Crypto
The rise of consumer cryptocurrency
Since its inception with the launch of Bitcoin in 2008, blockchain technology has gone through numerous cycles of public attention. Over time, growing interest and investment in the best-known cryptocurrencies has led to greater acceptance, as highlighted by the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF (exchange-traded fund) in January. While blockchains and their associated “crypto” assets have yet to be adopted by a truly broad base of consumers, that is starting to change, owing to a shift in how these technologies are being used.
Contrary to what mainstream media coverage often suggests, for many people, the value of these innovations lies not so much in cryptocurrencies as in blockchain-based digital goods such as virtual sneakers, gaming assets, and membership passes — all managed by way of non-fungible tokens. As we explain in our new book, The Everything Token: How NFTs and Web3 Will Transform the Way We Buy, Sell, and Create, NFTs — often misunderstood and even derided — are a general and flexible solution for establishing and tracking ownership across all manner of digital assets. (We both personally hold NFTs and other digital assets and advise companies with interests in this sector.)
NFTs are already being used in a wide range of contexts — from course credentials to coffee rewards — and they are poised to reshape the management of everything from concert tickets to health-care data. Since these are business contexts that affect consumers’ everyday experiences, NFTs may start to drive widespread consumer adoption on a scale that previous crypto applications have not.
The Early Years
A big reason for crypto’s lack of mainstream adoption has been its inaccessibility. These are early days, and many crypto applications still require users to interface near the technological rails that run the system. There are few protections against user error or having one’s account compromised, and the necessary technical knowledge makes everything difficult to navigate. But lest we forget, the early internet also was not user-friendly.
Much of the existing crypto infrastructure also lacks the capacity to manage transactions at a global scale, resulting in high transaction costs that frequently fall on the user. Years of regulatory uncertainty have not helped. Both in the United States and globally, there has been a general lack of clarity about which types of digital-asset transactions are permitted, how those assets are assessed for tax purposes, and whether that treatment may change in the future.
But market immaturity and mismatches between available applications have also been significant challenges. As with any novel, general-purpose technology, many early crypto applications were poorly conceived, unsustainable as businesses, or — in some cases — entirely fraudulent.
On top of that, much of the media and regulatory attention has focused on financial and monetary applications. In fact, crypto is hard to use as a medium of exchange until there is broad adoption. Meanwhile, because some early adopters were interested in crypto as a potential investment, financialisation bled over into other applications. When domain addresses were introduced on the Ethereum blockchain, for example, the result was a massive speculative market in what amounted to URL-squatting (when someone registers an address in hopes of later reselling it at a premium), which was supercharged by highly liquid crypto trading.
In short, the parallels to the early internet are manifold: the early crypto market has faced technical barriers that limit adoption, early experiments that didn’t always make the best use of the technology, and significant speculation. But, as with the internet, we are witnessing a shift toward better designed, more productive applications as the technology matures. To understand the new-generation applications, it helps to examine more precisely what blockchains are good for.
What Blockchain Can Do for You
Blockchains are massive global ledgers that use decentralised cryptographic protocols to record information in a way that is publicly verifiable, secure, and immutable. Today’s blockchains can run complex software that makes it possible to define, allocate, and track ownership, on a public ledger, of all manner of digital assets — from units of account (cryptocurrency) to domain addresses, user profiles, and even music tracks and web games. Individual accounts on blockchain-based systems, often referred to as digital wallets, give users direct ownership of whatever is recorded as “theirs” in the ledger. The owner of a given digital asset holds a unique key with which to verify herself as the owner and control which applications interact with her assets (and in what ways).
This is very different from most of the web and social-media experiences that we are accustomed to. Instead of a user having an account on a specific site like Facebook or Amazon — where that user’s data, profile, and other information are stored and controlled by the platform — blockchains allow users to retain complete control over their own account and associated data.
Moreover, users can connect that account to whatever platform they want and switch seamlessly between platforms. By contrast, although you can quit Facebook if you don’t like its policies, you cannot take your content, audience, and reputation with you.
