Cryptocurrency exchanges believed to be financing Russia’s war in Ukraine have been sanctioned by the U.K. government in the first attempt to prevent evasion via “dark networks.” The move indicates a new focus on digital sanctions evasion, and compliance teams should expect these rules to develop further, potentially in the EU and other jurisdictions.
Crypto
Federal government plans to ban crypto ATMs to stop scammers from defrauding Canadians | CBC News
Listen to this article
Estimated 4 minutes
The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.
The federal government announced it’s planning to ban crypto ATMs in order to protect Canadians from scammers using the machines to defraud victims.
The Liberals’ spring economic update on Tuesday referred to crypto ATMs as a “primary method for scammers to defraud victims and for criminals to place their cash proceeds of crime.”
Crypto ATMs might look a lot like a traditional banking machine, but instead of dispensing cash from your bank account, the majority of these machines allow customers to deposit cash and then convert it into cryptocurrency, like Bitcoin. Then, they can send it to a virtual wallet anywhere in the world.
Last year, CBC News spent months looking into this industry, speaking with law enforcement, financial regulators, cryptocurrency experts, former crypto ATM company employees, the operators themselves and fraud victims for a three-part series Feeding Fraud: The Crypto ATM Problem.
The investigation revealed that these machines, which currently operate legally in Canada, have become the main vehicle fraudsters use to get money from scam victims across the country. Canada’s financial intelligence agency, FINTRAC, came to that conclusion in a February 2023 analysis of suspicious transaction reports submitted to the agency.
Crypto ATMs are touted as a low-barrier, convenient way to buy or sell crypto, but that’s also what makes them appealing to fraudsters, CBC’s investigation found.
Funds are sent quickly, a bank account isn’t required, most transactions only require a phone number if depositing under $1,000 and, unlike a bank, there’s no human interaction or teller trained to recognize a fraud unfolding.
Canada has the most crypto ATMs per capita in the world, but currently has no industry-specific regulations. There are nearly 4,000 crypto ATMs across the country and more than 39,000 around the world.
Crypto ATMs are the main way fraudsters are getting money from Canadians, according to a federal report. The CBC’s Angelina King and Farrah Merali dive into the issue in the three-part series Feeding Fraud: The Crypto ATM Problem.
Last fall, CBC News requested interviews with both Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne and FINTRAC to ask about what (if any) action they were taking to address crypto ATMs becoming the main vehicle fraudsters use to get money from Canadian scam victims.
Neither request was granted. But when asked on Parliament Hill about the lack of specific regulations in the wake of the FINTRAC report, Champagne did not address the agency’s finding, instead telling CBC the government is looking at all options to prevent financial crimes.
“This is something we’re looking at very carefully and very seriously,” said Champagne last fall.
Tuesday’s economic update does not include many details on the proposed ban of crypto ATMs.
Currently, the machines are regulated like any other money services business (MSB) in Canada, a designation that includes foreign exchange dealers, regular ATMs and money-transfer services, like Western Union. The government’s update does say the measure will ensure Canadians can still buy virtual currencies from “brick-and-mortar MSBs, while better protecting MSBs from illicit activity.”
Other jurisdictions have previously taken action to fight fraud using crypto ATMs.
The U.K. effectively banned the machines by creating a licensing infrastructure in 2021 that hasn’t issued any licences to operators. New Zealand is proposing a ban on the machines and Australia introduced daily transaction limits last summer following a major investigation from its financial intelligence agency and police services.
South of the border, half of U.S. states have proposed or implemented laws to impose measures like daily transaction limits per customer, caps on transaction fees and requirements that operators issue refunds to scam victims.
Crypto
An Easy-to-Miss Radio Traffic Jam Is Behind Many Home WiFi Slowdowns
Key Takeaways
- WiFi slows most on 2.4 GHz during 8-10 AM and 6-10 PM as nearby networks compete.
- Bluetooth devices and microwaves can disrupt 2.4 GHz; 5 GHz or 6 GHz may improve speeds.
- WiFi 6E and WiFi 7 users can reduce congestion by switching channels and moving routers centrally.
Your WiFi can feel rock-solid at midnight and oddly sluggish by breakfast, even when you have not touched a single setting. The culprit is often outside your walls: a crowded slice of public radio spectrum where your router has to negotiate space with every nearby network, plus a grab bag of household gadgets that leak interference. Add peak-hours demand and the signal-blocking quirks of building materials and weather, and “slow internet” starts to look less like a billing issue and more like an invisible traffic problem you are forced to share.
When WiFi slows down without warning
One day your home WiFi feels snappy, the next it drags, even though your router hasn’t moved and your internet plan hasn’t changed. That swing is real, and it’s usually not your imagination or a “bad day” from your ISP. WiFi lives on shared airwaves, and those airwaves get crowded, noisy, and sometimes just plain finicky.
Think of your connection as a conversation in a busy room. Your laptop and router may be talking just fine, but the room itself can fill up fast with other chatter. What looks like a mystery slowdown is often the result of invisible competition and interference that changes hour by hour.
The battle of competing networks
Most homes still rely heavily on the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz WiFi bands, which are unlicensed spectrum in the US. That “free for everyone” reality is convenient, but it also means your network shares space with your neighbors, their smart TVs, their work laptops, and every nearby router doing the same thing.
Congestion has a rhythm. During common work-from-home and school-from-home windows, especially 8-10 AM, and again in the evening 6-10 PM, more devices are streaming, video calling, syncing, and downloading updates. Even if you pay for fast broadband, your WiFi link can become the bottleneck when the local radio environment gets packed.
