Connect with us

Culture

Has Pep Guardiola’s style of football become outdated – or is it more complicated than that?

Published

on

Has Pep Guardiola’s style of football become outdated – or is it more complicated than that?

Manchester City are having a bad season, there is no doubt about that. But there is a difference of opinion when it comes to deciding why this is the case.

Your more casual observer might put it down to Rodri’s absence with a long-term knee injury, and of course there is a lot of truth in that.

Perhaps you are pitching it somewhere in the middle, nodding sagely about several factors. Yes, Rodri’s injury was the first domino to fall but it exposed an “old” midfield — in Pep Guardiola’s words — and a defence completely blighted by injuries.

But there is another school of thought, one that looks beyond City’s borders. What if Guardiola’s entire playing style is becoming outdated?

This is a theory that has gone mainstream over the past couple of months, warranting a discussion on popular debate show The Overlap and an in-depth article on the BBC Sport website.

Advertisement

“Today, modern football is the way that Bournemouth play, that Newcastle play, Brighton play, Liverpool have always been like that, like we were,” Guardiola said himself in an interview with TNT at the end of last year. “It is modern football. Modern football is not so positional.”

Positional, of course, neatly describes Guardiola’s entire approach — ‘juego de posicion’, as it is known in Spanish — and that comment was the one picked up for the conversation on The Overlap: here is Guardiola suggesting that modern football is moving away from his style, so maybe that is why City have struggled so much over recent months, losing 15 of their last 30 matches.

That was the theme of the BBC article following City’s tepid performance at the Santiago Bernabeu, where it was suggested that their issues this season — injured, ageing players, underperforming stars, low confidence — were symptoms, not causes.

During discussions about this subject online, it was highlighted that City’s style of play is very different to the rest of the league. And it is. But here’s the thing: it always has been.

Advertisement

In previous seasons, their very different approach compared to the rest of the league has been held up as a reason for their dominance. Their slower style has been seen as part of the reason why they control games. As the chart above shows, City’s style this season is certainly not an outlier in the Guardiola era.

So it feels a little reductive to say the style is no longer working now that City are not doing well. Given there are so many obvious factors — injuries, low confidence, stalwarts like Kevin De Bruyne, Bernardo Silva and Ilkay Gundogan playing well below their best — is it not reasonable to say that those things have made the style less effective, in the same way that any team, playing any style, would probably be struggling as well?

And this was Guardiola’s point in that TNT interview, not that the league is getting away from City.

“We have to rise to the rhythm unbelievably,” he also said, “and we could not, simply we could not because we didn’t have the players.”

He goes on to reference the amount of injuries at clubs around Europe and finally offers a solution to the problems facing his side this year… and it did not relate to playing style.

Advertisement

“I reflect that in the future we have to (have) a longer squad,” he said. “I always believed (it has to be done) with few players, but with that the team cannot survive.”

Only last season he did indeed say he would “rather not be a manager” than to have a big squad but that has changed this season, and while he did discuss the changing face of the Premier League in that interview, he feels that the solution is not to rip up his style, but to firstly get his players back fit and secondly to ensure they stay fit by having more options.

The message is clear: take the injuries out of the equation and his style would still work.


Oscar Bobb has been a major loss for Guardiola this season (Stu Forster/Getty Images)

He may be wrong about the continued effectiveness of his own style, and he would probably not admit it even if he felt it, but it would be wrong to suggest, based on what he said at the end of last year, that he thinks City are being left behind.

The discussion has also seemingly disregarded City’s own evolution over the past couple of years, which was something else that Guardiola talked about in that interview.

Advertisement

When giving examples of other teams’ direct approach, he also included City: “Like we were”.

He was asked about this recently, too, and he spoke at length about the changes in the league, as well as those same two points: that the injuries have undermined City’s season and that they have been evolving with the times anyway.

“I saw personally that more teams like playing more man-to-man, more aggressive in your build-up, a few of them play like this,” he said. “In terms of being more direct, English football has been more direct (forever), it has always been, ‘Don’t play much in the middle and play long balls’.

“But in the last years a lot of teams play from behind, Tottenham is an example and many, many other teams.”

He then highlighted a process that City went through in 2022-23; initially that season when they struggled against teams that pressed them man-to-man, but they gradually became more effective because they embraced long balls to Erling Haaland. Something that has been seen this season, too, most notably against Chelsea in January.

Advertisement

Guardiola is confident his team can return to the top (Michael Regan/Getty Images)

“Normally, when you make a positional game against man-to-man it’s completely different but we handled ourselves really well against teams who play man-to-man, we are not concerned about that,” he continued, and then he got to the biggest issue with this season, in his eyes.

“It’s more… always we have the regret this season, I said many times, ‘What would have happened with (only) one, two, three muscular injuries during the season, three or four weeks out?’ But we have central defenders (who are) eight, 10 weeks out, we don’t have Rodri for six or seven months, Oscar (Bobb) is five, six months out.

“I can imagine we would have been more competitive than we have been, but when we have the squad we can play in that way. We can do it.

“While I am the manager, we are going to adjust something depending on the quality of the players or the problems that the opponents (pose) but I think we are going to try to play the way that defined the team for many years, that had success.

“The only difference is that there are more teams that (do) man-marking in our goal kick, they are more aggressive. Before they were more cautious. Now teams are so brave, that is a little bit different. I would say that is the only one, the rest… if you had your team you could compete and you could play the way we have played in the past.”

Advertisement

Rodri’s long-term absence continues to cast a shadow over City’s season (Michael Regan/Getty Images)

It is something City have adapted to, even as they maintain their overall more patient, slower approach in most games. The change may not put them closer to the other teams in the graphics because the majority of opponents still sit deep against City, and when they do that, Guardiola instructs his players to “take a coffee”, to make more passes and be more patient, to avoid counter-attacks.