NFTs are digital records that can be held in an individual digital wallet. They act similarly to property deeds. By associating an NFT with another asset — for instance, a piece of digital art, an item in a game, or even a physical asset like a book or a piece of clothing — it becomes easy to define and identify ownership in the digital realm. Some NFTs are transferable and can be bought and sold just like physical goods. Others are non-transferable and tied to a specific account, just like a driver’s licence or diploma.
Perhaps the simplest case for NFTs is in contexts where ownership is otherwise difficult to verify, such as with digital event tickets. In this case, NFTs provide a far better solution than the existing technology. A well-known market failure in this area stems from the difficulty of identifying whether a ticket (say, to a Taylor Swift concert) has been resold to multiple people at once on the secondary market — hardly an unimaginable scenario. When a ticket is just a QR code in an email, there’s no way to verify whether a prospective seller has “sold” it to multiple people, or even used it themselves.
NFTs address this by making each ticket a unique digital asset, which only one person — or more precisely, one digital wallet — can own at a time. Once a seller has transferred a ticket NFT to a buyer, the buyer has direct control of it and can verify that she is now the unique owner. Moreover, blockchain software can integrate the ticket transfer and exchange of payment into a single transaction, thus executing a secure transaction without the need for a third-party intermediary.
Good for Business
These uses explain why NFTs have grown so popular as a means of defining and exchanging ownership of digital images and other media files. Before NFTs, these markets were especially difficult to establish, because sharing a copy of a media file with a prospective buyer was often tantamount to giving it away. (That is why image databases have historically posted only low-resolution or watermarked files, and why online music marketplaces often allow only short previews of a given song.) Looking ahead, it is easy to see how the same uses will extend to digital trading cards, in-game items, and even library books.
Non-transferable NFTs, meanwhile, allow for secure digital credentialing without the need of a third party. A “digital diploma” NFT certifying completion of a course or academic programme could be freely read and verified by any platform to which the holder connects his digital wallet. (For example, LinkedIn could seamlessly verify whether you really did complete an “exec ed” programme at Harvard Business School.)
Similarly, NFTs can implement cross-platform subscriptions or memberships. Instead of needing an account with a given publication, simply holding a subscription NFT in your digital wallet could unlock access. Moreover, NFTs can be used to give people direct control of personal data such as health-care records, allowing patients to transfer their data seamlessly to new providers without all the hassle this currently entails.
And, of course, in a world where concern about AI fakes and impersonation is growing, there is a lot of value in being able to create interoperable, platform-agnostic, securely verifiable identity records that a person can use to prove they are who they say they are. These sorts of “proof of personhood” NFTs leverage offline identity verification to produce an on-chain digital asset that can be used to certify identity in contexts such as personal finance, e-commerce, and social media.
Finally, in all these cases — at least with public blockchains — it is easy for digital-asset owners and third parties to create value on top of NFTs beyond simple ownership. These functional utilities range widely in character and scope, from enforcing access to private chat rooms to offering free merchandise and even shared intellectual-property rights. An event sponsor could leverage ticket NFTs as the digital keys to an online fan community. Or a publication like The Economist could give free access to anyone holding a Project Syndicate subscription NFT without needing to interact with PS’s own database.
All of this makes NFTs an ideal technology for fostering consumer engagement. Unlike previous incarnations of digital goods, NFTs are truly owned by their holders, and we know that a greater sense of ownership can enhance brand attachment. If you truly own a valuable item in a popular video game, for example, you will have an incentive to help that game continue and attract new players. At the same time, NFTs’ interoperability makes them easy to showcase and use as part of one’s online identity throughout the digital domain.
Blockchain Branding
Here, the decentralised value creation that NFTs enable also can help. NFTs publicly surface a brand’s fans and connect them to one another within a mutually reinforcing network. By building community among an initial group of holders, NFT brands cultivate superfans who share their enthusiasm online and draw in others. We are seeing the makings of a new, powerful model of digital brand-building.
