The US Treasury designated Nobitex alongside Wallex, Bitpin and Ramzinex and sanctioned senior figures connected to Nobitex, including chairman, co-founder and former chief executive Amir Hossein Rad.

According to the Treasury, Nobitex processed more than half of all Iranian digital asset inflows in 2025. Washington also accused it of facilitating transactions linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), sanctions evasion, ransomware activity and the Central Bank of Iran’s access to hundreds of millions of dollars in stablecoins.

The sanctions therefore struck at part of the infrastructure that has allowed Iranian individuals, companies and state-linked actors to access international digital asset markets despite years of financial restrictions.

Crypto vs sanctions

Iran’s interest in cryptocurrency is not difficult to explain. Sanctions have sharply limited access to international banking networks, dollar transactions, trade finance and oil revenues. Digital assets do not eliminate these constraints but can provide alternative channels for moving value across borders.

Cryptocurrencies and stablecoins can help facilitate transactions, preserve value and maintain access to foreign markets. Stablecoins are particularly attractive because they reduce exposure to price volatility while still operating outside traditional correspondent banking networks.

Crypto mining has also become part of Iran’s sanctions-evasion toolkit. By using subsidized electricity to mine Bitcoin, Iran can effectively convert domestic energy resources into a globally transferable digital asset.

The strategy comes with costs. Mining places additional strain on Iran’s electricity grid and has been linked to power shortages and public frustration. Yet for a sanctioned economy, the logic remains compelling: when access to conventional finance is restricted, any mechanism capable of transforming local resources into internationally usable value becomes strategically important.

Hormuz and crypto

Cryptocurrency has also emerged in discussions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints.

Chainalysis reported recently that Iran intended to demand cryptocurrency payments from oil tankers seeking safe passage through the strait during periods of heightened tension. Whether such plans were fully implemented is less important than what they reveal about the potential role of digital assets in future geopolitical confrontations.

For Tehran, cryptocurrency offers several advantages in such scenarios. Payments can move rapidly across borders, avoid some traditional banking restrictions and reduce exposure to frozen accounts or conventional financial controls.

The prospect of crypto-based payments linked to maritime security demonstrates how digital assets could potentially be used not only to move money quietly but also to generate revenue during periods of geopolitical crisis.

The US Treasury has warned of sanctions risks associated with Iranian demands for transit-related payments through the Strait of Hormuz, including payments made through digital assets, fiat currency, offsets, swaps or other arrangements.

Blockchain evasion limits

Despite its advantages, cryptocurrency is not a magic shield against sanctions.

Blockchain transactions often leave traces that can be analyzed by firms such as Chainalysis and Elliptic or by government financial-intelligence agencies.

Once the United States designates a platform such as Nobitex, international exchanges, liquidity providers and counterparties face increased risks if they continue interacting with Iranian-linked wallets. This pushes activity toward smaller, less liquid and often riskier channels.

The sanctions also highlight another vulnerability. Treasury officials noted that Nobitex suffered a major hack in June 2025, underscoring the risks associated with relying on digital financial infrastructure.

Another area of interest is the role of the IRGC, which under Iran’s previous budget law was tasked with exporting roughly 700,000 barrels of crude oil per day—about half of the country’s exports at the time. The organization is also one of Iran’s largest infrastructure contractors.

While available data do not reveal where imported services originated or who ultimately benefited from them, the overlap illustrates the growing importance of non-traditional financial channels within Iran’s sanctioned economy.

Iran is likely to adapt. Activity may shift toward peer-to-peer trading, decentralized platforms, foreign intermediaries, stablecoin networks or new domestic exchanges. Yet each alternative carries costs, whether through reduced liquidity, greater compliance risks or increased exposure to future sanctions.

For Washington, the challenge is sustained enforcement. Sanctioning Nobitex will matter most if it is accompanied by international cooperation, improved blockchain intelligence, pressure on foreign exchanges and clear guidance for shipping firms, insurers and commodity traders.

