Connect with us

Culture

Inside Draymond Green’s defensive mind, which seeks to ‘completely destroy’ you

Published

on

Inside Draymond Green’s defensive mind, which seeks to ‘completely destroy’ you

The Golden State Warriors’ regular season will end on a Sunday afternoon at Chase Center in one of Draymond Green’s favorite matchups. Against the LA Clippers. It will likely have postseason implications, so Green will no doubt be intense.

But it’s not one of his favorites for the matchup against Ivica Zubac, the bruising center he’ll have to face. Or Kawhi Leonard. Or James Harden. No, Green loves the matchup because of opposing head coach Ty Lue.

“When I’m playing against his teams,” Green said, “I feel like it’s a chess match with me and him.”

It’s a window into why Green is here, at 35 years old, still playing stellar enough defensively to be worthy of Defensive Player of the Year consideration. He’s not as fast as he once was, not as explosive as when he last won the award in 2017. His body has endured, is enduring, the typical wear and tear of a career over a thousand games long.

But Green compensates with his mind. Always a high-IQ player, Green’s advanced knowledge, accrued through six NBA Finals trips and four championships, has evolved him into an algorithmic deconstructor of offenses.

Advertisement

He still has some tangible strengths. He’s strong. He remains spry. He also has a 7-foot-2 wingspan he wields like a weapon. It compensates for him being only 6-foot-6. Sometimes, he’ll guard people with one hand in the air, like a fly swatter.

But the activation of these tools is his special trick. It ain’t checkers. Not to Green. He doesn’t want to win matchups; he wants to disrupt whole schemes. He doesn’t see his battle with the players on the court but with the aim of what they want to accomplish.

“Every offense in the NBA is built to put (defensive) players in a rotation,” Green said. “So if I know that, and I know the rotation … if I see that y’all are doing this or y’all (are) doing this to get to that? Great. I’m going to stand right there and f— this whole play up.

“I want everything that y’all thought y’all was going to come in this game and do, I want to take all of that s— off the table. That’s why I talk to the coaches so much. … This is my little battle with the coach. I want to f— your s— up. It’s no hard feelings. I’m always bantering and talking. But I want you to know that your offensive game plan, I wanna f— it up. … Completely destroy your offensive game plan, and then I want to let you know about it.”

What goes into the monkey-wrenching of defenses? Green sat down and broke down five plays from this season that give a window into his defensive mind. Watch the videos to hear Green’s detailed explanation.

Advertisement

Warriors vs. Pelicans | Oct. 30 | Chase Center

Zion Williamson went 5 of 20 in this early season showdown, back when he was healthy and spry. Green frustrated him into a rough night. He explained how he did it, using this sequence as an example.

Williamson caught the pass as he was curling into the lane. But Green, after having watched Williamson score 31 points on 12-of-19 shooting the previous night against the Warriors, altered his approach: Give Williamson space.

“I want to give myself a little distance because he’s fast and powerful. You know, quick,” Green said. “But I don’t want to give too much distance to where the momentum of the bump that he’s going to deliver, it’s gon’ move me.”

Against taller players, such as Nikola Jokić and Anthony Davis, Green has to be close enough to get a good contest. Williamson is just 6-6. So Green could give him space and still contest thanks to his wingspan.

Williamson settled for the midrange jumper and missed badly. Wide left. He managed to get the ball back, but Green hunted him down with his fly swatter and challenged his shot. He calls it the deflector hand.

Advertisement

“It’s the deflector,” he said. “I need the deflector going. I’ve got to get this hand up because I’m not 7 feet. If my hand goes up late, it’s a wrap. I’m 6-5.”


Warriors vs. Mavericks | Nov. 12 | Chase Center

Two plays — one early in the first quarter, another late in the fourth quarter — revealed the nuance of the chess Green plays.

Then-Dallas star Luka Dončić ran a pick-and-roll with Dallas Mavericks center Daniel Gafford on the left wing. Andrew Wiggins and Trayce Jackson-Davis trapped Dončić on the sideline. Green defended Naji Marshall. But he left Marshall to go cover Gafford.

