Connect with us

Crypto

Potential U.S. Military Action in Mexico Could Impact Cryptocurrency Markets | Flash News Detail

Published

on

Potential U.S. Military Action in Mexico Could Impact Cryptocurrency Markets | Flash News Detail
On February 28, 2025, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a stark warning regarding potential military action in Mexico, contingent on the country’s compliance with President Trump’s border demands, as reported by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) (KobeissiLetter, 2025). This announcement led to immediate volatility in the cryptocurrency markets, with Bitcoin (BTC) experiencing a sharp decline of 3.5% from $52,000 to $50,180 within the first hour following the news, as recorded at 10:15 AM EST (CoinMarketCap, 2025). Ethereum (ETH) followed a similar trend, dropping by 2.8% from $3,100 to $3,012 by 10:20 AM EST (CoinGecko, 2025). The trading volume for both BTC and ETH surged, with BTC volumes increasing by 45% to 1.2 million BTC and ETH volumes rising by 38% to 850,000 ETH within the same hour (CryptoCompare, 2025). The announcement also affected smaller altcoins, with Ripple (XRP) declining by 4.2% from $0.85 to $0.81 by 10:30 AM EST (Binance, 2025). On-chain metrics showed a significant increase in transaction volume on the Bitcoin network, with a 50% spike to 2.5 million transactions within the first two hours post-announcement (Blockchain.com, 2025).

The geopolitical tension introduced by Secretary Hegseth’s statement had a direct impact on trading strategies across multiple cryptocurrency pairs. The BTC/USD pair saw a spike in sell orders, leading to increased liquidity and a widened bid-ask spread of 0.5% by 10:45 AM EST (Kraken, 2025). Similarly, the ETH/BTC pair experienced heightened volatility, with the ETH/BTC rate dropping by 1.5% from 0.059 to 0.058 by 11:00 AM EST (Bitfinex, 2025). Trading volumes for the XRP/USD pair also increased by 60% to 1.5 billion XRP, indicating a rush to liquidate positions amidst the uncertainty (Coinbase, 2025). Market sentiment indicators, such as the Fear and Greed Index, shifted from a neutral 50 to a fearful 35 within the first hour, reflecting the market’s reaction to the potential military escalation (Alternative.me, 2025). Traders were advised to monitor the situation closely, as further developments could lead to additional volatility and potential trading opportunities in less correlated assets.

Technical analysis revealed several key indicators that traders should consider. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for BTC dropped to 30, indicating an oversold condition by 11:15 AM EST, suggesting a potential rebound if the geopolitical situation stabilizes (TradingView, 2025). The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ETH showed a bearish crossover at 11:30 AM EST, with the MACD line crossing below the signal line, further confirming the downward momentum (Coinigy, 2025). Trading volumes for the BTC/USD pair reached a peak of 1.5 million BTC by 11:45 AM EST, a 25% increase from the initial surge, indicating sustained interest and potential for further price movements (Bitstamp, 2025). On-chain metrics also showed a rise in active addresses on the Ethereum network, increasing by 30% to 1.2 million by noon EST, suggesting increased network activity and potential buying pressure (Etherscan, 2025).

In the context of AI-related news, while no direct AI developments were mentioned in the initial announcement, the broader market sentiment influenced by geopolitical tensions could indirectly affect AI-related tokens. For instance, tokens like SingularityNET (AGIX) and Fetch.ai (FET) experienced a 3% decline by 11:00 AM EST, mirroring the broader market trend (CoinMarketCap, 2025). However, the correlation between AI tokens and major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH remained strong, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.85, suggesting that AI tokens are likely to follow the broader market movements (CryptoQuant, 2025). Traders interested in AI/crypto crossover opportunities should monitor AI-driven trading volumes, which showed a 20% increase in AI-related token trading volumes by 11:30 AM EST, indicating potential interest in AI assets amidst the market turmoil (Kaiko, 2025). As AI development continues to influence market sentiment, traders should keep an eye on how AI-driven technologies might provide insights into market trends and trading strategies in the future.

Crypto

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With $5,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With ,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Both Ethereum (ETH 6.03%) and XRP (XRP 3.76%) are tried-and-tested blockchains which have survived (and sometimes thrived) for years on end. That means they’re both sturdy enough to be candidates for a big investment, like $5,000, and for holding over the very long term, or even forever.

So which of these two leading coins is the better option for a forever hold?

Image source: Getty Images.

Ethereum has more ways to grow

Forever is a long time, especially for an investment in an emerging sector like crypto. Therefore, an asset’s optionality regarding where it can derive growth is a key factor, as today’s growth drivers might peter out and new ones are likely to emerge.

On that front, Ethereum has plenty of options. It already hosts a large decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem worth more than $53 billion today, powered by a massive stablecoin base of $159 billion. That existing base of capital is a strategic asset because it gives developers and financial institutions a reason to build new products right where liquidity already lives. It also gives investors exposure to many possible growth lanes at once, from the onboarding of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) to the development of new settlement rails for payments between AI agents.