New and established brands alike are using this strategy. NFT-native brands like the Bored Ape Yacht Club, Pudgy Penguins, and VeeFriends started with NFT collections and leveraged their communities of early adopters — that is, their NFT holders — as they offered products to a broader consumer market. Similarly, established companies like Nike, Porsche, The Hundreds, and even Time magazine have released NFT collections that encourage their fans and followers to express enthusiasm for their respective brands online.
For example, members of Starbucks’s Odyssey NFT reward programme (where one of us serves as community lead) can collect NFTs representing the classic Starbucks siren and the popular pumpkin spice latte. Many then display these digital assets online. Because of the way the underlying software works, nearly any NFT can take on this role. An NFT that starts as just a ticket to a baseball game or ballet performance can become an anchor for a rewards programme, unlocking a community of shared interest and giving high-value customers unique and valuable perks (like time on the field or an opportunity to meet their favourite prima ballerina).
Of course, NFTs are open to the same kind of speculative financialisation that we have seen elsewhere in the crypto market. But the most compelling business uses will centre on ubiquitous consumer applications. Even in the context of digital collectibles — which will likely remain a key use — NFTs are likely to become far more broadly accessible, and more focused on identity and community formation than on financial value. For example, we expect to see collectible NFT stamps for national parks, pop concerts, and maybe even for airport security dogs. (Yes, K9 units have trading cards. Ask for one the next time you travel!)
From Novel to Natural
Unlike with cryptocurrency, for which some people don’t see a reason to own the asset unless they are interested in conducting crypto transactions, consumers will see direct value in these types of NFT uses. Someone might receive her first NFT in the context of an ordinary ticket or coffee purchase, or when she completes an online course. As this happens more frequently, people will enter the blockchain ecosystem, establishing digital wallets and then connecting to more third-party applications.
Because a single digital wallet can be used flexibly across many different platforms, there will be a positive feedback loop whereby consumers who adopt crypto in this way can also more easily acquire and use other types of digital assets. As consumers become acclimated to owning their own digital assets and using them flexibly across the internet, they may even start to demand the same experience from other brands and web platforms.
Thus, even the simplest consumer NFT uses have the potential to become a major driver of crypto adoption, linking fans to the brands and ideas they love, and driving businesses to create more opportunities for them to do so. ©2024 Project Syndicate
Crypto
Trump Made $1.4bn From Cryptocurrency Since Returning to Office
Donald Trump made $1.4bn (approximately £1bn) from his cryptocurrency dealings in his first year back in office, in what his former White House lawyer has described as part of “the greatest onslaught of corruption in the history of mankind.”
Overall, Trump pulled in at least $2.2bn (£1.65bn) from his vast holdings, including real estate assets, in 2025. By comparison, his enterprises pulled in $662m (£495m) in 2024 before he returned to the presidency.
The US president – who denies any wrongdoing – received around $500m (£374m) from $WLFI, the digital currency sold by his family’s main crypto firm World Liberty Financial (WLF).
Trump also got a windfall from his $TRUMP meme coin, which was launched three days before his inauguration and earned him more than $600m (£449m).
The coin was dismissed as a ‘pump-and-dump scheme’ by analysts and led to hundreds of thousands of mostly small investors losing money.
The figures were released as part of Trump’s 927-page mandatory financial report for 2025.
An additional $500m (£374m) deal – struck days before his second inauguration in January 2025 – to sell 49% of WLF to representatives of a high-ranking Emirati royal has invited accusations of corruption.
The deal saw $187m (£140m) of the initial payment steered to entities controlled by the Trump family, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Months later, the UAE got the green light to import 500,000 Nvidia AI chips, despite concerns from US security officials.
Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb, who was part of the Trump administration’s legal team between 2017 and 2018, accused the president of violating parts of the constitution designed to prevent federal officials from engaging in corruption or being unduly influenced by foreign powers.
“Several hundred million dollars related to those coins,” Cobb told CNN. “How can that be anything other than trading on his image and likeness in violation of the emoluments clause?”