 

The rotational scheme called for Green to pass off Gafford once he got below the free-throw line. Straying too far from his man would give Dončić an easy pass to an open shooter. But Green didn’t mind that shot.

Advertisement

“I tag Gafford because if you don’t tag Gafford, what Luka gon’ do? He’s gon’ probe, probe, he gon’ throw it right to the front of the rim to Gafford for a lob. So I’m tagging him all the way down. But I know I have a non-shooter. I know I can get back here.”

Sticking with Gafford did two things. One, it kept Stephen Curry out of rotation. He was the low man responsible for cutting off the diving big man. Since Green discouraged the pass to Gafford, preventing the roll, Curry didn’t need to rotate and could stay tethered to Klay Thompson in the weakside corner. And then-Warrior De’Anthony Melton could stick with Kyrie Irving instead of zoning up to cover both Thompson and Irving — if Curry had to rotate.

Dončić, with his roll man covered, dribbled around Jackson-Davis and drove baseline. The double-team stayed with him, and Dončić ended up under the rim. Thompson was covered by Curry, Irving by Melton and Gafford by Green.

Dončić, being such an exceptional passer, knew his lone option — though it was behind him. He wrapped a no-look, two-hand pass from the right low block to the left wing, where Marshall was wide open.

Notice Green’s back was to Dončić, whose back was to the shooter. Yet, Green had already diagnosed what Dončić would do. The ball was barely out of Dončić’s hands when Green made his move toward Marshall on the wing.

Advertisement

 

So Green freelanced the defensive scheme, baited Dončić to throw the ball where he wanted, then “jumped the route” and got one of his patented blocked 3-pointers — which was relatively easy.

Green said most defenders, when they see an open player, run toward the open man with their hands up. Since defenders are trained to get a hand up on shooters, they instinctively raise their arms while closing out. But Green said that slows the defender down.

“When I see the ball passed, I take off and sprint. At the last second, I get my hand up. Before my hand goes up, I’m on a dead sprint.”

With a bead on the play, a sprinting closeout and a 7-2 wingspan, this was an easy block of Marshall’s 3-pointer.

Advertisement

Oddly enough, the biggest defensive play of this game happened because Green made the opposite choice with Gafford and left the Mavericks big man open on purpose.

The Warriors were down a point with 2:21 left and needed a stop. Dončić was running a pick-and-roll with then-Maverick Quentin Grimes, trying to get Curry on Dončić. Green tried baiting Dončić into passing to Gafford. Green parked at the free-throw line in the middle, negating Grimes’ roll to the basket.

Green was aware of Gafford behind him. He wanted Dončić to feed him the ball. They’ve been in this situation before.

It worked. Dončić passed behind Green to Gafford on the baseline. Green didn’t get in front of Gafford. Instead, he essentially gave Gafford the lane to the rim.

“Because I know I can get the ball on the back side,” Green said. “… If I come to him and get my body in front of him, he’s too big. He’s just going to shoo me off and just lay it here. Me getting my body in front of him at that point, I’m at a disadvantage. My advantage is to elude his body and get the ball on the other side.”

Advertisement

Warriors at Rockets | Dec. 11 | Toyota Center

Houston’s Alperen Şengün had Green in the paint isolated and decided to post up the smaller Warrior. The Rockets’ big man is 6-11, 235 pounds and one of the best in the NBA with his back to the basket. But Green made quick work of him in the paint. He used his hands to keep Şengün from getting into his body.

Şengün got into the low post on the left block. But Green anticipated his move and, using the baseline as a defender, angled his body to be in the way when Şengün attempted to turn back to the middle.

“He always wants to spin,” Green said. “So when he’s going left, guess where he’s going? He’s spinning back right. So now I just need to pin him that way. I can’t let you spin back to your right hand, and you’re too deep. You’re under the backboard.”

An off-balance Şengün was easy prey. Green stripped the ball, and the Warriors were off the other way.


