Connect with us

Culture

Breanna Stewart, Liberty even WNBA Finals series with Game 2 win over Lynx

Published

on

Breanna Stewart, Liberty even WNBA Finals series with Game 2 win over Lynx

NEW YORK — There was no singular way for members of the New York Liberty to turn the page after their historic Game 1 collapse to the Minnesota Lynx.

Star guard Sabrina Ionescu said she couldn’t just “flush” the result. Forward Leonie Fiebich watched the contest three full times in the 36 hours immediately after the overtime loss. Veteran guard Courtney Vandersloot described moving forward “as a process.”

Liberty coach Sandy Brondello was glad two days separated Game 1 and Game 2 so she had more time to watch film and reflect.  But just after 3 p.m. Sunday, a new game began. And with it, a new chapter in the series was written.

Though there were moments that felt eerily similar — New York, for instance, saw a 17-point lead shrink to only two with 3:21 remaining in the game — Sunday’s sequel featured a player who had a relatively minimal impact in the opener: Liberty wing Betnijah Laney-Hamilton. 

Laney-Hamilton played the fewest minutes (26) of any New York starter in Game 1. In the Liberty’s 80-66 Game 2 victory, she scored 20 points, tying her season high. Laney-Hamilton nailed a 3-pointer with 3:20 remaining, the biggest shot of the contest, which stretched the lead back to five.

Advertisement

Then, she grabbed a rebound on the ensuing possession as the Barclays Center-record 18,040 fans in attendance rejoiced. 

That Laney-Hamilton emerged as Sunday’s star is especially impressive considering Brondello’s prognosis of the wing Saturday. She played in only 28 games during the regular season, missing time from July 6 to Aug. 26 because of a knee procedure.

“She’s giving whatever she can,” Brondello said Saturday. “I think everyone sees that she’s trying. It’s not the same B that we’ve seen all season long, but it is what it is.”

She did more than just try. In addition to her offensive contributions, she spent time guarding Courtney Williams (who finished with only 15 points Sunday compared to 23 in Game 1) and Kayla McBride (who had a mere eight points after tallying 22 on Thursday). 

And yet, despite Laney-Hamilton’s boost, plus bounce-back games from Stewart (21 points, eight rebounds, and five assists) and Ionescu (15 points), there were still moments in which the two games seemed the same.  New York jumped out to a 10-point first quarter lead, but by the 6:52 mark of the period, it led by just six.

Advertisement

The Liberty led by 10 heading to halftime, but that was slashed to four points with just 90 seconds remaining in the frame. In the fourth quarter, New York’s lead grew as large as 11, but it shrunk, too. With just under four minutes left, the Liberty led by only two and those in attendance felt tension similar to the waning moments of Game 1.

This time, however, there would be no collapse. 

Stewart had three, of her finals-record seven, steals in the final five minutes. Jonquel Jones hit a timely layup with 3:57 left. Fiebich paused, took a deep breath and nailed a wide-open 3-pointer with 90 seconds left to extend New York’s cushion to nine points.

After doing so, with Minnesota having taken a timeout, Laney-Hamilton pumped her fist. So, too, did Ionescu. 

Collier had a modest game by her standards (16 points and eight rebounds), while a late 3-point attempt by Williams that rolled off the rim was a sign that Sunday afternoon would be different than Thursday night. 

Advertisement

Game 3 of the 1-1 series is Wednesday night. Tipoff is set for 8 p.m. ET. 

Laney-Hamilton becomes X-factor

Laney-Hamilton is less than three months removed from a procedure to remove two loose bodies from her right knee. She came off the bench during her ramp up to a full return and is still playing limited shifts in the postseason, with everyone acknowledging Laney-Hamilton isn’t going to be at 100 percent in this series.

But even at less than her best, the 2021 All-Star was still capable of being better. Laney-Hamilton had scored in double digits once in New York’s seven postseason games entering Sunday, and she was shooting 29.1 percent from the floor.

The Liberty needed more offense in Game 2 with Minnesota covering Fiebich more tightly after her five 3-pointers Thursday, and Laney-Hamilton came through. She was aggressive pulling up off of screens and made strong drives to the basket.