He added: “We are seeing the greatest onslaught of corruption in the history of mankind in the last 18 months.”
The White House has called the accusation “bogus and irrelevant”. Trump denied that he was profiting from the presidency, adding: “We have funds that run my money.”
“He got richer,” California’s governor Gavin Newsom posted on X. “His crypto supporters got rug-pulled.”
Lee Reiners, a former Federal Reserve Bank examiner who now specialises in cryptocurrency, told the New York Times: “It is hard to wrap your head around that the president of the United States would engage in this level of self-enrichment at the expense of so many of his supporters.”
He added: “This is a president of the United States who has made more money off crypto since he took office than he made in any prior year in his entire business career.”
Crypto
Senate Urged to Vote on CLARITY Act Before August Recess as Lawmakers Return July 13
Key Takeaways
- Supporters are warning that failure to schedule a CLARITY Act vote before the window closes could stall the bill for an extended period.
- Backers argue the legislation is critical to resolving oversight gaps, establishing registration pathways, and enforcing consumer protections and compliance standards.
- Analysts caution that without a scheduled Senate vote, procedural movement, or unified committee text, the bill faces growing legislative and political risk.
Limited July Schedule Raises Urgency for Floor Vote
Efforts to pass a federal crypto market-structure bill have entered a critical phase as the Senate remains in recess until July 13. The advocacy group Stand With Crypto on July 1 urged supporters to contact Senators and push for a floor vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or CLARITY Act, before lawmakers leave for the August recess.
The timeline leaves a narrow window for action following months of committee work and industry lobbying. Supporters say the bill would reduce regulatory uncertainty by establishing clearer federal rules for digital asset issuers, trading platforms, developers, and market participants.
“The Senate is in recess. The clock on Clarity is running,” Stand With Crypto noted on X, adding:
“The window before the August recess is short, and when Senators return on July 13, they can vote on the Clarity Act to end years of regulatory guesswork. Don’t let the window close. Call your Senators to schedule a vote on Clarity.”
The legislation advanced in June when the Senate Banking Committee approved H.R. 3633 in a bipartisan 15-9 vote. The bill outlines agency oversight, registration pathways for crypto firms, consumer protections, and compliance standards across digital asset markets.
Lawmakers return to Washington on July 13 after the Independence Day recess, leaving Congress with just eight legislative business days before the planned August recess. The compressed schedule gives lawmakers limited time to consider the CLARITY Act alongside annual defense and government funding legislation.
Industry Groups Increase Pressure on Senate Leadership
Industry advocacy has intensified as the legislative calendar tightens ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. More than 200 organizations, including Coinbase, Ripple, Kraken, Circle, Binance.US, Uniswap Labs, Paradigm, Andreessen Horowitz, and Stand With Crypto chapters, have urged Senate leaders to bring the bill to the floor.
Mason Lynaugh, policy director at Stand With Crypto, said:
“There’s a limited window to get this done, with few remaining days left in the current Congress before the midterm elections. If Senate leaders don’t schedule a CLARITY Act vote in the coming weeks, an enormous amount of bipartisan work, compromise, and progress, could be wasted.”
Ripple has also promoted the effort in Washington, D.C., including a branded CLARITY truck near Capitol Hill to raise visibility as lawmakers consider crypto legislation.
Stand With Crypto cited polling showing nearly three-quarters of surveyed crypto owners in Senate battleground states are more likely to support candidates who favor clearer cryptocurrency rules. The group also reported that more than one-third of respondents use digital assets for personal transfers, while 21% use them for monthly expenses.
Despite the momentum, analysts remain cautious. Galaxy Research lowered its 2026 passage estimate for the CLARITY Act to 50-50 from 60%, citing the absence of a scheduled Senate floor vote, no motion to proceed, and no unified text between Senate committees.
Crypto
Trump denies conflict of interest over crypto. And, Vatican excommunicates rebel group
Good morning. You’re reading the Up First newsletter. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to the Up First podcast for all the news you need to start your day.