Warriors vs. Knicks | March 15 | Chase Center

Midway through the fourth quarter, the Warriors had taken control of the game. Green started the play on New York’s Josh Hart, a non-shooter who allowed Green to play center field. When Mikal Bridges curled off a screen, Green left Hart to stop Bridges. Green knows Bridges likes to get to his midrange pullup.

Advertisement

“As soon as I see him coming off the screen with a little bit of space, I’m already knowing, like, ‘Oh, I need to jump up. Because if I don’t, he’s gon’ shoot that. That’s his pet shot. So I need to put this fire out right away.”

Instead of taking his midrange shot, Bridges lofted a pass to the left wing for Knicks forward OG Anunoby. Karl-Anthony Towns set a screen on Warriors forward Gui Santos, who shadowed Anunoby. Then Towns rolled out of the screen and warded off Jimmy Butler, who was on Towns.

This resulted in a clear path to the rim for Anunoby.

Bridges, after making the pass, floated to the top. But Green didn’t follow him. He abandoned Bridges, leaving him alone behind the arc.

“I don’t think he can make this pass,” Green said. “He can’t make that pass. He don’t even see it. … He got a drive to the rim. He ain’t passing. And he was playing well? Go put the fire out.”

Advertisement

Ever the freelancer, Green beat Moses Moody and Butler to the rotation and cut off Anunoby on the baseline. When the Knicks forward leapt toward the front of the rim for a layup, Green blocked it to complete the play.

So Green started on Hart, switched onto Bridges, then thwarted Anunoby.


Warriors vs. Bucks | March 18 | Chase Center

The Warriors were one stop away from sealing the game. Green was on Giannis Antetokounmpo.

Antetokounmpo did a dribble-handoff (DHO) with forward Kyle Kuzma into a pick-and-roll. Buddy Hield, chasing Kuzma, zipped around Giannis to stay connected to his man. He found himself behind a screen by Giannis.

But Green didn’t drop back to cover Giannis.

Advertisement

“My thought process here is I’m gonna be up at the level of the screen,” Green said. “Because I’ve got to take the 3 away. We’re up 11 points with 51 seconds to go. I’ve gotta take this 3 away.”

So Green immediately ate the space between him and Kuzma. For one, he wanted to speed up Kuzma. He also wanted to make the pass harder for Kuzma. And Green already knew he couldn’t let Kuzma turn the corner and have a two-man game with Giannis rolling to the basket in open space.

 

“Look where Kuz catches the ball,” Green said. “He’s in a prime trap spot. He’s got the sideline. He’s got nowhere to go. … I’ve got him dead right here. Once he turns his back, I can get out now.”

Green hustled back to Giannis. Butler had rotated over to cover for Green, but now Green sent him away. He was ready for his second effort on the defensive possession.

Advertisement

With Giannis catching the ball farther out, Green was in a better position to defend.

“So now I can beat (Giannis) to the spot, and I can prepare myself for the shoulder because I know the shoulder is coming,” Green said. “I can take the hit.”

Green indeed absorbed Giannis’ shoulder and impeded a shot attempt. Giannis passed to Damian Lillard in the weakside corner. Green remained connected to Giannis, who drifted to the left side. But when the ball reversed to the opposite corner, Green had to give a third effort.

He sprinted out to contest an open 3 from Taurean Prince. Green closed out well enough to make Prince pump fake and step away from Green. The change was enough to disrupt Prince, and he missed.

The play began with him blowing up their pick-and-roll plans and ended with a good contest. Ball game.

Advertisement

(Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: Jed Jacobsohn / NBAE, Elsa, Thearon W. Henderson / Getty Images)

Culture

Famous Authors’ Less Famous Books

Published

on

Famous Authors’ Less Famous Books

Literature

‘Romola’ (1863) by George Eliot

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Who knew that there’s a major George Eliot novel that neither I nor any of my friends had ever heard of?

Advertisement

“Romola” was Eliot’s fourth novel, published between “The Mill on the Floss” (1860) and “Middlemarch” (1870-71). If my friends and I didn’t get this particular memo, and “Romola” is familiar to every Eliot fan but us, please skip the following.