That approach has been enough to win the title in the past four seasons, so why would it have suddenly stopped? Is it because it is no longer effective, or because the players — for myriad reasons — have not been able to implement it properly?

(Header photo: Justin Setterfield/Getty Images)

Culture

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

Published

on

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries, by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.


For those of us in the national memory-keeping business, anniversaries hold near-totemic power. Satisfyingly round units of time, ideally bearing fancy, Latin-derived names, serve as the overburdened pegs on which to hang think pieces and museum exhibits, revisionist documentaries and maudlin public ceremonies. The arbitrary nature of such occasions is precisely what gives them their charge, inviting us to set aside complacency and submit to a comprehensive check-in.

In his new book, “America, U.S.A.,” Eddie S. Glaude Jr. presents an intriguing variation on the genre, seeing the country’s 250th birthday as an anniversary of anniversaries: 50 years since the malaise-ridden, schlock-heavy Bicentennial. A century since the subdued Prohibition-era Sesquicentennial. A century and a half since telegraphed reports of George Armstrong Custer’s defeat by the Lakota and Cheyenne at Little Bighorn rudely interrupted the Gilded Age Republic’s 100th birthday party.

If an anniversary offers a snapshot of a moment, the core of Glaude’s book is an old-timey photo album, a collection of notable episodes from earlier national reckonings, long-ago glances in the mirror. An estimable scholar of Black history, politics and religion at Princeton — best known for “Begin Again,” his 2020 meditation on James Baldwin’s relevance for our times — Glaude focuses, as his subtitle puts it, on “how race shadows the nation’s anniversaries.”

Such celebrations, he contends, have never really been the moments for honest self-reflection they are often advertised to be. Instead, the nation usually shatters the mirror, refusing to accept what it prefers not to see. “American anniversaries are often moments to turn a blind eye to the evils of the past and the present,” Glaude writes, “to suppress the fact of America’s divided soul.”

Advertisement

It’s a clever concept, and, needless to say, perfectly timed. Last year, Glaude notes, the Trump administration executed a hostile takeover of the government’s studiously bipartisan 250th anniversary planning. It is now preparing a program that is certain to conceal more than it reveals about the country ostensibly being celebrated.

Glaude, in no mood for celebration, argues that such omissions and evasions also defined commemorations in the past. In 1875, Frederick Douglass predicted “one grand Centennial hosannah of peace and good will to all the white race of this country.” He was right: The nation reached 100 years old at a crucial moment in the post-Civil War fight over racial equality, with white Northerners ready to give up on Southern Reconstruction. The occasion would help the once-warring sections to reunite around a shared commitment to white supremacy. On May 10, 1876, at the opening of the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, the police tried to bar Douglass from the grandstand, until a white politician vouched for him.

The 150th anniversary came soon after a resurgent Ku Klux Klan successfully pushed for a restrictive immigration law aimed at keeping America a “Nordic” nation. At the lavishly funded, lightly attended celebrations in Philadelphia, Black veterans of World War I were excluded from marching in the opening parade. A writer with The Associated Negro Press wondered “what was in the breast of those black men who fought to make America safe for Democracy and on Monday stood on the sidelines, forgotten, as the Nordic strode by in all his vain pride.”

By 1976, when the nation marked its Bicentennial, the violence of the ’60s had destroyed any semblance of consensus. Vietnam and Watergate had eroded trust in the government. The commission initially tasked with organizing the anniversary was disbanded amid reports of corruption. Corporations filled the vacuum, Glaude explains, with “star-spangled whoopee cushions; patriotic toilet seats; Liberty hamburgers; red, white and blue beer cans.” The author, around 8 years old at the time, dimly remembers donning a pair of tricolor trousers.

A half-century later, Glaude is refreshingly honest about the depths of his despair. “I do not love America, and never have, especially now,” he writes in one of the more startling opening sentences I’ve read in some time. He dismisses this year’s Semiquincentennial as reaching back “to a storybook America that requires either the banishment of Black people from view or the reduction of our role in the country’s history, so as to affirm America’s ongoing quest to be a more perfect union.”

Advertisement

Undoubtedly true. But Trump doesn’t own the country, at least not yet, nor the 250th anniversary of one of the most radically liberatory and confusingly contradictory events in world history — an inspiration, as Glaude shows, even to critical observers of the American experiment, like Douglass. Far from the revanchist MAGA-palooza in Washington, I suspect this summer’s unasked-for invitation to national soul-searching may surprise us yet.

Despite his despair, Glaude concludes that “the past still offers resources for us to freedom-dream.” So, too, does this book.


AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries | By Eddie S. Glaude Jr. | Crown | 270 pp. | $31

Continue Reading

Culture

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Published

on

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Moore is a dependable ingredient in any summer reading soufflé. Her airy novels accomplish what they came to do: entertain and transport, without the pyrotechnics of, say, books that eschew quotation marks. In “Down With the Shipmans,” three sisters, laden with baggage, converge on their late mother’s beach cottage, only to learn that their father and his much younger wife are planning to sell the place.

The stakes are high, the drama is juicy and the views are sublime. Moore even provides two beach dogs — Leo (an unruly pit bull mix) and Cinnamon (“golden retriever, red bandanna, long pink tongue”) — to keep things lively. (Comes out June 2)

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Published

on

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

new video loaded: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Artificial intelligence has made pirated audiobooks faster to make and harder to detect. Our reporter Alexandra Alter tells us about the latest threat to the publishing industry.

By Alexandra Alter, Léo Hamelin and Laura Salaberry

May 20, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending