece Snack Bucket.
Just ahead of him,
two men started arguing
about which one had been first in line. One of them pulled a knife.
Chris,
who had always been the best of us
at making peace,
stepped between them and was stabbed in the throat.
The man with the knife had spent time in four different institutions;
he had been released from Shawshank State Prison
only the week before.
Chris died almost instantly.
It is a privilege that I was allowed to tell this story. I get to tell Gordie Lachance’s story as originally imagined by Stephen King, with all of the experience of having lived my whole adult life with the memory of spending three months in Gordie Lachance’s skin.
Culture
Do You Know the Comics That Inspired These TV Adventures?
Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights offbeat television shows that began as comic books. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the comics and their screen versions.
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Sports1 week agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico6 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Business1 week agoDisney’s new CEO says his focus is on storytelling and creativity
-
Tennessee5 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube job scam text: How to spot it fast
-
Minneapolis, MN3 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Texas1 week agoHow to buy Houston vs. Texas A&M 2026 March Madness tickets