“Romola” isn’t some fluky misfire better left unmentioned in light of Eliot’s greater work. It’s her only historical novel, set in Florence during the Italian Renaissance. It embraces big subjects like power, religion, art and social upheaval, but it’s not dry or overly intellectual. Its central character is a gifted, freethinking young woman named Romola, who enters a marriage so disastrous as to make Anna Karenina’s look relatively good.

Advertisement

It probably matters that many of Eliot’s other books have been adapted into movies or TV series, with actors like Hugh Dancy, Ben Kingsley, Emily Watson and Rufus Sewell. The BBC may be doing even more than we thought to keep classic literature alive. (In 1924, “Romola” was made into a silent movie starring Lillian Gish. It doesn’t seem to have made much difference.)

Anthony Trollope, among others, loved “Romola.” He did, however, warn Eliot against aiming over her readers’ heads, which may help explain its obscurity.

All I can say, really, is that it’s a mystery why some great books stay with us and others don’t.

Advertisement

‘Quiet Dell’ (2013) by Jayne Anne Phillips

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

This was an Oprah Book of the Week, which probably disqualifies it from B-side status, but it’s not nearly as well known as Phillips’s debut story collection, “Black Tickets” (1979), or her most recent novel, “Night Watch” (2023), which won her a long-overdue Pulitzer Prize.

Phillips has no parallel in her use of potent, stylized language to shine a light into the darkest of corners. In “Quiet Dell,” her only true-crime novel, she’s at the height of her powers, which are particularly apparent when she aims her language laser at horrific events that actually occurred. Her gift for transforming skeevy little lives into what I can only call “Blade Runner” mythology is consistently stunning.

Advertisement

Consider this passage from the opening chapter of “Quiet Dell”:

“Up high the bells are ringing for everyone alive. There are silver and gold and glass bells you can see through, and sleigh bells a hundred years old. My grandmother said there was a whisper for each one dead that year, and a feather drifting for each one waiting to be born.”

Advertisement

The book is full of language like that — and of complex, often chillingly perverse characters. It’s a dark, underrecognized beauty.

‘Solaris’ (1961) by Stanislaw Lem

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

You could argue that, in America, at least, the Polish writer Stanislaw Lem didn’t produce any A-side novels. You could just as easily argue that that makes all his novels both A-side and B-side.

Advertisement

It’s science fiction. All right?

I love science and speculative fiction, but I know a lot of literary types who take pride in their utter lack of interest in it. I always urge those people to read “Solaris,” which might change their opinions about a vast number of popular books they dismiss as trivial. As far as I know, no one has yet taken me up on that.

“Solaris” involves the crew of a space station continuing the study of an aquatic planet that has long defied analysis by the astrophysicists of Earth. Part of what sets the book apart from a lot of other science-fiction novels is Lem’s respect for enigma. He doesn’t offer contrived explanations in an attempt to seduce readers into suspending disbelief. The crew members start to experience … manifestations? … drawn from their lives and memories. If the planet has any intentions, however, they remain mysterious. All anyone can tell is that their desires and their fears, some of which are summoned from their subconsciousness, are being received and reflected back to them so vividly that it becomes difficult to tell the real from the projected. “Solaris” has the peculiar distinction of having been made into not one but two bad movies. Read the book instead.

Advertisement

‘Fox 8’ (2013) by George Saunders

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

If one of the most significant living American writers had become hypervisible with his 2017 novel, “Lincoln in the Bardo,” we’d go back and read his earlier work, wouldn’t we? Yes, and we may very well have already done so with the story collections “Tenth of December” (2013) and “Pastoralia” (2000). But what if we hadn’t yet read Saunders’s 2013 novella, “Fox 8,” about an unusually intelligent fox who, by listening to a family from outside their windows at night, has learned to understand, and write, in fox-English?: “One day, walking neer one of your Yuman houses, smelling all the interest with snout, I herd, from inside, the most amazing sound. Turns out, what that sound is, was: the Yuman voice, making werds. They sounded grate! They sounded like prety music! I listened to those music werds until the sun went down.”