The United States does not need to stop every Iranian crypto transaction to have an effect. It only needs to make the system more expensive, more traceable, riskier and less attractive for counterparties.

The Nobitex case illustrates how financial warfare has moved from banks to blockchains. Digital assets have given Tehran greater flexibility under sanctions, but they have also created new vulnerabilities.

The more Iran relies on crypto infrastructure, the more that infrastructure becomes part of the sanctions battlefield.

Ancient Bitcoin 2014 Wallet Stirs

A dormant bitcoin ( BTC) address, first seen on Nov. 12, 2014, and untouched ever since, transferred 165.50 BTC this week at block height 952452. After remaining inactive for more than a decade, the Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash (P2PKH) address reemerged onchain, moving its holdings in a single transaction. The owner decided to move this cache amid bitcoin’s latest price downturn as BTC tapped the lowest value of 2026 on Friday.

At the time, the address‘s entire stash of 165.50 BTC was valued at just $60,738. Even after bitcoin’s recent pullback, those same holdings are now worth approximately $10.2 million, illustrating the dramatic 16,693.44% appreciation accumulated during more than a decade of dormancy.

The funds migrated from the original P2PKH wallet through a series of newly created Pay-to-Witness-Public-Key-Hash (P2WPKH) addresses before ultimately settling in a P2WPKH address that now holds 204.67 BTC, valued at approximately $12.6 million.

Two 2017 Addresses Shift 434.26 BTC

Following the 2014-era transfer, two wallets dating back to 2017 moved a combined 434.26 BTC. The first transaction took place at block height 952454, transferring 115 BTC valued at approximately $7.1 million from a P2PKH address created on May 9, 2017. The second wallet shifted 319.26 BTC, worth roughly $19.7 million, in a separate transfer. That address too, was first seen on May 9, 2017.

On that day, 9 years and 26 days ago in 2017, BTC was trading at $1,709 per coin, placing the value of the holdings at a fraction of their current worth. The latest movements add to a growing list of dormant-era wallets that have resurfaced in 2026, often drawing attention from onchain analysts and market observers.

Onchain Trail Reveals Movement, Not Motive

While the transfers coincided with bitcoin’s recent price weakness, the transactions themselves offer no indication that the coins were sold, as the funds remain visible in newly assigned addresses. However, they may have been offloaded to an over-the-counter (OTC) desk or temporary address from a custodian.

Of course, the identities behind the wallets and the motivations for awakening holdings that sat idle for nearly a decade remain unknown.

CARSON CITY, Nev. (FOX5) — Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford is warning residents about a growing scam involving cryptocurrency kiosks found in gas stations and convenience stores.

The machines, commonly called Bitcoin or crypto ATMs, convert cash into digital currency that can be sent to unknown third parties. The transactions cannot be reversed and are nearly untraceable, making it extremely difficult to recover stolen money.

Scammers typically begin with an unsolicited phone call, text, email or pop-up message that creates a sense of fear and urgency, Ford’s office said. The criminals often impersonate someone the victim would trust, such as a relative or representative of a legitimate organization. They claim an emergency exists that can only be resolved by depositing funds into a cryptocurrency kiosk.

MORE ON FOX5: Scam alert: Fake jail calls, bank spoofing on the rise across Nye County

The scammer then provides instructions about how to complete the transaction, which sometimes include a QR code associated with the scammer’s digital wallet.

According to FBI data cited by AARP, cryptocurrency kiosk scams disproportionately impact older adults. In 2025, cryptocurrency kiosks were used in scams that led to more than $389 million in reported losses.

“One of the most important ways to protect yourself from scams is to stay informed — scammers are consistently changing their tactics to fool you in new ways,” Ford said. “If a person asks you to use a cryptocurrency kiosk to transfer money, stop and consider if the interaction feels above board. When in doubt, follow your gut.”

Nevadans who believe they may have been victims of a scam, including one involving cryptocurrency kiosks, can file a complaint with the Office of the Attorney General.