Today’s top stories
President Trump’s financial disclosures reveal that he and his family earned more than $1 billion through cryptocurrency ventures and other businesses last year, according to a 927-page report filed with the Office of Government Ethics. The report shows that more than $500 million came from the cryptocurrency venture “World Liberty Financial,” which was co-founded by Trump family members. The sale of souvenir “meme” coins featuring Trump’s image generated more than $600 million. Other income included more than $50 million from settlements with media companies and millions in profits from Trump-branded products like Bibles, sneakers and watches. These earnings, which have outpaced his real estate business, have sparked concerns about potential conflicts of interest. The White House released a statement denying any conflicts of interest, and spokesperson Anna Kelly applauded Trump for making the U.S. “the crypto capital of the world.”
President Trump walks to board Air Force One as he departs Bismarck Municipal Airport on July 1, 2026, in Bismarck, North Dakota. Trump traveled to North Dakota to attend the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library dedication.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
- 🎧 Democrats have had a lot to say regarding the president’s earnings, NPR’s Linda Kenyon tells Up First. Sen. Adam Schiff of California suggested Trump has earned more money in the first year of his current term than in the rest of his life combined. Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado referred to the president’s cryptocurrency earnings as another example of what he described as “grift and corruption.” Crow also highlighted that the president took his first flight yesterday on a brand-new Air Force One, a gift from a foreign government valued at roughly $400 million.
The Vatican this morning formalized the excommunications of the bishops and priests of the conservative group known as the Society of St. Pius X, declaring that it has entered schism and broken communion with the pope and the Catholic Church. The group, known as SSPX, celebrates the traditional Latin Mass and opposes some modern church reforms. In the Catholic Church, the appointment of new bishops is the responsibility of the pope. But yesterday, the group defied Pope Leo XIV by consecrating four bishops without his approval. The Society framed its actions as a defense of Catholic tradition. During the ceremony, the Rev. Davide Pagliarani, head of the Society of St. Pius X, described the consecrations as an act of service rather than rebellion. Two of the excommunicated men teach in the U.S., where the group’s membership has been growing, according to the society.
A little over a week has passed since rare double earthquakes struck Venezuela. Thousands of people are feared dead as the official death toll continues to rise and hope diminishes for finding survivors in the rubble. Yesterday, the number of people killed by the quakes reached 2,295, and more than 11,200 people were injured, said Jorge Rodríguez, the president of Venezuela’s National Assembly. Tens of thousands of people remain unaccounted for. The number of people left homeless could be staggering. An analysis of satellite data by Corey Scher and Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University estimated that 58,870 buildings were likely damaged or destroyed by the earthquakes. The U.N.’s International Organization for Migration has reported that up to 6.8 million people could be affected by the disaster, needing shelter, water, sanitation, healthcare and other relief items. Here are the most significant developments since the tragedy occurred.
The U.S. men’s national team defeated Bosnia-Herzegovina 2-0, marking its first FIFA World Cup knockout round victory since 2002. With this win, the U.S. advances to the Round of 16, where it will face Belgium on July 6. The team will have to play without U.S. forward Folarin Balogun, who will be suspended after receiving a red card for a cleat-first challenge on Bosnian defender Tarik Muharemović. Balogun has scored three goals in three World Cup matches, including the first goal of yesterday’s game. Balogun is currently the top goalscorer for the U.S. team in the 2026 World Cup.
- 🎧 NPR’s Becky Sullivan says it’s hard to know how the U.S. will fare against Belgium next week. The Belgian team easily beat the U.S. 5-2 in a friendly back in March, but Sullivan says Belgium also looks like one of the most beatable “good teams” in the tournament so far. So the U.S. has a good chance, even without Balogun. A win would bring the American men to the quarterfinals, the furthest they’ve ever advanced in a modern World Cup.
Life advice
Got a fridge full of half-eaten food like this rotisserie chicken and not sure what to do with it? Chefs share creative cooking tricks and storage techniques to motivate you to use it all up.