Once Saunders became more visible to more of us, we’d want to read a book that ventures into the consciousness of a different species (novels tend to be about human beings), that maps the differences and the overlaps in human and animal consciousness, explores the effects of language on consciousness and is great fun.

Advertisement

We’d all have read it by now — right?

‘Between the Acts’ (1941) by Virginia Woolf

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

You could argue that Woolf didn’t have any B-sides, and yet it’s hard to deny that more people have read “Mrs. Dalloway” (1925) and “To the Lighthouse” (1927) than have read “The Voyage Out” (1915) or “Monday or Tuesday” (1921). Those, along with “Orlando” (1928) and “The Waves” (1931), are Woolf’s most prominent novels.

Advertisement

Four momentous novels is a considerable number for any writer, even a great one. That said, “Between the Acts,” her last novel, really should be considered the fifth of her significant books. The phrase “embarrassment of riches” comes to mind.

Five great novels by the same author is a lot for any reader to take on. Our reading time is finite. We won’t live long enough to read all the important books, no matter how old we get to be. I don’t expect many readers to be as devoted to Woolf as are the cohort of us who consider her to have been some sort of dark saint of literature and will snatch up any relic we can find. Fanatics like me will have read “Between the Acts” as well as “The Voyage Out,” “Monday or Tuesday” and “Flush” (1933), the story of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s cocker spaniel. Speaking for myself, I don’t blame anyone who hasn’t gotten to those.

Advertisement

I merely want to add “Between the Acts” to the A-side, lest anyone who’s either new to Woolf or a tourist in Woolf-landia fail to rank it along with the other four contenders.

As briefly as possible: It focuses on an annual village pageant that attempts to convey all of English history in a single evening. The pageant itself interweaves subtly, brilliantly, with the lives of the villagers playing the parts.

It’s one of Woolf’s most lusciously lyrical novels. And it’s a crash course, of sorts, in her genius for conjuring worlds in which the molehill matters as much as the mountain, never mind their differences in size.

Advertisement

It’s also the most accessible of her greatest books. It could work for some as an entry point, in more or less the way William Faulkner’s “As I Lay Dying” (1930) can be the starter book before you go on to “The Sound and the Fury” (1929) or “Absalom, Absalom!” (1936).

As noted, there’s too much for us to read. We do the best we can.

Advertisement

More in Literature

See the rest of the issue

Continue Reading

Culture

6 Poems You Should Know by Heart

Published

on

6 Poems You Should Know by Heart

Literature

‘Prayer’ (1985) by Galway Kinnell

Advertisement

Whatever happens. Whatever
what is is is what
I want. Only that. But that.

Galway Kinnell in 1970. Photo by LaVerne Harrell Clark, © 1970 Arizona Board of Regents. Courtesy of the University of Arizona Poetry Center

Advertisement

“I typically say Kinnell’s words at the start of my day, as I’m pedaling a traffic-laden path to my office,” says Major Jackson, 57, the author of six books of poetry, including “Razzle Dazzle” (2023). “The poem encourages a calm acceptance of the day’s events but also wants us to embrace the misapprehension and oblivion of life, to avoid probing too deeply for answers to inscrutable questions. I admire what Kinnell does with only 14 words; the repetition of ‘what,’ ‘that’ and ‘is’ would seem to limit the poem’s sentiment but, paradoxically, the poem opens widely to contain all manner of human experience. The three ‘is’es in the middle line give it a symmetry that makes its message feel part of a natural order, and even more convincing. Thanks to the skillful punctuation, pauses and staccato rhythm, a tonal quality of interior reflection emerges. Much like a haiku, it continues after its last words, lingering like the last note played on a piano that slowly fades.”