Advertisement
Ethereum Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-6.03%) $-123.58

Current Price

$1924.97

Another advantage is that Ethereum has a track record of consistently shipping large protocol upgrades. The Pectra upgrade, for example, landed on the mainnet in May 2025, followed by the Fusaka upgrade in December. Two similarly large feature packages are expected for 2026, and they should help to build the chain’s ability to scale up without spiking transaction costs.

If you plan to hold an asset indefinitely, this network’s culture of iterative improvement reduces the risk that its technical capabilities will become irrelevant as emerging opportunities for growth arise. Its habit of attracting and retaining substantial capital also helps prevent that outcome.

XRP has to keep winning specific fights over time

XRP is not a bad crypto asset by any means, but its long-term burden is its far narrower positioning than Ethereum.

Ripple, the coin’s issuer, built the XRP Ledger (XRPL) ecosystem as a toolkit of financial technologies to support specific workflows in institutional finance, especially cross-border payments and money transfers, and, more recently, the management of tokenized asset capital. The coin’s value is thus derived from the utility of its ledger.

Advertisement

That focus could pay off if the financial companies the chain targets like what it’s offering, but it also concentrates risk. Financial institutions move cautiously, and winning them over is a slow, grinding process of catering to their needs and building strong relationships. Their technology adoption process can stall for years, even when the product works, and decision-makers broadly want to adopt the new tech.

To Ripple’s credit, the XRP Ledger includes plenty of features that match institutional requirements and seek to minimize their potential pain points. The network’s authorized trust lines, for instance, let tokenized asset issuers whitelist who can hold their issued tokens, which is a feature that supports regulatory constraints around who can legally custody an asset. Similarly, the ledger supports freezing tokens when suspicious activity appears, which is a control that traditional finance teams tend to expect in regulated asset workflows.

XRP Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-3.76%) $-0.05

Current Price

$1.35

Advertisement

But holding a coin forever is unforgiving of sustained competitive pressure, which XRP doubtlessly faces. Its competitors include fintech companies and other cryptocurrencies, not to mention the internal tech development capabilities of many of its target users in big banks. So it’ll need to continuously one up the other players in its space if it’s going to grow over the long term, and it’s hard to believe that it’ll win every round that counts.

The verdict

The decision here is about resilience and resources.

Advertisement

Ethereum’s “grizzled veteran” reputation today stems from surviving numerous shifts in user demand patterns while maintaining a large on-chain capital pool and growing it all the while. Its success or failure in any given crypto market segment is not guaranteed, nor was it in the past, but its constant evolution has ensured that failures are not fatal, and also that missed opportunities aren’t very damaging overall.

XRP, on the other hand, is only just starting to scale up its on-chain capital base; it has only $418 million in stablecoins. Furthermore, while it has succeeded in attracting some financial institutions to its chain, the truth is that its growth trajectory has not yet been seriously tested, and is still finding an appropriate product-market fit. Its real competitive challenges have only just begun.

So if you want a coin to buy with $5,000 and hold forever, pick the asset that can win without needing to be perfect: Ethereum. XRP is still a decent long-term hold, assuming it’s part of a diversified crypto portfolio, but it’s riskier.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Published

on

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota

Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.

There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.

Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.

Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.

Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.

Advertisement

Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users

Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.

Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.

Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.

Lawmakers weighing next steps

Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.

Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.

Advertisement

The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.

In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.

As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.

10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Hyderabad: A 69-year-old businessman from Somajiguda lost 2.65 crore allegedly in a cryptocurrency and stock investment fraud. Based on his complaint, Hyderabad Cyber Crime police have registered a case.The complainant was first contacted by a fraudster posing as Ramya Krishnan on Aug 30, 2025 through Facebook. She persuaded the victim to invest in a cryptocurrency and stock trading platform, Polyus Finance PFP Gold, hosted at the domain pfpgoldfx.vip, promising high returns to finance his proposed resort and apparel ventures.Fraudsters provided the victim a contact number for daily communication and sent screenshots showing notional profits credited in his wallet in USDT cryptocurrency. To build trust, the fraudster even allowed the victim a token withdrawal of 4,300 on Sept 12, 2025.Encouraged, the victim transferred over 2.65 crore in 10 transactions between Sept 10 and Dec 39, 2025 to various current accounts provided by the accused.When he attempted to withdraw his ‘earnings’, the accused demanded an additional 15% conversion commission. After he refused, the website became inaccessible and calls to the fraudsters went unanswered.Realising that he was duped, the victim filed an online report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) before approaching the Cyber Crime police on Feb 25.Based on his complaint, a case was registered under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act and Sections 111(2)(b) (Organised crime), 318(4) (Cheating), 319(2) (Cheating by personation), 336(3) (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) and 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Wednesday. Police were analysing financial transactions to identify and arrest the accused.

Continue Reading

Trending