Pulse/Getty Images/Corbis RF Stills
hide caption
toggle caption
Pulse/Getty Images/Corbis RF Stills
Don’t let your leftovers go to waste. According to the nonprofit ReFED, about a quarter of all food products are wasted nationally. Life Kit spoke with chefs who shared clever storage techniques and cooking tips to help you make the most of your food scraps.
- 🍽️ Start with a mindset shift. Consider cooking with leftovers as a creative and experimental exercise rather than a guilt-driven one.
- 🍽️ Develop a collection of flexible, go-to recipes that can use up a variety of ingredients. For example, if you have leftover rice, you can cook it with other ingredients, such as rotisserie chicken and older vegetables, to make fried rice.
- 🍽️ Save yourself the guessing game of wondering what is in your fridge by labeling and dating your leftovers.
- 🍽️ Never throw away herb stems, as they still have the same herby flavor as the leaves. If you blend them with a clove of garlic and olive oil, you can create a base sauce. You can do the same thing with vegetables like broccoli to make soups.
For additional guidance on creative ways to use your leftover odds and ends, listen to this episode of NPR’s Life Kit. Subscribe to the Life Kit newsletter for expert advice on love, money, relationships and more.
Picture show
Garland Jones, recreational therapist and senior program director of the YMCA of South Florida’s special needs program, teaches Mackenzie Wesley, 5, to breathe safely in water by using a ping pong ball as a visual aid.
LA Johnson/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
LA Johnson/NPR
Children with autism are 160 times more likely to die from drowning compared to their peers, according to a 2017 study from Columbia University. This is largely because about half of autistic children have a tendency to wander away from safe environments. That fact, combined with an attraction to water, can be very dangerous. High-quality swim lessons can be a vital preventative measure to combat this issue. Florida, which has one of the highest childhood drowning rates in the nation, expanded a voucher program this month that puts children ages 1-7 who have autism at the front of the line for subsidized swim lessons. The YMCA of South Florida’s low-cost Swim Buddies program is one of the largest programs specifically designed for children with disabilities in the area. One of its key features is its focus on individualization and one-on-one instruction, rather than traditional group lessons. Staff members assess each child’s needs and tailor the lessons accordingly. Take a look at how this program is helping children with autism.
3 things to know before you go
Photo Illustration of the new Wegovy 1.5 mg and 4 mg semaglutide tablets with injectable prescription weight loss pens on a white background. Its a prescription medicine used with a reduced calorie diet and physical activity. (Photo by: Michael Siluk/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Universal Images Group/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Universal Images Group/Getty Images
- A Medicare pilot program for GLP-1 drugs launched yesterday, allowing beneficiaries to get a weight loss prescription for $50 a month.
- Kroger is set to acquire the Pittsburgh-based Giant Eagle grocery store chain for $1.65 billion. (via WESA)
- Dozens of states might be responsible for millions of dollars next year to help feed low-income families through the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, states with error rates of 6% or higher will be required to cover 5%, 10% or 15% of SNAP benefits in the coming years. (via KCUR)
This newsletter was edited by Suzanne Nuyen.
-
Fitness54 seconds ago
Huge 30-Year Study Finds Exercise Variety Can Help You Live Longer – Here’s the Ideal Mix
-
Movie Reviews11 minutes agoThe Kernel: Freshly popped film reviews — Batch #6 – Excalibur
-
World23 minutes agoAI ‘Organisms’ Come Alive in Kuala Lumpur as Dutch Artist Unveils Immersive Show
-
Health46 minutes agoIs Skipping Breakfast Bad? The Weight-Loss Truth May Surprise You
-
Lifestyle1 hour agoNearly half of Americans surveyed don’t know what America 250 commemorates
-
Technology1 hour agoAmazon updated 2023’s Fire HD 10 tablet with 4GB of RAM
-
World1 hour agoInterpol issues red notice for Ukrainian woman wanted for Monaco apartment bombing targeting oligarch
-
Politics1 hour agoMamdani blasts ICE agents, Elon Musk and ‘supremacy’ in America 250 speech ahead of July 4 weekend