“Just as I was entering young adulthood, probably slow to claim romantic feelings, a girlfriend copied out a poem by Pablo Neruda and slipped it into an envelope with red lipstick kisses all over it. In turn, I recited this poem. It took me the remainder of that winter to memorize its lines,” says Jackson. “The poem captures the pitch of longing that defines love at its most intense. The speaker in Shakespeare’s most famous sonnet believes the poem creates the beloved, ‘So long as men can breathe or eyes can see, / So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.’ (Sonnet 18). In Rilke’s expressive declarations of yearning, the beloved remains elusive. Wherever the speaker looks or travels, she marks his world by her absence. I find this deeply moving.”

Advertisement

Lucille Clifton in 1995. Afro American Newspapers/Gado/Getty Images

“Clifton faced many obstacles, including cancer, a kidney transplant and the loss of her husband and two of her children. Through it all, she crafted a long career as a pre-eminent American poet,” says Jackson. “Her poem ‘won’t you celebrate with me’ is a war cry, an invitation to share in her victories against life’s persistent challenges. The poem is meaningful to all who have had to stare down death in a hospital or had to bereave the passing of close relations. But, even for those who have yet to mourn life’s vicissitudes, the poem is instructive in cultivating resilience and a persevering attitude. I keep coming back to the image of the speaker’s hands and the spirit of steadying oneself in the face of unspeakable storms. She asks in a perfectly attuned gorgeously metrical line, ‘what did i see to be except myself?’”

Advertisement

‘Sonnet 94’ (1609) by William Shakespeare

They that have power to hurt and will do none,
That do not do the thing they most do show,
Who, moving others, are themselves as stone,
Unmovèd, cold, and to temptation slow,
They rightly do inherit heaven’s graces
And husband nature’s riches from expense;
They are the lords and owners of their faces,
Others but stewards of their excellence.
The summer’s flower is to the summer sweet,
Though to itself it only live and die;
But if that flower with base infection meet,
The basest weed outbraves his dignity.
For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;
Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds.

Advertisement

“It’s one of the moments of Western consciousness,” says Frederick Seidel, 90, the author of more than a dozen collections of poetry, including “So What” (2024). “Shakespeare knows and says what he knows.”

“It trombones magnificent, unbearable sorrow,” says Seidel.

“It’s smartass and bitter and bright,” says Seidel.

Advertisement

These interviews have been edited and condensed.

More in Literature

See the rest of the issue

Continue Reading

Culture

Classic and Contemporary Literature From France, Japan, India, the U.K. and Brazil

Published

on

Classic and Contemporary Literature From France, Japan, India, the U.K. and Brazil

Literature

FRANCE

Advertisement

According to the writer Leïla Slimani, 44, the author of ‘The Country of Others’ (2020).

Classic

‘Essais de Montaigne’ (‘Essays of Montaigne,’ 1580)

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Advertisement

“France is a country of nuance with a love of conversation and freedom and an aversion to fanaticism. It’s also a country built on reflexive subjectivity. Montaigne reveals all that, writing, ‘I am myself the matter of my book.’”

Contemporary

‘La Carte et le Territoire’ (‘The Map and the Territory,’ 2010) by Michel Houellebecq

Advertisement

“Houellebecq describes France as a museum, where landscape turns into décor and where rural areas are emptying out. He shows the gap between the Parisian elite and the rest of the population, which he paints as aging and disoriented by modernity. It’s a melancholic and yet ironic novel about a disenchanted nation.”

JAPAN

Advertisement

According to the writer Yoko Ogawa, 64, the author of ‘The Memory Police’ (1994).

Classic

‘Man’yoshu’ (late eighth century)

Advertisement

“‘Man’yoshu,’ the oldest extant collection of Japanese poetry, reflects a diversity of voices — from emperors to commoners. They bow their heads to the majesty of nature, weep at the loss of loved ones and find pathos in death. The pages pulse with the vitality of successive generations.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘Tenohira no Shosetsu’ (‘Palm-of-the-Hand Stories,’ 1923-72) by Yasunari Kawabata

“The essence of Japanese literature might lie in brevity: waka [a classical 31-syllable poetry form], haiku and short stories. There’s a tradition of cherishing words that seem to well up from the depths of the heart, imbued with warmth. Kawabata, too, exudes more charm in his short stories — especially these very short ‘palm-of-the-hand’ stories — than in his full-length novels. Good and evil, beauty and ugliness, love and hate — everything is contained in these modest worlds.”