Interference inside your home
Your own house can sabotage you. A microwave is the classic culprit because it can leak noise near 2.4 GHz, exactly where many WiFi networks still operate. Older cordless phones, some baby monitors, and even dense clusters of Bluetooth gadgets can add more clutter, especially in smaller apartments where everything sits close together.
Then there’s physics. Concrete, metal, and even water (think aquariums or thick pipes in walls) absorb and scatter radio signals. A router shoved behind a TV, tucked into a cabinet, or stuck in a far corner forces your devices to “hear” through more obstacles, lowering speeds and making dropouts more likely.
Weather, channels, and what you can do tonight
Environmental changes can matter too. Higher humidity and rain can slightly increase signal loss, and shifting temperatures can change how radio waves propagate around a neighborhood. You might never notice on its own, but paired with congestion it can tip a marginal connection into a frustrating one.
The 2.4 GHz band is also channel-limited. In the US there are 11 channels, but only 1, 6, and 11 don’t overlap. Many routers default to “auto channel,” so nearby networks can hop around trying to escape interference, sometimes creating instability. Practical fixes: prefer 5 GHz (or 6 GHz if you have WiFi 6E/7 gear), place the router centrally and higher up, and use a WiFi analyzer app to pick a less crowded channel instead of leaving it on auto.
Crypto
U.K.’s sanctions on cryptocurrency exchanges signal new focus on illicit digital financing – Compliance Week
Crypto
Trader Turns $2 Million of ETH Into $14,208 as Lighter Token Rallies 53%
Key Takeaways
- Lookonchain data shows the trader paid roughly 140 times LIT’s market price of $2.46 per token.
- Lighter burned 15.5M LIT, 6.3% of supply, on July 2 as its permanent buyback-and-burn program began.
- A whale lost $8.2M in Lighter’s thin ARC market in February, a caution for traders chasing the rally.
Paying 140 Times the Market Price
The transaction was flagged yesterday and the math behind it was brutal. At $2.01 million for 5,776 tokens, the trader paid an effective price of roughly $348 per LIT, about 140 times the token’s market price of $2.46 at the time of the trade. Had the same 1,126.44 ETH, implying an ether price near $1,784, been routed through a deep venue at market rates, it would have bought roughly 817,000 LIT. The wallet received 5,776.
Losses of this scale typically occur when a large market order is routed through an onchain liquidity pool with minimal depth and no slippage protection. Slippage refers to the gap between a trade’s expected price and its executed price; most decentralized exchange ( DEX) interfaces let users cap it, automatically canceling any order that would move the market beyond a set percentage. Whether the trader disabled that protection or used a custom route remains unclear.
The setup was especially dangerous because LIT’s float is unusually tight, given roughly 57% of the circulating supply is staked and another 145 million LIT sits locked in liquidity programs (while the token’s deepest markets sit on centralized exchanges and on Lighter’s own platform rather than in public pools).
In those conditions, a $2 million market order can exhaust a pool’s inventory within a single block, with arbitrage and maximal extractable value (MEV) bots capturing the difference almost instantly.
Why LIT Is Red-Hot
Lighter is an Ethereum-based decentralized exchange focused on perpetual futures, the derivatives category that turned rival Hyperliquid into one of crypto’s defining stories. The project describes itself as “the first exchange to offer verifiable order matching and liquidations while delivering best-in-class performance on par with traditional exchanges.”
LIT traded near $2.60 at the time of writing, up 22.5% in 24 hours and 53.3% on the week, making it the second most-searched coin on Coingecko. The token commands a $675 million market capitalization on 250 million circulating tokens, with $533.6 million in total value locked (TVL) on the platform and $116.76 million in daily trading volume.

Even after the rally, LIT sits 65.7% below its all-time high of $7.86 set Dec. 30, 2025 and roughly 245% above the $0.78 low it printed on March 31.
The surge follows a July 1 tokenomics overhaul in which Lighter said all LIT repurchased with protocol fees will be permanently burned. The first burn destroyed 15.5 million LIT, about 6.3% of the circulating supply, on July 2, and the team set a 6% staking yield target, with the platform directing more than 70% of its daily revenue to the buybacks.
Retail access is widening at the same time. Robinhood Wallet integrated Lighter’s perpetual futures last week, a catalyst that pushed LIT up 24% in a single day, while public praise from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin added further momentum.
Thin Markets Keep Claiming Victims
Sunday’s botched swap is not the first fortune lost on Lighter’s order books this year. In February, a whale lost $8.2 million attempting to squeeze the platform’s illiquid ARC perpetuals market, with about $2 million of the position liquidated directly on the order book.
Skeptics also note that only a quarter of LIT’s 1 billion total supply is in circulation, leaving a $2.7 billion fully diluted valuation and a long unlock runway once emissions resume. Whether the trader recovers anything is doubtful. MEV operators have occasionally returned funds captured in extreme slippage events, but such refunds are voluntary and rare.
-
Los Angeles, Ca45 minutes agoMissing 13-year-old with autism last seen at Los Angeles beach
-
Videos53 minutes agoCharlie Kirk’s alleged killer appears in court
-
Detroit, MI1 hour ago
GET TO KNOW: Wide receiver Kendrick Law
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoMultiple people lose eyes, hands in illegal fireworks-related injuries in San Francisco
-
Dallas, TX1 hour agoTexas took this Dallas couple’s newborn baby for 3 weeks. A judge says their rights were violated
-
Miami, FL1 hour agoSouth Florida foundation empowering thousands of young girls through education, mentorship, community support
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoWhere to watch Boston Red Sox vs Chicago White Sox: TV channel, start time, streaming for July 7
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoHouse fire in Denver fully engulfs power pole, detached garage mostly destroyed