When New York’s movement on offense stalled, she took advantage of switches by posting up smaller defenders in the post.

Advertisement

Laney-Hamilton hit one of the biggest shots of the night, a corner 3-pointer off of a no-look, kick out pass from Ionescu to extend the Liberty’s lead to five points, 71-66, with 3:21 left in the game. Minnesota would never get within one possession after that.

Her 20 points tied a season-high; the last time she reached that total came before the Olympic break, and before her surgery.

In Game 1, Brondello couldn’t get Laney-Hamilton on the court down the stretch because of the way she was moving. On Sunday, it would have been impossible to justify keeping Laney-Hamilton off the floor.  — Sabreena Merchant, women’s basketball staff writer

Minnesota remains resilient in defeat

The Lynx once again found themselves trailing early against the Liberty, this time facing down a 17-point deficit in the second quarter (compared to 18 in Game 1).

But Minnesota steadfastly sticks to its system of ball movement, trusting that the defense will eventually break and that its pressure defense will cause the opposing offense to stagnate. It looked like the formula might work again, as the Lynx nearly erased the deficit yet again, pulling within two in the fourth quarter.

Advertisement

Although they weren’t able to break through, to have come so close to potentially taking a decisive 2-0 series lead bodes well for when the series switches to Minnesota.

Kayla McBride and Napheesa Collier highlighted their team’s resilience after Game 1 even though the 45 minutes featured a series of mistakes, and that commitment shined through again Sunday, despite the result.  — Merchant

Required reading

(Photo: Nathaniel S. Butler / Getty Images)

Culture

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Published

on

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights thrillers first published as novels (or graphic novels) that were adapted into popular films. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.

Continue Reading

Culture

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Published

on

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s regular quiz about books, authors and literary culture. In honor of Gen. George Washington’s birthday on Feb. 22, this week’s super-size challenge is focused on the literature and history related to the American Revolution. In the 10 multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to exhibits, books and other materials related to this intense chapter in the country’s story, including an award-winning biography of the general and first U.S. president.

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Published

on

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Let’s play romance roulette. No genre has dominated the books world in the last few years. Like romance, it accounts for the biggest percentage of book sales, their avid fan bases. Everyone has been talking about romance as a Book Review editor and as a fan of the genre myself, I put together a to z glossary of 101 terms that you should know if you want to understand the world of romance are cinnamon roll. You may think a cinnamon roll is a delicious breakfast treat, but in a romance novel, this refers to a typically male character who is so sweet and tender and precious that you just want to protect him and his beautiful heart from the world. Ooh, a rake. This is basically the Playboy of historical romance. He defies societal rules. He drinks, he gambles. He’s out on the town all night and is a very prolific lover with a bit of a reputation as a ladies’ man. FEI these are super strong, super sexy, super powerful, immortal, fairy like creatures. One of my favorite discoveries in terms that I learned was stern brunch daddy. A lot of daddy’s usually a male love interest who seems very intimidating and alpha, but then turns out to be a total softie who just wants to make his love interest brunch. I think there’s a misconception that because these books can follow these typical patterns, that they can be predictable and boring. But I think what makes a really great romance novel is the way that these writers use the tropes in interesting ways, or subvert them. If you can think of it, there’s probably a romance novel about it. Oops, there’s only one bed. This is one of my personal favorite tropes is a twist on forced proximity. Characters find themselves in very close quarters, where inevitably sparks start to fly. Why choose is the porkulus dose of the romance world. Sometimes the best way to resolve a love triangle is by turning it into a circle, where everyone is invited to play. Oops, we lost one spice level. There’s a really wide spectrum. You can range from really low heat or no spice, what might also be called kisses. Only then you start to get into what we call closed door or fade to Black. These books go right up to the moment of intimacy, and then you get into what we call open door, which is more explicit. And sometimes these can get very high heat or spicy and even start verging into kink. There’s one thing that almost every romance novel has in common. It’s that no matter what the characters get up to in the end, it ends with a happily ever after. I say almost every romance novel. Sometimes you’re just happy for now.

Continue Reading

Trending