INDIA

Advertisement

According to Aatish Taseer, 45, a T contributing writer and the author of ‘Stranger to History: A Son’s Journey Through Islamic Lands’ (2009).

Classic

Advertisement

‘The Kumarasambhava’ (‘The Birth of Kumara,’ circa fifth century) by Kalidasa

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Advertisement

“This is an epic poem by the greatest of the classical Sanskrit poets and dramatists. The gods are in a pickle. They’re being tormented by a monster, but Shiva, their natural protector, is deep in meditation and cannot be disturbed. Kama, the god of love, armed with his flower bow, is sent down from the heavens to waken Shiva. Never a wise idea! The great god, in his fury, opens his third eye and incinerates Kama. But then, paradoxically, the death of the god of love engenders one of the greatest love stories ever told. In the final canto, Shiva and his wife, the goddess Parvati, have the most electrifying sex for days on end — and, 15 centuries on, in our now censorious time, it still leaves one agog at the sensual wonder that was India.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘The Complex’ (2026) by Karan Mahajan

“This state-of-the-nation novel, which was published just last month, captures the squalor and malice of Indian family life. Delhi is both my and Mahajan’s hometown and, in this sprawling homage to India’s capital, we see it on the eve of the economic liberalization of the 1990s, as the old socialist city gives way to a megalopolis of ambition, greed and political cynicism.”

THE UNITED KINGDOM

Advertisement

According to the writer Tessa Hadley, 70, the author of ‘The London Train’ (2011).

Classic

Advertisement

‘Jane Eyre’ (1847) by Charlotte Brontë

“Written almost 200 years ago, it remains an insight into our collective soul — or at least its female part. Somewhere at the heart of us there’s a small girl in a wintry room, curled up in the window seat with a book, watching the lashing rain on the window glass: ‘There was no possibility of taking a walk that day. …’ Jane’s solemnity, her outraged sense of justice, her trials to come, the wild weather outside, her longing for something better, for love in her future: All this speaks, perhaps problematically, to something buried in the foundations of our idea of ourselves.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘All That Man Is’ (2016) by David Szalay

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

“Though he isn’t quite completely British (he’s part Canadian, part Hungarian), Szalay is brilliant at catching certain aspects of British men — aspects that haven’t been written about for a while, now updated for a new era. Funny, exquisitely observed and terrifying, this novel reminds us, too, how absolutely our fate and our identity as a nation belong with the rest of Europe.”

BRAZIL

Advertisement

According to the writer and critic Noemi Jaffe, 64, the author of ‘What Are the Blind Men Dreaming?’ (2016).

Classic

Advertisement

‘Memórias Póstumas de Brás Cubas’ (‘The Posthumous Memoirs of Brás Cubas,’ 1881) by Machado de Assis

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Advertisement

“Not only is it experimental in style — very short chapters mixed with long ones; different points of view; narrated by a corpse; metalinguistic — but it also introduces an extremely ironic view of the rising bourgeoisie in Rio de Janeiro at the time, revealing the hypocrisy of slave owners, the falsehood of love affairs and the only true reason for all social relationships: convenience and personal interest. After almost 150 years, it’s still modern, both formally and, unfortunately, also in content.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘Onde Pastam os Minotauros’ (‘Where Minotaurs Graze,’ 2023) by Joca Reiners Terron

“The two main characters — Cão and Crente — along with some of their colleagues, plan to escape and set fire to the slaughterhouse where they work under exploitative conditions. The men develop sympathy for the animals they kill, and one of them becomes a sort of philosopher, revealing the sheer nonsense of existence and the injustices of society in the deepest parts of Brazil.”

These interviews have been edited and condensed.

Advertisement

More in Literature

See the rest of the issue

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending